How Sexy are Sexist Men? Women’s Perception of Male Response Profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
In Studies 1 to 3, German female students (total N = 326) rated the likability and typicality of male targets: a nonsexist, a benevolent sexist, a hostile sexist, and (in Studies 2 and 3) an ambivalent sexist. When targets were presented as response profiles in the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (Glick and Fiske 1996) (Studies 2 and 3), the benevolent sexist was rated to be most likable but least typical, whereas the ambivalent sexist was rated to be highly typical. Thus, women were aware of a link between benevolent and hostile sexism and approved of men’s benevolent sexism, especially when it was not paired with hostile sexism. Likability ratings were moderated by participants’ own benevolent sexism and feminist attitude.
KeywordsAmbivalent sexism Attraction Feminist attitudes Gender relations Person perception
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: science and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Harpercollins College Publishers.Google Scholar
- Newcomb, T. M. (1961). The acquaintance process. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
- United Nations (2008). Human development report 2007/2008. Retrieved January 5, 2009, from the United Nations Development Programme Web site: http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_20072008_EN_Complete.pdf.