Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of an acoustic pacemaker in Strecker's chorus frog,Pseudacris streckeri (Anura: Hylidae)

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    In breeding assemblages ofPseudacris streckeri the mating call of one individual often occurs immediately after that of another. Calling by one male then becomes entrained to that of another even though their intrinsic call periods are different. The mechanism underlying entrainment was analysed by presenting acoustic stimuli to isolated males in the laboratory.

  2. 2.

    When trains of acoustic stimuli at various rates were presented, males could entrain to stimuli with periods up to 60 msec (18%) shorter and 50 msec (15%) longer than their intrinsic call periods (Fig. 3). This range of periods corresponds to that found in natural populations (Table 1).

  3. 3.

    Each call-period consisted of three phases: (1) refractory phase—between beginning of period and up to 80 msec before next call; (2) excitatory phase— between end of refractory phase and beginning of call activation phase; (3) call activation phase—last 5–30 msec of call period. An acoustic stimulus presented during the excitatory phase normally evoked a call 30 msec after the end of the stimulus, thus shortening the period by up to 50 msec. Stimuli occurring during the refractory or call activation phases did not evoke calls.

  4. 4.

    Since call periods can be lengthened by up to 50 msec, there must be a lengthened refractory or excitatory phase in the cycle following an acoustic stimulus; this is supported by the fact that the first free-run period following an evoked call is longer than the average call period (Fig. 6). Lengthening probably occurs in the excitatory phase.

  5. 5.

    The call activation phase probably represents neural transmission time between sound arriving at the ear and the resulting evoked call.

  6. 6.

    The acoustic system ofP. streckeri is discussed in terms of a central pacemaker with initiates each call and whose activity is modified in a predictable fashion by appropriate auditory input.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brattstrom, B. H., Yarnell, R. M.: Aggressive behavior in two species of leptodactylid frogs. Herpetologica24, 222–228 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Capranica, R. R.: The evoked vocal response of the bullfrog. Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, H. C.: Reproductive interactions betweenHyla crucifer andPseudacris ornata (Anura: Hylidae). Amer. Midl. Natur.89, 81–88 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, F. E., Case, J. F., Buck, E., Buck, J.: Synchrony and flash entrainment in a New Guinea firefly. Science174, 161–164 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg, W.: The effect of stimulus chirps on a cricket's chirping (Acheta domesticus). Z. vergl. Physiol.65, 70–97 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. D. R.: The acoustic behaviour of the bush cricketPholidoptera griseoaptera. 2. Interaction with artificial sound signals. J. exp. Biol.45, 31–44 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemon, R. E.: Vocal communication by the frogEleutherodactylus martinicensis. Canad. J. Zool.49, 211–217 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlejohn, M. J., Martin, A. A.: Acoustic interaction between two species of leptodactylid frogs. Anim. Behav.17, 785–791 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus-Hills, J. J.: Neural correlates of acoustic behavior in the Australian bullfrogLimnodynastes dorsalis (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Z. vergl. Physiol.74, 140–152 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus-Hills, J. J.: The neural basis underlying acoustic behavior of the frogPseudophryne semimarmorata (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Anim. Behav.21, 781–787 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftus-Hills, J. J., Littlejohn, M. J.: Mating-call sound intensities of anuran amphibians. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer.49, 1327–1329 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. S.: Hearing and responses to calls in anurans. Behaviour23, 280–293 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R. S.: A model of the central mechanisms of male anuran acoustic behaviour. Behaviour39, 288–317 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, K.: An analysis of the phonoresponse of males of the true katydid,Pterophylla camellifolia (Fabricius) (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Behaviour31, 203–260 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, T. J.: Acoustic synchrony: two mechanisms in the snowy tree cricket. Science166, 891–894 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author acknowledges the support of Dr. W. F. Blair at the University of Texas at Austin and Dr. R. R. Capranica at Cornell University. This work was supported in part by NIH grant NS 09244 to Dr. R. R. Capranica. Mr. R. Sage assisted with recording and collecting in the field. Dr. J. L. Larimer and Mr. J. A. Paton provided assistance and advice during initial phases of the analysis. Drs. R. R. Capranica, F. E. Hanson and M. J. Littlejohn criticized the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loftus-Hills, J.J. Analysis of an acoustic pacemaker in Strecker's chorus frog,Pseudacris streckeri (Anura: Hylidae). J. Comp. Physiol. 90, 75–87 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00698369

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00698369

Keywords

Navigation