Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the dimensions used by Iranian and American students in rating instruction

  • Articles
  • Published:
International Review of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the dimensions of teacher behavior and classroom characteristics used by Iranian high school students (N=880) in evaluating their classroom experience. Secondly, it compared these dimensions to those used by American high school students (N=599). During January, 1978, both groups of students completed the Classroom Behavior Survey (CBS). Principal components analysis with varimax rotation yielded a 12 factor solution for Iranian data and 14 for the American data. Comparison of the factors suggest that the dimensions on which Iranian and American students evaluate their teachers are substantially different, though the dimensions they use to evaluate characteristics of the course and content are similar.

Résumé

Cette étude porte sur les cotes du comportement de l'enseignant et des caractéristiques de la classe utilisées par les élèves iraniens de l'enseignement secondaire. (N=880) dans leur évaluation de leur expérience scolaire. Elle compare ensuite ces cotes à celles utilisées par les élèves américains du secondaire. Les deux groupes d'élèves ont terminé leur enquête sur le comportement de la classe (CBS ECC) en janvier 1978. L'analyse des principales composantes avec rotation varimax a donné une solution à 12 facteurs pour les données iraniennes et à 14 facteurs pour les données américaines. La comparaison des facteurs suggère que les cotes selon lesquelles les élèves iraniens et américains évaluent leurs enseignants sont notablement différentes, bien que celles qu'ils utilisent pour évaluer les caractéristiques du cours et de son contenu soient similaires.

Zusammenfassung

Diese Studie untersucht die Dimensionen von Lehrerverhalten und Unterrichtsweisen, die iranische Studenten zur Evaluation ihrer Klassenerfahrungen angewandt haben. Ferner vergleicht sie diese Dimensionen mit den von amerikanischen Sekundarschülern benutzten. Beide Schülergruppen beendeten ihre Untersuchungen über Unterrichtsverhalten im Januar 1978. Eine Analyse der Hauptkomponenten, mit Varimax Rotation, ergab eine 12-Faktorenlösung für die iranischen Daten gegenüber 14 Faktoren für die amerikanischen. Ein Vergleich dieser Faktoren deutet darauf hin, daß die Dimensionen, aufgrund derer die iranischen und amerikanischen Schüler ihre Lehrer bewerten, stark voneinander abweichen, während sich die für die Beurteilung der Kurse und Inhalte gebrauchten gleichen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • BRISLIN, R. W., LONNER, W. S. and THORNDIKE, R. M.Cross-Cultural Research Methods. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • CHAPMAN, D. and CARTER, J. ‘Translation procedures for the cross-cultural use of measurement instruments’.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1 (1979), No. 3.

  • CHAPMAN, D. and HOLLOWAY, R. ‘College courses in the high school: the project advance model’.High School Journal. (March, 1977).

  • CHAPMAN, D., HOLLOWAY, R. and KELLY, E. ‘Using ratings by students to predict high and low achievers in a PSI course: a discriminant analysis’.Audio-Visual Communications Review; now,Educational Communications and Technology. 25 (1977), No. 4.

  • IRFANI, S. ‘Extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism in Iranian students’.International Journal of Psychology. 13 (1978), No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • KELLY, E. and CHAPMAN, D. ‘Explaining course-oriented attitude: a canonical analysis’.Educational Research Quarterly. 2 (1977), No. 3.

  • KELLY, E. and CHAPMAN, D.Classroom Behavior Survey. Syracuse, New York: Test Scoring and Evaluation Services, Syracuse University, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • KELLY, E. et al.Explaining Course-Oriented Attitude: a Canonical Analysis. Syracuse, New York: Division of Instructional Design, Development, and Evaluation, Syracuse University, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • KELLY, E., HOLLOWAY, R. and CHAPMAN, D.Using Student Ratings to Predict High and Low Achievers: a Replication and Cross Validation. Syracuse, New York: Division of Instructional Design, Development, and Evaluation, Syracuse University, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • KHAN, S. and WEISS, J. ‘The teaching of affective responses’. In Travers, R. (ed.)Second Handbook of Research on Teaching. Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEWY, A. ‘Competitive, cooperative, and universal aspects of the IEA subject matter surveys’.International Review of Education. 23 (1977), No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEHRYAN, H. A. and RAZAVICH, A. ‘Extroversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism as measured by Eysenck's inventories in Iran’.Journal of Genetic Psychology. 122 (1973).

  • NIE, N. et al.Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. (Second edition). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSGOOD, C. E., MAY, W. H. and MIRON, M. S.Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning. Urbana, Ill.: The University of Illinois Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEAKER, G. F.An Empirical Study of Education in Twenty-One Countries: a Technical Report. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • RANDHAWA, B. S. and LEWIS, L. W. Fu. ‘Assessment and effect of some classroom environment variables’.Review of Educational Research. 43 (1973), No. 3.

  • ROSENSHINE, B. and FURST, N. ‘Research on teaching performance criteria’. In Smith, B. D. (ed.)Research in Teacher Education: a Symposium. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • WALKER, D. A.The IEA Six Subject Survey: an Empirical Study of Education in Twenty-One Countries. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • WILBUR, F. and CHAPMAN. D.College Courses in the High School. Reston, Verginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals, 1978. (Monograph Series).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chapman, D.W., Kelly, E.F. A comparison of the dimensions used by Iranian and American students in rating instruction. Int Rev Educ 27, 41–60 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00597880

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00597880

Keywords

Navigation