Advertisement

Pain during second eye cataract surgery under topical anesthesia: an intraindividual study

  • Antonio Bardocci
  • Francesco Ciucci
  • Giorgio Lofoco
  • Serenella Perdicaro
  • Andrea Lischetti
Cataract

Abstract

Backgroud

Aim of the study was to investigate: 1) if second eye cataract surgery under topical anesthesia is more painful than surgery on the first eye, 2) if pain experienced during the procedure on the first eye may predict the pain of the second procedure, and 3) if patients' cooperation is different between the first and the second eye procedure.

Methods

Seventy-three consecutive patients undergoing bilateral non-simultaneous cataract surgery were prospectively included in the study. Surgical technique was sutureless clear corneal phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia. Immediately after surgery every patient graded the pain experienced using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain). At the end of each procedure the surgeon graded patients' cooperation using a 4-point scale.

Results

Mean VAS score was 2.35 (SD 2.63) for the first eye and 2.89 (SD 2.93) for the second eye. Such a difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.1777, Wilcoxon test). The correlation between the VAS score of the first and that of the second procedure was statistically significant (r = 0.5514, p < 0.0001, Spearman rank correlation). Patients' cooperation was 2.64 (SD 0.63) during the first procedure and 2.52 (SD 0.79) during the second procedure; this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.1769, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test).

Conclusions

After uneventful cataract surgery under topical anesthesia, pain experienced and cooperation did not differ between first and second eye procedures. A correlation was found between pain scores of the first and the second eye procedures.

Keywords

Topical anesthesia cataract surgery VAS score Intraoperative pain 

References

  1. 1.
    Ezra DG, Allan BD (2007). Topical anaesthesia alone versus topical anaesthesia with intracameral lidocaine for phacoemulsification. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.(3):CD005276Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    American Academy of Ophthalmology Cataract and Anterior Segment Panel. Preferred Practice Pattern (2006). Cataract in the Adult Eye. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology;34–38. Available at: http://one.aao.org/CE/PracticeGuidelines/PPP.aspx. Accessed October 15, 2010
  3. 3.
    Malik A, Fletcher EC, Chong V, Dasan J (2010) Local anesthesia for cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 36(1):133–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sharma NS, Ooi JL, Figueira EC, Rosenberg ML, Masselos K, Papalkar DP, Paramanathan N, Francis IC, Alexander SL, Ferch NI (2008) Patient perceptions of second eye clear corneal cataract surgery using assisted topical anaesthesia. Eye (Lond) 22(4):547–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng AC, Young AL, Law RW, Lam DS (2006) Prospective randomized double-masked trial to evaluate perioperative pain profile in different stages of simultaneous bilateral LASIK. Cornea 25(8):919–922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bardocci A, Lofoco G, Perdicaro S, Ciucci F, Manna L (2003) Lidocaine 2% gel versus lidocaine 4% unpreserved drops for topical anesthesia in cataract surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology 110(1):144–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Bardocci
    • 1
  • Francesco Ciucci
    • 1
  • Giorgio Lofoco
    • 1
  • Serenella Perdicaro
    • 2
  • Andrea Lischetti
    • 3
  1. 1.Divisione OculisticaOspedale San Pietro–FatebenefratelliRomeItaly
  2. 2.Reparto di Anestesia e RianimazioneOspedale San Pietro–FatebenefratelliRomeItaly
  3. 3.G. B. Bietti Eye Foundation–IRCCSRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations