Conclusions
-
1.
Analysis of the experimental data has shown that the deformation characteristics of materials with changing modules change not only with the change in sign of any of the main stresses, but also in the cases when the stresses do not change their sign, but the relationship between them changes.
-
2.
Equations for the relations between deformations and stresses for isotropic and anisotropic solids have been proposed to describe the phenomena of module differences, which include the function of the type of the stress state. The use of the parameter ξ has been justified to describe the module differences of materials. The proposed equations represent equations of the nonlinear theory of elasticity.
-
3.
A fully satisfactory agreement has been obtained between the calculated deformation coefficients and the exprimental data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Jones, “Relationships between stresses and deformations in materials with different elasticity modules in the case of stretching and compression,” Raket. Tekh. Kosmon.,15, No. 1, 16–26 (1977).
K. M. Kratsch, J. C. Schutzler, and D. A. Eitman, “Carbon-carbon 3-D orthogonal material behavior,” AIAA Paper, No. 365 (1972).
E. J. Seldin, “Stress-strain properties of polycrystalline graphites in tension and compression at room temperature”, Carbon,4, No. 2, 177–191 (1966).
A. V. Berezin, V. I. Strokov, and V. N. Barabanov, “Deformation and breakdown of graphite materials,” in: Building Materials Based on Carbon [in Russian], No. 11, Moscow (1976), pp. 102–110.
A. V. Berezin, E. V. Lomakin, V. I. Strokov, and V. N. Barabanov, “Resistance to deformation and breakdown of isotropic graphite materials under the conditions of a complex stressed state,” Probl. Prochn., No. 2, 60–65 (1979).
E. W. Smith and K. J. Pascoe, “The role of shear deformation in the fatigue failure of a glass fiber-reinforced composite”, Composites,8, No. 4, 237–243 (1977).
S. A. Ambartsumyan and A. A. Khachatryan, “Basic equations of the theory of elasticity for materials with different resistance towards stretching and compression,” Inzh. Zh., Mekho Tverd. Tela, No. 2, 44–53 (1966).
S. A. Ambartsumyan, “Equations of the plane case of the different-resistance or differntmodule theory of elasticity”, Izv. Akad. Nauk Arm. SSR, Mekh.,19, No. 2, 3–19 (1966).
S. A. Ambartsumyan, “Basic equations and functions of the different-module theory of elasticity of anisotropic solids,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 3, 51–61 (1969).
Jones, Nelson, “Physical models of the nonlinear deformation of graphite,” Raket. Tekh. Kosmon.,14, No. 6, 7–18 (1976).
E. V. Lomakin and Yu. N. Rabotnov, “Functions of the theory of elasticity for isotropic different-module solids,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 6, 29–34 (1978).
E. V. Lomakin, “Unique solutions of problems of the theory of elasticity for isotropic different-module solids,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 2, 42–45 (1979).
E. V. Lomakin, “Nonlinear deformation of materials, the resistance of which depends on the type of stressed state,” Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 4, 92–99 (1980).
S. G. Lekhnitskii, The Theory of Elasticity of Anisotropic Solids [in Russian], 2nd Ed., Moscow (1977).
V. I. Feodos'ev, Material Strength [in Russian], 7th Ed., Moscow (1974).
G. S. Shapiro, “The deformation of solids possessing different resistances to stretching and compression,” Inzh. Zh., Mekh. Tverd. Tela, No. 2, 123–125 (1966).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Translated from Mekhanika Kompozitnykh Materialov, No. 1, pp. 23–29, January–February, 1981.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lomakin, E.V. Difference in the modules of composite materials. Mech Compos Mater 17, 18–24 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00604877
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00604877