Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of regulation on productivity growth: An application to the transmission sector of the interstate natural gas industry

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We estimate a regulated cost function to examine the contributions of technical change, scale economies, and regulatory bias to productivity growth in an eleven-year, twenty-firm panel of interstate natural gas pipeline companies. We derive the unregulated cost function from the regulated cost function to produce estimates of movements in the unconstrained production technology. We find that the regulation constraint is binding in most years and that scale economies explain 38 percent more growth in the unconstrained production space than they do in the regulation-constrained production space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aivazian, Varouj A., Jeffrey L. Callen, M. W. Luke Chan, and Dean C. Mountain. 1987. “Economies of Scale versus Technological Change in the Natural Gas Transmission Industry.” Review of Economics and Statistics 69(#3, August): 556–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averch, Harvey and Leland L. Johnson. 1962. “Behavior of the Firm Under a Regulatory Constraint.” American Economic Review 52(#5, December): 1053–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, Badi H. 1980. “Seemingly Unrelated Regressions With Error Components.” Econometrica 48(#6, September): 1547–1551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William J. and Alvin K. Klevorick. 1970. “Input Choices and Rate of Return Regulation: An Overview of the Discussion.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 1(#2, Autumn): 162–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. 1980, 1983, 1984, 1989, 1991. Federal Reserve Bulletin, Washington DC.: U.S. Government Printing Office (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen, Jeffrey L. 1978. “Production, Efficiency, and Welfare in the Natural Gas Transmission Industry.” American Economic Review 68(#3, June): 311–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Laurits R., Dale W. Jorgenson, and Lawrence J. Lau. 1971. “Conjugate Duality and the Transcendental Logarithmic Function.” Econometrica 39(#4, July): 255–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commerce Clearing House Inc. 1978, 1981, 1986, 1987. U.S. Masters Tax Guide, Chicago: Commerce Clearing House Publishers, 61, 64, 69, 70.

  • Cowing, Thomas G. and Rodney Stevenson. 1981. Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denny, Michael, Melvin Fuss, and Leonard Waverman. 1981. “The Measurement and Interpretation of Total Factor Productivity in Regulated Industries, with an Application to Canadian Telecommunications.” Productivity Measurement in Regulated Industries, New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, Rolf and James Logan. 1983. “The Rate-of-Return Regulated Firm: Cost and Production Duality”. Bell Journal of Economics 14(#2, Autumn): 405–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, Rolf and James Logan. 1983. “The Rate of Return Regulated Version of Shephard's Lemma.” Economics Letters 13(#4, November): 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, Rolf and James Logan. 1986. “Regulation, Scale and Productivity: A Comment.” International Economic Review 27(#3, October): 777–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollop, Frank and Dale Jorgenson. 1980. “United States Productivity Growth by Industry 1947–1973.” in New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis, J. W. Kendrick and B. N. Baccara, eds., National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazilla, Michael and Raymond J. Kopp. 1986. “Systematic Effects of Capital Service Price Definition on Perceptions of Input Substitution.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 4(#2, April): 209–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson, Roger C. and Rex A. Sinquefield. 1989. Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation: Historical Returns (1926–1987), Virginia: Research Foundation of the Institute of Chartered Financial Analysts.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. 1990. Construction Review, Washington DC.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 34(#4, July–August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, Dale W. 1963. “Capital Theory and Investment Behavior.” American Economic Review 53(#2, May): 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners. 1973–1988. Annual Report on Utility and Carrier Regulation, Washington DC.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Gas Supply Association. 1989. Financial Performance of Major U.S. Interstate Pipelines: 1979–1989, Washington DC.

  • Nelson, Randy A. and Mark E. Wohar. 1983. “Regulation, Scale Economies, and Productivity in Steam-Electric Generation.” International Economic Review 24(#1, February): 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Oil and Gas, Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy. 1977–1987. Statisticsof Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Companies, Washington DC.: U.S. Printing Government Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Pipeline and Producer Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, U.S. Department of Energy. 1977–1980, 1978–1981, 1979–1982. Cost of Pipeline and Compressor Station Construction Under Non-Budget Pipeline Certificate Authorization, Washington DC.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Pipeline and Producer Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, U.S. Department of Energy. 1980–1983, 1981–1984, 1982—1985, 1983–1986, 1984–1987. Cost of Pipeline and Compressor Station Construction Under Natural Gas Act Section 7(c), Washington DC.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, H. Craig. 1975. “An Empirical Test of Regulatory Effects.” Bell Journal of Economics 6(#1, Spring): 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prucha, Ingmar R. 1984. “On the Asymptotic Efficiency of Feasible Aitken Estimators for Seemingly Unrelated Regression Models with Error Components.” Econometrica 52(# 1, January): 203–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sickles, Robin C., and Mary L. Streitwieser. 1989. “The Structure of Technology, Substitution, and Productivity in the Interstate Natural Gas Transmission Industry Under the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978.” C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University (July).

  • Sickles, Robin C., and Mary L. Streitwieser. 1992. “Technical Inefficiency and Productive Decline in the U.S. Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Industry Under the Natural Gas Policy Act.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 3(#1/2, June): 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sickles, Robin C., and Mary L. Streitwieser. 1995. “An Analysis of Technology, Productivity, and Regulatory Distortion in the Interstate Natural Gas Transmission Industry: 1977–1985.” Mimeo, Rice University.

  • Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation. 1991. Capitalization-Rate of Return Report, Texas Eastern Company Report, Texas.

  • Value Line Publishing Inc. 1977–1987. Value Line Investment Survey, New York: Value Line Publishers (December).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful to Gary Biglaiser, David Guilkey, C. A. Knox Lovell, and Helen Tauchen for their suggestions, and to Karen Bauer, Philip Budzik, Ronald Colter, and Mary Streitwieser for their assistance in compiling the data sample. We are also grateful to the participants at the Georgia Productivity Workshop and two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Granderson, G., Linvill, C. The impact of regulation on productivity growth: An application to the transmission sector of the interstate natural gas industry. J Regul Econ 10, 291–306 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157674

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00157674

Keywords

Navigation