Skip to main content
Log in

Sound and vibration sensitivity of VIIIth nerve fibers in the grassfrog, Rana temporaria

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have studied the sound and vibration sensitivity of 164 amphibian papilla fibers in the VIIIth nerve of the grassfrog, Rana temporaria. The VIIIth nerve was exposed using a dorsal approach. The frogs were placed in a natural sitting posture and stimulated by free-field sound. Furthermore, the animals were stimulated with dorso-ventral vibrations, and the sound-induced vertical vibrations in the setup could be canceled by emitting vibrations in antiphase from the vibration exciter. All low-frequency fibers responded to both sound and vibration with sound thresholds from 23 dB SPL and vibration thresholds from 0.02 cm/s2. The sound and vibration sensitivity was compared for each fiber using the offset between the rate-level curves for sound and vibration stimulation as a measure of relative vibration sensitivity. When measured in this way relative vibration sensitivity decreases with frequency from 42 dB at 100 Hz to 25 dB at 400 Hz. Since sound thresholds decrease from 72 dB SPL at 100 Hz to 50 dB SPL at 400 Hz the decrease in relative vibration sensitivity reflects an increase in sound sensitivity with frequency, probably due to enhanced tympanic sensitivity at higher frequencies. In contrast, absolute vibration sensitivity is constant in most of the frequency range studied. Only small effects result from the cancellation of sound-induced vibrations. The reason for this probably is that the maximal induced vibrations in the present setup are 6–10 dB below the fibers' vibration threshold at the threshold for sound. However, these results are only valid for the present physical configuration of the setup and the high vibration-sensitivities of the fibers warrant caution whenever the auditory fibers are stimulated with free-field sound. Thus, the experiments suggest that the low-frequency sound sensitivity is not caused by sound-induced vertical vibrations. Instead, the low-frequency sound sensitivity is either tympanic or mediated through bone conduction or sound-induced pulsations of the lungs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AP :

amphibian papilla

BF :

best frequency

PST :

peristimulus time

References

  • Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Elepfandt A (1995) Biophysics of under-water hearing in the clawed frog, Xenopus laevis. J Comp Physiol A 176: 317–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Jørgensen MB (1988) The response characteristics of vibration-sensitive saccular fibers in the grassfrog, Rana temporaria. J Comp Physiol A 162: 633–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Jørgensen MB (1989) Response characteristics of vibration-sensitive neurons in the midbrain of the grass-frog, Rana temporaria. J Comp Physiol A 164: 495–499

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Jørgensen MB (1996) One-tone suppression in the frog auditory nerve. J Acoust Soc Am (in press)

  • Christensen-Dalsgaard J, Narins PM (1993) Sound and vibration sensitivity of VIIIth nerve fibers in the frogs Leptodactylus albilabris and Rana pipiens pipiens. J Comp Physiol A 172: 653–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehret G, Tautz J, Schmitz B, Narins PM (1990) Hearing through the lungs: Lung-eardrum transmission of sound in the frog Eleutherodactylus coqui. Naturwissenschaften 77: 192–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng AS (1980) Directional characteristics of the acoustic receiver of the leopard frog (Rana pipiens): A study of eigth nerve acoustic responses. J Acoust Soc Am 68: 1107–1114

    Google Scholar 

  • Hetherington TE (1988) Biomechanics of vibration reception in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. J Comp Physiol A 163: 43–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaslow AP, Hetherington TE, Lombard RE (1988) Structure and function of the amphibian middle ear. In: Firtzsch B, Ryan MJ, Wilczynski W, Hetherington TE, Walkowiak W (eds) The evolution of the amphibian auditory system. John Wiley and Sons, New York Chichester Brisbane Toronto Singapore, pp 69–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen MB (1991) Comparative studies of the biophysics of directional hearing in anurans. J Comp Physiol A 169: 591–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen MB, Christensen-Dalsgaard J (1989) Peripheral origins and functional characteristics of vibration-sensitive VIIIth nerve fibers in the grassfrog. In: Menzel R (ed) Proceedings of the second international congress of neuroethology. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, p 90

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen MB, Christensen-Dalsgaard J (1991) Peripheral origins and functional characteristics of vibration-sensitive VIIIth nerve fibers in the frog Rana temporaria. J Comp Physiol A 169: 341–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen MB, Christensen-Dalsgaard J (1996) Directionality of auditory nerve fiber responses to pure tone stimuli in the grass-frog, Rana temporaria. I. Spike rate responses. J Comp Physiol A (submitted)

  • Jørgensen MB, Schmitz B, Christensen-Dalsgaard J (1991) Biophysics of directional hearing in the frog Eleutherodactylus coqui. J Comp Physiol A 168: 223–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombard RE, Straughan IR (1974) Functional aspects of anuran middle ear structures. J Exp Biol 61: 71–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Narins PM (1990) Seismic communication in anuran amphibians. BioScience 40: 268–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Narins PM, Ehret G, Tautz J (1988) Accessory pathway for sound transfer in a neotropical frog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 1508–1512

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonndorf J (1976) Bone conduction. In: Keidel WD, Neff WD (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology vol. V/3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 37–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlaming MSMG, Aertsen AMHJ, Epping WJM (1984) Directional hearing in the grass frog (Rana temporaria L.): I. Mechanical vibrations of tympanic membrane. Hearing Res 14: 191–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilczynski W, Resler C, Capranica RR (1987) Tympanic and extratympanic sound transmission in the leopard frog. J Comp Physiol A 161: 659–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Lewis ER, Feld D (1991) Seismic and auditory tuning curves from bullfrog saccular and amphibian papitlar axons. J Comp Physiol A 169: 241–248

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Jørgensen, M.B. Sound and vibration sensitivity of VIIIth nerve fibers in the grassfrog, Rana temporaria . J Comp Physiol A 179, 437–445 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192311

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192311

Key words

Navigation