Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Variation of wild boar reproductive performance in different habitat types: Implications for management

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was analyze reproductive performance of wild boar in different habitat over a 7-year period (2006–2012). A total of 468 pregnant females and 2.819 fetuses were analyzed, the mean number of fetuses was 6.02 (median = 6) per animal (4.62 per juvenile, 6.39 per yearling and 6.77 per adult). In litters, male-biased fetuses occurred significantly more often than female, the overall fetal sex ratio is 1: 0.86. Positive reproductive traits increased up to 90 kg of live body weight and then decreased. The reproductive parameters observed in our study reflect a relatively high reproductive capacity compared to the populations in southern and northern Europe, but are comparable with some populations in central Europe. Concerning habitat conditions, it is obvious that they influence the reproductive performance of females, and therefore must be included in management plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous, Hunting Law, Official Gazette of Republic Croatia, 2005, 140/05.

  • Anonymous, Informattion system of Central Hunting Records, Ministry of Agriculture, 2013. http://lovistarh.mrrsvg.hr/sle/login.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fsle%2fdefault.aspx. Accessed September 2013.

  • Bieber, C. and Ruf, T., Population dynamics in wild boar, Sus scrofa: Ecology, elasticity of growth rate, and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumer, J. Appl. Ecol., 2005, vol. 42, pp. 1203–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boitani, L. and Mattei, L., Aging wild boar (Sus scrofa) by tooth eruption, in: Ongules/Ungulates 91, Spitz, F., Janeau, G., Gonzales, G., and Aulagnier, S., Eds., Paris–Toulouse: SFEPMIRGM, 1992, pp. 419–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braak, C.J.F. and Šmilauer, P., Canoco Reference Manual and User’s Guide: Software for Ordination, Version 5.0, Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, C., Alexandre, N., Fernández-Llario, P., and Santos, P., Wild boar (Sus scrofa) harvesting using the espera hunting method: Side effects and management implications, Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 2010, vol. 56, pp. 465–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S., Llimona, F., and Grácia, J., Spacing and nocturnal activity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean metropolitan park, Wildl. Biol., 2003, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L.M., Leman, A.D., and Morris, M., Factors influencing litter size in swine: Parity-one females, J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 1988, vol. 192, pp. 187–194.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service, 2013. http://meteo.hr/. Accessed April 2013.

  • Delgado, R., Fernández-Llario, P., Azevedo, M., Beja-Pereira, A., and Santos, P., Paternity assessment in freeranging wild boar (Sus scrofa): Are littermates full-sibs?, Mammal. Biol., 2008, vol. 73, pp. 169–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditchkoff, S.S., Buck Jolly, D., Sparklin, B.D., Hanson, L.B., Mitchell, M.S., and Grand, J.B., Reproduction in a population of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) subjected to lethal control, J. Wildl. Manag., 2012, vol. 76, pp. 1235–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Llario, P. and Mateos-Quesada, P., Influence of rainfall on the breeding biology of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean ecosystem, Folia Zool., 2005, vol. 54, no. 3, pp 240–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, C., Alves de Silva, A., Alves, J., Vingada, J., and Soares, A.M.V.M., Reproductive performance of wild boar females in Portugal, Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 2011, vol. 57, pp. 363–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamelon, M., Besnard, A., Gaillard, J.M., Servanty, S., Baubet, E., Brandt, S., and Gimenez, O., High hunting pressure selects for early birth date: Wild boar as a case study, Evolution, 2011, vol. 65, pp. 3100–3112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geisser, H. and Reyer, H.U., Efficacy of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crop damage by wild boar, J. Wildl. Manag., 2004, vol. 68, pp. 939–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gethöffer, F., Sodeikat, G. and Pohlmeyer, K., Reproductive parameters of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in three different parts of Germany, Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 2007, vol. 53, pp. 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajji, G.E.M. and Zachos, F.E., Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA analyses reveal pronounced genetic structuring in Tunisian wild boar Sus scrofa, Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 2011, vol. 57, pp. 449–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, J., García-Serrano, A., and García-González, R., Reproductive and demographic parameters in two Iberian wild boar, Sus scrofa, populations, Acta Theriol., 2008, vol. 53, pp. 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, M.G., Mediterranean peninsulas: The evolution of hotspots, in Biodiversity Hotspots: Distribution and Protection of Conservation Priority Areas, Zachos, F.E. and Habel, J.C., Eds., Berlin: Springer, 2011, pp. 123–148.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Keuling, O., Stier, N., and Roth, M., How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L., Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 2008, vol. 54, pp. 729–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massei, G., Genov, P.V., and Staines, B.W., Diet, food availability and reproduction of wild boar in a Mediterranean coastal area, Acta Theriol., 1996, vol. 41, pp. 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massei, G., Kindberg, J., Licoppe, A., Gacic, D., Šprem, N., Kamler, J., Baubet, E., Hohmann, U., Monaco, A., Ozolinš, J., Cellina, S., Podgorski, T., Fonseca, C., Markov, N., Pokorny, et al., Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe, Pest Manag. Sci., 2015, vol. 71, pp. 492–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mauget, R., Seasonality of reproduction in the wild boar, in Control of Pig Reproduction, Cole, D.J.A. and Foxcroft G.R., Eds., London, Butterworths, 1982, pp. 509–526.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B., Determination of age of Scottish red deer from growth layers in dental cement, Nature, 1963, vol. 198, pp. 350–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Náhlik A., Sandor, G., Birth rate and offspring survival in a free-ranging wild boar Sus scrofa population, Wild. Biol., 2003, vol. 9, pp. 37–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-González, J., Carranza, J., and Torres-Porras, J., Relative effect of food supplementation and natural resources on female red deer distribution in a Mediterranean ecosystem, J. Wildl. Manag., 2010, vol. 74, pp. 1701–1708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlings, J.O., Pantula, S.G., and Dickey, D.A., Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool, 2nd ed., New York: Springer, 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosell, C., Navá s, F., and Romero, S., Reproduction of wild boar in a cropland and coastal wetland area: Implications for management, Anim. Biodivers. Conserv., 2012, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scandura, M., Iacolina, L., and Apollonio, M., Genetic diversity in the European wild boar Sus scrofa: Pphylogeography, population structure and wild × domestic hybridization, Mammal. Rev., 2011, vol. 41, pp. 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servanty, S., Gaillard, J.M., Allainé, D., Brandt, S., and Baubet, E., Litter size and fetal sex ratio adjustment in a highly polytocous species, the wild boar, Behav. Ecol., 2007, vol. 10, pp.1093–1099.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servanty, S., Gaillard, J.M., Toigo, C., Brandt, S., and Baubet, E., Pulsed resources and climate-induced variation in the reproductive traits of wild boar under high hunting pressure, J. Anim. Ecol., 2009, vol. 78, pp. 1278–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šprem, N., Piria, M., Novosel, H., Florijancic, T., Antunovic, B., and Treer, T., Morphological variability of the Croatian wild boar population, Šumarski List, 2011a, vol. 135, pp. 575–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šprem, N., Piria, M., Florijancic, T., Antunovic, B., Dumic, T., Gutzmirtl, H., Treer, T., and Curik, I., Morphometrical analysis of reproduction traits for the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.), Croat. Agric. Conspec. Sci., 2011b, vol. 76, pp. 263–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šprem, N., Dudukovic, D., Keros, T., and Konjevic, D. Wildlife–vehicle collisions in Croatia: A hazard for humans and animals, Coll. Antropol., 2013a, vol. 37, pp. 531–535.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Šprem, N., Škavic, P., Krupec, I., and Budor, I. Patterns of game animal attacks on hunters in Croatia over a 13-year period, Wild. Environ. Med., 2013b, vol. 24, pp. 267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šprem, N., Salajpal, K., Safner, T., Ðikic, D., Juric, J., Curik, I., Ðikic, M., and Cubric-Curik. V., Genetic analysis of hybridization between domesticated endangered pig breeds and wild boar, Livest. Sci., 2014, vol. 102, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurfjell, H., Spong, G., and Ericsson, G. Effects of hunting on wild boar Sus scrofa behavior, Wildl. Biol., 2013, vol. 19, pp. 87–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toigo, C., Servanty, S., Gaillard, J.M., Brandt, S., and Baubet, E., Disentangling natural from hunting mortality in an intensively hunted wild boar population, J. Wildl. Manag., 2008, vol. 72, pp. 1532–1539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziobrowski, M., Albinski, A., Bobek, J., and Ulejczyk, S., Characteristics of the wild boar population in the farmlandforest mosaic in north-eastern Poland, Proc. 9th Int. Symp. on Wild Boar and Other Suids, Hannover, 2012, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Zagreb, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Fisheries, Beekeeping, Game Management and Special Zoology, Svetošimunska cesta 25, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia

    N. Šprem, M. Piria, S. Prđun, H. Novosel & T. Treer

Authors
  1. N. Šprem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Piria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Prđun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. H. Novosel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Treer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Šprem.

Additional information

The article is published in the original.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Šprem, N., Piria, M., Prđun, S. et al. Variation of wild boar reproductive performance in different habitat types: Implications for management. Russ J Ecol 47, 96–103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106741361506017X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106741361506017X

Keywords

Search

Navigation