Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Features of the Influence of the Steam Field on the Formation of Agrocenosis and the Productivity of Spring Wheat in the Field Crop Rotations of a Region with Unstable Humidity

  • FARMING AND AMELIORATION
  • Published:
Russian Agricultural Sciences Aims and scope

Abstract

The article presents long-term data of field experience on the productivity of spring wheat and agrocenosis in crop rotations with the influence of different types of steam in a region of unstable moisture. The aim of the study is to determine the influence of the aftereffect of different-pair precursors on the formation of agrocenosis and productivity of spring wheat in the conditions of the steppe zone of the Southern Urals. Field experiments were carried out in rain-fed conditions in 2015–2020 on two food backgrounds: fertilized (N40P80K40) and nonfertilized. As a result of the study, the consumption of productive moisture of the meter layer during the growing season by spring wheat and fallow crops was established. The largest amount of it in the experiment is used by the employed pairs of soil protection (98.9 mm) and sideral (93.8 mm). Spring wheat (hard and soft) uses more soil moisture in the aftereffect of pure steam (111.0 and 96.3 mm, respectively). When replacing black vapors with occupied ones, a change in the ratio of segetal vegetation in the agrocenosis was noted, which leads to an increase in perennial weeds in the crops of the second and subsequent crops of the crop rotation. The use of different types of steam in crop rotations with appropriate agricultural techniques allows one to reduce the contamination of crops with various weeds. The use of crop rotations with appropriate agricultural techniques allows one to reduce the contamination of crops by various groups of weeds for harvesting durum wheat by pure steam up to 15.6…12.2 pcs. and soft wheat up to 16.7…11.8 pcs. per 1 m2 by backgrounds, respectively. The number of perennial weeds for harvesting in soft wheat crops in the aftereffect of soil-protective steam on a fertilized background was 1.2 pcs., while nonfertilized was 3.7 pcs. per 1 m2. Over the years of research, the number of perennials in soft wheat crops in the aftereffect of sideral steam was 3.2 pcs. on two food backgrounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Lazarev, V.I., Lazareva, R.I., Il’in, B.S., and Gavrilova, T.V., Agrotechnological evaluation of spring wheat cultivation after various forecrops under conditions of Kursk oblast, Zemledelie, 2019, no. 5, pp. 25–27.

  2. Usenko, S.V., Usenko, V.I., and Garkusha, A.A., Efficiency of tillage methods and intensification means for spring wheat depending on weather conditions and a forecrop in the forest-steppe of the Altai Ob region, Zemledelie, 2019, no. 5, pp. 16–21.

  3. Chibis, V.V. and Chibis, S.P., Formation of soil fertility elements in succession crop rotation in forest-steppe zone of Western Siberia, Zemledelie, 2016, no. 1, pp. 2–22.

  4. Mitrofanov, D.V., Maksyutov, N.A., Skorokhodov, V.Yu., et al., Biological activity influence of soil and nitrates on the yield of soft spring wheat in crop rotation and permanent sowing in Urals southern chernozems, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 2021, vol. 624, art. ID 012013.

  5. Gilev, S.D., Tsimbalenko, I.N., Surkova, Yu.V., et al., Dynamics of soil fertility at cultivation of spring wheat in crop rotations and as monoculture depending on the fertilizer system and processing, Zemledelie, 2017, no. 4, pp. 22–26.

  6. Kiryushin, V.I., The management of soil fertility and productivity of agrocenoses in adaptive-landscape farming systems, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2019, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1137–1145. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319070068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Skorokhodov, V.Yu., Maksyutov, N.A., Mitrofanov, D.V., et al., The effect of nitrate nitrogen on barley yield on chernozem of the southern steppe zone of the Southern Urals, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 2021, vol. 624, art. ID 012202.

  8. Cherkasov, G.N. and Dudkin, I.V., Dockage of sowings control at adaptive-landscape agricultural systems, Zemledelie, 2010, no. 1, pp. 43–45.

  9. Kozlova, Z.V., Matais, L.N., and Glushkova, O.A., Influence of fodder crop rotations on crop conference and productivity of agricultural crops in Baikal region, Vestn. Kazan. Gos. Agrar. Univ., 2020, vol. 2, no. 58, pp. 20–24.

  10. Kudeyarov, V.N., Soil-biogeochemical aspects of arable farming in the Russian Federation, Eurasian Soil Sci., 2019, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319010095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Toropova, E.Yu., Stetsov, G.Ya., Vorob’eva, I.G., et al., Interaction of consorts in agrocenoses of spring wheat in Western Siberia, Dostizh. Nauki Tekh. APK, 2020, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schlegel, A.J., Assefa, Y., Thompson, C.R., et al., Long-term tillage on yield and water use of grain sorghum and winter wheat, Agron. J., 2018, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 269–280. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.02.0104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook, R.L. and Trlica, A., Tillage and fertilizer effects on crop yield and soil properties over 45 years in southern Illinois, Agron. J., 2016, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 415–426. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2015.0397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kazeev, K.Sh., Mokrikov, G.V., Akimenko, Yu.V., et al., The influence of no-till technology on the ecological state of the southern chernozems in the Rostov region, Dostizh. Nauki Tekh. APK, 2020, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Palma-Bautista, C., Tahmasebi, B.K., Fernandez-Moreno, P.T., et al., First case of Conyza canadensis from Hungary with multiple resistance to glyphosate and flazasulfuron, Agronomy, 2018, vol. 8, no. 8. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/8/8/157/htm. Cited March 18, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy 8080157

  16. Kraehmer, H., Laber, B., Rosinger, C., et al., Herbicides as weed control agents: state of the art: I. Weed control research and safener technology: The path to modem agriculture, Plant Physiol., 2014, vol. 166, pp. 1119–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nichols, V., Verhulst, N., Cox, R., and Govaerts, B., Weed dynamics and conservation agriculture principles: A review, Field Crops Res., 2015, vol. 183, pp. 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuz’minykh, A.N. and Pashkova, G.I., Features of the formation productivity of winter rye depending on types fallows, Agrar. Vestn. Urala, 2016, vol. 3, no. 145, pp. 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kozlova, L.M., Working out of field crop rotations at various levels of intensification of agriculture in Kirov region, Agrar. Nauka Evro-Sev.-Vostoka, 2014, vol. 2, no. 39, pp. 30–34.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Albertsson, J., Verwijst, T., Hansson, D., et al., Effects of competition between short-rotation willow and weeds on performance of different clones and associated weed flora during the first harvest cycle, Biomass Bioenergy, 2014, vol. 70, no. 31, pp. 364–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vlasenko, A.N., Vlasenko, N.G., Kudashkin, P.I., et al., Environment-forming role of phytosanitary crops in crop rotations cultivated by no-till technology, Dostizh. Nauki Tekh. APK, 2019, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khismatullin, M.M., Legumes and legume-crop perennial grasses—a constituent part of organic farming of the republic of Tatarstan, Vestn. Kazan. Gos. Agrar. Univ., 2019, vol. 14, no. 2.

  23. Mhlanga, B., Cheesman, S., Maasdorp, B., et al., Weed community responses to rotations with cover crops in maize-based conservation agriculture systems of Zimbabwe, Crop Prot., 2015, vol. 69, pp. 1–8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0261219414003627. Cited March 14, 2021.

  24. Lazarev, V.I., Lazareva, R.I., Il’in, B.S., et al., Comparative evaluation of technologies for cultivation of spring common wheat with a different intensity level under conditions of the Kursk region, Dostizh. Nauki Tekh. APK, 2020, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Abashev, V.D. and Kozlova, L.M., Green manure crops in adaptive farming, Agrar. Nauka Evro-Sev.-Vostoka, 2005, no. 6, pp. 169–178.

  26. Chen, B., Liu, E., Tian, Q., et al., Soil nitrogen dynamics and crop residues. A review, Agron. Sustainable Dev., 2014, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 429–442.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamkar, B., Akbari, F., Jaime, A., et al., The effect of crop residues on soil nitrogen dynamics and wheat yield, Adv. Plants Agric. Res., 2014, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Akhmetzyanov, M.R. and Talanov, I.P., Efficiency of grain-crop rotation, depending on seeding of manure, straw and intermediate siderate, Vestn. Kazan. Gos. Agrar. Univ., 2019, vol. 4, no. 56, pp. 11–15.

  29. Ruleva, O.V. and Seminchenko, E.V., Influence of predecessors on the formation of elements of winter wheat productivity in the Lower Volga region, Agrar. Nauka, 2019, no. 4, pp. 68–72.

Download references

Funding

The research was carried out in accordance with the research plan for 2020–2021 Federal Scientific Center of Biological Systems and Agrotechnologies, Russian Academy of Sciences (no. 0761-2019-0003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Yu. Skorokhodov.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Translated by P. Kuchina

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skorokhodov, V.Y., Zorov, A.A. Features of the Influence of the Steam Field on the Formation of Agrocenosis and the Productivity of Spring Wheat in the Field Crop Rotations of a Region with Unstable Humidity. Russ. Agricult. Sci. 47, 541–547 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367421060136

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068367421060136

Keywords:

Navigation