Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Potentially Avoidable Admissions and Prolonged Hospitalization in Patients with Suspected Colon Cancer

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Suspicion of cancer in the Emergency Department (ED) may lead to potentially avoidable and prolonged admissions. We aimed to examine the reasons for potentially avoidable and prolonged hospitalizations after admissions from the ED for new colon cancer diagnoses (ED-dx).

Methods

A retrospective, single-institution analysis was conducted of patients with ED-dx between 2017 and 2018. Defined criteria were used to identify potentially avoidable admissions. Patients without avoidable admissions were examined for ideal length of stay (iLOS), using separate defined criteria. Prolonged length of stay (pLOS) was defined as actual length of stay (aLOS) being greater than 1 day longer than iLOS.

Results

Of 97 patients with ED-dx, 12% had potentially avoidable admissions, most often (58%) for cancer workup. Very little difference in demographic, tumor characteristics, or symptoms were found, except patients with potentially avoidable admissions were more functional (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] score 0–1: 83% vs. 46%; p = 0.049) and had longer symptom duration prior to ED presentation {24 days (interquartile range [IQR] 7–75) vs. 7 days (IQR 2–21)}. Among the 60 patients who had necessary admissions but did not require urgent intervention, 78% had pLOS, most often for non-urgent surgery (60%) and further oncologic workup. The median difference between iLOS and aLOS was 12 days (IQR 8–16) for pLOS.

Conclusions

Potentially avoidable admissions following Ed-dx were uncommon but were mostly for oncologic workup. Once admitted, the majority of patients had pLOS, most often for definitive surgery and further oncologic workup. This suggests a lack of systems to safely transition to outpatient cancer management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Issa IA, Noureddine M. Colorectal cancer screening: an updated review of the available options. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(28):5086–96. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5086.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Balchen V, Simon K. Colorectal cancer development and advances in screening. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:967–76. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S109285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ladabaum U, Mannalithara A, Meester RGS, Gupta S, Schoen RE. Cost-effectiveness and national effects of initiating colorectal cancer screening for average-risk persons at age 45 years instead of 50 years. Gastroenterology. 2019;157(1):137–48. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nawaz H, Via C, Shahrokni A, et al. Can the inpatient hospital setting be a golden opportunity to improve colon cancer screening rates in the united states? Health Promot Pract. 2014;15(4):506–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839913518559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wolf AMD, Fontham ETH, Church TR, et al. Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American cancer society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(4):250–81. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21457.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Joseph DA. Use of colorectal cancer screening tests by state. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Colorectal Cancer Screening | Cancer Trends Progress Report. Available at: https://progressreport.cancer.gov/detection/colorectal_cancer. Accessed 23 Aug 2022.

  9. Weithorn D, Arientyl V, Solsky I, et al. Diagnosis setting and colorectal cancer outcomes: the impact of cancer diagnosis in the emergency department. J Surg Res. 2020;255:164–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.05.005.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Amri R, Bordeianou LG, Sylla P, Berger DL. Colon cancer surgery following emergency presentation: effects on admission and stage-adjusted outcomes. Am J Surg. 2015;209(2):246–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.07.014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brooks GA, Abrams TA, Meyerhardt JA, et al. Identification of potentially avoidable hospitalizations in patients with GI cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(6):496–503. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.4330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson PC, Xiao Y, Wong RL, et al. Potentially avoidable hospital readmissions in patients with advanced cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2019;15(5):e420–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.18.00595.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Jawahri A, Keenan T, Abel GA, et al. Potentially avoidable hospital admissions in older patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in the USA: a retrospective analysis. Lancet Haematol. 2016;3(6):e276-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(16)30024-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Caterino JM, Adler D, Durham DD, et al. Analysis of Diagnoses, Symptoms, Medications, and Admissions Among Patients With Cancer Presenting to Emergency Departments. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(3):e190979. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0979.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Yabroff KR, Lamont EB, Mariotto A, et al. Cost of care for elderly cancer patients in the United states. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(9):630–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bosch X, Sanclemente-Ansó C, Escoda O, et al. Time to diagnosis and associated costs of an outpatient vs inpatient setting in the diagnosis of lymphoma: a retrospective study of a large cohort of major lymphoma subtypes in Spain. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):276. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4187-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ostby SA, Evans JG, Smith HJ, et al. Reducing emergency department (ED) computed tomography (CT) utilization in women treated for gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156(2):288–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.11.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jansma B, Vakkalanka P, Talan DA, Negaard B, Faine BA. Guideline adherence for the management of emergency department patients with febrile neutropenia and no infection source: Is there room for improvement? J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020;26(6):1382–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155219896396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chan DKH, Ang JJ. A simple prediction score for prolonged length of stay following elective colorectal cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406(2):319–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-020-02030-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bennedsen ALB, Eriksen JR, Gögenur I. Prolonged hospital stay and readmission rate in an enhanced recovery after surgery cohort undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20(12):1097–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14446.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Orive M, Aguirre U, et al. Risk factors affecting hospital stay among patients undergoing colon cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(11):4133–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04683-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chiu CC, Hsu WT, Choi JJ, et al. Comparison of outcome and cost between the open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis using nationwide hospital record database. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(11):3757–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06672-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly M, Sharp L, Dwane F, Kelleher T, Comber H. Factors predicting hospital length-of-stay and readmission after colorectal resection: a population-based study of elective and emergency admissions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Faiz O, Haji A, Burns E, Bottle A, Kennedy R, Aylin P. Hospital stay amongst patients undergoing major elective colorectal surgery: predicting prolonged stay and readmissions in NHS hospitals. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(7):816–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02277.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rogers MJ, Matheson LM, Garrard B, et al. Cancer diagnosed in the Emergency Department of a Regional Health Service. Aust J Rural Health. 2016;24(6):409–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pettit N, Sarmiento E, Kline J. Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer in proximity to an emergency department visit. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):10667. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13422-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. de Santis RB, Wainstein AJA, Machado GCOG, Santos FAV, Melo MRP, Drummond-Lage AP. Cancer patients admitted in the emergency department: A single-centre observational study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022;31(6):e13758. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Foreman S. Montefiore Medical Center in The Bronx, New York: improving health in an urban community. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2004;79(12):1154–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200412000-00007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mushlin AI, Black ER, Connolly CA, Buonaccorso KM, Eberly SW. The necessary length of hospital stay for chronic pulmonary disease. JAMA. 1991;266(1):80–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bannay A, Chaignot C, Blotière PO, et al. The best use of the charlson comorbidity index with electronic health care database to predict mortality. Med Care. 2016;54(2):188–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Azam F, Latif MF, Farooq A, et al. Performance status assessment by using ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) score for cancer patients by oncology healthcare professionals. Case Rep Oncol. 2019;12(3):728–36. https://doi.org/10.1159/000503095.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Parikh AB, Smith W, Sanderson M, et al. Identifying potentially avoidable hospitalizations in medicare patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis. J Oncol Pract. 2019;15(3):e187–94. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.18.00560.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schriner JB, Arientyl V, Kopp A, et al. Understanding factors associated with hospital admission for colon cancer diagnosis and staging work up. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(3 Suppl):17. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2021.39.3_suppl.17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hatam N, Fanusi T, Dehghani M, Vojdani R, Ramzi M, Askarian M. Economic burden of avoidable hospitalizations among patients with Cancer at Namazi Hospital in Shiraz, 2013. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP. 2017;18(1):177–82. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.1.177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Morden NE, Chang CH, Jacobson JO, et al. End-of-life care for medicare beneficiaries with cancer is highly intensive overall and varies widely. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012;31(4):786–96. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0650.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Petrelli F, Tomasello G, Borgonovo K, et al. Prognostic survival associated with left-sided vs right-sided colon cancer: a systematic Review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(2):211–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Helvaci K, Eraslan E, Yildiz F, et al. Comparison of clinicopathological and survival features of right and left colon cancers. J buon. 2019;7:1845.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Shida D, Inoue M, Tanabe T, et al. Prognostic impact of primary tumor location in stage III colorectal cancer-right-sided colon versus left-sided colon versus rectum: a nationwide multicenter retrospective study. J Gastroenterol. 2020;55(10):958–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-020-01706-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Peng J, Li C, Wang F, et al. Right- and left-sided stage III colon cancers present different prognostic outcomes of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:2095–103. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S163520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Group the EC. The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: results from an international registry. Ann Surg. 2015;261(6):1153-1159. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001029

  42. Juo YY, Hyder O, Haider AH, Camp M, Lidor A, Ahuja N. Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: first comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(2):177–84. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3660.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Andriotti T, Goralnick E, Jarman M, et al. The optimal length of stay associated with the lowest readmission risk following surgery. J Surg Res. 2019;239:292–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.02.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Tomlinson JS, et al. Wait times for cancer Surgery in the United States: trends and predictors of delays. Ann Surg. 2011;253(4):779–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318211cc0f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Muto T, Bussey HJR, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer. 1975;36(6):2251–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.2820360944.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hamilton SR. The adenoma-adenocarcinoma sequence in the large bowel: Variations on a theme. J Cell Biochem. 1992;50(S16G):41–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240501108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Bagaria SP, Heckman MG, Diehl NN, Parker A, Wasif N. Delay to colectomy and survival for patients diagnosed with colon cancer. J Invest Surg. 2019;32(4):350–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2017.1421732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Simunovic M, Rempel E, Thériault ME, et al. Influence of delays to nonemergent colon cancer surgery on operative mortality, disease-specific survival and overall survival. Can J Surg. 2009;52(4):E79–86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Hangaard Hansen C, Gögenur M, Tvilling Madsen M, Gögenur I. The effect of time from diagnosis to surgery on oncological outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer: A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(10):1479–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.06.015.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Amri R, Bordeianou LG, Sylla P, Berger DL. Treatment delay in surgically-treated colon cancer: does it affect outcomes? Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(12):3909–16. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3800-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Effort by H. In was supported by NIH-NCI grant 2K12 CA132783-06 (Paul Calabresi Career Development Award). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haejin In MD, MBA, MPH.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article was presented at the Academic Surgical Congress Meeting, 2 February 2022, Orlando, FL, USA.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Tool for potentially avoidable admissions for patients with newly diagnosed colon cancer

  1. 1.

    Potentially avoidable admission

  2. 2.

    Insufficient information

  3. 3.

    Unavoidable admission

Use the below criteria to identify patients safe for ED discharge. All criteria must be met to qualify for “potentially avoidable admissions”. If any criteria not met then the patient has “unavoidable admission”. If there is incomplete information to complete the criteria then the patient falls in category 2 “insufficient information”.

Condition

Potentially avoidable admission criteria

General

No persistent hemodynamic instabilitya

Afebrileb

No markers of peritonitis/perforation per laboratory values/physical exam/imaging

No urgent need for intervention

No concurrent diagnosis requiring admission

Tolerating oral diet or implied

Pain controlled with oral medications

Bleeding/Anemia

No transfusion requirement

Obstruction

No computed tomography (CT) read of high grade obstructionc

Evidence of bowel function in ED or immediately prior

  1. aSystolic blood pressure <90 mmHg for 3 hours or greater
  2. b36 oC < patient’s temperature < 38 °C
  3. c50% or greater difference in diameter of bowel between proximally dilated and distally collapsed bowel

Appendix 2

Resolution criteria for ideal length of stay (iLOS) during colon cancer admissions

Admitting condition

Resolution criteria

Anemia/Bleeding

Per notes, no sign of active bleeding

No blood transfusions over previous 24 hours

Definitive or presumed source of bleeding

Three consecutive stable hemoglobin recordings each separated by at least 6 hours OR

Two consecutive stable readings separated by at least 20 hours

Obstruction

Return of bowel function (flatus, bowel movement, ostomy output, etc.)

Regular diet is tolerated

Sepsis

Source of infection identified

If indicated, source control is obtained

Leukocytosis down trending over 24 hours

The patient is on definitive antibiotic therapy or completed antibiotics

The patient has either completed antibiotics, is on a oral regimen, or a peripherally inserted central catheter or midline has been placed for outpatient intravenous antibiotic therapy

Peritonitis

Operative procedurea

Improvement in physical exam

Pain Control

Pain controlled on oral regimen

Requiring one or fewer administrations of IV pain medication over proceeding 24 hours

Medical Condition Unrelated to Colon Cancer

Required inpatient workup complete

Inpatient need for treatment resolved

  1. When multiple criteria per condition, resolution date is the latest date all criteria met
  2. All criteria as per MD/PA/NP/RN note review
  3. aIf the patient underwent an emergent, urgent, or palliative surgical procedure before resolution of admission condition for symptomatic management, then the patient is excluded from iLOS

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tagerman, D.L., Ramos-Santillan, V., Kalam, A. et al. Potentially Avoidable Admissions and Prolonged Hospitalization in Patients with Suspected Colon Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 30, 4748–4758 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13593-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13593-2

Navigation