Skip to main content
Log in

Fully automated data acquisition, processing, and display in equilibrium radioventriculography

  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fully automated data acquisition, processing, and display procedure was developed for equilibrium radioventriculography. After a standardized acquisition, the study is automatically analzyed to yield both right and left ventricular time-activity curves. The program first creates a series of edge-enhanced images (difference between squared images and scaled original images). A marker point within each ventricle is then identified as that pixel with maximum counts to the patient's right and left of the count center of gravity of a stroke volume image. Regions of interest are selected on each frame as the first contour of local maxima of the two-dimensional second derivative (pseudo-Laplacian) which encloses the appropriate marker point, using a method developed by Goris. After shifting the left ventricular end-systolic region of interest four pixels to the patient's left, a background region of interest is generated as the crescent-shaped area of the shifted region of interest not intersected by the end systolic region. The average counts/pixel in this background region in the end systolic frame of the origina study are subtracted from each pixel in all frames of the gated study. Right and left ventricular time-activity curves are then obtained by applying each region of interest to its corresponding background-subtracted frame, and the ejection fraction, end diastolic, end systolic, and stroke counts determined for both ventricles. In fourteen consecutive patients, in addition to the automatic ejection fractions, manually drawn regions of interest were used to obtain ejection fractions for both ventricles. The manual regions of interest were drawn twice, and the average obtained. For the right ventricle, the correlation between auto and average manual ejection fraction was 0.52; the correlation between the two manual ejection fractions was 0.88. For the left ventricle, the correlation between auto and average manual ejection fraction was 0.96; the correlation between the two manual ejection fractions was 0.91. Automated processing is essential for the accurate and reproducible assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bianco JA, Makey DG, Laskey WK, Shafer DB (1979) Radionuclide left ventricular dV/dt for the assessment of cardiac function in patients with coronary disease. J Nucl Med 20:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borer JS, Bacharach SL, Green MV, Kent KM, Epstein SE, Johnston GS (1977) Realtime radionuclide cineangiography in the noninvasive evaluation of globel and regional left ventricular function at rest and during exercise in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 296:839–844

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burow RD, Strauss HW, Singleton R, Pond M, Rehn T, Bailey IK, Griffith LC, Nickoloff E, Pitt B (1977) Analysis of left ventricular function from multiple gated acquisition (MUGA) cardiac blood pool imaging. Comparison to contrast angiography. Circulation 56:1024–1028

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bourguignon MH, Schindledecker JG, Burow RD, Camargo EE, Becker LC, Wagner HN Jr (1980) Quantitication of left ventricular volume by equilibrium radioventriculography. Am J Cardiol 45:397 (Abst)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bourguignon MH, Schindledecker JG, Carey GA, Douglass KH, Burow RD, Camargo EE, Becker LC, Wagner HN Jr (1981) Quantification of left ventricular volume in gated equilibrium radioventriculography. Eur J Nucl Med 6:349–353

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang W, Henkin RE, Itale DJ, Hall D (1980) Methods for detection of left ventricular edges. Sem Nucl Med 10:39–53

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ganz WI, Weyler JP, Brenner AI, Bontemps R, Steingart R, Blaufox MD (1980) Variability of resting gated ejection fraction. J Nucl Med 21: p. 63 (Abstrt)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goris ML, Briandet PA: Operator independent determination of left ventricular region of interest in nuclear angiography. Cardiovascular Radiology, in press

  9. Links JM, Becker LC, Schindledecker JG, Guzman P, Burow RD, Nickoloff E, Alderson PO, Wagner HN Jr. Measurement of absolute left ventricular volume from gated blood pool studies. Circulation, in press

  10. Maddahi J, Berman DS, Matsuoka DT, Waxman AD, Stankus KE, Forrester JS, and Swan HJC (1979) A new technique for assessing right ventricular ejection fraction using rapid multiple-gated equilibrium cardiac blood pool scintigraphy. Circulation 60:581–589

    Google Scholar 

  11. Qureshi S, Wagner HN, Alderson PO, Housholder DF, Douglass KH, Lotter MG, Nickoloff EL, Tanabe M, Knowles LG (1978) Evaluation of left ventricular function in normal persons and patients with heart disease. J Nucl Med 19:135–141

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rigo P, Alderson PO, Robertson RM, Becker LC, Wagner HN (1979) Measurememt of aortic and mitral regurgitation by gated cardiac blood pool scans. Circulation 60:306–312

    Google Scholar 

  13. Upton MJ, Reych SK, Newman GE, Bounous EP, Jones RG (1980) The reproductibility of radionuclide angiographic measurements of left ventricular function in normal subjects at rest and during exercise. Circulation 62:126–132

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported in part by USPHS Grant Nos. HL 20674 and GM 10548

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bourguignon, M.H., Douglass, K.H., Links, J.M. et al. Fully automated data acquisition, processing, and display in equilibrium radioventriculography. Eur J Nucl Med 6, 343–347 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251335

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00251335

Keywords

Navigation