Skip to main content
Log in

Partner choice in heterologous chromosome segregation of the Y chromosome in competitive situations in the oocyte of Drosophila melanogaster

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterologous segregation of the Y chromosome and secondary non-disjunction of the X chromosomes in female meiosis of Drosophila melanogaster was investigated in ten different crosses where different constellations of translocation/inversion or translocation/translocation systems of the large autosomes were present in the female parent. It appeared that the Y chromosome always segregates from the shortest of the possible heterologous pairing partners. This may be due to size-dependent mechanism of so-called ‘distributive disjunction’ or to the possibility that the shorter the chromosome element is, the more easily it moves in the nucleus of the oocyte. Secondary non-disjunction of the X chromosomes appeared to be lower the more possible autosomal pairing partners the Y chromosome had, suggesting that the autosomes effectively compete with the X chromosomes for pairing with the Y chromosome. An alternative explanation is that, due to interchromosomal effect on recombination, crossing over in the X chromosomes was different in different experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • CarpenterA. T. C., 1991. Distributive segregation: Motors in the polar wind? Cell 64: 885–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • DouglasL. T., 1968. Meiosis III. The elastica and Markov processes as models for non-random segregation from associated nonhomologues in Drosophila. Genetica 39: 289–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrellR. F., 1957. Nonrandom assortment of non-homologous chromosomes. (Abstract). Genetics 65: 374.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrellR. F., 1959. Nonrandom assortment of non-homologous chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 44: 421–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrellR. F., 1962. A new hypothesis on the nature and sequence of meiotic events in female of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 48: 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrellR. F., 1964a. Chromosome size at distributive pairing in Drosophila melanogaster females. Genetics 50: 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrellR. F., 1964b. Distributive pairing: the size-dependent mechanism for regular segregation of the fourth chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 52: 226–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrellR. F., 1976. Distributive pairing. In: M.Ashburner and E.Novitski (Eds), The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 1a. Academic Press, London, pp. 436–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrellR. F. & GrellE.H., 1960. The behavior of non-homologous chromosomal elements involved in nonrandom assortment in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 46: 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • GuacciV. & KabackD. B., 1991. Distributive disjunction of authentic chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 127: 475–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • HolmD. G. & ChovnickA., 1975. Compound autosomes in Drosophila melanogaster: The meiotic behavior of compound thirds. Genetics 81: 293–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D. & Zimm, G., 1987. The Genome of Drosophila melanogaster: Part 3: rearrangements. Dros. Inf. Serv. 65.

  • NokkalaS. & PuroJ., 1976. Cytological evidence for a chromocenter in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes. Hereditas 83: 265–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • NovitskiE., 1964. An alternative to the distributive pairing hypothesis in Drosophila. Genetics 50: 1449–1451.

    Google Scholar 

  • NovitskiE. & PuroJ., 1978. A critique of theories of meiosis in the female of Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 89: 51–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • OksalaT., 1957a. The mechanism of secondary nondisjunction of X chromosomes and autosomes. Dros. Inf. Serv. 31: 147–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • OksalaT., 1957b. Pairing pattern of the chromosomes in female meiosis in Drosophila and the ‘interchromosomal effect on crossing over’. Dros. Inf. Serv. 31: 149.

    Google Scholar 

  • OksalaT., 1958. Chromosome pairing, crossing over, and segregation in meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 23: 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • PuroJ. & NokkalaS., 1977. Meiotic segregation of chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster oocytes. A cytological approach. Chromosoma 63: 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • PuroJ., 1991. Differential mechanisms governing segregation of a univalent in oocytes and spermatocytes of Drosophila melanogaster. Chromosoma 100: 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • SturtevantA.H. & BeadleG. W., 1962. In Introduction to Genetics. 391 pp. Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZhangP., KnowlesB. A., GoldsteinL. S. B. & HawleyR. S., 1990. A kinesin-like protein required for distributive chromosome segregation in Drosophila. Cell 62: 1053–1062.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZhangP. & HawleyR. S., 1990. The genetic analysis of distributive segregation in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Further genetic analysis of the nod locus. Genetics 125: 115–127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Portin, P. Partner choice in heterologous chromosome segregation of the Y chromosome in competitive situations in the oocyte of Drosophila melanogaster . Genetica 85, 139–145 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120320

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120320

Keywords

Navigation