Advertisement

Social Psychology of Education

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 471–490 | Cite as

Gender and ethnic stereotypes in student teachers’ judgments: a new look from a shifting standards perspective

  • Katharina HolderEmail author
  • Ursula Kessels
Article

Abstract

Teacher judgments of student performance might be biased by stereotypes, which can result in disadvantages for members of negatively stereotyped social groups. On the basis of the shifting standards theory, we examined gender and ethnic biases in student teachers’ judgments. According to this theory, whether such judgment biases are masked or revealed depends on the judgment context. Specifically, the use of subjective scales allows different standards of judgment to be applied to members of different social groups and should therefore mask biases, whereas the use of objective scales does not allow for a standard shift and should therefore reveal stereotyped expectations. The present studies tested predictions derived from this theory by varying the judgment context: using “educational standards” as a setting that requires objective scales and “inclusion” as a setting that employs subjective scales. Study 1 explored the stereotype that girls are not as good in mathematics as boys, Study 2 the stereotype that students of Turkish origin are not as good in German as nonimmigrants. Participants in two experimental vignette studies (Study 1: N = 155; Study 2: N = 265) were asked to evaluate the performance of a stereotyped or nonstereotyped target student in a context requiring ratings on either objective or subjective scales (2 × 2 between-subjects design). In line with the shifting standards theory, stereotyped students were evaluated similarly to nonstereotyped students on subjective scales but were evaluated more negatively on objective scales. Results indicate that student teachers’ judgments are biased by gender and ethnic stereotypes.

Keywords

Shifting standards Gender stereotypes Ethnic stereotypes Teacher judgments 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Artiles, A. J., Kozleski, E. B., Dorn, S., & Christensen, C. (2006). Learning in inclusive education research: Re-mediating theory and methods with a transformative agenda. Review of Research in Education, 30, 65–108. doi: 10.3102/0091732X030001065 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, R. E., Gottesman, R. L., Rock, D. A., & Cerullo, F. (1993). Influence of behavior perceptions and gender on teachers’ judgments of students’ academic skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 347–356. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.2.347 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biernat, M. (1995). The shifting standards model: Implications of stereotype accuracy for social judgment. In Y.-T. Lee, L. J. Jussim, & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 87–114). Washington: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biernat, M. (2009). Stereotypes and shifting standards. In D. N. Todd (Ed.), Handbook of stereotyping and prejudice (pp. 137–152). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  6. Biernat, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5–20. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.5 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biernat, M., Manis, M., & Nelson, T. E. (1991). Stereotypes and standards of judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 485–499. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.485 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biernat, M., & Vescio, T. K. (2002). She swings, she hits, she’s great, she’s benched. Implications of gender-based shifting standards for judgment and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 66–77. doi: 10.1177/0146167202281006 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Booth, T., & Ainscow, M. (2011). Index for inclusion. Developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol: CSIE.Google Scholar
  10. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  11. de Boer, H., Bosker, R. J., & van der Werf, Margaretha P. C. (2010). Sustainability of teacher expectation bias effects on long-term student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 168–179. doi: 10.1037/a0017289 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dickhäuser, O., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2003). Wahrgenommene Lehrereinschätzungen und das Fähigkeitsselbstkonzept von Jungen und Mädchen in der Grundschule [Perceptions of teacher evaluations and the academic self-concept of boys and girls in elementary school]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 50, 182–190.Google Scholar
  13. Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., van der Werf, G., Buunk, A. P., & van der Zee, Y. G. (2008). Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research, 78, 828–879. doi: 10.3102/0034654308321210 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in education and what it means for American schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Fennema, E., Peterson, P., Carpenter, T. R., & Lubinski, C. A. (1990). Teacher’s attributions and beliefs about girls, boys, and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21, 55–69. doi: 10.1007/BF00311015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. doi: 10.1177/001872675400700202 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60317-2 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gebhardt, M., Rauch, D., Mang, J., Sälzer, C., & Stanat, P. (2013). Mathematische Kompetenz von Schülerinnen und Schülern mit Zuwanderungshintergrund [Mathematical competencies of students with immigrant backgrounds]. In M. Prenzel, C. Sälzer, E. Klieme, & O. Köller (Eds.), PISA 2012. Fortschritte und Herausforderungen in Deutschland (pp. 275–308). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  19. Glock, S. (2016). Does ethnicity matter? The impact of stereotypical expectations on in-service teachers’ judgments of students. Social Psychology of Education, 19, 493–509. doi: 10.1007/s11218-016-9349-7 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glock, S., & Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2013). Does nationality matter? The impact of stereotypical expectations on student teachers’ judgments. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 111–127. doi: 10.1007/s11218-012-9197-z .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glock, S., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Klapproth, F., & Böhmer, M. (2013). Beyond judgment bias. How students’ ethnicity and academic profile consistency influence teachers’ tracking judgments. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 555–573. doi: 10.1007/s11218-013-9227-5 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gresch, C., & Becker, M. (2010). Sozial-und leistungsbedingte Disparitäten im Übergangsverhalten bei türkischstämmigen Kindern und Kindern aus (Spät-)Aussiedlerfamilien [Social and performance-related disparities in the transitional behaviour of children of Turkish origin and children from (late) resettler families]. In K. Maaz, J. Baumert, C. Gresch, & N. McElvany (Eds.), Der Übergang von der Grundschule in die weiterführende Schule. Leistungsgerechtigkeit und regionale, soziale und ethnisch-kulturelle Disparitäten (pp. 181–200). Berlin: BMBF.Google Scholar
  23. Jansen, M., Schroeders, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2014). Academic self-concept in science: Multidimensionality, relations to achievement measures, and gender differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.12.003 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jansen, M., Schroeders, U., Lüdtke, O., & Marsh, H. W. (2015). Contrast and assimilation effects of dimensional comparisons in five subjects. An extension of the I/E model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 1086–1101. doi: 10.1037/edu0000021 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1992). Teacher expectations II: Construction and reflection of student achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 947–961. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.947 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 131–155. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_3 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Keller, C. (2001). Effect of teachers’ stereotyping on students’ stereotyping of mathematics as a male domain. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(2), 165–173. doi: 10.1080/00224540109600544 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kessels, U., Heyder, A., Latsch, M., & Hannover, B. (2014). How gender differences in academic engagement relate to students’ gender identity. Educational Research, 56, 220–229. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2014.898916 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klieme, E., Avenarius, H., Blum, W., Döbrich, P., Gruber, H., & Prenzel, M., et al. (2003). Zur Entwicklung nationaler Bildungsstandards. Eine Expertise [The development of national education standards]. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.Google Scholar
  30. KMK-Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (2004a). Bildungsstandards im Fach Deutsch für den Primarbereich. Beschluss vom 15.10.2004 [Educational standards for German in primary education. Resolution of 15 October 2004]. Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  31. KMK-Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (2004b). Bildungsstandards im Fach Mathematik für den Primarbereich. Beschluss vom 15.10.2004 [Educational standards for mathematics in primary education. Resolution of 15 October 2004]. Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  32. KMK-Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (2010). Konzeption der Kultusministerkonferenz zur Nutzung der Bildungsstandards für die Unterrichtsentwicklung [Concept of the standing conference of the ministers of education and cultural affairs of the Länder in the Federal Republic of Germany: The usage of educational standards to develop and improve education]. Köln: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  33. Li, Q. (1999). Teachers’ beliefs and gender differences in mathematics: A review. Educational Research, 41, 63–76. doi: 10.1080/0013188990410106 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lorenz, G., Gentrup, S., Kristen, C., Stanat, P., & Kogan, I. (2016). Stereotype bei Lehrkräften? Eine Untersuchung systematisch verzerrter Lehrererwartungen [Stereotypes among teachers? A study of systematic bias in teacher expectations]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 68, 89–111. doi: 10.1007/s11577-015-0352-3 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maaz, K., Baeriswyl, F., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Herkunft zensiert? Leistungsdiagnostik und soziale Ungleichheit in der Schule [Background censored? Performance evaluation and social inequalities in school]. In D. Deißner (Ed.), Chancen bilden. Wege zu einer gerechteren Bildungein internationaler Erfahrungsaustausch (pp. 187–341). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Relations among dimensions of self-attribution, dimensions of self-concept, and academic achievements. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1291–1308. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.76.6.1291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129–149. doi: 10.3102/00028312023001129 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marsh, H. W. (1993). Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement and research. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 59–98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Marsh, H. W. (2005). Big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19, 141–144. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.19.3.141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. (2002). The pivotal role of frames of reference in academic self-concept formation: the “big fish-little pond” effect. In F. Pajares & T. C. Urdan (Eds.), Academic motivation of adolescents (pp. 83–123). Greenwich: Information Age Pub.Google Scholar
  41. McKown, C., & Weinstein, R. S. (2002). Modeling the role of child ethnicity and gender in children’s differential response to teacher expectations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 159–184. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01425.x .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McKown, C., & Weinstein, R. S. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 235–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.05.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44–59. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., et al. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 10593–10597. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809921106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nürnberger, M., Nerb, J., Schmitz, F., Keller, J., & Sütterlin, S. (2014). Implicit gender stereotypes and essentialist beliefs predict preservice teachers’ tracking recommendations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 84, 152–174. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2015.1027807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. OECD. (2015). Immigrant students at school. Easing the journey towards integration. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parks, F. R., & Kennedy, J. H. (2007). The impact of race, physical attractiveness, and gender on education majors’ and teachers’ perceptions of student competence. Journal of Black Studies, 37, 936–943. doi: 10.1177/0021934705285955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Prenzel, M., Sälzer, C., Klieme, E., & Köller, O. (Eds.) (2013). PISA 2012. Fortschritte und Herausforderungen in Deutschland [PISA 2012. Improvements and challenges in Germany]. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  49. Ready, D. D., & Wright, D. L. (2011). Accuracy and inaccuracy in teachers’ perceptions of young children’s cognitive abilities. The role of child background and classroom context. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 335–360. doi: 10.3102/0002831210374874 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2015). Sex differences in mathematics and science achievement: A meta-analysis of National Assessment of Educational Progress assessments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 645–662. doi: 10.1037/edu0000012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Riegle-Crumb, C., & Humphries, M. (2012). Exploring bias in math teachers’ perceptions of students’ ability by gender and race/ethnicity. Gender & Society, 26, 290–322. doi: 10.1177/0891243211434614 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rodriguez, G. (2010). Statistik und Tendenzen in der turksprachigen Vornamengebung [Turkish names in Germany—statistics and tendencies]. Namenkundliche Informationen, 97, 95–107.Google Scholar
  53. Rudolph, U., Böhm, R., & Lummer, M. (2007). Ein Vorname sagt mehr als 1000 Worte [A name says more than a thousand words: The social perception of first names]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38, 17–31. doi: 10.1024/0044-3514.38.1.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sälzer, C., Reiss, K., Schiepe-Tiska, A., Prenzel, M., & Heinze, A. (2013). Zwischen Grundlagenwissen und Anwendungsbezug: Mathematische Kompetenz im internationalen Vergleich. [Between basic knowledge and application: Mathematical competence in international comparison]. In M. Prenzel, C. Sälzer, E. Klieme, & O. Köller (Eds.), PISA 2012. Fortschritte und Herausforderungen in Deutschland (pp. 47–98). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  55. Schöber, C., Retelsdorf, J., & Köller, O. (2015). Verbales schulisches Selbstkonzept und sprachliche Leistungen in Gruppen mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund [Verbal academic self-concept and achievement in groups with and without migration background]. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 62, 89–105. doi: 10.2378/peu2015.art10d .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Seitz, S., & Platte, A. (2006). Unterricht zwischen Vielfalt und Standardisierung [Education between heterogeneity and standardization]. In A. Platte, S. Seitz, & K. Terfloth (Eds.), Inklusive Bildungsprozesse (pp. 122–131). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
  57. Shajek, A., Lüdtke, O., & Stanat, P. (2006). Akademische Selbstkonzepte bei Jugendlichen mit Migrationshintergrund [Academic self-concepts of immigrant students]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 34, 125–145.Google Scholar
  58. Sprietsma, M. (2013). Discrimination in grading. Experimental evidence from primary school teachers. Empirical Economics, 45, 523–538. doi: 10.1007/s00181-012-0609-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stanat, P., Rauch, D., & Segeritz, M. (2010). Schülerinnen und Schüler mit Migrationshintergrund [Immigrant students]. In E. Klieme, C. Artelt, J. Hartig, N. Jude, O. Köller, & M. Prenzel, et al. (Eds.), PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt (pp. 200–230). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  60. Steffens, M. C., & Jelenec, P. (2011). Separating implicit gender stereotypes regarding math and language. Implicit ability stereotypes are self-serving for boys and men, but not for girls and women. Sex Roles, 64, 324–335. doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9924-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 743–762. doi: 10.1037/a0027627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tenenbaum, H. R., & Ruck, M. D. (2007). Are teachers’ expectations different for racial minority than for European American students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 253–273. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teacher perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 49–62. doi: 10.1023/A:1020518104346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Timmermans, A. C., de Boer, H., & van der Werf, Margaretha P. C. (2016). An investigation of the relationship between teachers’ expectations and teachers’ perceptions of student attributes. Social Psychology of Education, 19, 217–240. doi: 10.1007/s11218-015-9326-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convention_accessible_pdf.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2017.
  66. van den Bergh, L., Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., Voeten, M., & Holland, R. W. (2010). The implicit prejudiced attitudes of teachers. Relations to teacher expectations and the ethnic achievement gap. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 497–527. doi: 10.3102/0002831209353594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Werning, R. (2010). Inklusion—Herausforderungen, Widersprüche und Perspektiven [Inclusion—challenges, contradictions and perspectives]. Lernchancen, 78, 4–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education and PsychologyFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations