Advertisement

Biological Invasions

, Volume 19, Issue 10, pp 3051–3066 | Cite as

Invasive herb Impatiens glandulifera has minimal impact on multiple components of temperate forest ecosystem function

  • Jan Čuda
  • Michaela Vítková
  • Marie Albrechtová
  • Wen-Yong Guo
  • Jacob N. Barney
  • Petr Pyšek
Original Paper

Abstract

Forests understories in Europe are known to generally resist invasion, though some alien plants do invade woodland communities. Here we focused on the impact of the widespread invasive annual Impatiens glandulifera, common along watercourses, but recently spreading in forests up to timberline. We investigated its impact on plant–soil feedback and ecosystem functioning. We recorded >40 variables focusing on: soil characteristics, including micro- and macro-nutrients; characteristics of litter layer and enzyme activity in litter; and richness and species composition of the forest understory. Three treatments were followed for 3 years: plots invaded by I. glandulifera; adjacent invader removal plots within the invaded area; and spatially separated uninvaded plots outside the invaded area. The effect of year-to-year variation was generally greater than that of the treatments, especially in soil and litter characteristics. Copper and boron were higher in invaded than invader removal and uninvaded plots, though in quantities that are unlikely to harm other plants. We found no effect of I. glandulifera on litter characteristics or enzyme activity. Despite almost 80% cover of I. glandulifera, we did not detect any difference in species richness and total vegetation cover between invaded and uninvaded plots. The floristic composition differed among the uninvaded, invader removal and invaded plots across 3 years. Our results indicate that the effect of I. glandulifera on the forest community studied was minor, and largely resulted from its increased shading to other plant species. In conclusion, we show how misleading the evaluation of impacts can be if based on a single season.

Keywords

Field study Global Invader Impact Network Himalayan balsam Litter Plant–soil interaction Plant invasions Removal Species richness Soil analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Zuzana Rumlerová, Matěj Man and Lukáš Vítek for their help in the field. This study was supported by the Praemium Academiae award to Petr Pyšek, project no. 14-36079G (Centre of Excellence PLADIAS) from the Czech Science Foundation, and long-term research development project no. RVO 67985939 from The Czech Academy of Sciences. JNB was partially supported by Virginia Tech College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. We thank Martin Hejda, Jan Pergl and Tomáš Herben for advice on the statistical analyses and to Zuzana Sixtová for technical support.

Supplementary material

10530_2017_1508_MOESM1_ESM.docx (531 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 532 kb)

References

  1. Adamowski W (2008) Balsams on the offensive: the role of planting in the invasion of Impatiens species. In: Tokarska-Guzik B, Brock JH, Brundu G, Child L, Daehler CC, Pyšek P (eds) Plant invasions: human perception, ecological impacts and management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 57–70Google Scholar
  2. Ammer C, Schall P, Wördehoff R, Lamatsch K, Bachmann M (2011) Does tree seedling growth and survival require weeding of Himalayan balsam (Impatiens glandulifera)? Eur J Forest Res 130:107–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews M, Maule HG, Raven JA, Mistry A (2005) Extension growth of Impatiens glandulifera at low irradiance: importance of nitrate and potassium accumulation. Ann Bot 95:641–648CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrews M, Maule HG, Hodge S, Cherrill A, Raven JA (2009) Seed dormancy, nitrogen nutrition and shade acclimation of Impatiens glandulifera: implications for successful invasion of deciduous woodland. Plant Ecol Divers 2:145–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin DS, Mitchell AM (2000) The effects of drying and re-flooding on the sediment and soil nutrient dynamics of lowland river–floodplain systems: a synthesis. River Res Appl 16:457–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barney JN, Tekiela DR, Barrios-Garcia MN, Dimarco RD, Hufbauer RA, Leipzig-Scott P et al (2015) Global Invader Impact Network (GIIN): toward standardized evaluation of the ecological impacts of invasive plants. Ecol Evol 5:2878–2889CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beerling DJ, Perrins DM (1993) Biological flora of British Isles: Impatiens glandulifera Royle (Impatiens Roylei Walp.). J Ecol 81:367–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CABI (2016) Impatiens glandulifera. http://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/28766. Accessed 19 Oct 2016
  10. Chittka L, Schürkens S (2001) Successful invasion of a floral market. Nature 411:653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawley JM (2013) The R book, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  12. Čuda J, Skálová H, Janovský Z, Pyšek P (2014) Habitat requirements, short-term population dynamics and coexistence of native and invasive Impatiens species: a field study. Biol Invasions 16:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Čuda J, Skálová H, Janovský Z, Pyšek P (2015) Competition among native and invasive Impatiens species: the roles of environmental factors, population density and life stage. AoB Plants 7:plv033CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Čuda J, Rumlerová Z, Brůna J, Skálová H, Pyšek P (2017) Floods affect the abundance of invasive Impatiens glandulifera and its spreadfrom river corridors? Divers Distrib 23:342–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Czech Geological Survey (2016) Digital soil map at a scale of 1:50000. http://mapy.geology.cz/pudy. Accessed 19 Oct 2016
  16. DAISIE European Invasive Alien Species Gateway (2006) Impatiens glandulifera. http://www.europe-aliens.org/speciesFactsheet.do?speciesId=17367. Accessed 19 Oct 2016
  17. Dassonville N, Vanderhoeven S, Vanparys V, Hayez M, Gruber W, Meerts P (2008) Impacts of alien invasive plants on soil nutrients are correlated with initial site conditions in NW Europe. Oecologia 157:131–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis MA, Bier L, Bushelle E, Diegel Chloe, Johnson Aleta, Kujala Brianna (2005) Non-indigenous grasses impede woody succession. Plant Ecol 178:249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diekmann M, Effertz H, Baranowski M, Dupré C (2016) Weak effects on plant diversity of two invasive Impatiens species. Plant Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s11258-016-0663-0 Google Scholar
  20. Essl F, Rabitsch W (eds) (2002) Neobiota in Österreich. Umweltbundesamt GmbH, WienGoogle Scholar
  21. Frazer GW, Canham CD, Lertzman KP (1999) Gap light analyzer (GLA): users manual and program documentation. Simon Frazer University, Burnaby, British Columbia, and the Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Gederaas L, Moen TL, Skjelseth S, Larsen LK (2012) Alien species in Norway—with the Norwegian Black List 2012. The Norwegian Biodiversity Infomation Centre, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenwood P, Kuhn N (2014) Does the invasive plant, Impatiens glandulifera, promote soil erosion along the riparian zone? An investigation on a small watercourse in northwest Switzerland. J Soils Sediments 14:637–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grime J, Hodgson J, Hunt R (2007) Comparative plant ecology: a functional approach to common British species. Castlepoint Press, ColvendGoogle Scholar
  25. Guevara-Escobar A, Tellez J, Gondalez-Sosa E (2005) Use of digital photography for analysis of canopy closure. Agrofor Syst 65:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hedge P, Kriwoken LK (2000) Evidence for effects of Spartina anglica invasion on benthic macrofauna in Little Swanport estuary, Tasmania. Austral Ecol 25:150–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hejda M, Pyšek P (2006) What is the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on species diversity of invaded riparian vegetation? Biol Conserv 132:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hejda M, Pyšek P, Jarošík V (2009) Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J Ecol 97:393–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hermy M, Honnay O, Firbank L, Grashof-Bokdam C, Lawesson JE (1999) An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation. Biol Conserv 91:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hillel D (1998) Environmental soil physics: fundamentals, applications, and environmental considerations. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  31. Hulme PE, Bremner ET (2005) Assessing the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on riparian habitats: partitioning diversity components following species removal. J Appl Ecol 43:43–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hulme PE, Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Vilà M (2013) Bias and error in understanding plant invasion impacts. Trends Ecol Evol 28:212–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackson ML (1958) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 689:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klute A (1986) Methods of soil analysis Part 1 Physical and mineralogical methods. Americal Society of Agronomy, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  36. Knapp PA (1996) Cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L) dominance in the great basin desert. History, persistence, and influences to human activities. Glob Environ Change 6:37–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kourtev PS, Ehrenfeld JG, Huang WZ (2002) Enzyme activities during litter decomposition of two exotic and two native plant species in hardwood forests of New Jersey. Soil Biol Biochem 34 (9):1207–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumschick S, Gaertner M, Vilà M, Essl F, Jeschke JM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Blackburn TM, Dick JTA, Evans T, Hulme PE, Kühn I, Mrugała A, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Ricciardi A, Richardson DM, Sendek A, Winter M (2015) Ecological impacts of alien species: quantification, scope, caveats and recommendations. Bioscience 65:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lambdon PW, Pyšek P, Basnou C, Hejda M, Arianoutsou M, Essl F, Jarošík V, Pergl J, Winter M, Anastasiu P, Andriopoulos P, Bazos I, Brundu G, Celesti-Grapow L, Chassot P, Delipetrou P, Josefsson M, Kark S, Klotz S, Kokkoris Y, Kühn I, Marchante H, Perglová I, Pino J, Vilà M, Zikos A, Roy D, Hulme PE (2008) Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80:101–149Google Scholar
  40. Lenth RV (2016) Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. J Stat Softw 69:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Liao C, Peng R, Luo Y, Zhou X, Wu X, Fang C, Chen J, Li B (2008) Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 177:706–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Maguire RO, Heckendorn S (2011) Laboratory procedures: Virginia Tech soil testing laboratory. Virginia Tech, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  44. Malíková L, Prach K (2010) Spread of alien Impatiens glandulifera along rivers invaded at different times. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 10:81–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marschner P (ed) (2011) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants, 3rd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Moore PD, Chapman SB (1986) Methods in plant ecology. Blackwell Scientific, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  47. Nable RO, Bañuelos GS, Paull JG (1997) Boron toxicity. Plant Soil 193:181–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nobis M (2008) Invasive Neophyten auch im Wald? Wald Holz 8:46–49Google Scholar
  49. Nobis M, Hunziker U (2005) Automatic thresholding for hemispherical canopy-photographs based on edge detection. Agric For Meteorol 128:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ogle SM, Reiners WA, Gerow KG (2003) Impacts of exotic annual brome grasses (Bromus spp.) on ecosystem properties of northern mixed grass prairie. Am Midl Nat 149:46–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2016) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
  52. Olsen RS (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL (ed) Methods in soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties. Americal Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 403–430Google Scholar
  53. Osono T, Takeda H (2005) Limit values for decomposition and convergence process of lignocellulose fraction in decomposing leaf litter of 14 tree species in a cool temperate forest. Ecol Res 20:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pattison Z, Rumble H, Tanner RA, Jin L, Gange AC (2016) Positive plant–soil feedbacks of the invasive Impatiens glandulifera and their effects on above-ground microbial communities. Weed Res 56:198–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pergl J, Sádlo J, Petrusek A, Laštůvka Z, Musil J, Perglová I, Šanda R, Šefrová H, Šíma J, Vohralík V, Pyšek P (2016) Black, grey and watch lists of alien species in the Czech Republic based on environmental impacts and management strategy. NeoBiota 28:1–37. doi: 10.3897/neobiota.28.4824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pyšek P, Prach K (1995) Invasion dynamics of Impatiens glandulifera—a century of spreading reconstructed. Biol Conserv 74:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pyšek P, Jarošík V, Hulme PE, Pergl J, Hejda M, Schaffner U, Vilà M (2012a) A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob Change Biol 18:1725–1737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pyšek P, Danihelka J, Sádlo J, Chrtek J Jr, Chytrý M, Jarošík V, Kaplan Z, Krahulec F, Moravcová L, Pergl J, Štajerová K, Tichý L (2012b) Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns. Preslia 84:155–255Google Scholar
  59. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruckli R, Rusterholz HP, Baur B (2013) Invasion of Impatiens glandulifera affects terrestrial gastropods by altering microclimate. Acta Oecol 47:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ruckli R, Rusterholz HP, Baur B (2014) Invasion of an annual exotic plant into deciduous forests suppresses arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis and reduces performance of sycamore maple saplings. For Ecol Manag 318:285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rumlerová Z, Vilà M, Pergl J, Nentwig W, Pyšek P (2016) Scoring environmental and socioeconomic impacts of alien plants invasive in Europe. Biol Invasions. doi: 10.1007/s10530-016-1259-2 Google Scholar
  63. Rusterholz HP, Salamon JA, Ruckli R, Baur B (2014) Effects of the annual invasive plant Impatiens glandulifera on the Collembola and Acari communities in a deciduous forest. Pedobiologia 57:285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scherber C, Eisenhauer N, Weisser WW et al (2010) Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature 468:553–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Skálová H, Jarošík V, Dvořáčková S, Pyšek P (2013) Effect of intra- and interspecific competition on the performance of native and invasive species of Impatiens under varying levels of shade and moisture. PLoS ONE 8:e62842CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Stehouwer R, Roth G (2004) Copper sulfate hoof baths and copper toxicity in soil. Penn State Field Crop News Publ. 4:1. http://extension.psu.edu/plants/crops/news/2004/april-2#copper. Accessed 19 Oct 2016
  67. Tanner RA, Gange AC (2013) The impact of two non-native plant species on native flora performance: potential implications for habitat restoration. Plant Ecol 214:423–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tanner RA, Varia S, Eschen R, Wood S, Murphy ST, Gange AC (2013) Impacts of an invasive non-native annual weed, Impatiens glandulifera, on above-and below-ground invertebrate communities in the United Kingdom. PLoS ONE 8:e67271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2012) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide: software for ordination (version 5.0). Biometris, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  70. Tolasz R (ed) (2007) Atlas of climate of the Czech Republic. Český hydrometeorologický ústav, Praha (in Czech)Google Scholar
  71. Vilà M, Espinar JL, Hejda M, Hulme PE, Jarošík V, Maron JL, Pergl J, Schaffner U, Sun Y, Pyšek P (2011) Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol Lett 14:702–708CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Vinogradova YK, Maiorov SR, Khorun LV (2010) Black book of the flora of Central Russia: alien plant species in Central Russian ecosystems. GEOS, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  73. Vitousek PM, Walker LR, Whiteaker LD, Mueller-Dombois D, Matson PA (1987) Biological invasion by Myrica faya alters ecosystem development in Hawaii. Science 238:802–804CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Vrchotová N, Šerá B, Krejčová J (2011) Allelopathic activity of extracts from Impatiens species. Plant Soil Environ 57:57–60Google Scholar
  75. Weidenhamer JD, Callaway RM (2010) Direct and indirect effects of invasive plants on soil chemistry and ecosystem function. J Chem Ecol 36:59–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wickham H, Francois R (2016) dplyr: a grammar of data manipulation. R package version 0.5.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Invasion Ecology, Institute of BotanyThe Czech Academy of SciencesPrůhoniceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Ecology, Faculty of ScienceCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic
  3. 3.Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed ScienceVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations