Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Single unit responses in cochlear nucleus of horseshoe bats to sinusoidal frequency and amplitude modulated signals

  • Published:
Journal of comparative physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    In the cochlear nucleus (CN) of Horseshoe bats, recordings were made from 148 single neurons to constant frequency (CF) signals and to sinusoidally frequency modulated (SFM) and sinusoidally amplitude modulated (SAM) signals, which in a first approximation simulate the periodic modulations of echoes returning from wing beating insects.

  2. 2.

    The probability of obtaining synchronized discharge activity to modulations was independent of the neurons' best frequencies (BFs). Neurons belonging to separate response pattern categories to CF-signals differed in the synchronization pattern to periodic modulations. While the response patterns of tonic neurons were characterized by an image-like reproduction of the time course of frequency or amplitude changes, phasic neurons respond with an activity peak to distinct portions of the modulation cycles. Neurons with build up patterns to CF-signals (n= 8) and three phasic neurons did not lock their discharges to SFM- or SAM-signals. Response patterns were essentially similar for SFM- and SAM-signals and systematically depended on modulation magnitude, carrier frequency and intensity parameters of the signals.

  3. 3.

    The effects of decreasing modulation magnitude were tested for 45 neurons with SFM- and for 46 neurons with SAM-signals. Asymmetries in the response patterns present at high modulation magnitudes disappeared with smaller modulation magnitudes and histogram envelopes approach sinusoidal form. Synchronized responses to SFM-signals were present down to modulation heights of ±20 Hz and to SAM-signals of 6%. Sensitivity for small modulation heights of the SFM-signal was highest in sharply tuned neurons in the frequency range of 81–88 kHz (‘filter neurons’). No correlations between minimum modulation depth of the SAM-signal and the neurons' BFs were found.

  4. 4.

    The carrier frequency of the SFM-signal was systematically varied in 19 neurons. Sensitivity for small modulation heights could be improved by positioning the carrier frequency near the flanks of the excitatory response area. The response to SAM-signals was less influenced by the carrier frequency.

  5. 5.

    The intensity parameter was studied in 18 neurons with SFM- and 25 neurons with SAM-signals. While synchronization was clearly present in the range of 10 to 30 dB SPL above minimum threshold, the response peaks to individual modulation cycles of tonic neurons tended to fuse at higher intensities. In sharply tuned neurons, individual response peaks to SFM-signals could be distinguished over wider intensity ranges than with SAM-signals.

  6. 6.

    Periodically amplitude modulated SFM-signals with different phase relations between amplitude maximum and particular frequency components were used for stimulation of 22 neurons. Due to their sharp tuning properties, the response pattern of filter neurons systematically changed depending on the phase relations of AM and FM, whereas the response pattern of neurons in other frequency ranges resembled the pattern to SAM-stimuli.

  7. 7.

    In order to determine the limiting rate of frequency and amplitude change for synchronization of response activity, the modulation frequency was varied between 50 Hz and 2,000 Hz in 59 neurons with SFM- and 46 neurons with SAM-stimuli. The range of modulation frequencies covered by synchronized activity was broad, with most neurons (n=41 SFM,n=28 SAM) reaching upper rates between 400 and 800 Hz, or even higher (n=6 SFM,n=14 SAM). Neurons with limiting rates below 400 Hz were rare (n=12 SFM,n=4 SAM). Low, medium and high limiting rates were found in tonic as well as phasic neurons. Some phasic neurons (n=3), required minimum modulation frequencies of 200 Hz to start synchronization. Synchronization behavior depended on intensity, center frequency, modulation magnitude and could be different for SFM- and SAM-signals in the same unit.

  8. 8.

    Data are discussed in relation to single unit recordings to periodically modulated signals in CN of other mammals and to results obtained from higher order auditory nuclei of Horseshoe bats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AC :

auditory cortex

BF :

best frequency

CF :

constant frequency

CN :

cochlear nucleus

df :

modulation height

FM :

frequency modulation

IC :

inferior colliculus

MGB :

medial geniculate body

PST :

post stimulus time

Rf :

Rhinolophus ferrumequinum

Rr :

Rhinolophus rouxi

SAM :

sinusoidal amplitude modulation

SFM :

sinusoidal frequency modulation

References

  • Britt RH (1976) Intracellular study of synaptic events related to phase-locking responses of cat cochlear nucleus cells to low frequency tones. Brain Res 112:313–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt R, Starr A (1976a) Synaptic events and discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus cells. I. Steady frequency tone bursts. J Neurophysiol 39:162–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt R, Starr A (1976b) Synaptic events and discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus cells. II. Frequency-modulated tones. J Neurophysiol 39:179–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns V (1976a) Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis by the CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. I. Mechanical specializations of the cochlea. J Comp Physiol 106:77–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns V (1976b) Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis by the CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. II. Frequency mapping in the cochlea. J Comp Physiol 106:87–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Caspary DM, Rupert AL, Moushegian G (1977) Neuronal coding of vowel sounds in the cochlear nuclei. Exp Neurol 54:414–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Creutzfeldt O, Hellweg FC, Schreiner C (1980) Thalamo-cortical transformation of response to complex auditory stimuli. Exp Brain Res 39:87–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelstätter R (1981) Hörphysiologische Untersuchungen an Neuronen der aufsteigenden Hörbahn der echoortenden FledermausRhinolophus rouxi. Inaugural Dissertation, Frankfurt

  • Evans EF (1975) Cochlear nerve and cochlear nucleus. In: Keidel WD, Neff WD (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol 2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 1–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans EF, Nelson PG (1973) The responses of single neurons in the cochlear nucleus of the cat as a function of their location and the anaesthetic state. Exp Brain Res 17:402–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey DA, Kiang NYS, Norris BE (1975a) Single unit activity in the posteroventral cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Comp Neurol 162:247–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey DA, Kiang NYS, Norris BE (1975b) Single unit activity in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the cat. J Comp Neurol 162:269–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman LJ, Henson OW (1977) Prey recognition and selection by the constant frequency bat,Pteronotus p. parnellii. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:411–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnischfeger G (1979) An improved method for extracellular marking of electrode tip positions in nervous tissue. J Neurosci Methods 1:195–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch HR, Morton Gibson M (1976) Responses of single units in the cat cochlear nucleus to sinusoidal amplitude modulations of tones and noise: Linearity and relation to speech perception. J Neurosci Res 2:337–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Machmerth H, Theiss D, Schnitzler H-U (1975) Konstruktion eines Luftultraschallgebers mit konstantem Frequenzgang im Bereich von 15 kHz-130 kHz. Acustica 34:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller J, Neuweiler G, Zoeller H (1978) Response characteristics of inferior colliculus neurons of the awake CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. I. Single tone stimulation. J Comp Physiol 125:217–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AR (1969) Unit responses in the rat cochlear nucleus to repetitive, transient sounds. Acta Physiol Scand 75:542–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AR (1972) Coding of amplitude and frequency modulated sounds in the cochlear nucleus of the rat. Acta Physiol Scand 86:223–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AR (1974) Coding of sounds with rapidly varying spectrum in the cochlear nucleus. J Acoust Soc Am 55:631–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson PG, Erulkar SD, Bryan JS (1966) Responses of units of the inferior colliculus to time-varying acoustic stimuli. J Neurophysiol 29:834–860

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G, Vater M (1977) Response patterns to pure tones of cochlear nucleus units in the CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Comp Physiol 115:119–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G, Brans V, Schuller G (1980) Ears adapted for the detection of motion, or how echolocating bats have exploited the capacities of the mammalian auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 68:741–753

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald J (1980) Die funktionelle Organisation des Hörcortex der großen Hufeisennase,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Inaugural Dissertation, University of Marburg

  • Pfeiffer RR (1966) Classification of response patterns of spike discharges for units in the cochlear nucleus: Tone burst stimulation. Exp Brain Res 1:220–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak GD, Schuller G (1981) Tonotopic organization and encoding features of single units in the inferior colliculus of Horseshoe bats: Functional implications for prey identification. J Neurophysiol 45:208–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeaupierre F De, Goldstein MH, Yeni Komishan G (1972) Cortical coding of repetitive acoustic pulses. Brain Res 48:205–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Romand R (1978) Survey of intracellular recording in the cochlear nucleus of the cat. Brain Res 148:43–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U (1968) Die Ultraschall-Ortungslaute der Hufeisenfledermäuse (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Ortungsituationen. Z Vergl Physiol 57:376–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler H-U (1978) Die Detektion von Bewegungen durch Echoortung bei Fledermäusen. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 1978:16–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller G (1979) Coding of small sinusoidal frequency and amplitude modulations in the inferior colliculus of the ‘CF-FM’ bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. Exp Brain Res 34:117–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller G, Pollak GD (1979) Disproportionate frequency representation in the inferior colliculus of Horseshoe bats: evidence for an “acoustic fovea”. J Comp Physiol 132:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller G, Beuter K, Schnitzler H-U (1974) Responses to frequency-shifted artificial echoes in the bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Comp Physiol 89:275–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer H (1981) The connections of the inferior colliculus and the organization of the brainstem auditory system in the Greater Horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum). J Comp Neurol 201:25–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1973) Feature extraction in the auditory system of bats. In: Møller A (ed) Basic mechanisms in hearing. Academic Press, New York, pp 675–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, Jen PH, Jen H-S (1977) Further studies on the peripheral auditory system of ‘CF-FM’ bats specialized for fine frequency analysis of Doppler-shifted echoes. J Exp Biol 69:207–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, Neuweiler G, Møller J (1976) Peripheral auditory tuning for fine frequency analysis by the CF-FM bat,Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. IV. Properties of peripheral auditory neurons. J Comp Physiol 106:111–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield IC, Evans EF (1965) Responses of auditory cortical neurons to stimuli of changing frequency. J Neurophysiol 28:655–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Young ED, Brownell WE (1976) Responses to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats. J Neurophysiol 39:282–300

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Marianne Vater

    Present address: Zoologisches Institut der Universität München, Luisenstrasse 14, D-8000, München 2, Germany

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arbeitskreis Neuro- und Rezeptorphysiologie, Fachbereich Biologie der J.W. Goethe-Universität, D-6000, Frankfurt, Germany

    Marianne Vater

Authors
  1. Marianne Vater
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vater, M. Single unit responses in cochlear nucleus of horseshoe bats to sinusoidal frequency and amplitude modulated signals. J. Comp. Physiol. 149, 369–388 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00619153

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00619153

Keywords

Search

Navigation