Abstract
This paper summarizes our findings on the eye morphology, visual perception, learning abilities, navigation system and recruitment strategy of three Myrmica species, pointing out the agreement between each species’ morphological, physiological and behavioral characters as well as the accordance between these characters and each species’ environmental preferences. We also draw biological generalities and report other similar studies. Myrmica sabuleti workers have small eyes, perceive the dimension, number of basic elements and orientation of a visual cue but do not distinguish shapes from one another. They see the colors, perceive UV light and the perspective, and adapt their vision to the light intensity. They learn odors better than visual cues and essentially use odors to navigate. Myrmica ruginodis workers have large eyes, distinguish shapes, small see-through forms as well as patterns of luminous points located above them. They have no olfactory memory but a very long lasting visual one. They exclusively use visual cues located above them while travelling, relying on odors only when they no longer see. Myrmica rubra workers have eyes of middle size and distinguish filled shapes but not hollow forms. Their olfactory and visual conditioning lead to equivalent learning in the course of time and they use all available olfactory and visual elements for navigating.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beugnon G., Lachaud J.-P. & Chagne P. 2005. Use of longterm stored vector information in the neotropical ant Gigantiops destructor. J. Insect Behav. 18(3): 415–432. DOI: 10.1007/s10905-005-3700-8
Blatrix R., Galkowski C., Lebas C. & Wegnez P. 2013. Fourmis de France, de Belgique et du Luxembourg. Delachaux et Niestlé, 287 pp. ISBN-10: 260301899X, ISBN-13: 978-2603018996
Cammaerts M-C. 1977. Étude démographique annuelle des sociétés de Myrmica rubra L. des environs de Bruxelles. Insect. Sociaux 24: 147–161.
Cammaerts M.-C. 1978. Recruitment to food in Myrmica rubra. Biol. Behaviour [Biologie du comportement] 4(2): 159–172.
Cammaerts M.-C. 2004. Some characteristics of the visual perception of the ant Myrmica sabuleti. Physiol. Entomol. 29(5): 472–482. DOI: 10.1111/j.0307-6962.2004.00419.x
Cammaerts M.-C. 2005a. How do workers of the ant Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) estimate the distance they walk? Belg. J. Entomol. 7: 87–98.
Cammaerts M.-C. 2005b. Sensitivity and adaptation of Myrmica sabuleti workers (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) to light. Myrmecologische Nachrichten 7: 77–86.
Cammaerts M.-C. 2007a. Colour vision in the ant Myrmica sabuleti Meinert, 1861 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 10: 41–50.
Cammaerts M.-C. 2007b. Perspective vision in workers of Myrmica sabuleti Meinert, 1861 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 10: 21–26.
Cammaerts M.-C. 2008. Visual discrimination of cues differing as for their number of elements, their shape or their orientation, by the ant Myrmica sabuleti. Biologia 63(6): 1169–1180. DOI: 10.2478/s11756-008-0172-2
Cammaerts M.-C. 2011. Visual vertical subtended angle of Myrmica ruginodis and Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Bull. Soc. Roy. Belge Entomol. 147: 113–120.
Cammaerts M.-C. 2012a. Navigation system of the ant Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 16: 111–121.
Cammaerts M.-C. 2012b. The visual perception of the ant Myrmica ruginodis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Biologia 67(6): 1165–1174. DOI: 10.2478/s11756-012-0112-z
Cammaerts M.-C. 2012c. Olfactory and visual conditioning in the ant Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Bull. Soc. Roy. Belge Entomol. 148(3): 199–208.
Cammaerts M.-C. 2013a. Visual discrimination of shapes in the ant Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Belg. J. Zool. 143(1): 69–78.
Cammaerts M.-C. 2013b. Spatio-temporal learning in three Myrmica species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Bull. Soc. R. Belg. Entomol. 149(2): 131–138.
Cammaerts M.-C. 2013c. Ants’ learning of nest entrance characteristics (Hymenoptera, Formicidae. Bull. Entomol. Res. 104(1): 29–34. DOI: 10.1017/S0007485313000436
Cammaerts M.-C. 2013d. Trail following learning by young Myrmica rubra workers (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ISRN Entomology. Article ID 792891, 6 pp. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/792891
Cammaerts M.-C. 2013e. Sensu stricto individual conditioning, and imitation, in the ant Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. France 49(4): 402–412. DOI: 10.1080/00379271.2014.893679
Cammaerts M.-C. 2013f. Age dependent spatio-temporal learning in the ant Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Bull. Soc. R. Belg. Entomol. 149: 205–212.
Cammaerts M.-C. & Cammaerts D. 2009. Light thresholds for colour vision in the workers of the ant Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Belg. J. Zool. 139(1): 40–49.
Cammaerts M.-C. & Cammaerts R. 1980. Food recruitment strategies of the ants Myrmica sabuleti and Myrmica ruginodis. Behav. Processes 5(3): 251–270. DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(80)90006-6
Cammaerts M.-C. & Lambert A. 2009. Maze negotiation by a Myrmicine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 12: 41–49.
Cammaerts M.-C. & Némeghaire S. 2012. Why do workers of Myrmica ruginodis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) navigate by relying mainly on their vision? Bull Soc. R. Belg. Entomol. 148(1): 42–52.
Cammaerts M.-C. & Rachidi Z. 2009. Olfactive conditioning and use of visual and odorous elements for movement in the ant Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 12: 117–127.
Cammaerts M.-C., Rachidi Z., Beke S. & Essaadi Y. 2012. Use of olfactory and visual cues for traveling by the ant Myrmica ruginodis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 16: 45–55.
Cammaerts M.-C., Rachidi Z. & Cammaerts D. 2011. Collective operant conditioning and circadian rhythms in the ant Myrmica sabuleti (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Bull. Soc. R. Belg. Entomol. 147(2): 142–154.
Cammaerts-Tricot M.-C. 1974a. Piste et phéromone attractive chez la fourmi Myrmica rubra. J. Comp. Physiol. 88: 373–382.
Cammaerts-Tricot M.-C. 1974b. Recrutement d’ouvrières, chez Myrmica rubra, par les phéromones de l’appareil à venin. Behaviour 50(1–2): 111–122. DOI: 10.1163/156853974X00066
De Koninck W., Ignace D., Vankerkhoven F. & Wegnez P. 2012. Atlas des fourmis de belgique. Bull. Soc. R. Belg. Entomol. 148(2): 95–186.
Devigne C. & Detrain C. 1999. Effet de la distance sur le recrutement alimentaire chez la fourmi Lasius niger. Actes Coll. Insectes Sociaux 12: 79–85.
Dupuy F., Sandoz J.-C., Giurfa M. & Josens R. 2006. Individual olfactory learning in Camponotus ants. Anim. Behav. 72(5): 1081–1091. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.03.011
Guerrieri F. & D’Ettorre P. 2010. Associative learning in ants: conditioning of the maxilla-labium extension response in Camponotus aethiops. J. Insect Physiol. 56(1): 88–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.09.007.
Hantgartner W. 1970. Control of pheromone quantity in odor trails of the ant Acanthomyops interjectus Mayr. Experientia 26(6): 664–665. DOI: 10.1007/BF01898753
Howard J. & Lawrence M. 1996. Conditioning of scouts and recruits during foraging by a leaf-cutting ant, Atta colombica. Anim. Behav. 52(2): 299–306. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0175
Josens R., Eschbach C. & Giurfa M. 2009. Differential conditioning and long-term olfactory memory in individual Camponotus fellah ants. J. Exp. Biol. 212: 1904–1011. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.030080
Macquart D., Latil G. & Beugnon G. 2006. La composante motrice de la navigation chez une formicine tropicale, p. 28. In: Union internationale pour l’étude des insectes sociaux — section française. Colloque annuel, Avignon 24–27 avril 2006, 93 pp.
Macquart D. & Beugnon G. 2007. Apprentissage d’une règle visuomotrice de déplacement chez la formicine néotropicale Gigantiops destructor Colloque Sect. Fr. IUSSI, Toulouse, p. 67. In: Union internationale pour l’étude des insectes sociaux — “Toulouse Envahie par les Insectes Sociaux”, Colloque annuel de la section française de l’Uieis, Toulouse 3–5 septembre 2007.
Merkle T. & Wehner R. 2009. How flexible is the systematic search behaviour of desert ants? Anim. Behav. 77(5): 1051–1056. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.006
Merkle T. & Wehner R. 2010. Desert ants use foraging distance to adapt the nest search to the uncertainty of the path integrator. Behav. Ecol. 21: 349–355. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arp197
Narendra A. 2007a. Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti I. Proportional path-integration takes the ant half-way home. J. Exp. Biol. 210(10): 1798–1803. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02768
Narendra A. 2007b. Homing strategies of the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti II. Interaction of the path integrator with visual cue information. J. Exp. Biol. 210(10): 1804–1812. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02769
Narendra A., Cheng K. & Wehner R. 2007a. Acquiring, retaining and integrating memories of the outbound distance in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. J. Exp. Biol. 210(4): 570–577. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.02678
Narendra A., Si A., Sulikowski D. & Cheng K. 2007b. Learning, retention and coding of nest-associated visual cues by the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61(10): 1543–1553. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-007-0386-2
Passera L. & Aron S. 2005. Les fourmis: comportement, organization sociale et évolution. Les Presses Scientifiques du CNRC, Ottawa, Canada, 480 pp. ISBN-10: 066097021X, ISBN-13: 978-0660970219
Rachidi Z., Cammaerts M.-C. & Debeir O. 2008. Morphometric study of the eye of three species of Myrmica (Formicidae). Belg. J. Entomol. 10: 81–91.
Schatz B., Chameron S., Beugnon G. & Collett T. S. 1999. The use of path integration to guide route learning in ants. Nature 399: 769–772. DOI: 10.1038/21625
Schultheiss P. & Cheng K. 2011. Finding the nest: inbound searching behaviour in the Australian desert ant, Melophorus bagoti. Anim. Behav. 81(5): 1031–1038. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.008.
Schwarz S. & Cheng K. 2010a. Visual discrimination, sequential learning and memory retrieval in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. Animal Cognition 14(6): 861–870. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-011-0419-0.2011
Schwarz S. & Cheng K. 2010b. Visual associative learning in two desert ant species. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64(12): 2033–2041. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-010-1016-y
Schwarz S., Albert L., Wystrach A. & Cheng K. 2011. Ocelli contribute to the encoding of celestial compass information in the Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. J. Exp. Biol. 214(Pt 6): 901–906. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.049262
Steck K., Hansson B. S. & Knaden M. 2009. Smells like home: Desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis, use olfactory landmarks to pinpoint the nest. Frontiers in Zool. 6:5. DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-6-5
Steck K., Hansson B. S. & Knaden M. 2011. Desert ants benefit from combining visual and olfactory landmarks. J. Exp. Biol. 214(Pt 8): 1307–1312. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.053579
Wegnez P., Ignace D., Fichefet V., Hardy M., Timmermann M. & Plume T. 2012. Fourmis de Wallonie (2003–2011). Publication du Département de l’Etude du Milieu Naturel et Agricole (SPW-DGARNE), Série “ Faune — Flore — Habitat ”, 272 pp. ISBN 10: 3637880458, ISBN 13: 2223637880458
Wehner R. 1981. Spatial vision in Arthropods. Chapter 4, pp. 287–616. In: Autrum H. (ed.), Series: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Part 7 / 6 C, Subseries: Vision in Invertebrates C: Invertebrate Visual Centers and Behavior II., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New-York, 663 pp. ISBN: 978-3-642-67870-7. DOI: 10.1007/978-3642-67868-4
Wehner R. 1997. The ant’s celestial compass system: spectral and polarization channels, pp. 145–185. In: Lehrer M. (ed.), Orientation and Communication in Arthropods, Experientia Supplementum, Birkhaüser Verlag, Basel, 402 pp. ISBN: 3-7643-5693-6
Wehner R. 2003. Desert ant navigation: how miniature brains solve complex tasks. J. Comp. Physiol. A 189: 579–588. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-003-0431-1
Wehner R. 2009. The architecture of the desert ant’s navigation toolkit (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 12: 85–96.
Wittlinger M., Wehner R. & Wolf H. 2006. The ant odometer: stepping on stilts and stumps. Science 312(5782): 1965–1967. DOI:10.1126/science.1126912
Wolf H. & Wehner R. 2000. Pinpointing food sources: Olfactory and anemotactic orientation in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J. Exp. Biol. 203(5): 857–868. PMID: 10667968
Wolgemuth S., Ronacher B. & Wehner R. 2001. Ant odometry in the third dimension. Nature 411(6839): 795–798 DOI: 10.1038/35081069
Wystrach A. & Beugnon G. 2008. Ants learn geometry and features. Current Biology 19(1): 61–66. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.054
Wystrach A., Schwarz S., Schultheiss P., Beugnon G. & Cheng K. 2011a. Views, landmarks, and routes: how do desert ants negotiate an obstacle course? J. Comp. Physiol. A 197(2): 167–179. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-010-0597-2.
Wystrach A., Beugnon G., Cheng K. 2011b. Landmarks or panoramas: what do navigating ants attend to for guidance? Frontiers in Zool. 8: 21 DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-8-21
www.fourmiswalbru.be (accessed February 2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cammaerts, MC., Cammaerts, D. Comparative outlook over physiological and ecological characteristics of three closely-related Myrmica species. Biologia 69, 1051–1058 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-014-0399-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-014-0399-z