Getting to the bottom of Taxol biosynthesis by fungi
- 8.4k Downloads
Taxol (paclitaxel) is a highly-oxygenated diterpenoid natural product first isolated from the pacific yew tree (Taxus brevifolia). It is one of the most widely used anticancer drugs. Soon after the discovery of its unique mode of action and the resulting high demand, an extensive search was initiated for alternative sources to replace the slow-growing and scarce pacific yew. Thus far, however, Taxol and related compounds have only been found in the genus Taxus, which comprises a small number of slow-growing plants with a broad but generally isolated geographical distribution. In 1993, Stierle and colleagues reported the independent biosynthesis of Taxol in an endophytic fungus isolated from Taxus brevifolia, which resulted in more than 160 subsequent publications and patents addressing the biosynthesis of Taxol and related taxanes by microorganisms. The literature on fungal taxane synthesis contains numerous inconsistencies, prompting us to thoroughly re-examine Taxol biosynthesis in endophytic fungi associated with Taxus spp. Using a combination of phytochemistry, molecular biology and genome sequencing, we were unable to find any evidence for independent taxane biosynthesis in any of the endophytes, including the isolate described in the original publication (Taxomyces andreanae) and several more recent isolates from Taxus trees. Our findings therefore resolve a long-standing mystery concerning the evolution of a complex terpenoid biosynthetic pathway in two distantly-related organisms.
KeywordsTaxol biosynthesis Endophytic fungi Taxanes Terpene biosynthesis Taxomyces andreanae
Taxol (paclitaxel), a highly-oxygenated diterpenoid natural product first isolated from the pacific yew tree (Taxus brevifolia), is arguably one of the most successful anticancer drugs of all time (Suffness and Wall 1995; Brown 2003). The limited supply of Taxol and related compounds made pharmaceutical development a major challenge (Suffness and Wall 1995). Therefore, soon after its unique mode of action was discovered, an extensive search was launched to find alternative sources because the pacific yew is slow-growing and scarce (Croom 1995; Itokawa 2003). For a long time, Taxol biosynthesis was thought to be restricted to the ancient Taxus genus (Taxaceae, Coniferales), which comprises 11 geographically-isolated species. Fossil records indicate that yew trees have existed for more than 200 million years with little evolutionary change. Taxus grandis from the Quaternary period shared many characteristics with the modern yew, Taxus baccata (Croom 1995). Considering the age and isolation of the genus together with the extreme longevity of individual members (some yew trees live more than 3,000 years), it was believed that the Taxol metabolic pathway was unique to this genus. Members of the closely related genera Pseudotaxus and Austrotaxus do not synthesize Taxol, although simple taxanes lacking the oxetane or D-ring structure have been isolated from Austrotaxus spicata, the only member of the genus Austrotaxus, which is regarded as a primitive ancestor of Taxus (Guéritte-Voegelein et al. 1987). Pseudotaxus spp. do not produce taxanes at all.
In 1993, Stierle and colleagues reported the unprecedented isolation of a Taxus spp. endopyhtic fungus (Taxomyces andreanae) that could synthesize Taxol and other taxanes such as baccatin III independently. This was demonstrated using radiolabeled precursors, such as 14C-phenylalanine and 14C-acetate (Stierle et al. 1993). Even more surprisingly, Taxol compromised an unusually high percentage (15–20 %) of the total taxane fraction synthesized by the fungus compared to that synthesized by the yew. The isolated Taxomyces andreanae was subject to a patent application and deposited at the Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures (Utrecht, The Netherlands) as number CBS 279.92 (Strobel et al. 1994). Several other groups soon confirmed the findings in this ground-breaking publication and provided additional supporting evidence (Flores-Bustamante et al. 2010). Microbial Taxol and taxane biosynthesis was found in several different genera of fungi, including Alternaria, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Fusarium, Monochaetia, Pestlotia, Pestalotiopsis, Pithomyces, Penicillium and Xylaria, which were isolated from yew and non-Taxus plants (Flores-Bustamante et al. 2010; Strobel et al. 1996; Soca-Chafre et al. 2011; Zhang et al. 2009; Zhao et al. 2009; Hoffman 2003). Recently, several reports have been published claiming that endophytic fungi contain genes previously identified in Taxus spp. that encode the corresponding pathway enzymes (Zhang et al. 2008; Staniek et al. 2009; Miao et al. 2009; Kumaran et al. 2010). The publication of Stierle and colleagues also resulted in a huge proliferation of studies of endophytes from Taxus species (Rivera-Orduña et al. 2011) and other medicinal plants (Kumar and Hyde 2004; Huang et al. 2009; Lin et al. 2010) as it generally became accepted that horizontal gene transfer was commonplace and that fungal endophytes within these plants could probably also produce the bioactive medicinal compounds produced by the plants (Chandra 2012).
Interestingly, these reports claiming the presence of previously identified Taxus spp. genes in endophytic fungi base their claims on the results of PCR experiments using primers designed according to published sequences from Taxus trees, indicating that fungal genomic DNA yields PCR amplification products virtually identical to the Taxus clones (Staniek et al. 2009; Miao et al. 2009). The presence of these genes would require the extensive horizontal gene transfer (HGT) between the yew trees and multiple endophytic fungi, representing a pathway with more than 20 steps (Croteau et al. 2006). We find it difficult to believe that this entire pathway could have transferred in an arbitrary manner, and therefore we searched for evidence of DNA transfer involving potential taxane-synthesis gene clusters originating from Taxus plants. Whereas biosynthetic gene clusters are a common features in bacterial genomes and have also been described in fungi (Tudzynski and Hölter 1998; Zhang et al. 2004), there have been few reports of clustered metabolic pathways in plants, and those that do exist tend to be spread over larger genomic regions than their microbial counterparts (Field and Osbourn 2008; Field et al. 2011; Chu et al. 2011). The existence of taxane gene clusters in fungi and plants raises intriguing questions about the origin and evolution of these highly-specialized biosynthetic pathways, and the potential for HGT from fungi to Taxus trees. However, HGT between distantly-related organisms is a rare evolutionary event which is also constrained by the amount of genetic information transferred and genetic barriers involving incompatible regulation and codon usage. This contrasts sharply with the widespread observation of Taxol biosynthesis in many different endophytic fungi (Kurland et al. 2003).
Material and methods
Isolation of endophytic fungi from Taxus spp. plant material
Endophytic fungi were isolated as previously described by Guo et al. (2006). Bark segments (0.5 × 0.5 cm) were removed with a sterile scalpel and surface sterilized for 5 min in 70 % ethanol. The inner bark was separated from the outer layer and placed on PDA agar (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) supplemented with 25 mg/L streptomycin. The plates were incubated at room temperature until fungal growth was visible. The mycelium was then transferred to fresh plates using the hyphal tip method.
Cultivation of endophytic fungi
The isolated endophytic fungi were cultivated on solid media, PDA (Carl Roth GmbH) supplemented with streptomycin or on YM-6.3 agar (0.4 % (w/v) glucose, 0.4 % (w/v) yeast extract, 2 % (w/v) malt extract, pH 6.3, 1.5 % (w/v) agar-agar). The fungi were transferred to fresh plates at weekly intervals by cutting out a piece of overgrown agar. In liquid culture, the fungi were grown in 0.6–10 L YM-6.3 medium (120 rpm in the dark) for 3 weeks or until no more glucose could be detected. The fungi were also cultivated in S7 medium as described for taxane-producing endophytes (Stierle et al. 1993).
For taxane analysis, the fungal culture media were extracted twice with an equal volume of chloroform. The organic phase was then dried over magnesium sulfate, evaporated to dryness and the residue was redissolved in 3–5 mL methanol. Plant material (30 g Taxus needles or tobacco leaf tissue) was lyophilized and extracted with 1:1 dichloromethane/methanol in a Soxhlet extractor. The organic solution was evaporated to dryness and redissolved in dichloromethane. After two rounds of extraction with water, the organic layer was dried over magnesium sulfate, evaporated to dryness and the residue was redissolved in methanol (Witherup et al. 1990).
Anti-taxane immunoassay (competitive inhibition enzyme immunoassay, CIEIA)
The anti-taxane immunoassay was carried out according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Cardax Pharmaceuticals, Hawaii). A standard curve for taxane quantitation was made using Taxol concentrations of 111, 37, 12.33, 4.11, 1.37, 0.46 and 1.15 ng/mL (Table S1). The samples were analyzed using three dilutions. Values in the linear range of the standard curve were used to calculate the concentration.
LC/MS/MS was carried out in multiple reaction monitoring scan mode using a QTrap3200 system (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany). The three most intensive mass transitions for three standard substances (Taxol, baccatin III and 10-deacetyl-baccatin III; Sigma-Aldrich, Idena) were used for detection (Table S2). Analysis in ESI negative ionization mode was carried out using the following settings: curtain gas 25 psi, CAD gas medium, ionspray voltage −4,500 V, temperature 450 °C, gas1 50 psi, gas2 65 psi. HPLC separation was carried out using a Curosil PFP column (150 × 3 mm, 3 μm; Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) under the following conditions: column oven, 25 °C; LC flow rate, 300 μL/min; solvent A, 98 % water and 2 % acetonitrile with 10 mM ammonium acetate; solvent B, 2 % water and 98 % acetonitrile with 10 mM ammonium acetate; gradient, 0 min 70 % A, 0.5 min 70 % A, 15 min 0 % A, 20 min 0 % A, 21 min 70 % A, 23 min 70 % A.
DNA isolation, construction of genomic phage libraries and hybridization
Fungal and plant genomic DNA was isolated using a modified CTAB method. Plant and fungal samples (1 g) were homogenized with a mortar under liquid nitrogen, supplemented with 10 volumes of CTAB buffer (100 mM Tris pH8, 20 mM EDTA, 1.4 M NaCl, 2 % β-mercaptoethanol, 2 % CTAB) and incubated for 1 h at 65 °C. The cell debris was removed by centrifugation (15 min, 2,000 × g) and the supernatant was extracted twice with an equal volume of 24:1 chloroform:isoamylalcohol. The DNA was then precipitated with isopropanol. Genomic phage libraries were constructed from EF0001, EF0021 and Taxomyces andreanae DNA, and plaque lifting was carried out according to the manufacturer’s guidelines (Lambda Dash® II / Gigapack® III XL, Stratagene). Heat-fixed membranes (Nylon N+, GE Healthcare) were supplemented with 20 mL Roti-Hybri-Quick (Carl Roth GmbH) and 100 μg/mL salmon sperm DNA (Sigma) in hybridization rolls. Pre-hybridization was carried out for 3 h at 55 °C. Probes against taxadiene synthase (TDS) and taxane-13α-hydroxylase (T13H) were prepared by PCR using primers corresponding to specific target genes, i.e. TDS1 (forward 5′-GCA GCG CTG AAG ATG AAT GC-3′, reverse 5′-CGA TTC GAT ACC CCA CGA TCC-3′, bp 22–546), TDS2 (forward 5′-GCC CTC GGC CTC CGA ACC C-3′, reverse 5′-GCC ATG CCG GAT TCT TTC CAC C-3′, bp 1,211–1,710), TDS3 (forward 5′-GGT GGA AGG AAT CCG GCA TGG CAG-3′, reverse 5′-GTC GCC AGC TCA AGG ATA CAA GCT C-3′, bp 1,693–2,263) andT13H (forward 5′-ATG GAT GCC CTT AAG CAA TTG GAA GTT TCC CC-3′, reverse 5′-GCT CCT GCA GGT GCT CC-3′, bp 1–604). The reactions were heated to 94 °C for 2 min followed by 25 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 55–60 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s and finally 72 °C for 5 min. Incorporation of α32P-dATP (Hartmann Analytic, Braunschweig, Germany) was done using the Hexalabel™ DNA Labeling Kit (Fermentas, St. Leon-Rot, Germany). The TDS and T13H probes were purified on G-50 gel filtration columns (GE Healthcare, Karlsruhe, Germany). Probes against taxane-5α-hydroxylase (T5H) were prepared by labeling oligonucleotides with γ-32P-dATP using polynucleotide kinase (oligo1 5′-GGC ATC CCA CAG TAG TAC TCT GCG GCC CTG CGG GAA ACC GGC TTA TTC TGT CCA ACG AGG AGA AGC TGG TGC AGA TGT CG-3′, and oligo2 5′-CCA CCA CTT CGC CAA TGG CTT TGA TTT TCA AGC TCT TGT CTT CCA ATC CAG AAT GCT ATC AAA AAG TAG TTC AAG AGC-3′). Probes were added to the pre-hybridization mix and hybridized against the membranes overnight at 55 °C. The membranes were washed three times for 30 min with 1:2, 1:5 and 1:10 dilutions of hybridization buffer, and then visualized by autoradiography on pre-flashed X-ray films (Hyperfilm MP, GE Healthcare) at −80 °C for 2 days.
Amplification of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences
ITS regions from the isolated Taxus endophytes were amplified by PCR using the universal primers ITS1 (5′-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′) (Sim et al. 2010) in 2× PCR-MasterMix Solution (i-Max II, INtRON Biotechnology) containing 1 μL of each primer (50 μM) and 20 ng genomic DNA, made up to 25 μL with water. Amplification was carried out on the GeneAmp PCR System (Applied Biosystems) at 94 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1.5 min, followed by a final 72 °C step for 7 min. PCR products were purified using NucleoFast 96 PCR plates (Machery-Nagel, Düren, Germany) and sequenced.
Isolation of total RNA and cDNA library construction
Total RNA from endophytes was isolated using the borax method. Mycelia were homogenized under liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle, incubated at 42 °C for 1 h in 15 mL borax buffer (0.2 M sodium tetraborate, 30 mM EGTA, 1 % (w/v) SDS, 1 % (w/v) deoxycholate, 1 % (v/v) Nonidet P-40, 2 % (w/v) polyvinylpyrolidone, 10 mM DDT, pH 9.0), supplemented with 1.2 mL 2 M KCl and stored on ice for 1 h. After centrifugation, RNA was selectively precipitated by adding 5 mL 8 M LiCl and storing at −20 °C overnight. The precipitate was washed three times with cold 2 M LiCl and resuspended in 2.8 mL TES buffer (50 mM Tri/HCl pH 5.7, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl) supplemented with 1 M CsCl. This suspension was overlaid with 1.2 mL TES buffer supplemented with 5.7 M CsCl and the RNA was purified by density gradient ultracentrifugation at room temperature at 100,000 × g for 16 h. The RNA was dissolved in 500 μL TE buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA) and mRNA was isolated using the Qiagen Oligotex mRNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). A cDNA-RACE library was constructed using the Clontech Marathon cDNA Amplification Kit (Takara BIO Europe, Saint-Germain-en-Laye, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers for the amplification of terpene synthase gene candidates are listed in Table S3.
Cloning, expression and functional testing of diterpene synthase 0021_TS_1762 and intron-1 splice variants of 0021_TS_1762
Synthetic diterpene synthase 1762 (Genskript, Hong Kong) was amplified using pUC57 as the template, and the product was transferred to the Escherichia coli expression vector pTrc-His2 using the pTrcHis2-TOPO® TA Expression Kit (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). The gene was also amplified with primers including Gateway attachment sites allowing the gene to be introduced into the yeast expression vector pYES-Dest52 by homologous recombination. The protein was expressed in E. coli DH5α cells (New England Biolabs, Frankfurt, Germany) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN-PK2-1 cells (EUROSCARF, Frankfurt, German) at 28 °C. Deletion variant 0021_TS_1762_del and intron1 random variants (primers listed in Table S3) were created by whole-plasmid PCR using pTrcHIS2-1762cosyn as the template with Herculase® II Fusion DNA Polymerase (Agilent Technologies, Karlsruhe, Germany) and the following temperature program: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles at 95 °C for 0.5 min, 58 °C for 0.5 min and 72 °C for 4 min, followed by a final step at 72 °C for 7 min. Crude protein extracts were prepared by disrupting the cells with glass beads. One volume of extract was used for in vitro testing with three volumes of assay buffer (100 mM Tris, 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 50 μM substrate 3H-GGPP, 3H-FPP or 14C-IPP (+DMAPP), total volume 500 μL). Biotransformation reactions were incubated at 30 °C, overnight. After the addition of 500 μL saturated NaCl the reactions were extracted twice with the same volume of ethyl acetate. The extracts were concentrated in a nitrogen stream and analyzed by radio-TLC on silica plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), which were developed with 9:1 cyclohexane:ethyl acetate or 3:1 pentane:diethyl ether. Products were detected using a radio-TLC Scanner RITA Star (Raytest, Straubenhardt, Germany).
Phage insert, ITS and whole genome sequencing
Phage inserts were sequenced using the Sanger method (Functional & Applied Genomics Group, Fraunhofer IME, Aachen, Germany) or shotgun sequencing (Eurofins MWG Operon, Ebersberg, Germany). ITS sequences were determined by Sanger sequencing (Functional & Applied Genomics Group, Fraunhofer IME). The EF0021 genome was sequenced using 454 technology by Seq-It GmbH, Kaiserslautern. The Taxomyces andreanae genome was sequenced by paired-end library sequencing (imagenes GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Each supplier also assembled the sequences they generated.
Sequences were analyzed using CLC Combined Workbench v3.6.1, Lasergene 7 Package, NCBI Blast and CloneManager Professional Suite 8. FGENESH was use for ORF and protein prediction (http://linux1.softberry.com/). Phylogenetic analysis was carried out using CLC Combined Workbench v3.6.1 with the protein sequences listed in Supplementary Data S3 and Table S4.
Results and discussion
Identification of potential taxane-producing fungi by indirect competitive inhibition enzyme immunoassay (CIEIA) using a polyclonal anti-taxane antibody. Values for Taxus and N. tabacum samples were obtained from 30-g extracts of biomaterial, 0.6 L EF0016 culture medium and 2 L EF0001 culture medium
Taxane concentration [ng/mL] in extract
Taxane concentration [ng/L] in culture medium
Taxane concentration [ng/g] from plant material
173.3 × 103
Without delay (assuming potential genetic instability in the fungi), we extracted genomic DNA from EF0001 and EF0021. To avoid potential contamination leading to PCR artifacts, we established genomic phage libraries for both species and used conventional hybridization as the screening method. We used three probes specific for Taxol biosynthesis: taxadiene synthase (Wildung and Croteau 1996), taxane-5α-hydroxylase (Jennewein et al. 2004a), and taxane-13α-hydroxylase (Jennewein et al. 2001). For EF0001, we screened a total of 300,000 phage plaques (average insert size, 23 kb) corresponding to ~6,900 Mb of endophyte genomic sequence. Assuming an average fungal genome size of 50 Mb, this strategy achieved >130-fold genome coverage. For EF0021, we screened a total of 40,000 phage plaques, corresponding to 920 Mb of genomic sequence and 18-fold genome coverage. Several potential positive inserts were sequenced, but none of them corresponded to known Taxus spp. genes involved in taxane biosynthesis. Given that we were unable to identify taxane-related genomic sequences in EF0001 and ER0021, we constructed a T. andreanae genomic phage library and screened 162,000 phage plaques (average insert size 20.3 kb, corresponding to 3,300 Mb of genomic sequence and 66-fold genome coverage) using the same probes as above and did not identify any positive clones.
Our failure to identify fungal genomic sequence related to known taxane-specific sequences from yew trees led us to conclude that taxane biosynthesis in endophytes may have evolved independently, as is the case for gibberellins, whose biosynthesis pathway differs between microbes and plants (Tudzynski and Hölter 1998; Bömke and Tudzynski 2009). To further examine the potential for independent taxane biosynthesis by endophytes, we sequenced the EF0021 genome using a shotgun sequencing approach, yielding 2,234,101 sequence reads with an average length of 390 bp. Sequence alignment of the raw data achieved 98.55 % aligned reads and 2,623 contigs covering 44.45 Mb of genomic DNA, corresponding to an estimated genome size of 45.9 Mb. Analysis of the resulting contigs revealed the absence of any genes with significant homology to Taxus spp. genes involved in taxane biosynthesis, confirming the negative results of the library screening experiment. Further analysis of the EF0021 genome sequence resulted in the identification of six putative terpene synthases, two of which were closely related to Aspergillus nidulans lanosterol synthase (and were therefore likely to be involved in sterol biosynthesis). The four others have potential roles in secondary metabolism, including one related to a previously-isolated fungal diterpene synthase (fusicoccadiene synthase) from the plant–pathogen Phomopsis amygdali (Toyomasu et al. 2007) (Suppl. Data S3). Fusicoccadiene synthase is a unique terpene synthase because it possesses both terpene synthase and prenyltransferase activity. The three other identified terpene synthases showed significant homology to fungal sesquiterpene synthases.
Functional analysis was carried out by constructing an EF0021 cDNA library, but it proved impossible to isolate cDNAs corresponding to the above genomic clones using gene-specific primers, indicating that the genes may not have been expressed under the cultivation conditions we used. The genomic sequence was therefore used to design a synthetic open reading frame for the putative diterpene synthase that was codon-optimized for expression in E. coli. Several variants were constructed due to an obscure intron/exon border at one position reflecting variability in the original sequence. Crude extracts from recombinant E. coli cells were examined for diterpene synthase activity using 3H-geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP), and for prenyltransferase activity using 14C-isopentenyl diphosphate and dimethylallyl diphosphate. The synthetic genes were also expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. None of the heterologous expression assays in either host showed any evidence for diterpene synthase enzymatic activity.
We repeated the above strategy for T. andreanae, which was previously reported to produce taxanes independently (CBS 279.92; US Patent 5322779(A)). Shotgun sequencing of the T. andreanae paired-end library yielded 235 million sequence reads with an average length of 100 bp. Assembly of the raw sequence data generated 2,274 contigs with an average size of 18 kbp, covering 93.5 % of the sequence reads. Contig alignment covered a cumulative sequence of 45.08 Mb, corresponding to an approximate genome size of 45 Mb. As was the case for EF0021, the T. andreanae genome did not contain any sequences with significant homology to taxane biosynthesis genes from Taxus spp., but in contrast to EF0021, further analysis of the T. andreanae genome revealed the presence of several additional terpene synthase genes (Suppl. Data S3). All of these sequences were homologous to other known fungal sesquiterpene synthases, although none of them were closely related to known diterpene synthases. As was the case for Taxus endophyte EF0021, we were therefore unable to identify any potential genes related or non-related to taxane biosynthesis in yew that could confer upon T. andreanae the ability to synthesize Taxol independently.
We next used phylogenetic analysis to compare the predicted terpene synthases from endophyte EF0021 and Taxomyces andreanae (Supplementary Fig. 2). All the predicted terpene synthases were aligned with the protein sequences initially used for targeted screening (Table S4). A phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the aligned dataset using UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means) with bootstrapping (100 replicates, bootstrap values shown at the nodes, Suppl. Fig. 2).
The terpene synthase sequences clustered into three major clades (A–C). Clade A consisted of proteins annotated as sesquiterpene synthases with the greatest similarity to Cop6 from Coprinopsis cinereus, including two proteins from EF0021 and eight from Taxomyces andreanae, whereas all other sequences formerly annotated as sesquiterpene synthases clustered in clade C along with Cop1–Cop5 from Coprinopsis cinereus and protoilludene synthase from Armillaria gallica (Agger et al. 2009; Engels et al. 2011). Because Cop1–5 differ from Cop6 mechanistically, using all-trans-farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) or cis-FPP as a substrate to form trichodiene-like or germancrene-like cyclization products, the new terpene synthases clustering in clades A and C are probably grouped on the basis of conserved functionally-relevant motifs as well as their fungal origin. Only two sequences, one each from EF0021 and Taxomyces andreanae, were similar to proteins in clade B, which contained all plant and fungal sequences related to diterpene biosynthesis. Clade B comprised three sub-clades, based either on origin (fungi vs. plants) or specific function (e.g. their role in gibberellin biosynthesis). The abovementioned diterpene synthase from EF0021 and prenyltransferase from T. andreanae clustered with the fungal prenyltransferases and fusicoccadiene synthases. However, since these special chimeric synthases contain a prenyltransferase domain, clustering probably reflected the stronger conservation of this domain which sets these proteins aside from the other terpene synthases. The presence of this domain also confers greater similarity e.g. to plant geranylgeranyl diphosphate and copalyl diphosphate synthases than other fungal sesquiterpene synthases in clades A and C. Our data clearly showed no evidence for homology to plant terpene synthases, and thus for trans-kingdom gene transfer, as initially proposed as a possible explanation for the evolution of Taxol biosynthesis in plants and fungi. Furthermore, we found no evidence for similarities between the terpene synthases in the two endophytes we investigated. Terpene synthase 0021_TS_1762 remains the only candidate for an enzyme that might be involved in diterpenoid metabolism, although the absence of a Taxomyces andreanae ortholog argues against the hypothesis that this enzyme is a fungal taxadiene synthase. Even if the pathway evolved independently in fungi and plants, as is thought to be the case for gibberellin biosynthesis (Bömke and Tudzynski 2009), enzymes that catalyze the complex synthesis of taxadiene should have a common evolutionary origin and should therefore show evidence of significant sequence similarity.
Excluding any evolutionary scenario discussed above, the detection of minute amounts of taxanes in our fungal isolates is best explained by residual taxanes synthesized by the host yew tree. Taxol and related taxanes are highly lipophilic compounds that accumulate in endophyte cell wall structures. The interaction between Taxol and membranes is dependent on the chemical composition of the membranes, and Taxol-lipid complexes can be stable for months (Sharma and Straubinger 1994; Crosasso et al. 2000). Furthermore, low Taxol concentrations, comparable to the levels we detected in endophyte extracts, did not affect the physiological properties of the membrane (Balasubramanian and Straubinger 1994; Sharma and Straubinger 1994; Bernsdorf et al. 1999; Crosasso et al. 2000; Zhao and Feng 2004). Although these experiments involved artificial membranes, there is also evidence that fungi can take up non-polar compounds by passive transport and store them in vesicles. For example, Fusarium solani can absorb polyaromatic compounds from the cell culture medium and store them within intracellular compartments with no impact on growth (Verdin et al. 2005). In the endophytes we studied, the accumulation of non-polar taxoid molecules in lipophilic cell structures combined with the high sensitivity of our analytical methods, immunological detection and LC/MS/MS-based multi-reaction monitoring (MRM) ensured that these carry-overs could be detected. After the first and second passages of the fungal cultures, no taxanes could be detected by LC/MS/MS. The fungi were no longer associated with the Taxol source and hence the trace amounts of taxanes detected initially were diluted below the detection limit.
Our results and conclusions therefore offer a satisfactory explanation for the contradictory results in earlier publications, some providing evidence for independent taxane biosynthesis in different endophytic fungi and others lacking this evidence.
U.H. was supported by a pre-doctoral fellowship from the Volkswagen Foundation, Hannover, Germany (AZ.: I/82 754).
- Brown DT (2003) Preclinical and clinical studies of the taxanes. In: Itokawa H, Lee K-H (eds) The genus Taxus. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 387–435Google Scholar
- Caruso M, Colombo AL, Fedeli L, Pavesi A, Quaroni S, Saracchi M, Ventrella G (2000) Isolation of endophytic fungi actinomycetes taxane producers. Ann Microbiol 50:3–13Google Scholar
- Croom EM Jr (1995) Taxus for taxol and taxoids. In: Suffness M (ed) Taxol® science and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 37–70Google Scholar
- Guo BH, Wang YC, Zhou XW, Hu K, Tan F, Miao ZQ, Tang KX (2006) An endophytic Taxol-producing fungus BT2 isolated from Taxus chinensis var. mairei. Afr J Biotechnol 5:875–877Google Scholar
- Heinig U, Jennewein S (2009) Taxol: a complex diterpenoid natural product with an evolutionarily obscure origin. Afr J Biotechnol 8:1370–1385Google Scholar
- Hoffman A (2003) Methods for obtaining taxanes. US patent 6638742 (B1)Google Scholar
- Huang WY, Cai YZ, Surveswaran S, Hyde KD, Corke H, Sun M (2009) Molecular phylogenetic identification of endophytic fungi isolated from three Artemisia species. Fungal Divers 36:69–88Google Scholar
- Itokawa H (2003) Taxoids occurring in the genus Taxus. In: Itokawa H, Lee K-H (eds) The genus Taxus. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 35–78Google Scholar
- Kumar DDS, Hyde KD (2004) Biodiversity and tissue-recurrence of endophytic fungi in Tripterygium wilfordii. Fungal Divers 17:69–90Google Scholar
- Stierle A, Stierle D, Strobel G (2000) Taxol production by a microbe. US patent 6013493(A)Google Scholar
- Strobel G, Stierle AA, Stierle DB (1994) Taxol production by Taxomyces andreanae. US patent 5322779 (A)Google Scholar
- Suffness M, Wall ME (1995) Discovery and development of Taxol. In: Suffness M (ed) Taxol® science and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–25Google Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.