Skip to main content
Log in

A catalog of models for multiplication and division of whole numbers

  • Published:
Educational Studies in Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The above catalog contains fifteen headings, each of which indicates a collection of families of models for multiplication and division of whole numbers. The catalog refers to somewhat more than sixteen families of models which are easily distinguished one from the other.

Not included in the catalog thus far developed are several interpretations of multiplication and division that are also of interest. Among these are models based on the equivalency of denominations of money and various units of measurement. Other interpretations which are of historical interest are those of McLellan and Dewey [15] and Thorndike [24]. The relation between models of operations on whole numbers and models of operations defined on larger universal sets is also of interest. One aspect of this area of interest is the process of constructing models of multiplication and division of whole numbers from such models by altering the rules of the model or delimiting its universal set. For example, one can begin with one of Diénès' models of multiplication of integers [8, pp. 57–58] and make approapriate adjustments and result in a model of multiplication of whole numbers. Other interpretations developed by Diénès are of interest because they involve concretizations of whole numbers which are operators as opposed to states [8, pp. 12, 30; 9, p, 36].

These are a great many strategies available for the use of models in teaching the operations on whole numbers. In one such strategy, an educator can define either multiplication or division on some basis (most likely in terms of a model) and then the other can be defined as its inverse.

Another strategy is to define each operation in terms of a different model. For example, one might define multiplication in terms of the repeated addition model and division in terms of the repeated subtraction model.

Still another type of procedure involves a multiple embodiment strategy in which several interpretations are taught as representing each operation.

The choice of a particular strategy would depend upon a great many factors. Some of the factors would be the type of culture and students for which the program is written, the psychological assumptions adopted by the writer, and the writer's knowledge of the domain of models for the operations as well as their relation to the abstract mathematical domain which they represent. This article has contributed to a basis for intelligent decisions in this area by presenting a characterization of the domain of models for multiplication and division of whole numbers and their relation to the abstract operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Apostel, L.: 1961, ‘Towards the Formal Study of Models in the Non-Formal Sciences’, The Concept of the Role of the Model in Mathematics and Natural and Social Sciences, Proceedings of the Colloquium sponsored by the Division of Philosophy of Sciences of the International Union of History and Philosophy of Sciences, Gordon and Breach, New York.

  2. AdlerI.: 1958, The New Mathematics, J. Day Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BourbakiN.: 1950, ‘The Architecture of Mathematics’, American Mathematical Monthyl 57, translated by A. Dresden, 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BraunfeldP. and M.Wolfe: 1966, ‘Fractions for Low Achievers’, The Arithmetic Teacher 13, 647–655.

    Google Scholar 

  5. BraunfeldP., C.Dilley, and W.Rucker: 1967, ‘A New UICSM Approach to Fractions for the Junior High School’, The Mathematics Teacher 60, 215–221.

    Google Scholar 

  6. ByrneR. J.: 1966, Modern Elementary Mathematics, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cambridge Conference on School Mathematics: 1965, Reports of 1965 Summer Study, Section II, Chapter 4, Educational Services Inc., Newton, Mass.

  8. DiénèsZ. P.: 1964, Mathematics in the Primary School, Macmillan Co. of Canada, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DiénèsZ. P. and E. W.Golding: 1966, Sets, Numbers, and Powers, Herder and Herder, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eicholz R. E. et al.: 1963, Elementary School Mathematics, Book 2, Teachers' Edition, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Educational Research Council of Greater Cleveland: 1961, Greater Cleveland Mathematics Program 2, Science Research Associates, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  12. GattegnoC.: 1960, Modern Mathematics with Numbers in Colour, Cuisenaire Co. of America, Mt. Vernon. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hartung M. L. et al.: 1960, Charting the Course for Arithmetic, Scott, Foresman and Co., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  14. HerveyM. A.: 1966, ‘Children's Responses to Two Types of Multiplication Problems’, The Arithmetic Teacher 13, 288–292.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McLellanJ. A. and J.Dewey: 1895, The Psychology of Number, Appleton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Minnesota School Mathematics and Science Center: 1966, Minne Math and Science Teaching Project, Unit XIX, Minnesota School Mathematics and Science Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minn.

    Google Scholar 

  17. MontessoriM.: 1964, The Montessori Method, translated by Anne E. George, Schocken Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  18. OhmerM. M. and C. V.Aucoin: 1966, Modern Mathematics for Elementary Teachers, Blaisdell, Waltham, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P and H Educational Aids: Elementary Equation Balance, P and H Educational Aids, Dallas, Tex.

  20. Plumly Manufacturing Corporation: Flash-Dial, Plumly Manufacturing Corporation, Fort Worth, Tex.

  21. School Mathematics Study Group: 1962, Mathematics for the Elementary School, Grade 4, Part 1. A. C. Vronan's, Pasadena, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  22. SuppesP.: October 25, 1965, The Psychological Foundations of Mathematics, Technical Report No. 80, Psychology Series, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  23. SwainR. L.: 1960, ‘Modern Mathematics and School Arithmetic’, in Instruction in Arithmetic, Twenty-Fifth Yearbook, The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Washington, D.C..

    Google Scholar 

  24. ThorndikeE. L.: 1921, The New Methods in Arithmetic, Rand McNally, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  25. VestF. R.: 1969, ‘A Catalog of Models for the Operations of Addition and Subtraction of Whole Numbers”, Educational Studies in Mathematics 2, 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vest F. R.: 1969, ‘An Analysis of the Representational Relationship Between the Operations on Whole Numbers and Their Models’, Journal of Structural Learning 2, No. 4.

  27. Vest, F. R.: 1968, ‘Development of the “Model Construct” and Its Application to Elementary School Mathematics’, unpublished doctoral dissertation, School of Education, North Texas State University, Denton, Texas.

  28. Wirtz R. W. et al.: 1962, Workshop for Children, Encyclopaedia Britannica Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vest, F.R. A catalog of models for multiplication and division of whole numbers. Educ Stud Math 3, 220–228 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305450

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305450

Keywords

Navigation