Summary
-
1.
Electrophysiological responses were obtained from the peripheral olfactory system of the American eel,Anguilla rostrata, using three different recording methods: averaged multiunit activity from the olfactory mucosa (MNR), averaged multiunit activity from bundles of olfactory nerve axons (NTR), and the underwater electro-olfactogram (EOG).
-
2.
For each of the three techniques, response magnitude increased exponentially with logarithmic increase in stimulus concentration, denoting a power function (Figs. 2, 3).
-
3.
Thresholds forl-glutamine, determined from NTR, MNR, and EOG recordings, were 10−9.6±0.3mol/l, 10−8.0±0.2mol/l and 10−7.8±0.2 mol/l, respectively. The difference between the NTR and the EOG and MNR thresholds was significant while the difference between EOG and MNR thresholds was not (Table 2).
-
4.
Gamma, the reciprocal of the power function exponent, which is the number of log steps of concentration necessary to produce a tenfold increase in response magnitude, was 10.3±0.4 for the NTR, 6.5±0.4 for the MNR, and 5.3±0.2 for the EOG. The difference between the NTR gamma and the EOG and MNR gammas was significant while the difference between the EOG and MNR gammas was not (Table 2).
-
5.
There was a significant correlation between the relative stimulus effectiveness for 11 amino acids determined with each of the three methods (Fig. 4).
-
6.
An amino acid with 5 or 6 carbon atoms, a linear side chain, and an unsubstituted hydrogen and amino group in the alpha position was generally a highly effective olfactory stimulus.
-
7.
Esterification of the primary carboxyl group ofl-alanine did not result in a loss of stimulatory effectiveness, indicating that a charged carboxyl group may not be necessary for maximal stimulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adrian ED (1959) Des réactions électriques du système olfactif. Actual Neurophysiol 1:11–18
Beidler LM, Tucker D (1955) Response of nasal epithelium to odor stimulation. Science 122:76
Belghaug R, Døving KB (1977) Odour threshold determined by studies of the induced waves in the olfactory bulb of the char (Salmo alpinus). Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 57:327–330
Bodznick D (1978) Calcium ion: odorant for natural water discriminations and migratory behavior of sockeye salmon. J Comp Physiol 127:157–167
Caprio J (1976) Olfactory and gustatory responses of catfish to amino acids and derivatives. Doctoral Dissertation, Florida State University
Caprio J (1978) Olfaction and taste in the channel catfish — Electrophysiological study of the responses to amino acids and derivatives. J Comp Physiol 123:357–371
Caprio J (1980) Similarity of olfactory receptor responses (EOG) of freshwater and marine catfish to amino acids. Can J Zool 58:1778–1784
Caprio J, Raderman-Little R (1978) Scanning electronmicroscopy of the catfish olfactory lamellae. Tissue Cell 10:1–9
Davis H (1961) Some principles of sensory receptor action. Physiol Rev 41:391–416
Døving KB, Belghaug R (1977) Frequency of induced waves in the olfactory bulb in char (Salmo alpinus); a temperature dependence. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 56:577–579
Døving KB, Holmberg K (1974) A note on the function of the olfactory organ of the hagfish,Myxine glutinosa. Acta Physiol Scand 91:430–432
Fuortes MGF (1959) Initiation of impulses in visual cells ofLimulus. J Physiol 148:14–28
Gesteland RC (1975) Techniques for investigating single unit activity in the vertebrate olfactory epithelium. In: Moulton DG, Turk A, Johnston JW Jr (eds) Methods in olfactory research. Academic Press, London, pp 269–322
Gesteland RC, Howland B, Lettvin JY, Pitts WH (1959) Comments on microelectrodes. Proc Inst Radio Engin 47:1856–1862
Getchell TV (1974) Electrogenic sources of slow voltage transients recorded from frog olfactory epithelium. J Neurophysiol 37:1115–1130
Goh Y, Tamura T (1978a) The electrical responses of the olfactory tract to amino acids in the carp. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 44:341–344
Goh Y, Tamura T (1978b) Electrical responses of the fish olfactory tract to some chemical stimulants in the carp. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 44:1289–1294
Goh Y, Tamura T (1980) Olfactory and gustatory responses to amino acids in two marine teleosts — red sea bream and mullet. Comp Biochem Physiol [C] 66:217–224
Goh Y, Tamura T, Kobayashi H (1979) Olfactory responses to amino acids in marine teleosts. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 62:863–868
Hara TJ (1973) Olfactory responses to amino acids in rainbow trout,Salmo gairdneri. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 44:407–416
Hara TJ (1976) Structure-activity relationships of amino acids in fish olfaction. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 54:31–36
Hara TJ (1977a) Further studies on the structure-activity relationships of amino acids in fish olfaction. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 56:559–565
Hara TJ (1977b) Olfactory discrimination between glycine and deuterated glycine by fish. Experientia 33:618–619
Hara TJ, Brown SB (1979) Olfactory bulbar responses of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) exposed to morpholine during smoltification. J Fish Res Board Can 36:1186–1190
Hara TJ, Thompson BE (1978) The reaction of whitefish,Coregonus clupeaformis, to the anionic detergent sodium lauryl sulphate and its effects on their olfactory responses. Water Res 12:893–897
Hara TJ, Carolina Law YM, Hobden BR (1973) Comparison of the olfactory response to amino acids in rainbow trout, brook trout, and whitefish. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 45:969–977
Hashimoto Y, Konosu S, Fusetani N, Nose T (1968) Attractants for eels in extracts of short-necked clams. I. Survey of the constituents eliciting feeding behavior by the omission test. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 34:78–83
Katz B (1950) Depolarization of sensory nerve terminals and the initiation of impulses in the muscle spindles. J Physiol 111:261–282
Katz B, Schmitt OH (1940) Electrical interaction between two adjacent nerve fibers. J Physiol 97:477–488
Konosu S, Fusetani N, Nose T, Hashimoto Y (1968) Attractants for eels in the extracts of short-necked clams. II. Survey of constituents eliciting feeding behavior by fractionation of extracts. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 34:84–87
Maeda K, Yagi T, Noguchi A (1980) Induced excitation and synchronization of nerve impulses in two parallel unmyelinated fibers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 27:139–145
Moulton DG, Tucker D (1964) Electrophysiology of the olfactory system. Ann NY Acad Sci 116:380–428
Okano M, Takagi SF (1974) Secretion and electrogenesis of the supporting cell in the olfactory epithelium. J Physiol 242:353–370
Ottoson D (1956) Analysis of the electric activity of the olfactory epithelium. Acta Physiol Scand 35 (Suppl 122):1–83
Ottoson D, Shepherd GM (1970) Steps in impulse generation in the isolated muscle spindle. Acta Physiol Scand 79:423–430
Rees CJC (1970) The primary process of reception in the Type 3 (‘water’) receptor cell of the flyPhormia terranovae. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol] 174:469–490
Satou M, Ueda K (1978) Synchronized rhythmic discharges of the secondary olfactory neurons in the carp. Brain Res 158:1313–1329
Shibuya T (1964) Dissociation of olfactory neural response and mucosal potential. Science 143:1338–1340
Silver WL (1979) Olfactory responses from a marine elasmobranch, the Atlantic stingray,Dasyatis sabina. Mar Behav Physiol 6:297–305
Silver WL, Caprio J, Blackwell JF, Tucker D (1976) The underwater electro-olfactogram: A tool for the study of the sense of smell of marine fishes. Experientia 32:1216–1217
Sutterlin AM, Sutterlin N (1971) Electrical responses of the olfactory epithelium of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). J Fish Res Board Can 28:565–572
Suzuki N (1977) Intracellular responses of lamprey olfactory receptors to current and chemical stimulation. In: Katsuki Y, Sato M, Takagi SF, Oomura Y (eds) Food intake and chemical senses. Japan Scientific Press, Tokyo, pp 13–22
Suzuki N (1978) Effects of different ionic environments on the olfactory response in the lamprey. Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 61:461–467
Suzuki N, Tucker D (1971) Amino acids as olfactory stimuli in freshwater catfishIctalurus catus (L.). Comp Biochem Physiol [A] 40:399–404
Teichmann H (1959) Über die Eeistung des Geruchsinnes beim Aal (Anguilla anguilla L.) Z Vergl Physiol 42:206–254
Terzuolo CA, Washizu Y (1962) Relation between stimulus strength, generator potential and impulse frequency in stretch receptor of Crustacea. J Neurophysiol 25:56–66
Thommesen G (1978) The spatial distribution of odour induced potentials in the olfactory bulb of the char and trout (Salmonidae). Acta Physiol Scand 102:205–217
Tucker D, Suzuki N (1972) Olfactory responses to Schreckstoff of catfish. In: Schneider D (ed) Olfaction and taste IV. Wiss Verlagsges, Stuttgart, pp 121–127
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silver, W.L. Electrophysiological responses from the peripheral olfactory system of the American eel,Anguilla rostrata . J. Comp. Physiol. 148, 379–388 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00679022
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00679022