Journal of Wood Science

, Volume 58, Issue 5, pp 437–445 | Cite as

Accumulation of constitutive diterpenoids in the rhytidome and secondary phloem of the branch bark of Larix gmelinii var. japonica

  • Kazuto Seki
  • Ken Orihashi
  • Mayumi Sato
  • Masanori Kishino
  • Naoto Saito
Original article

Abstract

The quantitative compositions of the major constitutive diterpenoids in the rhytidome and secondary phloem of the branch bark of Kuril larch (Larixgmelinii var. japonica) were investigated. The eight major diterpenoids were isolated from a diethyl ether extract of the branch bark of L. gmelinii var. japonica and identified as 13-epimanool (1), larixol (2), larixyl acetate (3), 13-epitorulosyl acetate (4), abietic acid (5), neoabietic acid (6), dehydroabietic acid (7), and isopimaric acid (8). The amount of each diterpenoid was subsequently quantified in both the rhytidome and secondary phloem. All of the diterpenoids were present in both bark tissues, but the amounts were significantly higher in the rhytidome than in the secondary phloem. Developed fusiform resin cavities containing oleoresins were commonly observed in dead secondary phloem captured into the rhytidome of a bark transverse section. The accumulation and distribution of these constitutive diterpenoids in the bark tissues can probably be attributed to terpenoid biosynthesis in the living secondary phloem and the rhytidome formation process. From the viewpoint of constitutive chemical defense in conifers, it is suggested that the tree body may be more effectively defended against natural enemies by the higher amount of diterpenoid amount in the outermost and dead bark tissue, the rhytidome, where the potentially poisonous and easily oxidizable diterpenoids can be safely and stably maintained.

Keywords

Constitutive terpenoids Rhytidome Secondary phloem Larix gmelinii var. japonica Plant chemical defense 

References

  1. 1.
    Laver ML (1991) Bark. In: Lewin M, Goldstein IS (eds) Wood structure and composition. Mercel Dekker, New York, pp 409–434Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kučera LJ, Bergamin L (2003) The structure, function and physical properties of bark. In: Vaucher E, Eckenwalder JE (eds) Tree bark: a color guide. Timber Press, Portland, pp 23–37Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewinsohn E, Gijzen M, Croteau R (1991) Defense mechanisms of conifers: differences in constitutive and wound-induced monoterpene biosynthesis among species. Plant Physiol 96:44–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Phillips MA, Croteau R (1999) Resin-based defenses in conifers. Trends Plant Sci 4:184–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling E (2005) Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytol 167:353–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raffa KF, Berryman AA (1982) Accumulation of monoterpenes and associated volatiles following inoculation of grand fir with a fungus transmitted by the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Entomol 114:797–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Langenheim JH (1994) Higher plant terpenoids: a phytocentric overview of their ecological roles. J Chem Ecol 20:1223–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yamada T (2001) Defense mechanisms in the sapwood of living trees. J For Res 6:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keeling CI, Bohlmann J (2006) Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defense of conifers against insects and pathogens. New Phytol 170:657–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keeling CI, Bohlmann J (2006) Diterpene resin acids in conifers. Phytochemistry 67:2415–2423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inukai T, Haga R (1953) Experimental studies on the taste of the vole for various kinds of the larch (in Japanese). Mem Fac Agric Hokkaido Univ 1:281–300Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takahashi N, Nishiguchi C (1966) Studies on the resistance of forest trees to red-backed vole, Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae (Thomas), I: relative feeding preference of the vole for seedlings of conifers under laboratory conditions (in Japanese). Bull Tokyo Univ For 62:153–172Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chiba S, Nagata Y (1976) Studies on the breeding of Larix species, V: experimental estimation of the vole resistance and heritability among hybrids, back-crosses, and triple hybrids (in Japanese). Bull Oji Inst For Tree Improv 3:33–44Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ishihara K, Matsukawa A (1941) Forest tree breeding and improvement, II: traits of F1 hybrids of conifer trees (in Japanese). In: Proceedings of the S15 Annual Meeting of Japan Forest Society, pp 126–131Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yanagisawa S, Kawanishi T (1955) On the rinds of four species of the Larix genus (in Japanese). Bull Gov For Exp Stn 79:125–142Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nishiguchi C, Arisawa H, Iizuka T (1977) Studies on the resistance of forest trees to the red-backed vole, Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae, IV: chemical substances taking part in the resistance of Sakhalin larch, Larix gmelinii to biting by the vole (in Japanese). J Jap For Soc 59:167–172Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hayashi E, Iizuka K, Sukeno S, Kohno K (1998) Relationship between resistance to vole browsing and content of ether extract in bark of larch species and hybrids. J For Res 3:119–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sukeno S, Ozawa S (1997) Identification of compounds found in the larch associated with resistance to vole, and its application for early test, III: identification of compounds associated with vole resistance (in Japanese). Abstracts of the 108th Annual Meeting of Japan Forest Society, pp 198Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sato M, Seki K, Kita K, Moriguchi Y, Hashimoto M, Yunoki K, Kofujita H, Onishi M (2009) Comparative analysis of diterpene composition in the bark of the hybrid larch F1, Larix gmelinii var. japonica × L. kaempferi and their parent trees. J Wood Sci 55:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trockenbrodt M (1990) Survey and discussion of the terminology used in bark anatomy. IAWA Bull ns 11:141–166Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Evert RF (2006) Esau’s plant anatomy: meristems, cells, and tissues of the plant body; their structure, function, and development, 3rd edn. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kozlowski TT, Pallardy SG (1997) Physiology of woody plants, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Langenheim JH (2003) Plant resins: chemistry, evolution, ecology, and ethnobotany. Timber Press, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hansson L, Gref R, Lundren L, Theander O (1986) Susceptibility to vole attacks due to bark phenols and terpens in Pinus contorta provenances introduced into Sweden. J Chem Ecol 12:1569–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Norin T, Ohloff G, Willihalm B (1965) The structures and configurations of larixol and larixyl acetate. Tetrahedron Lett 6:3523–3528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bruns K (1970) Absolute configuration at position 13-C atom in labdane-type diterpenoids (in German). Tetrahedron Lett 11:3263–3264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Manning TR (1973) Diterpene constituents of Pinus contorta bark. Aust J Chem 26:2735–2739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fang JM, Wu SK, Chen YS (1985) A study of the constituents of the bark of Tsuga chinensis Pritz. var. formosana (Hay.). J Chin Chem Soc 32:477–480Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dev Sukh, Misra R (1985) Handbook of terpenoids: diterpenoids, II: bicylic diterpenoids. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Enzell CR, Ryhage R (1965) Mass spectrometric studies of diterpenes, I: carbobicyclic diterpenes. Arkiv Kemi 23:367–399Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Piovetti L, Gonzalet E, Diara A (1980) Diterpene composition of Cupressus dupreziana and Cupressus sempervirens. Phytochemistry 19:2772–2773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hanari N, Ono Y, Ooi T, Yamamoto H (1998) Diterpenes extracted by a polar solvent from the bark of the resinous stem canker of Chamaecyparis obtusa (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 44:342–350Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, AIST (2004) SDBS Web. http://riodb01.ibase.aist.go.jp/sdbs/. Accessed 14 Sep 2010
  34. 34.
    National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST (2008) NIST Chemistry Web Book. http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/. Accessed 14 Sep 2010
  35. 35.
    Sadhra S, Gray CN, Foulds IS (1997) High-performance liquid chromatography of unmodified rosin and its applications in contact dermatology. J Chrom B 700:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wenkert E, Afongo A, Beak P, Carney RWJ, Jeffs PW, McChesney JD (1965) The proton magnetic resonance spectral characteristics of tricyclic diterpenic substances. J Org Chem 30:713–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kuo YH, Chen WC (1999) Chemical constituents of the pericarp of Platycladus orientalis. J Chin Chem Soc 46:819–824Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mills JS (1973) Diterpens of Larix oleoresins. Phytochemistry 12:2407–2412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chernenko GF, Ivanova EE, Demenkova LI, Shmidt ÉN (1991) Extractive substances in the bark of Larix dahurica (in Russian). Khim Prir Soedin 4:580–582Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ishii Y, Ohara S (2004) Quantitative difference of the components between the inner bark and the outer bark of Morus alba L (in Japanese). J Jpn For Soc 86:372–374Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Srivastava LM (1964) Anatomy, chemistry, and physiology of bark. In: Romberger JA, Mikola P (eds) International review of forestry research. I. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 203–277Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Croteau R, Johnson MA (1985) Biosynthesis of terpenoid wood extractives. In: Higuchi T (ed) Biosynthesis and biodegradation of wood components. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 379–439Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Srivastava LM (1963) Secondary phloem in the Pinaceae. Univ Calif Publ Bot 36:1–141Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Chang YP (1954) Anatomy of common North American pulpwood barks. TAPPI monograph series No. 14. TAPPI, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wu H, Hu ZH (1997) Comparative anatomy of resin ducts of the Pinaceae. Trees 11:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chang YP (1954) Bark structure of North American conifers. Technical Bulletin No. 1095. USDA Forest Products Laboratory, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gershenzon J (1994) Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plants. J Chem Ecol 20:1281–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wittstock U, Gershenzon J (2002) Constitutive plant toxins and their role in defense against herbivores and pathogens. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:300–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Enoki A, Kitao K (1975) Autoxidation of resin acids, III: photooxidation of abietic acid. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 21:101–106Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Wood Research Society 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuto Seki
    • 1
  • Ken Orihashi
    • 1
  • Mayumi Sato
    • 1
  • Masanori Kishino
    • 1
  • Naoto Saito
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Products Research InstituteHokkaido Research OrganizationAsahikawaJapan

Personalised recommendations