Advertisement

Annals of Dyslexia

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 246–260 | Cite as

Gestalt imagery: A critical factor in language comprehension

  • Nanci Bell
Part III Recent Research Findings

Abstract

Gestalt imagery—the ability to create imaged wholes—is a critical factor in oral and written language comprehension. Despite good decoding, good vocabulary, and adequate background experiences, many individuals experience weak gestalt imagery, thus processing “parts” rather than “wholes,” from verbal stimuli, spoken or written. This contributes to a Language Comprehension Disorder that may be accompanied by a commonality of symptoms: weak reading comprehension, weak oral language comprehension, weak oral language expression, weak written language expression, difficulty following directions, and a weak sense of humor. Sequential stimulation using an inquiry technique develops gestalt imagery and results in significant improvement in reading comprehension.

Keywords

Reading Comprehension Mental Imagery Language Comprehension Percentile Ranking Word Attack 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aristotle. 1972.Aristotle on Memory. Providence, Rhode Island: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arnheim, R. 1966. Image and thought.In G. Kepes (ed.).Sign, Image, Symbol. New York: George Braziller, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, N. 1986.Visualizing and Verbalizing for Language Comprehension and Thinking. Paso Robles, California: Academy of Reading Publications.Google Scholar
  4. Bleasdale, F. 1983. Paivio’s Dual-Coding Model of Meaning Revisited.In J. C. Yuille (ed.).Imagery, Memory and Cognition: Essays in honor of Allan Paivio. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Bower, G. H. and Morrow, D. G. 1990. Mental models in narrative comprehension.Science: Jan: 44–48.Google Scholar
  6. Kosslyn, S. M. 1976. Using imagery to retrieve semantic information: A developmental study.Child Development 47:434–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kosslyn, S. M. 1983.Ghosts in the Minds Machine. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Levin, J. R. 1973. Inducing comprehension in poor readers.Journal of Educational Psychology 65:19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Levin, J. R. 1981. On functions of pictures in prose.In F. Pirozzolo and M. Wittrock (eds.).Neuropsychological and Cognitive Processes in Reading. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Linden, M. A. and Wittrock, M. C. 1981. The teaching of reading comprehension according to the model of generative learning.Reading Research Quarterly 17:44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Long, S. A., and Winograd, P. N., and Bridge, C. A. 1989. The effects of reader and text characteristics on reports of imagery during and after reading.Reading Research Quarterly 19(3):353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marks, D. F. 1972. Vividness of visual imagery and effect on function.In P. Sheehan (ed.).The Function and Nature of Imagery. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Oliver, M. E. 1982. Improving comprehension with mental imagery. Paper read at the Annual Meeting of the Washington Organization for Reading Development of the International Reading Association, Seattle, Washington, March 1982.Google Scholar
  14. Paivio, A. 1969. Mental imagery in associative learning and memory.Psychological Review 76:241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paivio, A. 1971.Imagery and Verbal Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Reprinted 1979. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Paivio, A. 1986.Mental Representations: A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Peters, E. E. and Levin, J. R. 1986. Effects of a mnemonic imagery strategy on good and poor readers’ prose recall.Reading Research Quarterly 21:179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. 1971.Imagery and the Child. New York: Basic Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  19. Pirozzolo, F. and Wittrock, M. 1981.Neuropsychological and Cognitive Processes in Reading. New York: Academic Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Pressley, G. M. 1976. Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remember what they read.Journal of Educational Psychology 68: 355–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pribram, K. 1971.Languages of the Brain: Experimental paradoxes and principles in neuropsychology. New York: Brandon House, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Richardson, A. 1969.Mental Imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  23. Rollins, M. 1989.Mental Imagery: On the limits of cognitive science. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Sadoski, M. 1983. An exploratory study of the relationship between reported imagery and the comprehension and recall of a story.Reading Research Quarterly 19(1):110–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sheehan, P. W. (ed.). 1972.The Function and Nature of Imagery. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, B. D., Stahl, N., and Neil, J. 1987. The effect of imagery instruction on vocabulary development.Journal of College Reading and Learning 20:131–137.Google Scholar
  27. Stemmler, A. 1969. Reading of highly creative versus highly intelligent secondary students.Reading and Realism 13:821–831.Google Scholar
  28. Tierney, R. J. and Cunningham, J. W. 1984. Research on teaching reading comprehension.In P. D. Pearson (ed.).Handbook of Reading Research. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Orton Dyslexia Society 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nanci Bell
    • 1
  1. 1.Lindamood-Bell Learning ProcessesSan Luis Obispo

Personalised recommendations