Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Wildlife Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) population densities all over Europe cause severe economic problems. In popular belief, the wild boar is a more or less diurnal species, causing only minor problems when undisturbed, but is assumed to become nocturnal and wide-ranging when opposed to hunting pressure. In our study, we investigated the impact of hunting and several environmental factors on movements, spatial utilisation and activity patterns by radiotelemetry. Activity pattern revealed a mean proportion of diurnal activity of 12% of all localisations with a monthly change. The wild boar showed increased diurnal activity on undisturbed feeding habitats, especially in early summer. Different hunting methods did influence activity and spatial utilisation in terms of activity and smaller home ranges in areas with only single hunt, although this might be biased by seasonal effects. Flight distances increased significantly after single hunt and capture incidents, but still ranged inside the annual home ranges. Battues did not influence the spatial utilisation before and after hunt significantly. In only 14% of the observed cases did wild boar show small scaled escape movements after battues. The overlaps of home ranges did not change after battues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baubet E, Brandt S, Touzeau C (1998) Effet de la chasse sur les stratégies d’occupation de l’espace des sangliers (Sus scrofa). Analyses préliminaires. Gibier Faune Sauvage 15:655–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Beuerle W (1975) Freilanduntersuchungen zum Kampf- und Sexualverhalten des Europäischen Wildschweines (Sus scrofa L.). Z Tierpsychol 39:211–258

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bieber C, Ruf T (2005) Population dynamics in wild boar Sus scrofa: ecology, elasticity of growth rate and implications for the management of pulsed resource consumers. J Appl Ecol 42:1203–1213 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01094.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boitani L, Mattei L, Morini P, Zagarese B (1992) Experimental release of captivity reared wild boar (Sus scrofa). in: “Ongulés/Ungulates 91”. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Toulouse, pp 413–417

  • Boitani L, Mattei L, Nonis D, Corsi F (1994) Spatial and activity patterns of wild boar in Tuscany, Italy. J Mammal 75:600–612 doi:10.2307/1382507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton SP (1975) The effect of the European wild boar (Sus scrofa) on Gray Beech Forest in the Great Smokey Mountains. Ecology 56:1356–1366 doi:10.2307/1934702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briedermann L (1971) Ermittlungen zur Aktivitätsperiodik des Mitteleuropäischen Wildschweines (Sus scrofa L.). Zool Gart 40:302–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Briedermann L (1990) Schwarzwild. 2nd edn. Neumann-Neudamm, Melsungen

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt WH (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J Mammal 24:346–352 doi:10.2307/1374834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill S, Llimona F, Gràcia J (2003) Spacing and nocturnal activity of wild boar Sus scrofa in a Mediterranean metropolitan park. Wildl Biol 9(Suppl):3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Calenge C, Maillard D, Vassant J, Brandt S (2002) Summer and hunting season home ranges of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in two habitats in France. Game Wildl Sci 19:281–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Caley P (1997) Movement, activity patterns and habitat use of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a tropical habitat. Wildl Res 24:77–87 doi:10.1071/WR94075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousse S, Spitz F, Hewison M, Janeau G (1994) Use of space by juveniles in relation to their postnatal range, mother, and siblings: an example in the wild boar, Sus scrofa L. Can J Zool 72:1691–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousse S, Janeau G, Spitz F, Cargnelutti B (1995) Temporal ontogeny in the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): a systemic point of view. IBEX J Mt Ecol 3:122–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuartas P, Braza F (1990) Reparto temporal de actividades del jabali (Sus scrofa) en Doñana (SO Spain). Acta Vert 17:91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • de Solla SR, Bonduriansky R, Brooks RJ (1999) Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. J Anim Ecol 68:221–234 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00279.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dexter N (1996) The effects of an intensive shooting exercise from a helicopter on the behaviour of surviving feral pigs. Wildl Res 23:435–441 doi:10.1071/WR9960435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbarth E, Ophoven E (2002) Bewegungsjagd auf Schalenwild. Franckh-Kosmos Verlags-GmbH & Co., Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliger A, Linderoth P, Pegel M, Seitler S (2001) Ergebnisse einer landesweiten Befragung zur Schwarzwildbewirtschaftung. WFS-Mitteilungen, pp 5–7

  • Garrott RA, White GC, Bartmann RM, Weybright DL (1986) Reflected signal bias in biotelemetry triangulation systems. J Wildl Manage 50:747–752 doi:10.2307/3800995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard JF, Campan R (1988) Variabilité éco-ethologique chez le sanglier europeén: comparision des travaux francaise. Cah Ethologie Appliquee 8:63–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Gortázar C, Ferroglio E, Höfle U, Frölich K, Vicente J (2007) Diseases shared between wildlife and livestock: a European perspective. Eur J Wildl Res 53:241–256 doi:10.1007/s10344-007-0098-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groot Bruinderink GWTA, Hazebroek E (1996) Wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa L.) rooting and forest regeneration on podzolic soils in the Netherlands. For Ecol Manage 88:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundlach H (1968) Brutfürsorge, Brutpflege, Verhaltensontogenese und Tagesperiodik beim Europäischen Wildschwein (Sus scrofa L.). Z Tierpsychol 25:955–995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Happ N (2002) Hege und Bejagung des Schwarzwildes. Franckh-Kosmos Verlags-GmbH & Co., Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig R (1998) Schwarzwild. 5. Aufl. ed. BLV Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooge PN, Eichenlaub B (2001) Movement 2.0. Alaska Biological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Ancorage, AK, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Janeau G, Cargnelutti B, Cousse S, Hewison M, Spitz F (1995) Daily movement pattern variations in wild boar (Sus scrofa L.). IBEX J Mt Ecol 3:98–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward RE, South AB, Walls SS (2003) Ranges 6 v1.2: For the analysis of tracking and location data. Anatrack Ltd., Wareham, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuling O, Stier N, Roth M (2008) Annual and seasonal space use of different age classes of female wild boar Sus scrofa L. Eur J Wildl Res (in press) doi:10.1007/s10344-007-0157-4

  • Killian G, Miller L, Rhyan J, Doten H (2006) Immunocontraception of Florida feral swine with a single-dose GnRH vaccine. Am J Reprod Immunol 55:378–384 doi:10.1111/j.1600-0897.2006.00379.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Labudzki L, Wlazelko M (1991) Saisonale Dynamik der vom Schwarzwild im Feldanbau verursachten Schäden im Forschungsgebiet Zielonka. Z Jagdwiss 37:250–257 doi:10.1007/BF02239730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemel J, Truvé J, Söderberg B (2003) Variation in ranging and activity behaviour of European wild boar Sus scrofa in Sweden. Wildl Biol 9(Suppl):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebl T, Elliger A, Linderoth P (2005) Aufwand und Erfolg der Schwarzwildjagd in einem stadtnahen Gebiet. WFS-Mitteilungen, pp 1–5

  • Lott DF (1989) Intraspecific variation in the social system of wild vertebrates. Behaviour 88:266–325 doi:10.1163/156853984X00353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillard D, Fournier P (1995) Effect of shooting with hounds on home range size of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) groups in Mediterranean habitat. IBEX J Mt Ecol 3:102–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Massei G, Genov PV, Staines B, Gorman ML (1997) Factors influencing home range and activity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean costal area. J Zool (Lond) 242:411–423

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlroy JC (1989) Aspects of the ecology of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in the Murchison area, New Zealand. N Z J Ecol 12:11–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Meriggi A, Sacchi O (1992a) Habitat selection by wild boars in Northern Appenines (N-Italy). “Ongulés/Ungulates 91”. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Toulouse, pp 435–438

  • Meriggi A, Sacchi O (1992b) Factors affecting damage by wild boars to cereal fields in Northern Italy. “Ongulés/Ungulates 91”. Proceedings of the International Symposium, Toulouse, pp 439–441

  • Meynhardt H (1989) Schwarzwild-Bibliothek 2: Das Revier. Neumann-Neudamm, Melsungen

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynhardt H (1990) Schwarzwild-Report. 8th ed. Neumann, Leipzig, Radebeul

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo L, Massei G, Genov PV (1997) Daily home range and activity of wild boar in a Mediterranean area free from hunting. Ethol Ecol Evol 9:287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer FJ, Otto DK, Tipton AR, Hable CP (1981) Home ranges, movements and habitat use of European wild boar in Tennessee. J Wildl Manage 45:343–353 doi:10.2307/3807917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer FJ, Swank WT, Clebsh EEC (1984) The effects of wild pig rooting in a deciduous forest. J Wildl Manage 48:464–473 doi:10.2307/3801179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sodeikat G, Pohlmeyer K (2002) Temporary home range modifications of wild boar family groups (Sus scrofa L.) caused by drive hunts in Lower Saxony (Germany). Z Jagdwiss 48(Suppl):161–166 doi:10.1007/BF02192404

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodeikat G, Pohlmeyer K (2003) Escape movements of family groups of wild boar Sus scrofa influenced by drive hunts in Lower Saxony, Germany. Wildl Biol 9(Suppl):43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodeikat G, Pohlmeyer K (2004) Escape movements of wild boar piglets (Sus scrofa, L.) after trapping, marking and releasing. Wild Boar Research 2002. A selection and edited papers from the “4th International Wild Boar Symposium”. Galemys, 16 Special Issue, pp 185–193

  • Sodeikat G, Pohlmeyer K (2007) Impact of drive hunts on daytime resting site areas of wild boar family groups (Sus scrofa L.). Wildl Biol Pract 3:28–38 doi:10.2461/wbp.2007.3.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wölfel H (ed) (2003) Bewegungsjagden. Leopold Stocker, Graz-Stuttgart

  • Zimmerman JW, Powell RA (1995) Radiotelemetry error: location error method compared with error polygons and confidence ellipses. Can J Zool 73:1123–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Antje and Bernd Achenbach, Tanja Lampe, Josepha Ihde, Juliane Saebel and Kirstin Lauterbach for their help during field work and the Forestry Office of Schildfeld for very good cooperation. We thank Sonja Ludwig and Alexander Braasch for assistance with statistical problems. For helpful comments on an early draft of this manuscript, we thank Sonja Ludwig, Arne Nolte, Ulf Hohmann and the anonymous reviewer.

The study was supported by the Foundation “Wald und Wild in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern“, and the Ministry of Agriculture of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania.

All experiments comply with the current laws of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Forest Botany and Forest Zoology, Chair of Forest Zoology, Dresden University of Technology, Pienner Str. 7, 01737, Tharandt, Germany

    Oliver Keuling, Norman Stier & Mechthild Roth

Authors
  1. Oliver Keuling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Norman Stier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mechthild Roth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Keuling.

Additional information

Communicated by C. Gortázar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keuling, O., Stier, N. & Roth, M. How does hunting influence activity and spatial usage in wild boar Sus scrofa L.?. Eur J Wildl Res 54, 729–737 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0204-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0204-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation