Skip to main content
Log in

Quasiparticle phenomenology for thermodynamics of strong-coupling superconductors

  • Published:
Journal of Low Temperature Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We show that reduced critical fields, entropies, and specific heats of superconductors, regardless of “coupling-strength,” can be fitted essentially within experimental errors by curves appropriate to a system of independent fermion quasiparticles. The analysis proceeds from the formula for the entropy of a system of independent fermionsS=−k B Σ [f lnf+(1−f) ln (1−f)], where we take the quasiparticle spectrum to be the same as in the BCS (weak-coupling) theoryE 2 k =(ε 2 k 2). The temperature dependence of the energy gap is also taken to be the same as in the BCS theory, the only adjustable parameter being the gap ratio Δ(0)/k B T c . The necessary values of this ratio are found to be in reasonable agreement with the experimental values deduced from electron tunneling and infrared absorption. Some speculations are offered for the paradoxical success of this simple model, based on analogies with the effects of strong coupling in the normal state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer,Phys. Rev. 108, 1175 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Meservey and B. B. Schwartz, inSuperconductivity, Vol. I, R. D. Parks, ed. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1969), Chap. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. J. Scalapino,ibid. in, Chap. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. W. L. McMillan and J. M. Rowell,ibid. in, Chap. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. K. Finnemore and D. E. Mapother,Phys. Rev. 140, A507 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. C. Swihart,Phys. Rev. 131, 73 (1963);IBM J. Res. and Dev. 6, 14 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. R. Clem,Ann. Phys. 40, 268 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Mühlschlegel,Z. Physik 155, 313 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. Padamsee, J. E. Neighbor, and C. A. Shiffman,Phys. Letters 41A, 427 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. L. Decker, D. E. Mapother, and R. W. Shaw,Phys. Rev. 112, 1888 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  11. T. Ohtsuka and Y. Kimura,Physica 55, 562 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. A. Leopold and H. A. Boorse,Phys. Rev. 134, A1322 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Ferriera da Silva, E. A. Burgemeister, and Z. Dokoupil,Physica 41, 409 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. U. Gubser,Phys. Rev. B6, 827 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Padamseeet al., unpublished.

  16. A. M. Toxen,Phys. Rev. Letters 15, 462 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. M. Eliashberg,Soviet Phys.—JETP 16, 780 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. Grimvall,J. Phys. Chem. Solids 29, 1221 (1968);Solid State Commun. 7, 213 (1969);Phys. Kond. Materie 9, 283 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. B. Allen and M. L. Cohen,Phys. Rev. B1, 1329 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. G. Poulsen and W. R. Datars, inProc. LT 12, E. Kanda, ed. (Academic Press of Japan, Tokyo, 1971), p. 617; P. Goy and G. Weisbuch,ibid., p. 615; P. Goy,Phys. Letters 31A, 584 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. H. Lambert,Phys. Rev. B3, 4416 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. C. Dynes,Solid State Commun. 10, 615 (1972); W. L. McMillan,Phys. Rev. 167, 331 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. G. Adler, J. E. Jackson, and B. S. Chandrasekhar,Phys. Rev. Letters 16, 53 (1966); B. R. Sood,Phys. Rev. 6B, 136 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. V. Culbert, D. E. Farrell, and B. S. Chandrasekhar,Phys. Rev. B3, 794 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. Brändli and P. N. Trofimenkoff,Phys. Letters 36A, 431 (1971); J. G. Adler, J. E. Jackson, and T. A. Will,Phys. Letters 24A, 407 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. Y. L. Shen, N. M. Senozan, and N. E. Phillips,Phys. Rev. Letters 14, 1025 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Markowitz and L. P. Kadanoff,Phys. Rev. 131, 563 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  28. G. J. Culler, B. D. Fried, R. W. Huff, and J. R. Schrieffer,Phys. Rev. Letters 10, 399 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. M. Eliashberg,Soviet Phys.—JETP 11, 696 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. Balian and C. de Dominicis,Ann. Phys. 62, 229 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. E. Prange and L. P. Kadanoff,Phys. Rev. 134, A566 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  32. W. E. Hubin and D. M. Ginsberg,Phys. Rev. 188, 716 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. F. Cochran, C. A. Shiffman, and J. E. Neighbor,Rev. Sci. Instr. 37, 499 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Y. Nakagawa and A. D. B. Woods,Phys. Rev. Letters 11, 271 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported in part by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission under Contract No. AT(30-1)-3972.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Padamsee, H., Neighbor, J.E. & Shiffman, C.A. Quasiparticle phenomenology for thermodynamics of strong-coupling superconductors. J Low Temp Phys 12, 387–411 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654872

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654872

Keywords

Navigation