Skip to main content
Log in

Acoustic communication in phaneropterid bushcrickets: species-specific delay of female stridulatory response and matching male sensory time window

  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The stridulatory sounds and movements produced by the females of various bushcricket species (Tettigonoidea: Phaneropteridae: Barbitistini) are compared with those of the males. Behavioral experiments are carried out to determine the significance of the female sounds in acoustic communication. Selection factors involved in the evolution of female stridulation are discussed. The morphological apparatus for sound production has evolved independently in males and females. Whereas males rub a toothed file on the underside of the left wing over the inner edge of the right wing, the plectrum, the females stridulate by rubbing a thickened vein on the underside of the left wing over modified spines on the upper surface of the right wing (Fig. 2). Similarly, the movements responsible for sound production are not homologous in males and females. In the male the audible closing movement is always preceded by wing opening, whereas the female in general initiates the closing movement when the wings are in the resting slightly opened position, and abruptly produces complete closure (Fig. 3, 4 and 5). The female responds to male singing by emitting one to several highly damped sound pulses each lasting less than one ms. The interval between the song of a conspecific male and this response is a very precise species-specific characteristic (Fig. 7). In species with male songs that are complicated in structure or continuous, the females respond only at specific time-after patticular “markers” in the song of the male. The time interval between male song and female response is an important criterion by which the male identifies conspecific female song (Fig. 8). Because the response delay of the female and corresponding “neuronal time window” in the male are distinct they may be important in species discrimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander RD (1960) Sound communication in Orthoptera and Cicadidae. In: Lanyon, Tavolga (eds) Animal sounds and communication. Am Inst Biol Sci Publ 7:38–92

  • Allard HA (1929) Our insect instrumentalists and their musical technique. Ann Rep Seer Smithsonian Inst (for 1928):563–591

  • Ayal Y, Broza M, Pener MP (1973) A new species of the genus Phaneroptera Serville (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae) from Southern Israel and Sinai with some data on its biology. Isr J Zool 22:83–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey WJ, Thiele DR (1983) Male spacing behaviour in the Tettigoniidae: An experimental approach. In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, pp 163–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Beier M (1948) Das Genus Panoploscelis Scudder (Orthop-Pseudophyllinae). Proc VIII Int Congr Entomol Stockholm: 111–115

  • Boldyrev BT (1928) Biological studies on Bradyporus multituberculatus F. W. (Orth., Tettig.). Eos (Madrid) 4:13–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber A (1953) Laut- und Gebärdensprache bei Insekten. Orthoptera (Geradflügler) Teil I. Staatl Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart S1–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulton BB (1983) Stridulating organs of female Tettigoniidae (Orthoptera). Entomol News 44:270–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt U (1914) Copulation und Spermatophoren von Grylliden und Locustiden II. Zool Jahrb (Syst) 37:1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Graber V (1872) Über den Tonapparat der Locustiden, ein Beitrag zum Darwinismus. Z Wissensch Zool 22:100–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne DT (1981) Sexual difference theory: Mormon crickets show reversal in mate choice. Science 213:779–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley JC, Robinson DJ (1976) Acoustic behaviour of both sexes of the speckled bush cricket Leptophyes punctatissima. Physiol Entomol 1:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley JC, Robinson DJ, Warne AC (1974) Female response song in the ephippigerines Steropleurus stali and Platystolus obvius (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Anim Behav 22:382–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedwig B, Elsner N (1985) Sound production and sound detection in a stridulating acridid grasshopper (Omocestus viridulus). In: Kalmring K, Elsner N (eds) Acoustic and vibrational communication in insects. Parey, Berlin Hamburg, pp 61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller KG (1984) Zur Bioakustik und Phylogenie der Gattung Poecilimon (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Phaneropterinae). Zool Jahrb (Syst) 111:69–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Helversen D von, Helversen O von (1983) Species recognition and acoustic localization in acridid grasshoppers: a behavioural approach. In: Huber F, Markl H (eds) Neuroethology and behavioural physiology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo pp 95–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Helversen O von, Elsner N (1977) The stridulatory movements of acridid grasshoppers recorded with an opto-electronic device. J Comp Physiol 122:53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry GM (1939) Stridulatory mechanism in the female tegmina of Scaphurinae. Ceylon J Sci Sect B 21:185–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy Y (1971) Ultrastructure des organes stridulants des femelles de Tettigonoidea (Insectes, Orthoptères, Ensiféres). C R Acad Sci Paris 272 D:2699–2701

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd JE (1977) Bioluminescence and communication. In: Sebeock TA (ed) How animals communicate. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, London, pp 164–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Lysaght AM (1931) Biological notes on a long-horned grass-hopper, Caedicia simplex (Walk.). N Z J Sci Tech 12:296–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris GK, Fullard JH (1983) Random noise and congeneric discrimination in Conocephalus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). In: Gwynne DT, Morris GK (eds) Orthopteran mating systems. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado pp 73–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickle AD (1976) Interspecific differences in frequency and other physical parameters of pair forming sounds of bush katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae: Phaneropterinae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 69:1136–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickle AD, Carlysle TC (1975) Morphology and function of female sound-producing structures in ensiferan Orthoptera with special emphasis on the Phaneropterinae. Int J Insect Morphol Embryol 4:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Papi F (1969) Light emission, sex attraction and male flash dialogues in a firefly, Luciola lusitanica (Charp.). Monit Zool Ital 3:135–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Regen J (1903) Über die Stridulationsorgane der saltatoren Orthopteren. Arb Wiener Zool Inst 14:359–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Rheinlaender J, Hardt M, Robinson D (1985) The directional sensitivity of a bushcricket ear: A behavioural and neurophysiological study. Physiol Entomol (in press)

  • Robinson DJ (1980) Acoustic communication between the sexes of the bushcricket Leptophyes punctatissima. Physiol Entomol 5:183–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DJ, Rheinlaender J, Hartley JC (1985) Temporal parameters of the male-female communication in Leptophyes punctatissima Bosc. Physiol Entomol (in press)

  • Rupprecht R (1975) Die Kommunikation von Sialis (Megaloptera) durch Vibrationssignale. J Insect Physiol 21:305–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner JD (1964) The Texas bush cricket-its sounds and their significance. Anim Behav 12:235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Spooner JD (1968) Pair-forming acoustic systems of phaneropterine katydids (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Anim Behav 16:197–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner F (1895) Über das Vorkommen von Rana arvalis Nilson in Niederösterreich und die Paarung von Ephippigera vitium Serv. Zool Anz 18:479–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickler W (1967) Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung und Phylogenetik. In: Heberer G (ed) Die Evolution der Organismen. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 420–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf H (1985) Monitoring the activity of an auditory interneuron in a free-moving grasshopper. In: Kalmring K, Elsner N (eds) Acoustic and vibrational communication in insects. Parey, Berlin Hamburg, pp 51–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhantiev RD, Dubrovin NN (1977) Sound communication in the genus Isophya (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae). Zool Zurnal 56:40–51 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heller, KG., von Helversen, D. Acoustic communication in phaneropterid bushcrickets: species-specific delay of female stridulatory response and matching male sensory time window. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18, 189–198 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290822

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00290822

Keywords

Navigation