Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differences in pain experience and cooperation between consecutive surgeries in patients undergoing phacoemulsification

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare pain experience and cooperation between consecutive surgeries in patients undergoing phacoemulsification in both eyes, using sub-Tenon’s local anesthesia without sedation. In this study, 268 patients with bilateral senile cataracts were recruited. All operations were performed without sedation, using a clear corneal phacoemulsification technique and sub-Tenon’s local anesthesia, by one of four surgeons. The first surgery was performed on the eye with the higher grade cataract. The other eye was operated on within 3 months by the same surgeon (mean interval 1.9 ± 1.1 months). All patients were asked to grade their pain experience during induction and maintenance of anesthesia and also during the phacoemulsification surgery, using a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) administered after the surgery. The cooperation of the patient was graded from 0 (no event) to 3 (markedeye and head movement and lid squeezing) by the attending surgeon. The VAS scores and cooperation scores of the patients were the outcome measurements. The mean pain score was 2.11 ± 0.79 in the first eye and 3.33 ± 0.80 in the second eye during the administration of sub-Tenon’s anesthesia, and 1.50 ± 0.60 in the first eye and 2.10 ± 0.57 in the second eye during the phacoemulsification surgery. The patient cooperation score was 1.60 ± 0.75 in the first surgery and 2.08 ± 0.72 in the second surgery. The differences between the first and second surgeries were statistically significant for all outcome measures (p < 0.01). Patients who previously underwent phaco surgery in one eye experienced more pain and showed worse cooperation during the phaco surgery in the second eye, especially if there was a short time between the surgeries, viz., less than 3 months. Therefore, if the surgeon has difficulty in the first operation gaining the patient’s cooperation, the surgeon must be careful: if contralateral eye surgery is required, the addition of sedation/analgesia should be considered or the surgery postponed for a while to abolish the influence of recent memory on the patient’s subsequent pain experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarkar S, Maiti P, Nag S, Sasmal NK, Biswas M (2010) Changing trends of ocular anaesthesia in phaco-emulsification surgery. J Indian Med Assoc 108(12):823–825

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stevens JD (1992) A new local anaesthetic technique for cataract surgery by one quadrant sub-Tenon’s infiltration. Br J Ophthalmol 76:670–674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Roman SJ, Chong Sit DA, Boureau CM, Auclin FX, Ullern MM (1997) Sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia: an efficient and safe technique. Br J Ophthalmol 81:673–676

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Fichman RA (1996) Use of topical anaesthesia alone in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 22:612–614

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fazel, Forghani Z, Aghadoost D, Fakharian E (2008) Retrobulbar versus topical anesthesia for phacoemulsification. Pak J Biol Sci 19:2314–2319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sarikkola AU, Uusitalo RJ, Hellstedt T, Ess SL, Leivo T, Kivelä T (2011) Simultaneous bilateral versus sequential bilateral cataract surgery: helsinki simultaneous bilateral cataract surgery study report 1. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:992–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leivo T, Sarikkola AU, Uusitalo RJ, Hellstedt T, Ess SL, Kivelä T (2011) Simultaneous bilateral cataract surgery: economic analysis: helsinki simultaneous bilateral cataract surgery study report 2. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:10038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Omulecki W, Laudanska-Olszewska I, Synder A (2009) Factors affecting patient cooperation and level of pain perception during phacoemulsification in topical and intracameral anesthesia. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:97783

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aslan L, Asalnkurt M, Çekic O, Aksoy A, Yıldız H (2013) The pain experience and cooperation of patients inconsecutive cataract surgery. Eur J Ophthalmol 23(3):339–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Manners TD, Burton RL (1996) Randomised trial of topical versus sub-Tenon’s local anaesthesia for small-incision cataract surgery. Eye 10:367–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bardocci A, Ciucci F, Lofoco G, Perdicaro S, Lischetti A (2011) Pain during second eye cataract surgery under topical anesthesia: an intraindividual study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:15114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta SK, Kumar A, Agarwal S (2010) Cataract surgery under topical anesthesia: gender-based study of pain experience. Oman J Ophthalmol 3:1404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Omulecki W, Laudanska-Olszewska I, Synder A (2009) Factors affecting patient cooperation and level of pain perception during phacoemulsification in topical and intracameral anesthesia. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:97783

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zafirakis P, Voudouri A, Rowe S, Livir-Rallatos G, Livir-Rallatos C (2001) Topical versus sub-Tenon’sanesthesia without sedation in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:873–879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zehetmayer M, Radax U, Skorpik C et al (1996) Topical versus peribulbar anesthesia in clear corneal cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 22:480–484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Johnston RL, Whitefield LA, Giralt J et al (1998) Topical versus peribulbar anesthesia, without sedation, for clear corneal phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg 24:407–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fukasaku H, Marron JA (1994) Pinpoint anesthesia: a new approach to local ocular anesthesia. J Cataract Refract Surg 20:468–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel BCK, Burns TA, Crandall A et al (1996) A comparison of topical and retrobulbar anesthesia for cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 103:1196–1203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharwood PL, Thomas D, Roberts TV (2008) Adverse medical events associated with cataract surgery performed under topical anaesthesia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 36(9):8426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Omulecki W, Laudanska-Olszewska I, Synder A (2009) Factors affecting patient cooperation and level of pain perception during phacoemulsification in topical and intracameral anesthesia. Eur J Ophthalmol 19:97783

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta SK, Kumar A, Agarwal S (2010) Cataract surgery under topical anesthesia: gender-based study of pain experience. Oman J Ophthalmol 3:140–144

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Vallerand AH, Polomano RC (2000) The relationship of gender to pain. Pain Manag Nurs 1(Suppl 1):815

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma NS, Ooi JL, Figueira EC et al (2008) Patient perceptions of second eye clear corneal cataract surgery using assisted topical anesthesia. Eye 22:54750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bardocci A, Ciucci F, Lofoco G, Perdicaro S, Lischetti A (2011) Pain during second eye cataract surgery under topical anesthesia: an intraindividual study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249:1511–1514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ursea R, Feng MT, Zhou M, Lien V, Loeb R (2011) Pain perception in sequential cataract surgery: comparison of first and second procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:100914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. El Rami H, Fadlallah A, Fahd D, Fahed S (2012) Patient-perceived pain during laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of fellow eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 38:4537

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pud D, Golan Y, Pesta R (2009) Hand dominancy: a feature affecting sensitivity to pain. Neurosci Lett 467:237–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Albanese MC, Duerden EG, Rainville P, Duncan GH (2007) Memory traces of pain in human cortex. J Neurosci 27(17):4612–4620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sezen Akkaya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Sezen Akkaya, Yelda Buyru Özkurt, Sibel Aksoy, Hatice Kübra Kökçen have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akkaya, S., Özkurt, Y.B., Aksoy, S. et al. Differences in pain experience and cooperation between consecutive surgeries in patients undergoing phacoemulsification. Int Ophthalmol 37, 545–552 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0295-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0295-3

Keywords

Navigation