Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous propranolol and pindolol in patients with coronary heart disease

  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To determine whether the depression of left ventricular pumping activity associated with beta-blockade alone could be offset by a substantial degree of partial agonist activity, the haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous propranolol and pindolol were compared in a randomised between-group saline controlled study in twenty patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease. The intravenous doses of propranolol (2–16 mg) and pindolol (0.2–1.6 mg) used were selected on the basis of published reports of equivalence in terms of exercise blockade of chronotropic beta-adrenoceptors. Following four intravenous boluses of each drug, administered according to a cumulative log-dosage schedule, there was a log-linear increase in the plasma concentrations of each drug. The range of plasma concentrations achieved were those which have been shown to be associated with substantial attenuation of sympathetic stimulation of cardiac beta-adrenoceptors. At rest propranolol resulted in dose-related linear reductions in heart rate and cardiac output and linear increases in left heart filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance compared with saline-controlled measurements. The only statistically significant change at rest after pindolol was a small increase in the left heart filling pressure. The calculated systemic vascular resistance was increased after propranolol but unchanged after pindolol. During supine bicycle exercise the systolic blood pressure increased less after propranolol than after saline or pindolol. The increments in all other measured haemodynamic variables during exercise were equally influenced by the two drugs. Propranolol resulted in a significantly greater depression of the relationship between left heart filling pressure and cardiac output at rest and during exercise than an equivalent beta-blocking dose of pindolol. The contrasting haemodynamic profile of the two drugs is explicable by the partial agonist stimulation of the heart by pindolol directly maintaining left ventricular pumping activity and simultaneously lowering afterload by stimulating vasodilator beta2-adrenoceptors in peripheral arteriolar resistance vessels. In patients with impairment of left ventricular function due to coronary heart disease who require intravenous beta-blocking therapy, partial agonist activity in a beta-blocking drug may be haemodynamically advantageous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maroko PR, Kjekshus JK, Sobel BE et al. (1971) Factors influencing infarct size following experimental coronary artery occlusion. Circulation 43: 67–82

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Libby P, Maroko PR, Covell JW, Malloch CI, Ross J Jr, Braunwald E (1971) The effects of practolol on left ventricular function and infarct size following acute experimental coronary occlusion. Clin Res 19: 116

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pelides LJ, Reid DW, Thomas M, Shillingford JP (1972) Inhibition by beta-blockade of the ST segment elevation after acute myocardial infarction in man. Cardiovasc Res 6: 295–302

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Norris RM, Clarke ED, Sammel NL, Smith WM, Williams B (1978) Protective effect of propranolol in threatened myocardial infarction. Lancet 2: 907–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yusuf S, Ramsdale D, Peto R et al, (1980) Early intravenous atenolol treatment in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2: 273–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fearon RE (1967) Propranolol in the prevention of ventricular fibrillation due to experimental coronary artery occlusion. Am J Cardiol 20: 222–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Menken U, Wiegand V, Bucher B, Meesmann W (1979) Prophylaxis of ventricular fibrillation after acute experimental coronary occlusion by chronic beta-adrenoceptor blockade with atenolol. Cardiovasc Res 13: 588–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jewitt DE, Mercer CJ, Shillingford JP (1969) Practolol in the treatment of cardiac dysrhythmias due to acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2: 227–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sandler G, Pistevos AC (1971) Use of oxprenolol in cardiac arrhythmias associated with acute myocardial ischaemia. Br Med J 1: 254–257

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lemberg L, Arcebal AG, Castellanos A, Slavin D (1970) Use of alprenolol in acute cardiac arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 30: 77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rossi PR, Yusuf S, Ramsdale D, Furze L, Sleight P (1983) Reduction of ventricular arrhythmias by early intravenous atenolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction. Br Med J 286: 506–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramsdale D, Farragher BE, Ward C et al. (1982) Pain relief in acute myocardial infarction by intravenous atenolol. Am Heart J 103: 459–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hjalmarson A, Elmfeldt D, Herlitz A et al. (1981) Effect on mortality of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2: 823–827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Beta-blocker Heart Attack Study Group (1981) The beta-blocker heart attack trial — preliminary report. J Am Med Assoc 246: 2073–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Norwegian Multicentre Study Group (1981) Timolol-induced reduction in mortality and reinfarction in patients surviving acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 304: 801–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor SH, Silke B, Ebbutt A, Sutton GC, Prout B, Burley DM (1982) A long-term secondary prevention study with oxprenolol in coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 307: 1293–1301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Braunwald E (1969) Thirteenth Bowditch Lecture. The determinants of myocardial oxygen consumption. Physiologist 12: 65–93

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor SH, Silke B, Lee PS, Hilal A (1982) Haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous beta-blocking drugs with different ancillary properties in patients with coronary heart disease. Eur Heart J 3: 564–569

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Parker JO, Di Giorgi S, West RO (1966) A hemodynamic study of acute coronary insufficiency precipitated by exercise. Am J Cardiol 17: 470–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma B, Taylor SH (1970) Reversible left ventricular failure in angina pectoris. Lancet 2: 902–907

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reale A, Nigri A, Gioffre PA, Motolese M (1979) Acute influence of different beta-blocking agents upon left heart haemodynamics at rest and during exercise in patients with coronary heart disease. Eur J Cardiol 9: 101–109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor SH, Silke B, Lee PS (1981) Intravenous beta-blockade in coronary heart disease: Is cardioselectivity or intrinsic sympathomimetic activity haemodynamically useful? N Engl J Med 306: 631–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Coltart DJ, Alderman EL, Robinson SC, Harrison DC (1975) Effect of propranolol on left ventricular function, segmental wall motion and diastolic pressure-volume relation in man. Br Heart J 37: 357–364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Dehmer GJ, Falkoff M, Lewis SE, Hillis LD, Parkey RW, Willerson JT (1981) Effect of oral propranolol on rest and exercise left ventricular ejection fraction, volumes and segmental wall motion in patients with angina pectoris. Assessment of equilibrium gated blood pool imaging. Br Heart J 45: 656–666

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. White C de B, Udwadia BP (1975) Beta-adrenoceptor blockade and alpha-adrenergic potentiation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2: 99–105

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ablad B, Carlsson E, Ek L, Johnsson G, Lundgren B (1980) General pharmacology of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. In: Poppers PJ (ed) Beta-blockade and general anaesthesia. Astra Pharmaceuticals, Rijwijk, pp 46–58

    Google Scholar 

  27. Svendsen TL, Hartling O, Trap-Jensen J (1979) Immediate haemodynamic effects of propranolol, practolol, pindolol, atenolol and ICI 89406 in healthy volunteers. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 15: 223–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Carruthers SG (1982) Cardiac dose-response relationships of oral and intravenous pindolol. Br J Clin Pharmacol 13: 193S-198S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Holt DW, Bhamra RK, Flanigan RJ, Tynan MJ (1980) A rapid high performance liquid chromatographic method for the measurement of propranolol in small samples of blood, plasma or serum at the concentrations attained during therapy (Ab). Proc 1st Int Congr Paediatr Lab Med, Jerusalem

  30. Biomedial Computing Programme — ‘P’ Series (1979) Dixon WJ, Brown MB (eds) University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 540–580

    Google Scholar 

  31. Winer BJ (1971) Statistical principles in experimental design, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 197–200

    Google Scholar 

  32. Svendsen T, Hartling OJ, Trap-Jensen J, McNair A, Bliddal J (1981) Adrenergic beta-receptor blockade: Haemodynamic importance of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Clin Pharmacol Ther 29: 711–718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pine M, Fawrot L, Smith S, McDonald K, Chidsey CA (1975) Correlation of plasma propranolol concentration with therapeutic response in patients with angina pectoris. Circulation 52: 886–893

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Jennings G, Bobik A, Korner P (1981) Influence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of beta-adrenoceptor blockers on the heart rate and blood pressure responses to graded exercise. Br J Clin Pharmacol 12: 355–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Helfant RH, De Villa MA, Meister SG (1971) Effect of sustained isometric hand-grip exercise on left ventricular performance. Circulation 44: 982–993

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Quinones MA, Gaasch WH, Waisser E, Thiel HG, Alexander JK (1974) An analysis of the left ventricular response to isometric exercise. Am Heart J 88: 29–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Furnival CM, Linden RJ, Snow HM (1970) Inotropic changes in the left ventricle; the effect of changes in heart rate, aortic pressure and enddiastolic pressure. J Physiol (London) 211: 359–387

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Clark BJ, Menninger K, Bertholet A (1982) Pindolol — the pharmacology of a partial agonist. Br J Clin Pharmacol 13: 149S-158S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Thulesius O, Gjores JE, Berlin E (1982) Vasodilating properties of beta-adrenoceptor blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Br J Clin Pharmacol 13: 229S-230S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lochan R, Silke B, Taylor SH (1981) Speed of onset of pharmacodynamic activity of propranolol, practolol, oxprenolol and metroprolol after intravenous injection in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 12: 721–724

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gugler R, Krist R, Raczinski H, Hoffgen K, Bodem G (1980) Comparative pharmacodynamic and plasma levels of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 10: 337–343

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Storstein L (1980) Effect of intravenous and oral pindolol on exercise tolerance and electrocardiographic changes in angina pectoris. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2: 739–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silke, B., Nelson, G.I.C., Ahuja, R.C. et al. Comparative haemodynamic dose-response effects of intravenous propranolol and pindolol in patients with coronary heart disease. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 25, 157–165 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00543785

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00543785

Key words

Navigation