Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanisms of intra-and interspecific interference between larval stoneflies

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Behavior of focal individuals of two potentially competing sympatric stonefly species, Megarcys signata and Kogotus modestus (Perlodidae), was videotaped in flow-through plexiglass arenas placed in the East River, Gunnison County, Colorado. Focal individuals were observed alone and in pairs with conspecifics and allospecifics at four prey (Baetis bicaudatus, Baetidae, Ephemeroptera) densities to determine whether competitors and prey resource levels affected prey capture rates. Presence of conspecific or allospecific competitors reduced stonefly prey capture rates, especially for Kogotus, the smaller of the two species, due to a significant decline in predator-prey encounter rates with competitors present. This competitive effect was not observed at the lowest and highest prey densities due to very low or very high predator-prey encounter rates, respectively. Thus, interference affected feeding rates only at intermediate prey densities. Competitors had no effect on the probability of attacks per prey encounter or capture success per attack. Within each stonefly species the effects of intra-and interspecific interference on feeding rates were similar, even though behavioral responses by both stoneflies to interspecific encounters were more frequent than to encounters with conspecifics. Kogotus showed the highest levels of response to encounters with other stoneflies, maintaining those high levels of response to Megarcys over all prey densities. Further, male Kogotus, which are the smaller sex, responded more frequently to competitive interactions than did females. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that interspecific interference was asymmetrical with Megarcys, the larger species, being the superior competitor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan JD (1982) Feeding habits and prey consumption of three setipalpian stoneflies (Plecoptera) in a mountain stream. Ecology 63: 26–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Anholt BR (1990) An experimental separation of interference and exploitative competition in a larval damselfly. Ecology 71: 1483–1493

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker RL (1981) Behavioural interactions and use of feeding areas by nymphs of Coenagrion resolutum (Coenagrionidae: Odonata). Oecologia (Berlin) 49: 353–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker RL (1983) Spacing behaviour by larval Ischnura cervula Selys: effects of hunger, previous interactions, and familiarity with an area (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 12: 201–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Blois C (1988) Spatial distribution and interactions between Anax imperator Leech larvae at different developmental stages (Anisoptera: Aeshnidae). Odonatologica 17: 85–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss LW (1979) Bryozoan overgrowth interactions — the interdependence of competition for space and food. Nature 281: 475–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am Midl Natur 122: 661–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Convey P (1988) Competition for perches between larval damselflies: the influence of perch use on feeding efficiency, growth rate and predator avoidance. Freshwat Biol 19: 15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SD, Walde SJ, Peckarsky BL (1990) Prey exchange rates and the impact of predators on prey populations in streams. Ecology 71: 1503–1514

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley PH, Nisbet RM, Gurney WSC, Lawton JH (1987) Intraspecific interference among larvae in a semivoltine dragonfly population. Oecologia (Berlin) 71: 447–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley PH, Gillett S, Lawton JH (1988) Contests between larval damselflies: empirical steps toward a better ESS model. Anim Behav 36: 1496–1510

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley PH, martin EK (1989) Functional response and interference within and between year classes of a dragonfly population. J N Am Benthol Soc 8: 211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlandsson A, Malmqvist B, Andersson KG, Herrmann J, Sjöström P (1988) Field observations on the activities of a group-living semiaquatic bug Velia caprai. Arch Hydrobiol 112: 411–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Eymann M, Friend WG (1988) Behaviors of larvae of the blackflies Simulium vittatum and S. decorum (Diptera: Simuliidae) associated with establishing and maintaining dispersion patterns on natural and artificial substrates. J Insect Behav 1: 169–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Gause GF (1934) The struggle for existence. Hafner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart DD (1985) Causes and consequences of territoriality in a grazing stream insect. Ecology 66: 404–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart DD (1986) The adaptive significance of territoriality in filterfeeding larval black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae). Oikos 46: 88–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart DD (1987) Experimental studies of exploitative competition in a grazing stream insect. Oecologia 73: 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey IF, Corbet PS (1986) Territorial interactions between larvae of the dragonfly Pyrrhosoma nymphula: outcome of encounters. Anim Behav 34: 1550–1561

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildrew AG, Townsend CR (1980) Aggregation, interference and foraging by larvae of Plectrocnemia conspersa (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae). Anim Behav 28: 553–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard SE, O'Malley SLC, Russo R (1988) The functional response of Toxorhynchites rutilus rutilus to changes in the population density of its prey Aedes aegypti. Med Vet Entomol 2: 279–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson A, Vuoristo T (1979) Significance of stridulation in larval Hydropsychidae (Trichoptera). Behav 71: 167–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH, Hassell MP (1981) Asymmetrical competition in inseets. Nature (London) 793–796

  • MacArthur RH, Levins R (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat 101: 377–385

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez LA (1987) Sensory mechanisms underlying the predatorprey interaction between perlodid stonefly nymphs and their mayfly nymph prey. Ph.D. Dissertation. 207 pp

  • McAuliffe JM (1984) Resource depression by a stream herbivore: effects on distributions and abundances of other grazers. Oikos 42: 327–333

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA, Crowley PH (1987) The effects of density and relative size on the aggressive behaviour, movement and feeding of damselfly larvae (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). Anim Behav 35: 1051–1061

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin PJ, Johnson EA (1988) Experimental studies of asymmetric competition among anurans. Oikos 53: 398–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajunen VI (1982d) The effect of age-dependent interference on larval development in Callicorixa producta (Reut.) (Hemiptera, Corixidae). Ann Zool Fenn 19: 221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajunen VI (1982b) Replacement analysis of non-equilibrium competition between rock pool corixids (Hemiptera, Corixidae). Oecologia 52: 153–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1980) Predator-prey interactions between stoneflies and mayflies: behavioral observations. Ecology 61: 932–943

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1985) Do predaceous stoneflies and siltation affect the structure of stream insect communities colonizing enclosures? Can J Zool 63: 1519–1530

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1988) Why predaceous stoneflies do not aggregate with their prey. Verh Int Verein Limnol 23: 2135–2140

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1991) A field test of resource depression by predator stonefly larvae. Oikos (in press)

  • Peckarsky BL, Dodson SI (1980) Do stonefly predators influence benthic distributions in streams? Ecology 61: 1275–1282

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Penton MA (1985) Is predaceous stonefly behavior affected by competition? Ecology 66: 1718–1728

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Penton MA (1989) Mechanisms of prey selection by stream-dwelling stoneflies. Ecology 70: 1203–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Wilcox RS (1989) Stonefly nymphs use hydrodynamic cues to discriminate between prey. Oecologia 54: 301–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson CH, Andre SV (1980) An experimental analysis of interspecific competition among marine filter feeders in a soft-sediment environment. Ecology 61: 129–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RJ (1980) Territorial behavior of a larval dragonfly Xanthocnemis zealandica (McLachlan) (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 9: 285–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RJ (1985) Interspecific interactions of New Zealand damselfly larvae I. Xanthocnemis zealandica, Ischnura aurora, and Austrolestes colensonis (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae: Lestidae). New Zealand J Zool 12: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am Nat 122: 240–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1983) Stability, prey density and age/dependent interference in an aquatic insect predator, Notonecta hoffmanni. J Anim Ecol 50: 625–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöström P (1985) Territoriality in nymphs of Dinocras cephalotes (Plecoptera). Oikos 45: 351–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Soluk DA, Collins NC (1988) A mechanism for interference between stream predators: responses of the stonefly Agnetina capitata to the presence of sculpins. Oecologia 76: 630–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1987) The importance of the mechanisms of interspecific competition. Am Nat 129: 769–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance RR (1984) Interference competition and the coexistence of two competitors on a single limited resource. Ecology 65: 1349–1357

    Google Scholar 

  • Walde SJ, Davies RW (1984) The effect of intraspecific interference on Kogotus nonus (Plecoptera) foraging behavior. Can J Zool 62: 2221–2226

    Google Scholar 

  • wiens JA (1977) Competition in variable environments. Amer Sci 65: 590–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox RS, Ruckdeschel T (1982) Food threshold territoriality in a water strider (Gerris remigis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11: 85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DS, Leighton M, Leighton DR (1978) Interference competition in a tropical ripple bug (Hemiptera: Veliidae). Biotropica 10: 302–306

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peckarsky, B.L. Mechanisms of intra-and interspecific interference between larval stoneflies. Oecologia 85, 521–529 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323764

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323764

Key words

Navigation