Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of chemical facilitators on the frequency of electrofusion of tobacco mesophyll protoplast

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trypsin, pronase, protease, dispase, spermine, spermidine, and DMSO were characterized for their effect on the frequency of electrofusion of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. Protease (Boehringer Mannheim) and Sigma pronase (1.26 mg/ml; 15 min incubation) increased the fusion frequency from 7% (control) to 20.7% (2.9X increase). Following protease and pronase were trypsin (2.8X), spermine (2.4X), dispase (2.1X), DMSO (2.0X), and spermidine (1.4X). BM Protease and polyamines caused the least amount of damage, followed by DMSO and trypsin (26% and 24% decrease in viability respectively), pronase (41%) and dispase (57%). Callus formed from all but dispase-treated protoplasts. Shoots regenerated from calli of all but trypsin-treated protoplasts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BA:

6-Benzylaminopurine

BM:

Boehringer Mannheim

DMSO:

dimethyl sulfoxide

FDA:

fluorescein diacetate

FM:

protoplast fusion medium

HEPES:

N-2-hydroxyethylpiperazine-N′-2-ethanesulfonic acid, sodium salt

MES:

2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid

MS:

Murashige and Skoog (1962)

NAA:

α-Naphthaleneacetic acid

PEG:

polyethylene glycol

SE:

standard error of the mean

References

  • Altman A, Kaur-Sawhney R, Galston AW (1977) Plant Physiol. 60:570–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Apelbaum A, Icekson I, Burgoon AC, Lieberman M (1982) Plant Physiol. 70:1221–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates GW, Hasenkampf CA (1985) Theor. Appl. Genet. 70:227–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Boss WF, Grimes HD, Brightman A (1984) Protoplasma 120:209–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapel M, Teissie J, Alibert G (1984) FEBS Lett. 173:331–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN, Constabel F, Michayluk MR, Gamborg O (1972) Planta 103:348–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn H, Schieder R, Schieder O (1985) Plant Sci. 38:121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Menczel L, Wolfe K (1984) Plant Cell Reports 3:196–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol. Plant. 15:473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagata T, Melchers G (1978) Planta 142:235–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwood TH, Zeigler CJ, Martin GM (1976) Somatic Cell Genet. 2:263–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno-Shosaku T, Okada Y (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 120:138–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammler DH (1971) In: Jacob SW, Rosenbaum EE, Wood DC (ed) Dimethyl sulfoxide, Marcel Dekker, N.Y., pp 189–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotman BR, Papermaster RO (1966) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 55:134–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheurich P, Zimmermann U (1981) Naturwissenschaften 68:45–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Senn A, Pilet PE (1981) Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 102:19–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeda T, Senda M (1984) Plant and Cell Physiol. 25:619–624

    Google Scholar 

  • Tempelaar MJ, Jones MGK (1985) Plant Cell Reports 4:92–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Vienken J, Zimmermann U, Fouchard M, Zagury D (1983) FEBS Lett. 163:54–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann U, Pilwat G, Richter H-P (1981) Naturwissenschaften 68:577–579

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by G. C. Phillips

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruzin, S.E., McCarthy, S.C. The effect of chemical facilitators on the frequency of electrofusion of tobacco mesophyll protoplast. Plant Cell Reports 5, 342–345 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00268597

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00268597

Keywords

Navigation