Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis, bioactivity evaluation, and docking study of 5-aminosalicylic acid’s fatty acid derivatives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Monatshefte für Chemie - Chemical Monthly Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Some new oleic acid, linoleic acid, lauric acid derivatives of 5-aminosalicylic acid were produced in order to enhance bioactivity properties of 5-aminosalicylic acid. All new compounds’ structures were confirmed by spectroscopic methods. Moreover, in vitro antibacterial, anticancer, and anti-inflammatory activities of new synthesized compounds were investigated. Antibacterial activity was studied against pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria, Escherichia coli and Gram-positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus via disc diffusion method. Additionally, all derivatives’ anti-inflammatory activity were evaluated through NO suppression assay using interferon gamma (IFN-γ)/lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages. Furthermore, in vitro cytotoxicity assay was probed using MTT test against 3T3 and HT-29 cell lines. In another effort, docking studies were performed to predict the possible interactions and binding energy of new compounds against cyclooxygenase (COX-1/COX-2) and lipoxygenase (5-LOX) proteins. In conclusion, all new compounds exhibited moderate to better bioactivity improvements in comparison with parent drug. Also study of interactions between the new derivatives with active sites of proteins presented greater binding affinities than 5-aminosalicylic acid.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giannini E, Kane S, Testa R, Savarino V (2005) Dig Liver Dis 37:723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Friend DR (2005) Adv Drug Delivery Rev 57:247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams C, Panaccione R, Ghosh S, Rioux K (2011) Therap Adv Gastroenterol 4:237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stolfi C, Fina D, Caruso R, Caprioli F, Sarra M, Fantini MC, Rizzo A, Pallone F, Monteleone G (2008) Biochem Pharmacol 75:668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tursi A, Joseph RE, Streck P (2011) Dig Dis Sci 56:3112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Campregher C, Luciani MG, Biesenbach P, Evstatiev R, Lyakhovich A, Gasche C (2010) Inflamm Bowel Dis 16:576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Couto D, Ribeiro D, Freitas M, Gomes A, Lima JL, Fernandes E (2010) Redox Rep 15:259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Freeman HJ (2012) Clin Med Insights Gastroenterol 5:77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang Z, Ye X, Wu Q, Wu K, Fan D (2014) Int J Surg 12:516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Travis S, Jewell D (1994) Pharmacol Ther 63:135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Soliman MH, Mohamed GG (2013) Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 107:8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. RajeshYadav O (2011) J Pharm Sci Res 3:966

    Google Scholar 

  13. Babazadeh M, Edjlali L, Rashidian L (2007) J Polym Res 14:207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pertuit D, Moulari B, Betz T, Nadaradjane A, Neumann D, Ismaïli L, Refouvelet B, Pellequer Y, Lamprecht A (2007) J Control Release 123:211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung YJ, Lee JS, Kim YM (2001) J Pharm Sci 90:1767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Williams CM (2000) Ann Zootech 49:165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Field CJ, Blewett HH, Proctor S, Vine D (2009) Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 34:979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adnani A, Basri M, Chaibakhsh N, Ahangar HA, Salleh AB, Rahman RNZRA, Rahman MBA (2011) Carbohydr Res 346:472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu Y-P, Su Z-W, Li C-H (1989) J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Benjamin S, Spener F (2009) Nutr Metab 6:36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fitscher B, Elsing C, Riedel H-D, Gorski J, Stremmel W (1996) Exp Biol Med 212:15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Waterman E, Lockwood B (2007) Altern Med Rev 12:331

    Google Scholar 

  23. Singh S, Taneja M, Majumdar DK (2007) Indian J Exp Biol 45:403

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kitahara T, Koyama N, Matsuda J, Aoyama Y, Hirakata Y, Kamihira S, Kohno S, Nakashima M, Sasaki H (2004) Biol Pharm Bull 27:1321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Roynette CE, Calder PC, Dupertuis YM, Pichard C (2004) Clin Nutr 23:139

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gil A (2002) Biomed Pharmacother 56:388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mellou F, Loutrari H, Stamatis H, Roussos C, Kolisis FN (2006) Process Biochem 41:2029

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh S, Nair V, Jain S, Gupta Y (2008) Indian J Exp Biol 46:453

    Google Scholar 

  29. Calder PC (2006) Am J Clin Nutr 83:S1505

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pinto TA, Hrdina R, Kirsch G, Campos AM, Rodrigues LM, Esteves AP (2012) Arkivoc 6:185

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jiang Y, Kuang C (2009) J Chem Sci (Bangalore, India) 121:1035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Desbois AP, Mearns-Spragg A, Smith VJ (2009) Mar Biotechnol 11:45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Campbell JW, Cronan JE Jr (2001) Annu Rev Microbiol 55:305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hendriksen R, Agenaar J, Van Bergen M (2003) Laboratory protocols. Isolation of Salmonella. http://www.antimicrobialresistance.dk/data/images/salmonella2_pdf.pdf

  35. Kowti R, Harsha R, Ahmed M, Hareesh A, Thammanna Gowda S, Dinesha R, Kumar BS, Ali MI (2010) Res J Pharm Biol Chem Sci 3:691

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leong SW, Faudzi SMM, Abas F, Aluwi MFFM, Rullah K, Wai LK, Bahari MNA, Ahmad S, Tham CL, Shaari K (2014) Molecules 19:16058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ali NM, Mohd Yusof H, Yeap S-K, Ho W-Y, Beh B-K, Long K, Koh S-P, Abdullah MP, Alitheen NB (2014) Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014:6

  38. Mosmann T (1983) J Immunol Methods 65:55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Boncler M, Różalski M, Krajewska U, Podsędek A, Watala C (2014) J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 69:9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vareed SK, Reddy MK, Schutzki RE, Nair MG (2006) Life Sci 78:777

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Charlier C, Michaux C (2003) Eur J Med Chem 38:645

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Palkar MB, Singhai AS, Ronad PM, Vishwanathswamy A, Boreddy TS, Veerapur VP, Shaikh MS, Rane RA, Karpoormath R (2014) Bioorg Med Chem 22:2855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hegazy GH, Ali HI (2012) Bioorg Med Chem 20:1259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gilbert NC, Bartlett SG, Waight MT, Neau DB, Boeglin WE, Brash AR, Newcomer ME (2011) Science 331:217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM (1995) Protein Eng 8:127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for financial support of this work by ERGS (KPM) with Grant No. 5527054 and University of Putra Malaysia (UPM).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Samira Yousefi or Emilia Abdulmalek.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 4826 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yousefi, S., Bayat, S., Rahman, M.B.A. et al. Synthesis, bioactivity evaluation, and docking study of 5-aminosalicylic acid’s fatty acid derivatives. Monatsh Chem 146, 2139–2149 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-015-1538-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-015-1538-0

Keywords

Navigation