Exploring dispersal barriers using landscape genetic resistance modelling in scarlet macaws of the Peruvian Amazon
Dispersal is essential for species persistence and landscape genetic studies are valuable tools for identifying potential barriers to dispersal. Macaws have been studied for decades in their natural habitat, but we still have no knowledge of how natural landscape features influence their dispersal.
We tested for correlations between landscape resistance models and the current population genetic structure of macaws in continuous rainforest to explore natural barriers to their dispersal.
We studied scarlet macaws (Ara macao) over a 13,000 km2 area of continuous primary Amazon rainforest in south-eastern Peru. Using remote sensing imagery from the Carnegie Airborne Observatory, we constructed landscape resistance surfaces in CIRCUITSCAPE based on elevation, canopy height and above-ground carbon distribution. We then used individual- and population-level genetic analyses to examine which landscape features influenced gene flow (genetic distance between individuals and populations).
Across the lowland rainforest we found limited population genetic differentiation. However, a population from an intermountain valley of the Andes (Candamo) showed detectable genetic differentiation from two other populations (Tambopata) located 20–60 km away (FST = 0.008, P = 0.001–0.003). Landscape resistance models revealed that genetic distance between individuals was significantly positively related to elevation.
Our landscape resistance analysis suggests that mountain ridges between Candamo and Tambopata may limit gene flow in scarlet macaws. These results serve as baseline data for continued landscape studies of parrots, and will be useful for understanding the impacts of anthropogenic dispersal barriers in the future.
KeywordsPopulation genetics Dispersal Movement ecology Feathers Microsatellites Neotropics Andes Barriers LiDAR
Supplementary material 2 (MP4 288299 kb)
- Asner GP, Knapp DE, Martin RE, Tupayachi R, Anderson CB, Mascaro J, Sinca F, Chadwick KD, Higgins M, Farfan W, Llactayo W, Silman MR (2014) Targeted carbon conservation at national scales with high-resolution monitoring. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(47):E5016–E5022CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Baraloto C, Alverga P, Quispe SB, Barnes G, Bejar Chura N, da Silva IB, Castro W, da Souza H, de Souza Moll IE, Del Alcazar Chilo J, Duenas Linares H, Quispe JG, Kenji D, Marsik M, Medeiros H, Murphy S, Rockwell C, Selaya G, Shenkin A, Silveira M, Southworth J, Vasquez Colomo GH, Perz S (2015) Effects of road infrastructure on forest value across a tri-national Amazonian frontier. Biol Conserv 191:674–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- BirdLife International and NatureServe (2014) Bird species distribution maps of the world. Version 4.0. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK and NatureServe, Arlington, USA.Google Scholar
- Collar N, Boesman P, Sharpe CJ (2016) Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. http://www.hbw.com/node/54620. Accessed 4 Oct 2016
- Conover T (2003) Perú’s long haul: highway to riches, or ruin? Natl Geogr 203:80–100Google Scholar
- Forshaw JM (2011) Parrots of the world. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
- Girardin CAJ, Malhi Y, AragÃO LEOC, Mamani M, Huaraca Huasco W, Durand L, Feeley KJ, Rapp J, Silva-Espejo JE, Silman M, Salinas N, Whittaker RJ (2010) Net primary productivity allocation and cycling of carbon along a tropical forest elevational transect in the Peruvian Andes. Glob Change Biol 16(12):3176–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- IUCN (2014) The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2014.2. http://www.iucnredlist.org/
- McDougald D, Rice SA, Barraud N, Steinberg PD, Kjelleberg S (2012) Should we stay or should we go: mechanisms and ecological consequences for biofilm dispersal. Nat Rev Micro 10(1):39–50Google Scholar
- McRae BH, Shah VB, Mohapatra TK (2013) Circuitscape 4 user guide. The Nature Conservancy. http://www.circuitscape.org/
- Munn CA (1992) Macaw biology and ecotourism, or “When a bird in the bush is worth two in the hand”. In: Beissinger SR, Snyder NFR, Munn CA (eds) New world parrots in crisis: solutions from conservation biology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 47–72Google Scholar
- R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- Schmidt KL (2013) Spatial and temporal patterns of genetic variation in scarlet macaws (Ara macao): implications for population management in La Selva Maya. Columbia University, Central AmericaGoogle Scholar
- Schofield G, Dimadi A, Fossette S, Katselidis KA, Koutsoubas D, Lilley MKS, Luckman A, Pantis JD, Karagouni AD, Hays GC (2013) Satellite tracking large numbers of individuals to infer population level dispersal and core areas for the protection of an endangered species. Divers Distrib 19(7):834–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tickell O (1993) Highway threatens Tambopata. Geographical 65:7–9Google Scholar
- Vigo G, Williams M, Brightsmith DJ (2011) Growth of scarlet macaw (Ara macao) chicks in southeastern Peru. Ornitol Neotropical 22:143–153Google Scholar
- Wang Y-H, Yang K-C, Bridgman C, Lin L-K (2008) Habitat suitability modelling to correlate gene flow with landscape connectivity. Landsc Ecol 23(8):989–1000Google Scholar