Skip to main content
Log in

Highly efficient transformation and regeneration of aspen plants through shoot-bud formation in root culture

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The natural capacity of aspen (Populus tremula L.) roots for direct shoot-bud regeneration was harnessed to establish a highly efficient transformation and regeneration procedure that does not require a pre-selection stage on antibiotics. Aspen stem segments were transformed using wildtype Agrobacterium rhizogenes (LBA9402) with the binary p35SGUSINT plasmid carrying the genes coding for β-glucuronidase (GUS) and neomycin phosphotransferase II. High levels of transient GUS expression were found in the basal cut surface of 87% of the segments, and 98% of these formed well-developed adventitious roots. Proliferating root cultures were established in liquid culture, and GUS expression was found in 75% of the roots. Shoot-bud regeneration in root cultures was very high: 99% of the roots yielded shoot-buds (4.3 buds per root), of which 91% expressed GUS. Southern blot analysis and polymerase chain reaction confirmed the transgenic nature of the plants expressing GUS. Kanamycin resistance of transformants was tested with respect to callus growth and bud regeneration. Callus from transgenic plants exhibited a high growth rate in the presence of up to 100 μg/μl kanamycin, and bud regeneration from transformed roots occurred in the presence of up to 30 μg/μl kanamycin. Callus and buds from control (non-transformed) plants failed to proliferate or regenerate, respectively, in the presence of kanamycin at concentrations above 10 μg/μl. Ninety-four independent clones from different transformation events were established, of which 52 were phenotypically true-to-type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NAA:

α-naphthaleneacetic acid

BA:

6-benzylaminopurine

GUS:

β-glucuronidase

NPTII:

neomycin phosphotransferase II

PCR:

polymerase chain reaction

EtOH:

ethanol

CTAB:

cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

SDS:

sodium dodecyl sulfate

NOS:

nopaline synthase

CaMV:

cauliflower mosaic virus

References

  • Ahuja MR (1986) In: Evans DA, Sharp WR, Ammirato PV (eds) Handbook of plant cell culture. Techniques and applications, vol 4. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, pp 627–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Meir H, Vainstein A (1994) Sci Hort 58:115–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmi T (1994) MSc Thesis. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Block M (1990) Plant Physiol 93:1110–1116

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper J, Scott R, Hamil J (1988) In: Draper J, Scott R, Armitage P, Walden R (eds) Plant genetic transformation and gene expression. A laboratory manual. Blackwell Scientific Publications, United Kingdom, pp 69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Everett NP, Robinson KEP, Mascarebhas DD (1987) Bio/Tech 5:1201–1204

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg AP, Vogelstein B (1984) Anal Biochem 137:266–267

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fillatti JJ, Sellmer J, McCown B, Haissing B, Comai L (1987) Mol Gen Genet 206:192–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham J, McNicol RJ, Kumar A (1990) Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 20:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  • James DJ, Uratsu S, Cheng J, Negri P, Viss P, Dandekar AM (1993) Plant Cell Rep 12:559–563

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA, Burgess SM, Hirsh D (1986) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:8447–8451

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA, Wilson KJ (1991) In: Gelvin SB, Schilperoort RA, Verma DP (eds) Plant Mol Biol Manual, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Belgium, B14:1–33

  • Jin S, Komari T, Gordon MP, Nester EW (1987) J Bacteriol 10:4417–4425

    Google Scholar 

  • Klee H, Horsch R, Rogers S (1987) Ann Rev Plant Physiol 38:467–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopfenstein NB, Shi NQ, Kernan A, McNabb HS, Hall RB, Hart ER, Thornburg RW (1991) Can J Forest Res 21:1321–1328

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn F, Heidmann I, Saedler H, Meyer P (1990) Mol Gen Genet 222:329–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

  • Matzke M, Matzke AJM (1993) Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 44:53–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15:473–497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nadel BL, Hazan G, David R, Huttermann A, Altman A (1992) Acta Hort 314:61–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit A, Berkaloff A, Tempe J (1986) Mol Gen Genet 202:388–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomponi M, Spano L, Sabbadini MG, Costantion P (1983) Plasmid 10:119–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Pythoud F, Sinkar VP, Nester EW, Gordon MP (1987) Bio/Tech 5:1323–1327

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellmer JC, McCown BH (1989) In: Yps B (ed) Plant protoplasts and genetic engineering II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 155–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CJS, Watson CF, Bird CR, Ray J, Schuch W, Grierson D (1990) Mol Gen Genet 224:477–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachel SE, Messens E, Montagu MV, Zambryski P (1985) Nature 318:624–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai C-J, Podila GK, Chiang VL (1994) Plant Cell Rep 14:94–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzuri G, Hillel J, Lavi U, Haberfeld A, Vainstein A (1991) Plant Sci 76:91–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Vancanneyt G, Schmidt R, O'Connor-Sanchez A, Willmitzer L, RochaSosa M (1990) Mol Gen Genet 220:245–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Wordragen MF, Dons JM (1992) Plant Mol Biol Rep 10:12–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Qi M, Cutler AJ (1993) Nucl Acids Res 21:4153–4154

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by H. Lörz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tzfira, T., Ben-Meir, H., Vainstein, A. et al. Highly efficient transformation and regeneration of aspen plants through shoot-bud formation in root culture. Plant Cell Reports 15, 566–571 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232454

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232454

Keywords

Navigation