Abstract
Radionuclide-based techniques have been used to measure ventricular function for over three decades [1–8]. The methods for measurement of ventricular function can be divided into two basic categories. The first category employs any tracer that can directly label the blood pool itself. One then examines the deformity of the cavitary blood pool as it is moved by the thickening and systolic motion of the myocardial walls. With these methods one can directly image the blood pool in the ventricular cavity throughout the cardiac cycle. The second category of methods for measurement of ventricular function uses tracers that label the myocardial walls (e.g., 99mTc-sestamibi, [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose). One then examines how those walls thicken and translate, move, or contract throughout the cardiac cycle. With this method one can directly image the myocardium throughout the cardiac cycle. Active movement or contraction of the inner endocardial wall of the ventricular chamber compresses the blood pool and deforms the ventricular cavity and is the conventional marker for systolic ventricular wall motion or function. Only this method permits the evaluation of myocardial wall thickening, a marker of systolic function and viability that can help separate passive systolic wall motion from active myocardial contraction. This method for measuring ventricular mechanical function simultaneously yields a measurement of myocardial perfusion or of metabolism (depending on the tracer used to label the myocardium). However, this advantage is also a source of one of the method’s disadvantages, namely, that if perfusion or metabolism is reduced in a particular segment of the myocardium, then that segment is not easily visualized, hampering visualization of wall motion or thickening in that segment. Temporal and spatial resolution of the related functional image data is not as good as the blood pool method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hoffmann G, Klein N. Die methode der radiokardiographischen funktions analyse. Nuklearmedizin. 1968;7:350–70.
Strauss HW, Zaret BL, Hurley PJ. A scintiphotographic method for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction in man without cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 1971;28:575–80.
Zaret BL, Strauss HW, Hurley PJ. A noninvasive scintiphotographic method for detecting regional ventricular dysfunction in man. N Engl J Med. 1971;284:1165–70.
Parker JA, Secker-Walker R, Hill R. A new technique for the calculation of left ventricular ejection fraction. J Nucl Med. 1972;13:649–51.
Green MV, Ostrow HG, Douglas MA, et al. High temporal resolution ECG-gated scintigraphic angiocardiography. J Nucl Med. 1975;16:95–8.
Steele P, Kirch D, LeFree M, et al. Measurement of right and left ventricular ejection fractions by radionuclide angiocardiography in coronary artery disease. Chest. 1976;70:51–6.
Bacharach SL, Green MV, Borer JS. A real-time system for multi-image gated cardiac studies. J Nucl Med. 1977;18:79–84.
Borer JS, Bacharach SL, Green MV. Real-time radionuclide cineangiography in the noninvasive evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function at rest and during exercise in patients with coronary-artery disease. N Engl J Med. 1977;296:839–44.
Freedman NMT, Bacharach SL, Cuocolo A, et al. ECG gated PET C-11 monoxide studies: an answer to the “background” question in planar Tc-99m gated blood pool imaging. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:938.
Boyd HL, Gunn RN, Marinho NV, Kanwatowski SP, Bailey DL, Costa DC, et al. Non-invasive measurement of left ventricular volumes and function by gated positron emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996;23:1594–602.
Fischman AJ, Moore RH, Gill JB, et al. Gated blood pool tomography—a technology whose time has come. Semin Nucl Med. 1989;19:13–21.
Underwood SR, Walton S, Laming PJ, et al. Left ventricular volume and ejection fraction determined by gated blood pool emission tomography. Br Heart J. 1985;53:216–22.
Ishino Y. Assessment of cardiac function and left ventricular regional wall motion by 99mTc multigated cardiac blood-pool emission computed tomography. Kaku Igaku. 1992;29:1069–81.
Bartlett ML, Srinivasan G, Barker WC, et al. Left ventricular ejection fraction: comparison of results from planar and SPECT gated blood-pool studies. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1795–9.
Borer J, Supino P. Radionuclide angiography part II: equilibrium imaging. In: Iskandrian AE, Verani MS, editors. Nuclear cardiac imaging: principles and applications. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 323–67.
Botvinick EH, O’Connell JW, Kadkade PJ, et al. The potential added value of three-dimensional reconstruction and display of SPECT gated blood pool images. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;25:509–14.
Gill JB, Moore RH, Tamaki N, et al. Multigated blood-pool tomography: new method for the assessment of left ventricular function. J Nucl Med. 1986;27:1916–24.
Groch MW, Marshall RC, Erwin WD, et al. Quantitative gated blood pool SPECT for the assessment of coronary artery disease at rest. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;5:567–73.
Groch MW, Marshall RC, Schippers D, et al. Three dimensional analysis of gated blood pool SPECT: applicability of multiple reference models. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:45P–145.
Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Wachter P. A new algorithm for the quantitation of myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:712–9.
Bartlett ML, Buvat I, Vaquero JJ, et al. Measurement of myocardial wall thickening from PET/SPECT images: comparison of two methods. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:473–81.
Cooke CD, Garcia EV, Cullom SJ, et al. Determining the accuracy of calculating systolic wall thickening using a fast Fourier transform approximation: a simulation study based on canine and patient data. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:1185–92.
Garcia E, Bacharach SL, Mahmarian JJ, et al. Imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures: part 1. J Nucl Med. 1996;3:G3–46.
Botvinick EH, editor. Topic 7, radionuclide angiography: equilibrium and first pass methods. Self-study program III. In: Botvinick E, editor. Nuclear medicine: cardiology. Reston: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 2007.
Botvinick EH, Glazer H, Shosa D. What is the relationship and utility of scintigraphic methods for the assessment of ventricular function? Cardiovasc Clin. 1983;13:65–78.
Bodenheier MM, Banka FS, Fooshee CM. Quantitative radionuclide angiography in the right anterior oblique view: comparison with contrast ventriculography. Am J Cardiol. 1978;41:718–25.
Marshall RC, Berger HJ, Costin JC. Assessment of cardiac performance with quantitative radionuclide angiocardiography. Circulation. 1977;56:820–9.
VanDyke D, Anger HO, Sullivan RW. Cardiac evaluation from radioisotope dynamics. J Nucl Med. 1972;13:585–92.
Bacharach SL, Green MV, Borer SJ. Instrumentation and data processing in cardiovascular nuclear medicine: evaluation of ventricular function. Semin Nucl Med. 1979;9:257–74.
Wackers JF. New horizons for myocardial perfusion imaging with technetium-99m labeled isonitrile. In: Pohost GM, Higgins CB, Nanda NC, et al., editors. New concepts in cardiac imaging. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1989. p. 93–108.
Upton MT, Rerych SK, Newman GE, et al. Detecting abnormalities in left ventricular function during exercise before angina and ST segment depression. Circulation. 1980;62:341–9.
Udelson JE, Dilsizian V, Bonow RO. Nuclear cardiology. In: Libby P, Zipes DP, Mann DL, Bonow RO, editors. Braunwald’s heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2007. p. 287–331.
Garcia E, Botvinick EH, Hasagawa B, Ratzlaff N. Topic 1, Physical and technical aspects of nuclear cardiology. Self-study program III. In: Botvinick E, editor. Nuclear medicine: cardiology. Reston: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 2003.
Maltz OL, Treves S. Quantitative radionuclide angiocardiography. Determination of Qp/Qs in children. Circulation. 1973;76:1049.
Bacharach SL, Green MV. Data processing in nuclear cardiology: measurement of ventricular function. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1982;29:1343–54.
Strauss HW, Zaret BW, Hurley PJ. A scintigraphic method for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction in man without cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 1971;28:575–83.
Parker DA, Karvelis KC, Thrall JH, Froelich JW. Radionuclide ventriculography: methods. In: Cardiac nuclear medicine. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 1997.
Groch MW, Marshall RC, Erwin WD, Schippers DJ, Barnett CA, Leidholdt Jr EM. Quantitative gated blood pool SPECT for the assessment of coronary artery disease at rest. J Nucl Cardiol. 1998;5:567–73.
Links JM, Frank TL, Engdahl JC, et al. Cardiac single-photon emission tomography with a 90-degrees dual-head system. Eur J Nucl Med. 1995;22:548–52.
Underwood SR, Walton S, Ell PJ, et al. Gated blood-pool emission tomography: a new technique for the investigation of cardiac structure and function. Eur J Nucl Med. 1985;10:332–7.
Bacharach SL, Green MV, Borer JS, et al. Left-ventricular peak ejection rate, filling rate, and ejection fraction—frame rate requirements at rest and exercise. J Nucl Med. 1979;20:189–93.
Bacharach SL et al. Assessment of ventricular function. In: Pohost GM, O’Rourke RA, Berman DS, Shah PM, editors. Imaging in cardiovascular disease. Philadelphia: Lipincott Williams and Williams; 2000. Bacharach SL, Green MV, Borer JS et al. Beat-by-beat validation of ECG gating. J Nucl Med. 1980;21:307–13.
Bonow R, Bacharach SL, Green MV. Impaired left ventricular diastolic filling in patients with coronary artery disease assessment with radionuclide angiography. Circulation. 1981;64:315–23.
Botvinick EH, Dae MW, O’Connell JW. Blood pool scintigraphy. Clin Cardiol. 1989;7:537–63.
Patel CD, Balakrishnan VB, Kumar L, Naswa N, Malhotra A. Does left ventricular diastolic function deteriorate earlier than left ventricular systolic function in anthracycline cardiotoxicity? Hell J Nucl Med. 2010;13:233–7.
Appel JM, Jensen BV, Nielsen DL, Ryberg M, Zerahn B. Systolic versus diastolic cardiac function variables during epirubicin treatment for breast cancer. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;26:217–23.
Dae MW, Botvinick EH, O’Connell JW. Atrial corrected Fourier amplitude ratios for the scintigraphic quantitation of valvar regurgitation. Am J Noninvas Cardiol. 1987;1:155–62.
Frais M, Botvinick E, Shosa D, O’Connell JW. Phase image characterization of ventricular contraction in left and right bundle branch block. Am J Cardiol. 1982;50:95–103.
Kerwin W, Botvinick EH, O’Connell JW. Ventricular contraction abnormalities in dilated cardiomyopathy: acute effects of dual chamber simultaneous biventricular pacing to correct interventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1221–7.
Munoz del Romeral L, Stillson C, Lesh M, Dae M, Botvinick E. The relationship of myocardial contraction and electrical excitation—the correlation between scintigraphic phase image analysis and electrophysiologic mapping. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:792–800.
Munoz del Romeral L, Stillson C, Lesh M, Botvinick E. The variable functional effects of the pacing site in normal and scarred ventricles. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:904–13.
O’Connell JW, Schreck C, Moles M, et al. A unique method by which to quantitate synchrony with equilibrium radionuclide angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:441–50.
Lalonde M, Birnie D, Ruddy TD, deKemp RA, Wassenaar RW. SPECT blood pool phase analysis can accurately and reproducibly quantify mechanical dyssynchrony. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:803–10.
Nichols KJ, Van Tosh A, Wnag Y, Palestro CJ, Reichek N. Validation of gated blood pool SPECT regional left ventricular function measurements. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:53–60.
Harel F, Finnerty V, Gregoire J, Thibault B, Marcotte F, Ugoloni P, Khairy P. Gated blood pool SPECT versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17:427–34.
Oeff M, Scheinman MM, Abbott JA, et al. Phase image triangulation of accessory pathways in patients undergoing catheter ablation of posteroseptal pathways. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991;14:1072–80.
Germano G. Technical aspects of myocardial SPECT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1499–507.
The Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, American College of Cardiology; The Committee on Advanced Cardiac Imaging and Technology, Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association; and Board of Directors, Cardiovascular Council, Society of Nuclear Medicine. Standardization of cardiac tomographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:255–6.
Germano G, Berman D. Acquisition and processing for gated perfusion SPECT: technical aspects. In: Germano G, Berman D, editors. Clinical gated cardiac SPECT. Armonk: Futura; 1999. p. 93–113.
Nakajima K, Higuchi T, Taki J, et al. Accuracy of ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by gated myocardial SPECT: comparison of 4 software programs. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:1571–8.
Schaefer WM, Lipke CSA, Standke D, et al. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT: MRI validation and comparison of the Emory Cardiac Tool Box with QGS and 4D-MSPECT. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1256–63.
Xia W, Lv Z, Wang G, Cai H, Ni J, Zhang Y, Ye B. A comparison and validation of blood-pool imaging and ECG-gated SPET myocardial perfusion imaging to assess left ventricular ejection fraction. Hell J Nucl Med. 2010;13(3):241–5.
Nakajima K, Nishimura T. Inter-institution preference-based variability of ejection fraction and volumes using quantitative gated SPECT with Tc-99m-tetrofosmin: a multicentre study involving 106 hospitals. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:127–33.
Honda N, Machida K, Mamiya T, et al. Two-dimensional polar display of cardiac blood pool SPECT. Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15:133–6.
Links JM, Devous MD. 3-dimensional display in nuclear medicine: a more useful depiction of reality, or only a superficial rendering? J Nucl Med. 1995;36:703–4.
Metcalfe MJ, Cross S, Norton MY, et al. Polar map or novel three-dimensional display technique for the improved detection of inferior wall myocardial infarction using tomographic radionuclide ventriculography. Nucl Med Commun. 1994;15:330–40.
Botvinick EH, Hoffman JIE, Maddahi J, Garcia E, Rodrigues EA,Van Train K, Berman DS. Topic 5, Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy-technical aspects. Self-study program III. In: Botvinick E, editor. Nuclear medicine: cardiology. Reston: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 2003.
Indovina AG. Three-dimensional surface display in blood pool gated SPECT. Angiology. 1994;45:861–6.
Taillefer R, DePuey EG, Udelson JE, et al. Comparison between the end-diastolic images and the summed images of gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT perfusion study in detection of coronary artery disease in women. J Nucl Cardiol. 1999;6:169–76.
Mok DY, Bartlett ML, Bacharach SL, et al. Can partial volume effects be used to measure myocardial thickness and thickening? IEEE Comp Cardiol. 1992;19:195–8.
Bacharach SL. Regional and global ventricular function. In: Dilsizian V, editor. Myocardial viability: a clinical and scientific treatise. Armonk: Futura; 2000.
Botvinick EH, Dae MW, O’Connell JW. The scintigraphic evaluation of the cardiovascular system. In: Parmley WW, Chatterjee KC, editors. Cardiology. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1983.
Yun J, Block M, Botvinick EH. Unique contraction pattern in patients after coronary bypass graft surgery by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 2003;28:18–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Botvinick, E.H., Costouros, N.G., Bacharach, S.L., O’Connell, J.W. (2013). Assessment of Cardiac Function: First-Pass, Equilibrium Blood Pool, and Gated Myocardial SPECT. In: Dilsizian, V., Narula, J. (eds) Atlas of Nuclear Cardiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5551-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5551-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-5549-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-5551-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)