Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mixed-methods analysis of multidimensional conditions for the Human Development Index: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (FsQCA) study

  • RESEARCH PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Social and Economic Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine whether the conditions of origin (health, education, income) for the Human Development Index as well as the conditions of the Gender Equality Index, Corruption Perception Index, and Human Freedom Index created causal results. Various configurations of parameters were analyzed using set theory. Specifically, fuzzy sets qualitative comparative analysis (FsQCA) method was used. Using data from different databases for 2019, 143/147 countries were included in the study. As a result of the research, six most likely configurations for human development conditions emerged which are summarized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi, Date of Access: 11.10.2021.

  2. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/download-data, Date of Access: 11.10.2021.

  3. https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/042815/are-there-critics-human-development-index-hdi.asp, Erişim Tarihi: 08.09.2022.

  4. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr2020_technical_notes.pdf, Date of Access: 12.10.2021.

  5. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2009/10/gender-inequality-remains-major-obstacle-development-more-women-men-live, Date of Access: 09.09.2022.

  6. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl, Date of Access: 15.10.2021.

  7. https://www.cato.org/human-freedom-index/2020, Date of Access: 13.10.2021.

  8. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/download-data, Date of Access: 15.10.2021.

  9. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/download-data, Date of Access: 15.10.2021.

  10. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2020/index/nzl, Date of Access: 15.10.2021.

  11. https://www.cato.org/human-freedom-index/2020, Date of Access: 15.10.2021.

  12. United Nations. https://hdr.undp.org/user/login?destination=/data-center/documentation-and-downloads#t292n2878, Access Date: 07.09.2022.

  13. United Nations. https://hdr.undp.org/hdi-what-it-is, Access Date: 07.09.2022.

  14. https://hdr.undp.org/content/wide-inequalities-peoples-well-being-cast-shadow-sustained-human-development-progress, Access Date: 07.09.2022.

  15. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wesp/wesp_current/2014wesp_country_classification.pdf, Date of Access: 18.10.2021.

References

  • Abouna MS, Bourgeois P (2021) The globalization and feminization of soccer: the twin factors of global dynamics and national structures. Staps 1:103–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya A, Wall HJ (1994) An evaluation of the United Nations’ human development index. J Econ Soc Meas 20(1):51–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akçay S (2006) Corruption and human development. Cato J 26:29

    Google Scholar 

  • Akhmat G, Zaman K, Shukui T, Javed Y, Khan SR (2014) Social health indicators andeconomic growth: evidence from East Asia and Pacific, Middle East and North Africa, South Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa. Soc Indic Res 119(2):663–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves A, Costa L, da Dias L (2017) Analysis of correlation among HDI (Human Development Index), violence and corruption perceptions ındex. In: Conference: 5th CR3 making corporate responsibility useful, Helsinki, Finland

  • Amin E, Sabermahani A (2017) Gender inequality index appropriateness for measuring inequality. J Evid-Inform Soc Work 14(1):8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand S, Sen A (2000) The income component of the human development index. J Hum Dev 1(1):83–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aşkun V, Çizel R, Çizel B (2021) Ülkelerin İnovasyon Düzeyinin Sosyal Sermaye, Ekonomik Değer Algısı and Politik Kültürle Karmaşık İlişkisi: Bulanık Küme Nitel Karşılaştırmalı Analiz. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 16(2):317–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becherair A, Tahtane M (2017) The causality between corruption and human development in MENA countries: A panel data analysis. East-West Journal of Economics and Business, 20(2)

  • Begu LS, Apostu SA, Enache AO (2020) Corruption perceptions index and economic development of the country. In: Proceedings of the ınternational conference on applied statistics, vol 1, no 1, pp 115–122

  • Berg BL (1989) Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. Allyn & Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggeri M, Mauro V (2018) Towards a more ‘sustainable’ human development index: integrating the environment and freedom. Ecol Ind 91:220–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucak Ç (2022) Ekonomik Özgürlük Endeksi, İnsani Gelişme Endeksi ve Ekolojik Ayak İzi: E7 Ülkeleri İçin Ampirik Bir Analiz. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 12(23):141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher S (2017) Environmental performance as one of the indicators of sustainable development in Asia. J Environ Biol 38(1):67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cambell TD (1974) Quantitative knowing in action research. In: New Orleans: annual meeting of the American Psychological Association

  • Campbell JA, McIntyre J, Kucirkova N (2021) Gender equality, human development, and PISA results over time. Soc Sci 10(12):480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caricati L (2017) Testing the status-legitimacy hypothesis: a multilevel modeling approach to the perception of legitimacy in income distribution in 36 nations. J Soc Psychol 157(5):532–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles I (2014) The mismeasure of nations: a review essay on the human development report 1998. Measuring and promoting wellbeing: how important is economic growth? 281. ISBN: 9781925021318. https://doi.org/10.22459/MPW.04.2014.13

  • Cheng C, Zhong H, Guo Y, Li G (2018) Research on the driving pattern of firm’s online/off line innovation collaboration: BASED on networking synergy and resource allocation. Stud Sci Sci 36:723–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge DS (2013) A primer on quantitized data analysis and permutation testing. J Mixed Methods Res 7(1):81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW, Clark VLP (2017) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Despotis DK (2005) A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 56(8):969–980. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasic B, Devic Z, Denic N, Zlatkovic D, Ilic ID, Cao Y et al (2020) Human development index in a context of human development: review on the western Balkans countries. Brain Behav 10(9):e01755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers R (2017) QCA in empirical marketing research: an experiment featuring Dorah Explorah, investigating celebrity endorsement’s effect on product selection. Australas Market J (AMJ) 25(3):225–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dervis K, Klugman J (2011) Measuring human progress: the contribution of the Human Development Index and related indices. Revue D’économie Politique 121(1):73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul J (2016) Identifying single necessary conditions with NCA and fsQCA. J Bus Res 69(4):1516–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW (2013) Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Serv Res 48(6pt2):2134–2156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank AG (1969) Latin America: underdevelopment and revolution. Monthly Review Press

  • Gao Z, He D, Niu S (2021) On what could Chinese mining enterprises achieve high-level environmental performance?—Based on the fsQCA method. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(14):7290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner J, Oswald AJ (2007) Money and mental wellbeing: a longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery wins. J Health Econ 26(1):49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaye A, Klugman J, Kovacevic M, Twigg S, Zambrano E (2010) Measuring key disparities in human development: the gender inequality index. Hum Dev Res Pap 46:41

    Google Scholar 

  • Giray S, Ergut O (2014) Multivariate analysis of countries according to subdimensions of human development and gender inequality indices. Eurasian J Soc Sci 2(3):48–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham CL, Pettinato S (2004) Happiness and hardship: opportunity and insecurity in new market economies. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Martínez I, Saifuddin SM, Haq R (2021) The United Nations Gender Inequality Index. Handbook on diversity and ınclusion ındices. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 83–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Günbayi I, Sorm S (2018) Social paradigms in guiding social research design: the functional, interpretive, radical humanist and radical structural paradigms. Online Submiss 9(2):57–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrero C, Martínez R, Villar A (2012) A newer human development index. J Human Develop Capabilities 13(2):247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2011.645027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks N, Streeten P (1979) Indicators of development: the search for a basic needs yardstic. World Dev 7:567–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson J, Kühner S (2013) Beyond indices: the potential of fuzzy set ideal type analysis for cross-national analysis of policy outcomes. Policy Soc 32(4):303–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Invernizzi DC, Locatelli G, Brookes N, Davis A (2020) Qualitative comparative analysis as a method for project studies: the case of energy infrastructure. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 133:110314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishida A (2009) Application potentialities of the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis: reconstruction of the Human Development Index by fsQCA. Sociol Theory Methods 24(2):203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam SM, Clarke M (2002) The relationship between economic development and social welfare: a new adjusted GDP measure of welfare. Soc Indic Res 57(2):201–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivankova N, Wingo N (2018) Applying mixed methods in action research: methodological potentials and advantages. Am Behav Sci 62(7):978–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabłoński Ł (2011) Kapitał ludzki w wybranych modelach wzrostu gospodarczego. Gospodarka Narodowa Polish J Econ 245(1–2):81–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ (2004) Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res 33(7):14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung J, Peacock A, Colledge S, Grebely J, Cunningham EB, Hickman M et al (2019) A global meta-analysis of the prevalence of HIV, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus among people who ınject drugs—do gender-based differences vary by country-level ındicators? J Infect Dis 220(1):78–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu C, Nie F, Ren D (2021) Temporal and spatial evolution of China’s Human Development Index and its determinants: an extended study based on five new development concepts. Soc Indic Res 157(1):247–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López-Casasnovas G, Soley-Bori M (2014) The socioeconomic determinants of health: economic growth and health in the OECD countries during the last three decades. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11(1):815–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maniyalath N, Narendran R (2016) The human development index predicts female entrepreneurship rates. Int J Entrepreneurial Behav Res 22(5):745–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark QJ (2014) Global variance in female population height: the influence of education, income, human development, life expectancy, mortality and gender inequality in 96 nations. J Biosoc Sci 46(1):107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins NO (2020) Human development: which way now? New Polit Econ 25(3):404–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxcy SJ (2003) Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: the search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In: Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, pp 51–89

  • McMahon F (2012) Towards a worldwide index of human freedom. Fraser Institute, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Melgar N, Rossi M, Smith TW (2010) The perception of corruption. Int J Public Opin Res 22(1):120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Mo PH (2001) Corruption and economic growth. J Comp Econ 29(1):66–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollayeva T, Mollayeva S, Pacheco N, Colantonio A (2021) Systematic review of sex and gender effects in traumatic brain injury: equity in clinical and functional outcomes. Front Neurol 12:678971. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.678971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse S (2003) Greening the United Nations’ Human Development Index? Sustain Dev 11(4):183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nzabonimpa JP (2018) Quantitizing and qualitizing (im-) possibilities in mixed methods research. Methodol Innov 11(2):2059799118789021

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordanini A, Parasuraman A, Rubera G (2014) When the recipe is more important than the ingredients a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of service innovation configurations. J Serv Res 17(2):134–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010) PISA 2009 results: what students know and can do: student performance in reading, mathematics and science, vol I. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco JPG, Silveira JB, Ferreira RPC, Lo K, Schineider JR, Giacomin HTA, San Tam WW (2019) Gender inequality and depression among medical students: a global meta-regression analysis. J Psychiatr Res 111:36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamuk Ş (2019) Türkiye’nin 200 Yillik iktisadi Tarihi. Turkiye Is Bankasi Kultur Yayinlari, Istanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey RS (1993) Development, peace and human rights in South Asia. Indian J Soc Work 54:537–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas IO, Woodside AG (2021) Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): guidelines for research practice in information systems and marketing. Int J Inf Manag 58:102310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paykani T, Rafiey H, Sajjadi H (2018) A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis of 131 countries: which configuration of the structural conditions can explain health better? Int J Equity Health 17(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinar M, Stengos T, Topaloglou N (2013) Measuring human development: a stochastic dominance approach. J Econ Growth 18(1):69–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podobnik B, Shao J, Njavro D, Ivanov PC, Stanley HE (2008) Influence of corruption on economic growth rate and foreign investment. Eur Phys J B 63(4):547–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M, Sachs J, Cornelius P, McArthur J, Schwab K (2002) The global competitiveness report 2001–2002. World Economic Forum and Harvard University

  • Powdthavee N, Van Den Berg B (2011) Putting different price tags on the same health condition: re-evaluating the well-being valuation approach. J Health Econ 30(5):1032–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qizilbash M (2001) Corruption and human development: a conceptual discussion. Oxf Dev Stud 29(3):265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC (1987) The comparative method: moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC (2008) Measurement versus calibration: a set‐theoretic approach. In: The Oxford handbook of political methodology, pp 174–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0008

  • Ragin CC (2009) Redesigning social inquiry. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin CC, Patros Strand SIT, Rubinson C (2017) User’s guide to fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis. University of California

  • Ranis G (2004) Human development and economic growth. Available at SSRN 551662

  • Ranis G, Stewart F, Ramirez A (2000) Economic growth and human development. World Dev 28(2):197–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranis G, Stewart F, Samman E (2006) Human development: beyond the human development index. J Hum Dev 7(3):323–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasoolimanesh SM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Olya H (2021) The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: Partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Int J Contemp Hospitality Manage 33(5):1571–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratsimbaharison AM (2018) Democracy, democratization, and development in Post-Cold War Africa (1990–2012). Curr Res J Soc Sci Hum 1:60

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinert KA (2021) The Basic Needs Approach. Elgar Encyclopedia of Development

  • Rihoux B, Ragin C (2004) Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): State of the art and prospects. In: APSA 2004 Annual Meeting, Panel, pp 47–49

  • Rihoux B, Ragin CC (2008) Configurational comparative methods: qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagar AD, Najam A (1998) The Human Development Index: a critical review. Ecol Econ 25(3):249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salas-Bourgoin MA (2014) A proposal for a modified Human Development Index. Cepal Review. https://hdl.handle.net/11362/37019

  • Sandelowski M (2000) Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection, and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Res Nurs Health 23(3):246–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarabia M, Crecente F, del Val MT, Giménez M (2020) The Human Development Index (HDI) and the Corruption Perception Index (CPI) 2013–2017: analysis of social conflict and populism in Europe. Econo Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja 33(1):2943–2955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider CQ, Wagemann C (2012) Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: a guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schüler D (2006) The uses and misuses of the Gender-Related Development Index and gender empowerment measure: a review of the literature. J Hum Dev 7(2):161–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seers D (1963) The limitations of the special case 1. Bull Oxford Univ Inst Econ Stat 25(2):77–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šečkutė V, Giedraitis VR, Rastenienė A (2014) Capitalism: its varieties and relationship with the Corruption Perceptions Index. Ekonomika 93(3):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shabbir G, Anwar M (2007) Determinants of corruption in developing countries. The Pakistan development review, pp 751–764

  • Solimano A (ed) (2005) Political crises, social conflict and economic development: the political economy of the Andean region. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan TN (1994) Human development: a new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel? Am Econ Rev 84(2):238–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Strozzi AG, Peláez-Ballestas I, Granados Y, Burgos-Vargas R, Quintana R, Londoño J et al (2020) Syndemic and syndemogenesis of low back pain in Latin–American population: a network and cluster analysis. Clin Rheumatol 39(9):2715–2726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suri T, Boozer MA, Ranis G, Stewart F (2011) Paths to success: the relationship between human development and economic growth. World Dev 39(4):506–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (2003) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A, Teddlie C, Teddlie CB (1998) Mixed methodology: combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, vol 46. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie C, Tashakkori A (2009) Foundations of mixed methods research. Sage Publications Inc., Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Travnickova Z (2018) Geocaching: global game ın the light of freedom ındices. Globalizatıon and ıts socio-economic consequences. In: 18th ınternational scientific conference on globalization and ıts socio-economic consequences, pp 2369–2376

  • Turczak A, Zwiech P (2014) Variability of household disposable income per capita by types of residence in Poland. Stat Trans New Ser 4(15):573–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Udaltsova MV, Abramova EA (2020) Socıal well-being as a factor of freedom. Tomsk State Univ J Philos Sociol Polıt Scı 54:208–217

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (1990) Human development report. Concept and measurement of human development. United Nations Development Program, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Human Development Program (UNDP) (2018) STATISTICAL UPDATE 2018 Human Development Indices and Indicators. http://report2017.archive.s3-website-us-east-1.amazonaws.com/

  • Vásquez I, McMahon F (2020a) The Human Freedom Index 2020a. In: A global measurement of personal, civil, and economic freedom. Cato Institute and the Fraser Institute

  • Vásquez I, McMahon F (2020b) The Human Freedom Index 2020b. Fraser Institute

  • Vásquez I, Štumberger T (2012) An index of freedom in the world. Towards a worldwide index of human freedom, 55

  • Welzel C (2006) Democratization as an emancipative process: the neglected role of mass motivations. Eur J Polit Res 45(6):871–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm PG (2002) International validation of the corruption perceptions index: implications for business ethics and entrepreneurship education. J Bus Ethics 35(3):177–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff H, Chong H, Auffhammer M (2009) Human Development Index: are developing countries misclassified? (former title: Consequences of Data Error in Aggregate Indicators: Evidence from the Human Development Index) (No. 319-2016-9853)

  • Woodside AG (2016) Bad to good: achieving high quality and ımpact in your research. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R, Lepinteur A, Clark AE, D’ambrosio C (2021) Life satisfaction and the human development index across the world. J Cross-Cultural Psychol 54(2):269–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022121104478

  • Zaman K, Imran M, Asif M (2019) Extended version of human development index with Millennium development goals: a case study of Pakistan. EuroEconomica 38(1). https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=794201

Internet Resources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Career Development, Application and Research Center, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya, Turkey

    Sergen Gürsoy

  2. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Labor Economics and Industrial Relations, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey

    Ayten Yagmur

  3. Faculty of Education, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey

    Ilhan Gunbayı

Authors
  1. Ayten Yagmur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sergen Gürsoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ilhan Gunbayı
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergen Gürsoy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose. In addition, there is no financial support for this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yagmur, A., Gürsoy, S. & Gunbayı, I. Mixed-methods analysis of multidimensional conditions for the Human Development Index: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (FsQCA) study. J. Soc. Econ. Dev. 26, 214–234 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-023-00265-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-023-00265-w

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation