Advertisement

Current Cardiology Reports

, 19:87 | Cite as

Cardiovascular Disease, the Nitric Oxide Pathway and Risk of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia

  • Blossom C. M. Stephan
  • Stephanie L. Harrison
  • Hannah A. D. Keage
  • Abrar Babateen
  • Louise Robinson
  • Mario Siervo
Open Access
Psychological Aspects of Cardiovascular Diseases (A Steptoe, Section Editor)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Psychological Aspects of Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

Purpose of Review

In this review, we summarise the evidence on the association between cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cognitive impairment and explore the role of the nitric oxide (NO) pathway as a causal mechanism.

Recent Findings

Evidence from epidemiological studies suggests that the presence of CVD and its risk factors in midlife is associated with an increased risk of later life cognitive impairment and dementia. It is unclear what is driving this association but risk may be conveyed via an increase in neurodegeneration (e.g. amyloid deposition), vascular changes (e.g. small vessel disease) and mechanistically due to increased levels of oxidative stress and inflammation as well as changes in NO bioavailability.

Summary

CVDs and dementia are major challenges to global health worldwide. The NO pathway may be a promising biological candidate for future studies focused on reducing not only CVD but also risk of cognitive decline and dementia.

Keywords

Cardiovascular disease Cognitive impairment Dementia Endothelial function Nitric oxide 

Introduction

Midlife cardiovascular disease (CVD) and vascular risk factors have been consistently associated with an increased risk of later life cognitive impairment and dementia [1, 2, 3]. The underlying mechanisms explaining how CVDs and their risk factors negatively affect cognitive function are complex, remain unclear and will likely vary depending on the type, age of onset, duration and severity of disease and co-occurring risk factors such as low educational attainment and disease-related co-morbidity [4]. In addition to neurovascular (e.g. small vessel disease) and neuropathological (e.g. amyloid disposition) processes, other biological pathways are thought to be involved, such as the nitric oxide (NO), inflammatory (e.g. interleukin-6) and oxidative stress pathways. Each of these processes and the NO pathway have been implicated in the pathophysiology of CVD, vascular risk factors, cerebrovascular disease (e.g. stroke), cognitive impairment and dementia. However, the direction of causality is yet to be established.

The aim of this review is to firstly provide an overview of studies investigating the link between CVD and cognitive function including risk of dementia focusing on midlife to later life; and, secondly, discuss how the NO pathway can explain the risk for dementia conferred by CVD and its risk factors. Determining the mediating effect of the NO pathway between CVD and cognitive impairment and dementia is important to (1) identify and validate sensitive biomarkers to discriminate individuals at greatest risk of future cognitive decline and dementia; (2) test the efficacy of targeted nutritional interventions enhancing NO availability and whether these exert downstream positive effects on brain metabolic and vascular regulation; and, (3) inform dietary and lifestyle prevention programmes to concomitantly reduce incidence of CVD and dementia in older aged populations.

CVD, Cognitive Function and Dementia

Systematic reviews consistently report impairment in cognitive function and an increased risk of dementia (including all-cause, Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia) in individuals with a history of CVD including coronary heart disease, heart failure and atrial fibrillation [5, 6, 7, 8]. In addition, vascular risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes, excess adiposity, metabolic syndrome and physical inactivity, as well as CVD risk prediction models (e.g. the Framingham CVD and coronary heart disease risk scores), have been associated with cognitive decline and future risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in older aged populations [9••, 10, 11, 12]. Although general cognitive impairments have been shown in relation to CVD and vascular risk factors, deficits appear initially and more predominantly within attention, executive function (i.e. higher level cognitive skills associated with mental control and self-regulation such as planning, decision making and inhibition) and processing speed domains [13, 14, 15]. Where associations have not been reported, studies have been found to be under-powered for cognitive/dementia outcomes, have used limited neuropsychological tests restricted to a single or few cognitive domains and generally have had short follow-up times [9••]. The results may also depend on the characteristics of the study population (e.g. age, sex, ethnicity, disease severity), follow-up length, whether disease is controlled (pharmacological vs. non-pharmacological), presence of disease-related co-morbidity and population sampling (i.e. clinical vs. population based).

Indeed, the role of CVD and its risk factors in the development of cognitive impairment and dementia becomes less prominent, and potentially protective, with advancing age. Obesity (measured using the body mass index or waist-to-hip ratio) [16, 17, 18], hypertension [2], the metabolic syndrome [19] and hypercholesterolaemia [20, 21, 22] have been associated with non-significant or even protective effects on risk of cognitive decline and dementia in the very old population, defined as persons aged ≥85 years. Each of these conditions may have a distinct biological substrate explaining the reduced risk of cognitive impairment and dementia in this age group. For example, the obesity paradox could be explained by the role of adipose tissue in body weight regulation and as an energy provider for costly physiological processes (e.g. immune function, glomerular filtration or haematopoiesis) [23]. These functions may become vital at later stages of life when the capacity of frail bodies to cope with stressors and adversities is diminished and all available resources are required to help maintain physical and mental health [24]. The specific mechanisms that could explain the hypertension findings are still uncertain, but a higher blood pressure may maintain brain tissue vascular perfusion and a potential drop in blood pressure could be expected in individuals developing dementia due to dysregulation of autonomic regulatory mechanisms controlling vascular tone [25, 26]. Regarding the metabolic syndrome, the lack of an association in very old age groups could be due to how the metabolic syndrome is measured (i.e. cut-offs may not be age sensitive) and the fact that it is not a single entity but rather an amalgamation of several cardio-metabolic risk factors [27]. Regarding cholesterol, higher levels may be protective at very old age since cholesterol is an essential component in the structure of the myelin sheath of neurons, key for efficient transmission of nerve impulses and brain functioning [28, 29].

These results highlight that CVD and its risk factors are associated with cognitive impairment and dementia in middle-aged and young-old (i.e. 65–84 years of age) individuals. Therefore, it seems that the timing of disease (e.g. mid versus later life) and sample characteristics (e.g. age) are important in determining the strength as well as the direction (i.e. risk versus protective) of any association. Additional studies are needed to understand whether the tracking of CVD and its risk factors across the life course (i.e. duration of disease) and timing when the condition occurs influence the pattern of associations between CVD and its risk factors with cognitive function and dementia.

Structural and Functional Brain Changes Associated with CVD and Vascular Risk Factors: Links to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia

CVD can alter the brain structure and functioning including an increase in white matter lesions, small vessel disease, micro-bleeds, cerebral infarcts, grey matter atrophy and regional structural alterations (e.g. in the hippocampus), in addition to cerebral hypoperfusion and increased amyloid disposition [30, 31]. Each is a potential pathological mediator in the CVD-cognition pathway involved in the initiation and progression of cognitive symptoms [3]. Further, a recent review of brain changes associated with vascular risk factors including hypertension, obesity, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes and the metabolic syndrome also found evidence of brain structural and functional changes even in asymptomatic individuals that have been linked to cognitive function [32]. Findings from autopsy studies suggest additive or synergistic links between Alzheimer’s disease and vascular (i.e. cerebral amyloid angiopathy and small vessel disease) pathologies on the influence and promotion of cognitive impairment and risk of dementia in older aged populations [33]. Taken together, it emerges that an integrated, complex network of vascular, metabolic and neural mechanisms regulating cerebral blood flow and cognitive processes are likely to be important components in the pathophysiology underlying cognitive impairment and dementia in the presence of vascular disease.

Inflammation and Oxidative Stress

In all age groups, including the very old, a significant and increased risk of cognitive decline and dementia has been associated with high inflammation (e.g. C-reactive protein and interleukin-6) and oxidative stress (e.g. homocysteine) levels [10, 34]. Both oxidative stress and inflammation are closely connected to the pathophysiology of CVD and neurological diseases such as dementia [35, 36]. Regarding cardiovascular health, higher levels of oxidative stress and inflammation have been linked to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [37]. In relation to the brain, higher levels of oxidative stress and inflammation have been linked to impaired cellular function which may have direct effects on neuronal structure and integrity [38]. Further, inflammation is thought to be important in neurodegeneration, as a consequence as well as contributor to the development of some of the classic hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease pathology such as amyloid-beta plaques [39]. Oxidative stress and inflammation therefore contribute to the pathogenesis of CVDs and dementia and a key intermediate mechanistic link between these two conditions and its risk factors maybe be represented by the NO pathway given the pleiotropic roles of NO in the regulation of vascular, metabolic, immune and cognitive functions [40].

Physiological Roles of Nitric Oxide Production in Brain Function

NO is a reactive gas secreted in endothelial cells by the endothelial isoform of the enzyme NO synthase and is tonically released to control systemic vascular tone (i.e. arterial tone, cardiac output and venous capacitance) and platelet aggregation [41]. The vascular endothelium represents a physical and functional interface between circulating blood corpuscolate, fluid blood components (e.g. nutrients) and tissue metabolic processes [42]. Damage to the vascular endothelium is considered as a key pathogenetic element in the onset of atherosclerosis and CVD [43].

NO synthase converts l-arginine into an equimolar amount of NO and citrulline (enzymatic synthetic pathway) [41]. NO can also be generated by an alternative non-enzymatic pathway. This involves a two-step reduction of inorganic nitrate into nitrite by oral bacteria (first step) and further reduction of nitrite into NO in the stomach or vascular periphery by the low gastric pH and reductase activity of selected enzymes (second reducing step) [44]. A description of the NO synthetic pathways and pleiotropic effects on physiological functions is provided in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Pathways involved in the synthesis of nitric oxide and downstream physiological effects. NO 3 nitrate, NO 2 nitrite, NOS nitric oxide synthase. (Modified from Jones AM. Sports Medicine (Auckland, New Zealand). 2014; 44 (Suppl 1):35–45) [45]

The production of NO in the brain and its role in the control of neuronal functions has been comprehensively investigated in animal studies [46]. However, little evidence on the role of NO in brain function in humans exists. In a small number of studies, it has been demonstrated that NO is involved in learning and memory processes [47]. For example, NO donors (molsidomine, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine and sodium nitro-prussiate) and l-arginine have been found to help increase NO availability in the brain resulting in improvements in learning and memory [48, 49]. In addition, methyl analogues of l-arginine (i.e. asymmetric dimethylarginine, ADMA or nitro-l-arginine methyl ester), which are known to inhibit NO synthesis, have been associated with cognitive impairment in older adults with and without dementia [50, 51].

The beneficial effects of NO on brain function (e.g. learning and memory) appear to be mediated by several mechanisms. These include nitrosylation of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) and augmentation of excitability via modulation of voltage-gated potassium channels, which can mediate a calcium-dependent activation of neuronal NO synthase and downstream canonical cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP)-mediated signalling. NO also regulates other pathways via the post-translational modification (S-nitrosylation and 3-nitrotyrosination) of proteins involved in synaptic transmission and intracellular trafficking [52]. However, evidence also suggests that high NO generation could lead to abnormal protein modifications and impact on the pathogenesis of various neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease [53••]. Hence, a better understanding of the physiological role of NO on brain function and identification of the specific regulatory mechanisms may represent an important diagnostic and therapeutic strategy for the maintenance of cognitive function.

Endothelial Dysfunction, NO and Cognitive Impairment

Endothelial function is closely linked to the control of cerebrovascular reactivity, which is essential for creating a favourable environment for neurons, by maintaining energy-dependent processes and removing metabolic waste [54, 55, 56]. It has been suggested that impaired cerebrovascular reactivity is not only related to CVDs, but can also be associated with dementia [57]. Studies have explored the association between physiological (i.e. flow-mediated dilation and pulse wave velocity) and circulating biomarkers of endothelial function and NO bioavailability (i.e. nitrate, nitrite, ADMA) with cognitive impairment [51, 58, 59, 60, 61]. Flow-mediated dilation was found to be lower in patients with Alzheimer’s disease compared to that of controls and was significantly correlated directly with global cognitive function (Mini Mental State Examination scores) and Clinical Dementia Rating scores (inverse association) [62]. Similarly, pulse wave velocity has been found to be significantly higher in Alzheimer’s disease patients compared to controls without cognitive impairment [63]. Patients with Alzheimer’s disease have also been found to have higher plasma concentrations of ADMA and lower levels of nitrate compared to healthy controls [51, 64]. In contrast, two studies have reported lower ADMA concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer’s disease patients compared to healthy controls [65, 66] whereas one study found no significant differences between Alzheimer’s disease patients and age-matched control subjects [67]. Inconsistencies in findings could be related to differences in the stages of dementia across studies [67] and the degree of methylation of arginine residues in the brain due to a reduction of S-adenosyl-l-methionine [68]. S-Adenosyl-l-methionine concentrations are decreased in cerebrospinal fluid of Alzheimer’s disease patients which could have an effect on the generation and release of ADMA in the brain [69]. The net effect of this decrease in ADMA concentrations is an increased generation of NO in the brain which could be more susceptible to react with oxidative species and generate peroxynitrite, thus contributing to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease [70, 71]. Together, these results highlight the role of endothelial dysfunction in the pathophysiology of dementia and suggest that physiological markers of endothelial dysfunction are more closely associated with cognition compared to circulating biomarkers of NO.

It has also been suggested that impaired NO and endothelial dysfunction could be associated with cognitive impairment, and the development of Alzheimer’s disease, possibly due to dysfunction of cerebral blood flow and reduced oxygen supply to the brain [72]. Disruption of the neurovascular function could therefore be considered as a major risk factor for cerebral vascular deregulation, which could be affected by compromised NO activity. Manukhina et al. found that a reduced NO production in rats, following the administration of the NO synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), increased the harmful effects of beta-amyloid and was linked to memory deficits like those observed in Alzheimer’s disease, whereas the administration of NO donors showed a protective effect on beta-amyloid deposition [73]. As beta-amyloid is the primary component of the extracellular plaques and is increased in neurodegenerative disease, investigating the association between NO and beta-amyloid might give a better understanding of how vascular function is linked to neuronal damage.

NO-Targeted Nutritional Interventions

The biosynthesis of NO is highly dependent on arginine and inorganic nitrate intake since they are the main substrates for the enzymatic and non-enzymatic pathways, respectively. In addition, NO synthesis can be enhanced by the presence or activity of other nutrients such as vitamin C, polyphenols or polyunsaturated fatty acids [41, 44]. Arginine supplementation has been shown to improve cognitive function and cerebral blood flow in 16 older aged adults (mean age 79 years) [74]. However, more robust and larger clinical trials are needed to confirm these preliminary results. Dietary nitrate supplementation has also been associated with significant benefits on blood pressure and endothelial function [75•, 76]. A few studies have investigated the effect of dietary nitrate on cerebral blood flow, and a summary of these studies is described in Table 1. Overall, dietary nitrate has been found to enhance cerebral blood flow in humans of different ages and has been associated with improved cognitive processes [77, 78, 79]. However, studies are characterised by a short duration, small sample size and have restricted recruitment to healthy individuals with normal cognitive function. Therefore, it remains to be established whether nitrate supplementation over longer time periods influences cognitive function in older individuals (≥60 years) with cognitive impairment.
Table 1

Examples of human studies investigating the effect of inorganic nitrate on cerebral blood flow (CBF)

Reference

Participants

Study design

Measures

Dietary intervention/period

Main findings

Presley et al. 2011 [77]

16 healthy older individuals

RCT, crossover

CBF

High nitrate diet vs. low nitrate diet for 2 days

CBF increased with high-nitrate diet

Bond et al. 2013 [78]

12 healthy adults

RCT, crossover

CVRI, BP, TVR and BP measured at rest and at two exercise workloads

500-ml BJ or placebo (orange juice)/single dose

CVRI was decreased after single beetroot juice treatment at rest and at submaximal exercise workloads

Wightman et al. 2015 [79]

40 healthy adults

RCT, double-blind, placebo, parallel

NIRS, cognitive tasks (including 3s and 7s verbal series), BP, HR

450-ml BJ or placebo drink with negligible nitrate content/150 min

Nitrate improved CBF and performance on 3s serial subtractions test but not others

BJ beetroot juice, BP blood pressure, CBF cerebral blood flow, CVRI cerebrovascular resistance index, HR heart rate, NIRS near-infrared spectroscopy, RCT randomised clinical trial, TVR total vascular resistance

Implications for Research

The findings highlight that CVDs and vascular risk factors are major risks for the onset of cognitive decline and dementia. However, timing of the disease matters as the association varies with age. Further, while there is some preliminary evidence on the association between biomarkers of NO availability and cognitive processes in humans, most of research is still limited to animal models. However, these studies have demonstrated a role of NO-related mechanisms in the regulation of cognitive processes alongside the established effects on blood flow and cellular metabolism. These data can therefore prompt the development of research hypotheses in this area, such as to explore the association in longitudinal studies between physiological (i.e. flow-mediated dilation and pulse wave velocity) and biochemical (nitrate, nitrite, ADMA) biomarkers with prospective changes in cognitive function and risk of incident dementia. Positive results may have important diagnostic implications for the development of risk prediction and screening models for the early identification of individuals at risk of and with cognitive decline and dementia. Further, two nutrients (i.e. arginine and inorganic nitrate) are the precursors of NO in the enzymatic and non-enzymatic synthetic pathways and therefore dietary patterns (e.g. Mediterranean diet, DASH diet) or foods rich in these nutrients (e.g. lettuce, rocket, cabbage, eggs, beetroot, nuts) may be examples of targeted nutritional interventions aimed at increasing NO bioavailability and potentially reducing risk of CVD as well as improving cognitive function. However, the effects derived from the supplementation of these nutrients on cognitive function have not been explored in human clinical trials.

Conclusions

With a rapidly ageing population, CVDs and dementia are major challenges to global health and future health care provision. A critical characteristic of these trends is that the largest proportion of cases will be in low- and middle-income countries where public health resources and clinical services are limited. Therefore, sensitive and affordable biomarkers for the early identification of CVD and dementia risk are an urgent priority alongside testing effective nutritional and lifestyle preventative and treatment strategies to maintain cognitive function. The NO pathway may be a promising biological candidate to respond directly to these requisites (biomarkers and interventions) and future studies testing the role of NO as a mediator of the association between cardiovascular diseases and cognitive function are awaited.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Louise Robinson reports grants from the National Institute of Health Research Professorship.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Blossom CM Stephan, Stephanie L. Harrison, Hannah Keage, Abrar Babateen, Louise Robinson and Mario Siervo declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Norton S, Matthews FE, Barnes DE, Yaffe K, Brayne C. Potential for primary prevention of Alzheimer’s disease: an analysis of population-based data. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13(8):788–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sharp SI, Aarsland D, Day S, Sonnesyn H, Ballard C. Hypertension is a potential risk factor for vascular dementia: systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;26(7):661–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Snyder HM, Corriveau RA, Craft S, Faber JE, Greenberg SM, Knopman D, et al. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia including Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2015;11(6):710–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pressler SJ, Subramanian U, Kareken D, Perkins SM, Gradus-Pizlo I, Sauve MJ, et al. Cognitive deficits in chronic heart failure. Nurs Res. 2010;59(2):127–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cannon JA, Moffitt P, Perez-Moreno AC, Walters MR, Broomfield NM, McMurray JJV, et al. Cognitive impairment and heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Fail. 2017;23:464–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eggermont LH, de Boer K, Muller M, Jaschke AC, Kamp O, Scherder EJ. Cardiac disease and cognitive impairment: a systematic review. Heart. 2012;98(18):1334–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Bai R, Mohanty S, Pump A, Cereceda Brantes M, et al. Atrial fibrillation and the risk of incident dementia: a meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(11):1761–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vogels RL, Scheltens P, Schroeder-Tanka JM, Weinstein HC. Cognitive impairment in heart failure: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Heart Fail. 2007;9(5):440–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    •• Harrison SL, Ding J, Tang EY, Siervo M, Robinson L, Jagger C, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk models and longitudinal changes in cognition: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114431. This systematic review summarises evidence on the association between cardiovascular disease risk prediction models and longitudinal changes in cognitive function and risk of incident dementia. The results highlight that such models may be useful for identifying those individuals at high risk of future cognitive impairment/dementia (i.e. for prevention and risk reduction). CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Harrison SL, de Craen AJ, Kerse N, Teh R, Granic A, Davies K, et al. Predicting risk of cognitive decline in very old adults using three models: the Framingham Stroke Risk Profile; the cardiovascular risk factors, aging, and dementia model; and oxi-inflammatory biomarkers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(2):381–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Biessels GJ, Staekenborg S, Brunner E, Brayne C, Scheltens P. Risk of dementia in diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(1):64–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Purnell C, Gao S, Callahan CM, Hendrie HC. Cardiovascular risk factors and incident Alzheimer disease: a systematic review of the literature. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009;23(1):1–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dregan A, Stewart R, Gulliford MC. Cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive decline in adults aged 50 and over: a population-based cohort study. Age Ageing. 2013;42(3):338–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keage HA, Kurylowicz L, Lavrencic LM, Churches OF, Flitton A, Hofmann J, et al. Cerebrovascular function associated with fluid, not crystallized, abilities in older adults: a transcranial Doppler study. Psychol Aging. 2015;30(3):613–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kramer JH, Reed BR, Mungas D, Weiner MW, Chui HC. Executive dysfunction in subcortical ischaemic vascular disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(2):217–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anstey KJ, Cherbuin N, Budge M, Young J. Body mass index in midlife and late-life as a risk factor for dementia: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Obes Rev. 2011;12(5):e426–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Beydoun MA, Beydoun HA, Wang Y. Obesity and central obesity as risk factors for incident dementia and its subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2008;9(3):204–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keage HA, Gupta S, Brayne C. Risk for dementia and age at measurement. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;26(3):329–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harrison SL, Stephan BC, Siervo M, Granic A, Davies K, Wesnes KA, et al. Is there an association between metabolic syndrome and cognitive function in very old adults? The Newcastle 85+ Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(4):667–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mielke MM, Zandi PP, Shao H, Waern M, Östling S, Guo X, et al. The 32-year relationship between cholesterol and dementia from midlife to late life (e–pub ahead of print). Neurology. 2010;75(21):1888–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mielke MM, Zandi PP, Sjogren M, Gustafson D, Ostling S, Steen B, et al. High total cholesterol levels in late life associated with a reduced risk of dementia. Neurology. 2005;64(10):1689–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duron E, Hanon O. Vascular risk factors, cognitve decline, and dementia. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(2):363–81.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rodriguez A, Ezquerro S, Mendez-Gimenez L, Becerril S, Fruhbeck G. Revisiting the adipocyte: a model for integration of cytokine signaling in the regulation of energy metabolism. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2015;309(8):E691–714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Osher E, Stern N. Obesity in elderly subjects: in sheep’s clothing perhaps, but still a wolf! Diabetes Care. 2009;32(Suppl 2):S398–402.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Corrada MM, Hayden KM, Paganini-Hill A, Bullain SS, DeMoss J, Aguirre C, et al. Age of onset of hypertension and risk of dementia in the oldest-old: the 90+ study. Alzheimer’s Dement. 13(2):103–10.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kennelly SP, Lawlor BA, Kenny RA. Blood pressure and dementia—a comprehensive review. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2009;2(4):241–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siervo M, Harrison SL, Jagger C, Robinson L, Stephan BC. Metabolic syndrome and longitudinal changes in cognitive function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimer’s Dis: JAD. 2014;41(1):151–61.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ricciarelli R, Canepa E, Marengo B, Marinari UM, Poli G, Pronzato MA, et al. Cholesterol and Alzheimer’s disease: a still poorly understood correlation. IUBMB Life. 2012;64(12):931–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schreurs BG. The effects of cholesterol on learning and memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;34(8):1366–79.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Leritz EC, McGlinchey RE, Kellison I, Rudolph JL, Milberg WP. Cardiovascular disease risk factors and cognition in the elderly. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2011;5(5):407–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Richardson K, Stephan BC, Ince PG, Brayne C, Matthews FE, Esiri MM. The neuropathology of vascular disease in the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS). Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9(6):687–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Friedman JI, Tang CY, de Haas HJ, Changchien L, Goliasch G, Dabas P, et al. Brain imaging changes associated with risk factors for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in asymptomatic patients. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(10):1039–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kalaria RN. Vascular basis for brain degeneration: faltering controls and risk factors for dementia. Nutr Rev. 2010;68(Suppl 2):S74–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Agostinho P, Cunha RA, Oliveira C. Neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2010;16(25):2766–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Manoharan S, Guillemin GJ. The role of reactive oxygen species in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and Huntington’s disease: a mini review. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:8590578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Verdile G, Keane KN, Cruzat VF, Medic S, Sabale M, Rowles J, et al. Inflammation and oxidative stress: the molecular connectivity between insulin resistance, obesity, and Alzheimer’s disease. Mediat Inflamm. 2015;2015:105828.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis. Nature. 2000;407(6801):233–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Floyd RA, Hensley K. Oxidative stress in brain aging. Neurobiol Aging. 23(5):795–807.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wyss-Coray T. Ageing, neurodegeneration and brain rejuvenation. Nature. 2016;539(7628):180–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hirst DG, Robson T. Nitric oxide physiology and pathology. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ). 2011;704:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Moncada S, Palmer RM, Higgs EA. Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. 1991;43(2):109–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Galley HF, Webster NR. Physiology of the endothelium. Br J Anaesth. 2004;93(1):105–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Davignon J, Ganz P. Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2004;109(23 suppl 1):III-27–32.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Gladwin MT. The nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008;7(2):156–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jones AM. Dietary nitrate supplementation and exercise performance. Sports Med (Auckland, New Zealand). 2014;44(Suppl 1):35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Garry PS, Ezra M, Rowland MJ, Westbrook J, Pattinson KT. The role of the nitric oxide pathway in brain injury and its treatment—from bench to bedside. Exp Neurol. 2015;263:235–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Paul V, Ekambaram P. Involvement of nitric oxide in learning & memory processes. Indian J Med Res. 2011;133(5):471–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pitsikas N, Rigamonti AE, Cella SG, Sakellaridis N, Muller EE. The nitric oxide donor molsidomine antagonizes age-related memory deficits in the rat. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26(2):259–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Xu X, Russell T, Bazner J, Hamilton J. NMDA receptor antagonist AP5 and nitric oxide synthase inhibitor 7-NI affect different phases of learning and memory in goldfish. Brain Res. 2001;889(1–2):274–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Garthwaite J, Boulton CL. Nitric oxide signaling in the central nervous system. Annu Rev Physiol. 1995;57:683–706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Asif M, Soiza RL, McEvoy M, Mangoni AA. Asymmetric dimethylarginine: a possible link between vascular disease and dementia. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2013;10(4):347–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Steinert JR, Chernova T, Forsythe ID. Nitric oxide signaling in brain function, dysfunction, and dementia. Neuroscientist. 2010;16(4):435–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    •• Balez R, Ooi L. Getting to NO Alzheimer’s disease: neuroprotection versus neurotoxicity mediated by nitric oxide. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2016;2016:3806157. This review summarises evidence on the link between the NO pathway and pathogenic mechanisms of Alzheimer’s disease. The paper highlights the dual role of NO as a protective or harmful molecule depending on tissue concentration levels and interaction with oxidative stress. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pretnar-Oblak J. Cerebral endothelial function determined by cerebrovascular reactivity to L-arginine. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Yates KF, Sweat V, Yau PL, Turchiano MM, Convit A. Impact of metabolic syndrome on cognition and brain: a selected review of the literature. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32(9):2060–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kelleher RJ, Soiza RL. Evidence of endothelial dysfunction in the development of Alzheimer’s disease: is Alzheimer’s a vascular disorder? American journal of cardiovascular disease. 2013;3(4):197–226.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sun Y, Cao W, Ding W, Wang Y, Han X, Zhou Y, et al. Cerebral blood flow alterations as assessed by 3D ASL in cognitive impairment in patients with subcortical vascular cognitive impairment: a marker for disease severity. Front Aging Neurosci. 2016;8:211.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Naiberg MR, Newton DF, Goldstein BI. Flow-mediated dilation and neurocognition: systematic review and future directions. Psychosom Med. 2016;78(2):192–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Scuteri A, Wang H. Pulse wave velocity as a marker of cognitive impairment in the elderly. J Alzheimer’s Dis: JAD. 2014;42(Suppl 4):S401–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rabkin SW. Arterial stiffness: detection and consequences in cognitive impairment and dementia of the elderly. J Alzheimer’s Dis: JAD. 2012;32(3):541–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Harmon D, Eustace N, Ghori K, Butler M, O'Callaghan S, O'Donnell A, et al. Plasma concentrations of nitric oxide products and cognitive dysfunction following coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2005;22(4):269–76.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dede DS, Yavuz B, Yavuz BB, Cankurtaran M, Halil M, Ulger Z, et al. Assessment of endothelial function in Alzheimer’s disease: is Alzheimer’s disease a vascular disease? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(10):1613–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hanon O, Haulon S, Lenoir H, Seux ML, Rigaud AS, Safar M, et al. Relationship between arterial stiffness and cognitive function in elderly subjects with complaints of memory loss. Stroke. 2005;36(10):2193–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Selley ML. Increased concentrations of homocysteine and asymmetric dimethylarginine and decreased concentrations of nitric oxide in the plasma of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2003;24(7):903–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Abe T, Tohgi H, Murata T, Isobe C, Sato C. Reduction in asymmetrical dimethylarginine, an endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, in the cerebrospinal fluid during aging and in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2001;312(3):177–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Arlt S, Schwedhelm E, Kolsch H, Jahn H, Linnebank M, Smulders Y, et al. Dimethylarginines, homocysteine metabolism, and cerebrospinal fluid markers for Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis: JAD. 2012;31(4):751–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Mulder C, Wahlund L-O, Blomberg M, de Jong S, van Kamp GJ, Scheltens P, et al. Alzheimer’s disease is not associated with altered concentrations of the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor asymmetric dimethylarginine in cerebrospinal fluid. J Neural Transm. 2002;109(9):1203–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Paik WK, Kim S. NG-Methylarginines: biosynthesis, biochemical function and metabolism. Amino Acids. 1993;4(3):267–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bottiglieri T, Godfrey P, Flynn T, Carney MW, Toone BK, Reynolds EH. Cerebrospinal fluid S-adenosylmethionine in depression and dementia: effects of treatment with parenteral and oral S-adenosylmethionine. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990;53(12):1096–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Su JH, Deng G, Cotman CW. Neuronal DNA damage precedes tangle formation and is associated with up-regulation of nitrotyrosine in Alzheimer’s disease brain. Brain Res. 1997;774(1–2):193–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Smith MA, Richey Harris PL, Sayre LM, Beckman JS, Perry G. Widespread peroxynitrite-mediated damage in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 1997;17(8):2653–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Toda N, Ayajiki K, Okamura T. Cerebral blood flow regulation by nitric oxide in neurological disorders. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2009;87(8):581–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Manukhina EB, Pshennikova MG, Goryacheva AV, Khomenko IP, Mashina SY, Pokidyshev DA, et al. Role of nitric oxide in prevention of cognitive disorders in neurodegenerative brain injuries in rats. Bull Exp Biol Med. 2008;146(4):391–5.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ohtsuka Y, Nakaya J. Effect of oral administration of L-arginine on senile dementia. Am J Med. 2000;108(5):439.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    • Ashor AW, Lara J, Siervo M. Medium-term effects of dietary nitrate supplementation on systolic and diastolic blood pressure in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2017;35(7):1353–9. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides an update on the current evidence on the association between dietary nitrate supplementation and improvement in blood pressure control. This has implications for the design of future studies aimed at improving cognition in people with a high cardiovascular disease risk profile. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Lara J, Ashor AW, Oggioni C, Ahluwalia A, Mathers JC, Siervo M. Effects of inorganic nitrate and beetroot supplementation on endothelial function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Nutr. 2016;55(2):451–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Presley TD, Morgan AR, Bechtold E, Clodfelter W, Dove RW, Jennings JM, et al. Acute effect of a high nitrate diet on brain perfusion in older adults. Nitric Oxide Biol Chem. 2011;24(1):34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Bond V, Curry BH, Adams RG, Asadi MS, Millis RM, Haddad GE. Effects of dietary nitrates on systemic and cerebrovascular hemodynamics. Cardiol Res Pract. 2013;2013:435629.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Wightman EL, Haskell-Ramsay CF, Thompson KG, Blackwell JR, Winyard PG, Forster J, et al. Dietary nitrate modulates cerebral blood flow parameters and cognitive performance in humans: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover investigation. Physiol Behav. 2015;149:149–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Blossom C. M. Stephan
    • 1
  • Stephanie L. Harrison
    • 2
  • Hannah A. D. Keage
    • 3
  • Abrar Babateen
    • 4
    • 5
  • Louise Robinson
    • 1
  • Mario Siervo
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Health and Society and Newcastle University Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle Biomedical Research Building, Campus for Ageing and VitalityNewcastle upon Tyne,UK
  2. 2.Department of Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Health SciencesFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
  3. 3.Cognitive Ageing and Impairment Neurosciences Laboratory, School of Psychology, Social Work and Social PolicyUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  4. 4.Institute of Cellular MedicineNewcastle University, Newcastle Biomedical Research Building, Campus for Ageing and VitalityNewcastle upon Tyne,UK
  5. 5.Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Clinical Nutrition DepartmentUmm Al-Qura UniversityMakkahSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations