Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ranking of sectors based on fuzzy importance measure

  • Published:
Economics of Planning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The changing nature of policy variables specific to any planned developmental programme often leads to conflicting decisional problems regarding the identification of thrust areas. Hence the inherent requirement is for a composite index which eases out such ambiguous choice issues. The present paper introduces the measure of sectoral importance which is capable of encompassing different variables with their associated weights and ranks sectors in an economy based on such a measure. However, the term importance suggests the qualitativeness and subjectivity involved in defining such a concept and thus establishes the need for the concepts of fuzzy mathematics. The theory of fuzzy subsets is capable of dealing with qualitative variables within a quantitative framework. The sectoral importance measures derived from the sectoral output linkages, employment multipliers and value added multipliers, have been represented as fuzzy subsets, or to be precise, as fuzzy numbers. A comparison of these numbers through the binary approach of determination of the measure of relative strength provides the basis for the ranking of sectors. The novelty of the approach lies in its simplicity and flexibility in treating qualitative factors which characterise most decision support socio economic planning problems. The validity of the exercise has been tested by applying it to the economy of West Bengal, a State of India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alagh, Y.K., Bhalla, G.S. and Kashyap, S.P. (1980), Structural Analysis of Gujrat, Punjab and Haryana Economies: An I-O Study, Allied Publishers, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, J.J. (1985), ‘Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers’, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 15(1), 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, C. and Chattopadhyay, R.N. (1986), ‘The industrial economy of West Bengal—Its problems and prospects’, Indian Journal of Regional Science XVIII(2), 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. (1975), ‘Inter-industry indicators of employment potential’, Applied Economics 7, 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, A., Stahl, C. and Alauddin, M. (1985), ‘Inter-industry analysis of employment linkages in Bangladesh’, Economics of Planning 19(1), 24–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazari, B.R. and Krishnamurty, J. (1970), ‘Employment implications of India's industrialisation: Analysis in an input-output framework’, Review of Economics and Statistics 52, 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, A. (1973), Theory of Fuzzy Subsets: Volume 1, Academic Press.

  • Zadeh, L.A. (1965), ‘Fuzzy sets’, Information and Control 12, 338–353.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, C., Chattopadhyay, R.N. Ranking of sectors based on fuzzy importance measure. Econ Plann 23, 77–95 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312928

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00312928

Keywords

Navigation