Skip to main content
Log in

‘Ancestral’ neural mechanisms of electrolocation suggest a substrate for the evolution of the jamming avoidance response

  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The genusSternopygus, believed to reflect ancestral traits of gymnotiform electric fish, is closely related to the more ‘modern’ genusEigenmannia (Mago-Leccia 1978; Fink and Fink 1981).Sternopygus is the only known genus of electric fish that does not perform a jamming avoidance response (JAR) to minimize the potentially detrimental effects of signal interference between discharging neighbors (Bullock et al. 1972, 1975), and its ability to electrolocate objects is rather immune to jamming (Matsubara and Heiligenberg 1978).

By studying the responses of midbrain neurons to stimulus regimes effective in eliciting the JAR inEigenmannia, we found thatSternopygus has neurons capable of discriminating the sign of the difference frequency between interfering electric organ discharges (EODs). These ‘sign-selective’ neurons, which are believed to be important elements in the control of the JAR inEigenmannia, may, therefore, fulfill a more general function in the detection of moving objects and conspecifics but could potentially be assembled for the evolution of a JAR inSternopygus. The relative immunity to jamming in this genus may result, in part, from a stronger reliance upon the ampullary electrosensory system which operates in the DC and low-frequency range, outside the EOD spectrum of these fish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AM :

amplitude modulation

Df :

frequency difference

EOD :

electric organ discharge

JAR :

jamming avoidance response

References

  • Bastian J, Yuthas J (1984) The jamming avoidance response ofEigenmannia: Properties of a diencephalic link between sensory processing and motor output. J Comp Physiol A 154:895–908

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrend K (1977) Processing information carried in a high frequency wave: Properties of cerebellar units in a high frequency electric fish. J Comp Physiol 118:357–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock TH (1982) Electroreception. Annu Rev Neurosci 5:121–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock TH, Chichibu S (1965) Further analyses of sensory coding in electroreceptors of electric fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 54:422–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock TH, Hamstra RH, Scheich H (1972) The jamming avoidance response of high frequency electric fish. J Comp Physiol 77:1–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock TH, Behrend K, Heiligenberg W (1975) Comparison of the jamming avoidance responses of gymnotoid and gymnarchid electric fish: A case of convergent evolution of behavior and its sensory basis. J Comp Physiol 103:97–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumot JPC, Robertson RM (1986) Neuronal circuits: An evolutionary perspective. Science 233:849–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink SV, Fink WL (1981) Interrelationships of ostariophysan fishes (Teleostei). Zool J Linn Soc 72:297–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank K, Becker MC (1964) Microelectrodes for recording and stimulation. In: Nastuk WL (ed) Physical techniques in biological research, vol 5, part A. Academic Press, New York, pp 23–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W (1986) Jamming avoidance responses: Model systems for neuroethology. In: Bullock TH, Heiligenberg W (eds) Electroreception, Wiley, New York, pp 613–649

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W, Rose G (1986) Gating of sensory information: Joint computations of phase and amplitude data in the midbrain of the electric fish,Eigenmannia. J Comp Physiol A 159:311–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiligenberg W, Baker C, Matsubara J (1978) The jamming avoidance response inEigenmannia revisited: The structure of a neuronal democracy. J Comp Physiol 127:267–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Mago-Leccia F (1978) Los peces de la familia Sternopygidae de Venezuela. Acta Scient Venezolana 29 [Suppl 1]:1–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsubara J (1981) Neural correlates of a nonjammable electrolocation system. Science 211:722–1725

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsubara J (1982) Physiological cell types in the posterior lateral line lobes of weakly electric fish: Neural correlates of electrolocation under jamming. J Comp Physiol 149:339–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsubara J, Heiligenberg W (1978) How well do electric fish electrolocate under jamming? J Comp Physiol 125:285–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge BL, Heiligenberg W, Matsubara J (1981) The neural basis of a sensory filter in the jamming avoidance response: No grandmother cells in sight. J Comp Physiol 145:153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose G, Heiligenberg W (1986) Neural coding of difference frequencies in the midbrain of the electric fishEigenmannia: Reading the sense of rotation in an amplitude-phase plane. J Comp Physiol A 158:613–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose G, Keller C, Heiligenberg W (1986)Sternopygus offers insight into the functional role of sign-selective neurons in the torus semicircularis. Neurosci Abstr 58:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Symmes D (1981) On the use of natural stimuli in neurophysiological studies of audition. Hearing Res 4:203–214

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rose, G., Keller, C. & Heiligenberg, W. ‘Ancestral’ neural mechanisms of electrolocation suggest a substrate for the evolution of the jamming avoidance response. J. Comp. Physiol. 160, 491–500 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00615082

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00615082

Keywords

Navigation