Abstract
This Perspective explores how consideration of hydrogen bonding can be used to both predict and better understand partition coefficients. It is shown how polarity of both compounds and substructures can be estimated from measured alkane/water partition coefficients. When polarity is defined in this manner, hydrogen bond donors are typically less polar than hydrogen bond acceptors. Analysis of alkane/water partition coefficients in conjunction with molecular electrostatic potential calculations suggests that aromatic chloro substituents may be less lipophilic than is generally believed and that some of the effect of chloro-substitution stems from making the aromatic π-cloud less available to hydrogen bond donors. Relationships between polarity and calculated hydrogen bond basicity are derived for aromatic nitrogen and carbonyl oxygen. Aligned hydrogen bond acceptors appear to present special challenges for prediction of alkane/water partition coefficients and this may reflect ‘frustration’ of solvation resulting from overlapping hydration spheres. It is also shown how calculated hydrogen bond basicity can be used to model the effect of aromatic aza-substitution on octanol/water partition coefficients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
van de Waterbeemd H, Smith DA, Jones BC (2001) Lipophilicity in PK design: methyl, ethyl, futile. J Comput Aided Mol Des 15:273–286
Giaginis C, Tsantili-Kakoulidou A (2008) Alternative measures of lipophilicity: from octanol–water partitioning to IAM retention. J Pharm Sci 97:2984–3004
Waring MJ (2010) Lipophilicity in drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 5:235–248
Sarkar A, Kellogg GE (2010) Hydrophobicity—shake flasks, protein folding and drug discovery. Curr Top Med Chem 10:67–83
Collander R (1937) Permeability. Ann Rev Biochem 6:1–18
Lindemann B, Solomon AK (1962) Permeability of luminal surface of intestinal mucosal cells. J Gen Physiol 45:801–810
Oldendorf WH (1974) Lipid solubility and drug penetration of the blood brain barrier. Exp Biol Med 147:813–816
Banks WA, Kastin A (1985) Peptides and the blood–brain barrier: lipophilicity as a predictor of permeability. Brain Res Bull 15:287–292
Yalkowsky SH, Valvan SC (1980) Solubility and partitioning I: solubility of nonelectrolytes in water. J Pharm Sci 69:912–922
Hansch C, Björkroth JP, Leo A (1987) Hydrophobicity and central nervous system agents: on the principle of minimal hydrophobicity in drug design. J Pharm Sci 76:663–687
Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ (1997) Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 23:3–25
Kenny PW, Montanari CA (2013) Inflation of correlation in the pursuit of drug-likeness. J Comput Aided Mol Des 27:1–13
Nernst W (1891) Verteilung eines Stoffes zwischen zwei Lösungsmitteln und zwischen Lösungsmittel und Dampfraum. Z Phys Chem 8:110–139
Leo A, Hansch C, Elkins D (1971) Partition coefficients and their uses. Chem Rev 71:525–616
Dearden JC, Bresnen GM (1988) The measurement of partition coefficients. Quant Struct Act Relatsh 7:133–144
Mannhold R, Poda GI, Ostermann C, Tetko IV (2009) Calculation of molecular lipophilicity: state-of-the-art and comparison of log P methods on more than 96,000 compounds. J Pharm Sci 98:861–893
Kenny PW, Montanari CA, Prokopczyk IM (2013) ClogPalk: a method for predicting alkane/water partition coefficient. J Comput Aided Mol Des 27:389–402
Harris MJ, Higuchi T, Rytting JH (1973) Thermodynamic group contributions from ion pair extraction equilibriums for use in the prediction of partition coefficients. Correlation of surface area with group contributions. J Phys Chem 77:2694–2703
Scherrer RA, Donovan SF (2009) Automated Potentiometric Titrations in KCl/Water-saturated octanol: method for quantifying factors influencing ion-pair partitioning. Anal Chem 81:2768–2778
Kenny PW, Leitão A, Montanari CA (2014) Ligand efficiency metrics considered harmful. J Comput Aided Mol Des 28:699–710
Andrews PR, Craik DJ, Martin JL (1984) Functional group contributions to drug-receptor interactions. J Med Chem 27:1648–1657
Leach AR, Hann MM, Burrows JN, Griffen EJ (2006) Fragment screening: an introduction. Mol BioSyst 2:429–446
Albert JS, Blomberg N, Breeze AL, Brown AJH, Burrows JN, Edwards PD, Folmer RHA, Geschwindner S, Griffen EJ, Kenny PW, Nowak T, Olsson L, Sanganee H, Shapiro AB (2007) An integrated approach to fragment-based lead generation: philosophy, strategy and case studies from AstraZeneca’s drug discovery programmes. Curr Top Med Chem 7:1600–1629
Hopkins AL, Keserü GM, Leeson PD, Rees DC, Reynolds CH (2014) The role of ligand efficiency metrics in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:105–121
Collander R (1951) Partition of organic compounds between higher alcohols and water. Acta Chem Scand 5:774–780
Dallas AJ, Carr PW (1992) A thermodynamic and solvatochromic investigation of the effect of water on the phase-transfer properties of octan-1-ol. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2 1992:2155–2161
Goldman S (1974) The determination and statistical mechanical interpretation of the solubility of water in benzene, carbon tetrachloride, and cyclohexane. Can J Chem 52:1668–1680
Abraham MH, Whiting GS, Fuchs R, Chambers EJ (1990) Thermodynamics of solute transfer from water to hexadecane. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2 1990:291–300
Finkelstein A (1976) Water and nonelectrolyte permeability of lipid bilayer membranes. J Gen Physiol 68:127–135
Mayer PT, Anderson BD (2002) Transport across 1,9-decadiene precisely mimics the chemical selectivity of the barrier domain in egg lecithin bilayers. J Pharm Sci 91:640–646
Radzicka A, Wolfenden R (1988) Comparing the polarities of the amino acids: side-chain distribution coefficients between the vapor phase, cyclohexane, 1-octanol, and neutral aqueous solution. Biochem 27:1664–1670
Shih P, Pedersen LG, Gibbs PR, Wolfenden R (1998) Hydrophobicities of the nucleic acid bases: distribution coefficients from water to cyclohexane. J Mol Biol 280:421–430
Bannan CC, Burley KH, Chiu M, Shirts MR, Gilson MK, Mobley DL (2016) Blind prediction of cyclohexane–water distribution coefficients from the SAMPL5 challenge. J Comput Aided Mol Des. doi:10.1007/s10822-016-9954-8
Rustenburg AS, Dancer J, Lin B, Feng JA, Ortwine DF, Mobley DL, Chodera JD (2016) J Comput Aided Mol Des. doi:10.1007/s10822-016-9971-7
Cabani S, Gianni P, Mollica V, Lepori L (1981) Group contributions to the thermodynamic properties of nonionic organic solutes in dilute aqueous solution. J Solut Chem 10:563–595
Dearden JC, Bresnen GM (2005) Thermodynamics of water–octanol and water–cyclohexane partitioning of some aromatic compounds. Int J Mol Sci 6:119–129
Golumbic C, Orchin M, Weller S (1949) Partition studies on phenols. I. Relation between partition coefficient and ionization constant. J Am Chem Soc 71:2624–2627
Delaney AD, Currie DJ, Holmes HL (1969) Partition coefficients of some N-alkyl and N, N-dialkyl derivatives of some cinnamamides and benzalcyanoacetamides in the system cyclohexane–water. Can J Chem 47:3273–3277
Seiler P (1974) Interconversion of lipophilicities from hydrocarbon/water systems into the octanol/water system. Eur J Med Chem 9:473–479
Riebesehl W, Tomlinson E (1984) Enthalpies of solute transfer between alkanes and water determined directly by flow microcalorimetry. J Phys Chem 88:4770–4775
Young RC, Mitchell RC, Brown TH, Ganellin CR, Griffiths R, Jones M, Rana KK, Saunders D, Smith IR, Sore NE, Wilks TJ (1988) Development of a new physicochemical model for brain penetration and its application to design of centrally acting H2 receptor histamine antagonists. J Med Chem 31:656–671
Lambert WJ, Wright LA (1989) Development of a preformulation lipophilicity screen utilizing a C-18-derivatized polystyrene–divinylbenzene High-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) column. Pharm Res 7:577–586
El Tayar N, Tsai R-S, Testa B, Carrupt P-A, Leo A (1991) Partitioning of solutes in different solvent systems: the contribution of hydrogen-bonding capacity and polarity. J Pharm Sci 80:590–598
Leahy DE, Morris JJ, Taylor PJ, Wait AR (1992) Model solvent systems for QSAR. Part 2. Fragment values (f-values) for the critical quartet. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2 1992:723–731
El Tayar N, Testa B, Carrupt P-A (1992) Polar intermolecular interactions encoded in partition coefficients: an indirect estimation of hydrogen-bond parameters of polyfunctional solutes. J Phys Chem 96:1455–1459
Abraham MH, Chadha HS, Whiting GS, Mitchell RC (1994) Hydrogen bonding. 32. An analysis of water–octanol and water–alkane partitioning and the ∆logP parameter of Seiler. J Pharm Sci 83:1085–1100
Habgood MD, Liu ZD, Dehkordi LS, Khodr HH, Abbott J, Hider RC (1999) Investigation into the correlation between structure of hydroxypyridones and blood–brain barrier permeability. Biochem Pharmacol 57:1305–1310
Wohnsland F, Faller B (2001) High-throughput permeability pH profile and high-throughput alkane/water log P with artificial membranes. J Med Chem 44:923–930
Zissimos AM, Abraham MH, Barker MC, Box KJ, Tam KY (2002) Calculation of Abraham descriptors from solvent–water partition coefficients in four different systems; evaluation of different methods of calculation. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2 2002:470–477
Caron G, Ermondi G (2005) Calculating virtual log P in the alkane/water System (log PN alk) and its derived parameters ∆log PN oct–alk and log DpH alk. J Med Chem 48:3269–3279
Toulmin A, Wood JM, Kenny PW (2008) Toward prediction of alkane/water partition coefficients. J Med Chem 51:3720–3730
Wittekindt C, Klamt A (2009) COSMO-RS as a predictive tool for lipophilicity. QSAR Comb Sci 28:874–877
Shalaeva M, Giulia Caron G, Abramov YA, O’Connell TN, Plummer MS, Yalamanchi G, Farley KA, Goetz GH, Philippe L, Shapiro MJ (2013) Integrating intramolecular hydrogen bonding (IMHB) considerations in drug discovery using ∆logP as a tool. J Med Chem 56:4870–4879
Ermondi G, Visconti A, Esposito R, Caron G (2014) The Block Relevance (BR) analysis supports the dominating effect of solutes hydrogen bond acidity on ∆log Poct–tol. Eur J Pharm Sci 53:50–54
Chen D, Oezguen N, Urvil P, Ferguson C, Dann SM, Savidge TC (2016) Regulation of protein–ligand binding affinity by hydrogen bond pairing. Sci Adv 2:e1501240
Tsai R-S, Fan W, El Tayar N, Carrupt P-A, Testa B, Kier LB (1993) Solute-water interactions in the organic phase of a biphasic system. 1. Structural influence of organic solutes on the “water-dragging” effect. J Am Chem Soc 115:9632–9639
Bard B, Carrupt P-A, Martel S (2012) Determination of alkane/water partition coefficients of polar compounds using hydrophilic interaction chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1260:164–168
Lin B, Pease JH (2013) A novel method for high throughput lipophilicity determination by microscale shake flask and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen 16: 817–825.
Jensen DA, Gary RK (2015) Estimation of alkane–water log P for neutral, acidic, and basic compounds using an alkylated polystyrene–divinylbenzene high-performance liquid chromatography column. J Chromatogr A 1417:21–29
Chung K, Park H (2016) Extended solvent-contact model approach to blind SAMPL5 prediction challenge for the distribution coefficients of drug-like molecules. J Comput Aided Mol Des. doi:10.1007/s10822-016-9928-x
Klamt A, Eckert F, Reinisch J, Wichmann K (2016) Prediction of cyclohexane–water distribution coefficients with COSMO-RS on the SAMPL5 data set. J Comput Aided Mol Des. doi:10.1007/s10822-016-9927-y
Bannan CC, Calabro G, Kyu DY, Mobley DL (2016) Calculating partition coefficients of small molecules in octanol/water and cyclohexane/water. J Chem Theor Comput 12:4015–4024
Kenny PW, Montanari CA, Prokopczyk IM, Ribeiro JFR, Sartori GR (2016) Hydrogen bond basicity prediction for medicinal chemistry design. J Med Chem 59:4278–4288
Abraham MH (1993) Scales of solute hydrogen-bonding: their construction and application to physicochemical and biochemical processes. Chem Soc Rev 22:73–83
Taft RW, Gurka D, Joris L, Schleyer PVR, Rakshys JW (1969) Studies of hydrogen-bonded complex formation with p-fluorophenol. V. Linear free energy relationships with OH reference acids. J Am Chem Soc 91:4801–4808
Abraham MH, Duce PP, Prior DV, Barratt DG, Morris JJ, Taylor PJ (1989) Hydrogen bonding. Part 9. Solute proton-donor and proton-acceptor scales for use in drug design. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2 1989:1355–1375
Laurence C, Berthelot M (2000) Observations on the strength of hydrogen bonding. Perspect Drug Discov Des 18:39–60
Laurence C, Brameld KA, Graton J, Le Questel J-Y, Renault E (2009) The pKBHX database: toward a better understanding of hydrogen-bond basicity for medicinal chemists. J Med Chem 52:4073–4086
Kenny PW (2009) Hydrogen bonding, electrostatic potential and molecular design. J Chem Inf Model 49:1234–1244
Murray JS, Ranganathan S, Politzer P (1991) Correlations between the solvent hydrogen bond acceptor parameter β and the calculated molecular electrostatic potential. J Org Chem 56:3734–3739
Kenny PW (1994) Prediction of hydrogen bond basicity from computed molecular electrostatic properties: implications for comparative molecular field analysis. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 2 1994:199–202
Graton J, Le Questel J-Y, Maxwell P, Popelier PLA (2016) Hydrogen-bond accepting properties of new heteroaromatic rings chemical motifs: a theoretical study. J Chem Inf Model 56:322–334
Graton J, Berthelot M, Gal J-F, Laurence C, Lebreton J, Le Questel J-Y, Maria P-C, Robins R (2003) The nicotinic pharmacophore: thermodynamics of the hydrogen-bonding complexation of nicotine, nornicotine, and models. J Org Chem 68:8208–8221
Bissantz C, Kuhn B, Stahl M (2010) A medicinal chemist’s guide to molecular interactions. J Med Chem 53:5061–5084
Persch E, Dumele O, Diederich F (2015) Molecular recognition in chemical and biological systems. Angew Chem Int Ed 54:3290–3327
OEChem Toolkit. OpenEye Scientific Software. http://www.eyesopen.com/oechem-tk. Accessed 19 Aug 2016
Spicoli Toolkit. OpenEye Scientific Software. http://www.eyesopen.com/spicoli-tk. Accessed 19 Aug 2016
OpenEye Scientific Software, 9 Bisbee Court, Suite D, Santa Fe, NM 87508. http://www.eyesopen.com. Accessed 28 Feb 2013
SMARTS Theory Manual. Daylight Chemical Information Systems. http://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smarts.html
SMARTS at Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smiles_arbitrary_target_specification
Weininger D (1988) SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J Chem Inf Comp Sci 28:31–36
Weininger D, Weininger A, Weininger JL (1989) SMILES. 2. Algorithm for generation of unique SMILES notation. J Chem Inf Comp Sci 29:97–101
OMEGA. OpenEye Scientific Software http://www.eyesopen.com/omega
Hawkins PCD, Skillman AG, Warren GL, Ellingson BA, Stahl MT (2010) Conformer generation with OMEGA: algorithm and validation using high quality structures from the protein databank and Cambridge structural database. J Chem Inf Model 50:572–584
Halgren TA (1999) MMFF VI. MMFF94S option for energy minimization studies. J Comp Chem 20:720–729
SZYBKI. OpenEye Scientific Software http://www.eyesopen.com/szybki
Bondi A (1964) van der Waals volumes and radii. J Phys Chem 68:441–451
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas Ö, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2009) Gaussian 09, Revision A.1, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford
Szabo A, Ostlund NS (1996) Modern quantum chemistry. Introduction to advanced electronic structure theory. Dover, Mineola
Becke AD (1993) Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652
Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys Rev B 3:785–789
Møller C, Plesset MS (1934) Note on the approximation treatment for many-electron systems. Phys Rev 46:618–622.
Frisch MJ, Head-Gordon M, Pople JA (1990) A direct MP2 gradient method. Chem Phys Lett 166:275–280
Hehre WJ, Pople JA (1971) Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. IX. Extended Gaussian-type basis for molecular-orbital studies of organic molecules. J Chem Phys 54:724–728
Frisch MJ, Pople JA, Binkley JS (1984) Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. 25. Supplementary functions for Gaussian basis sets. J Chem Phys 80:3265–3269
Spitznagel GW, Clark T, Chandrasekhar J, Schleyer PVR (1982) Stabilization of methyl anions by first-row substituents. The superiority of diffuse function-augmented basis sets for anion calculations. J Comput Chem 3:363–371
Hansch C, Leo A, Hoekman D (1995) Exploring QSAR. American Chemical Society, Washington DC
Kenny PW, Montanari CA, Prokopczyk IM, Sala FA, Sartori GR (2013) Automated molecule editing in molecular design. J Comput Aided Mol Des 27:655–664
Kenny PW, Sadowski J (2005) Structure modification in chemical databases. Methods and principles in medicinal chemistry. In: Oprea T (ed) Chemoinformatics in drug discovery 23:271–285
Leach AG, Jones HD, Cosgrove DA, Kenny PW, Ruston L, MacFaul P, Wood JM, Colclough N, Law B (2006) Matched molecular pairs as a guide in the optimization of pharmaceutical properties; a study of aqueous solubility, plasma protein binding and oral exposure. J Med Chem 49:6672–6682
Hussain J, Rea C (2010) Computationally efficient algorithm to identify matched molecular pairs (MMPs) in large data sets. J Chem Inf Model 50:339–348
Hu X, Hu Y, Vogt M, Stumpfe D, Bajorath J (2012) MMP-Cliffs: systematic identification of activity cliffs on the basis of matched molecular pairs. J Chem Inf Model 52:1138–1145
Dossetter AG, Griffen EJ, Leach AG (2013) Matched molecular pair analysis in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 18:724–731
Kramer C, Fuchs JE, Whitebread S, Gedeck P, Liedl KR (2014) Matched molecular pair analysis: significance and the impact of experimental uncertainty. J Med Chem 57:3786–3802
JMP version 12.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC 27513. http://www.jmp.com
Ritchie TJ, Macdonald SJF, Pickett SD (2015) Insights into the impact of N- and O-methylation on aqueous solubility and lipophilicity using matched molecular pair analysis. MedChemComm 6:1787–1797
Mobley DL, Baker JR, Barber AE, Fennell CJ, Dill KA (2008) Charge asymmetries in hydration of polar solutes. J Phys Chem B 112:2405–2414
Mukhopadhyay A, Fenley AT, Tolokh IS, Onufriev AV (2012) Charge hydration asymmetry: the basic principle and how to use it to test and improve water models. J Phys Chem B 116:9776–9783
Reif MM, Hünenberger PH (2016) Origin of asymmetric solvation effects for ions in water and organic solvents investigated using molecular dynamics simulations: the Swain acity-basity scale revisited. J Phys Chem B 120:8485–8517
Ritchie TJ, Macdonald SJF (2014) Physicochemical descriptors of aromatic character and their use in drug discovery. J Med Chem 57:5206–5215
Adler TK, Albert A (1960) Diazaindenes (“azaindoles”). Part I. Ionization constants and spectra. J Chem Soc 1960:1794–1797
Topliss JG (1972) Utilization of operational schemes for analog synthesis in drug design. J Med Chem 15:1006–1011
Brown DG, Gagnon MM, Boström J (2015) Understanding our love affair with p-chlorophenyl: present day implications from historical biases of reagent selection. J Med Chem 58:2390–2405
Leahy DE, Morris JJ, Taylor PJ, Wait AR (1994) Model solvent systems for QSAR. Part IV. The hydrogen bond acceptor behaviour of heterocycles. J Phys Org Chem 7:743–750
Edwards JO, Pearson RG (1962) The factors determining nucleophilic reactivities. J Am Chem Soc 84:16–24
Jorgensen WL, Pranata J (1990) Importance of secondary interactions in triply hydrogen bonded complexes: guanine-cytosine vs uracil-2,6-diaminopyridine. J Am Chem Soc 112:2008–2010
Hann MM, Leach AR, Harper G (2001) Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Comp Sci 41:856–864
Johnson ME, Malardier-Jugroot C, Murarka RK, Head-Gordon T (2009) Hydration water dynamics near biological interfaces. J Phys Chem B 113:4082–4092
Bethel PA, Gerhardt S, Jones EV, Kenny PW, Karoutchi GI, Morley AD, Oldham K, Rankine N, Augustin M, Krapp S, Simader H, Steinbacher S (2009) Design of selective cathepsin inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19:4622–4625
Murray CW, Rees DC (2016) Opportunity knocks: organic chemistry for fragment-based drug discovery (FBDD). Angew Chem Int Ed 55:488–492
Acknowledgements
We thank FAPESP (Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Grant No. 2013/18009-4) and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa; Grant No. 303991/2014-3) for financial support. NMB and IMP thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and JFRR and GRS thank CNPq for scholarships. We are grateful to OpenEye Scientific Software for an academic software license. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers of the manuscript for their constructive and insightful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borges, N.M., Kenny, P.W., Montanari, C.A. et al. The influence of hydrogen bonding on partition coefficients. J Comput Aided Mol Des 31, 163–181 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-016-0002-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-016-0002-5