Abstract
A systematic measurement of outdoor gamma radiations in Panchkula district of Haryana, India, was done using a radiation monitor based on Geiger–Muller technique. The gamma dose rate was found to be in the range from 70.0 ± 3.5 to 168.0 ± 8.4 nSv/h. The annual effective dose (AED) due to the outdoor gamma radiation in Panchkula district was computed to range from 0.086 ± 0.004 to 0.206 ± 0.010 mSv/year. The value of excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) was found to be in the range from 0.322 × 10–3 to 0.773 × 10–3.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), Bethesda, MD Uncertainties in Fatal Cancer Risk Estimates Used in Radiation Protection: NCRP Report no. 126, 1997.
Kapdan, E., Altinsoy, N., Karahan, G., and Yuksel, A., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2018, vol. 318, p. 1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-6060-5
Gabdo, H.T., Ramli, A.T., Sanusi, M.S., Saleh, M.A., and Garba, N.N., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2014, vol. 299, p. 1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-014-2928-1
Jeelani, G., Hassan, W., Saleem, M., Sahu, S.K., Pandit, G.G., and Lone, S.A., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07647-6
Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, New York: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), 2000.
Solehah, A.R. and Samat, S.B., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2018, vol. 315, p. 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5654-7
Licínio, M. V., Freitas, A.C., Evangelista, H., Costa-Gonçalves, A., Miranda, M., and Alencar, A.S., J. Environ. Radioact., 2013, vol. 126, p. 32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.07.012
Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, New York: United Nations, 1994.
Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR Report to General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes, New York: United Nations, 1993.
Jindal, M.K., Sar, S.K., Baghel, T., and Wadhwa, D.S., J. Geol. Soc. India, 2021, vol. 97, p. 85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-021-1629-y
Kumar, J.M., Kumar, S.S., Arun, A., Shweta, S., Megha, S., and Vijita, D., Res. J. Chem. Environ., 2018, vol. 22, p. 22
Sharma, P., Kumar Meher, P., and Prasad Mishra, K., J. Radiat. Res. Appl. Sci., 2014, vol. 7, p. 595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2014.09.011
Jindal, M.K., and Sar, S.K., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2020, vol. 325, p. 121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07205-6
Kaur, M., Kumar, A., Mehra, R., and Mishra, R., Nucl. Technol. Radiat. Prot., 2018, vol. 33, p. 106. https://doi.org/10.2298/NTRP1801106K
Kobya, Y., Taşkın, H., Yeşilkanat, C.M., and Çevik, U., Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess., 2015, vol. 21, p. 2077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2015.1017876
Ground Water Information Booklet Panchkula District, Haryana, North Western Region, Chandigarh: Central Ground Water Board (CGWB), 2013.
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 103, Ann. ICRP, 2007, 37(2–4)-F.
Tanwer, N., Anand, P., Batra, N., Kant, K., Gautam, Y.P., and Sahoo, S.K., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07960-0
Sankaran, A.V., Jayaswal, B., Nambi, K.S.V., and Sunata, C.M., U, Th and K Distributions Inferred from Regional geology Gnd the Terrestrial Radiation Profiles in India, Bombay: Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, 1986.
Rangaswamy, D.R., Srinivasa, E., Srilatha, M.C., and Sannappa, J., Radiat. Prot. Environ., 2015, vol. 38, p. 154. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0464.176152
Monica, S., Visnu Prasad, A., Soniya, S., and Jojo, P., Radiat. Prot. Environ., 2016, vol. 39, p. 38. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0464.185180
Mercier, J.F., Tracy, B.L., d’Amours, R., Chagnon, F., Hoffman, I., Korpach, E.P., Johnson, S., and Ungar, R.K., J. Environ. Radioact., 2009, vol. 100, p. 527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2009.03.002
Fujinami, N., Environ. Int., 1996, vol. 22, p. 181. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(96)00106-7
Greenfield, M.B., Domondon, A.T., Tsuchiya, S., and Tomiyama, M., J. Appl. Phys., 2003, vol. 93, p. 5733. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1563313
Paatero, J., Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 2000, vol. 87, p. 273. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a033008
Rishi, M.S., Keesari, T., Sharma, D.A., Pant, D., and Sinha, U.K., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2017, vol. 311, p. 1937. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5178-1
Pant, D., Keesari, T., Sharma, D., Rishi, M., Singh, G., Jaryal, A., Sinha, U.K., Dash, A., and Tripathi, R.M., J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2017, vol. 313, p. 635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5284-0
Tanwer, N., Khyalia, P., Deswal, M., and Laura, J., Rasayan J. Chem., 2022. vol. 15, p. 343. https://doi.org/10.31788/RJC.2022.1516608
Taskin, H., Karavus, M., Ay, P., Topuzoglu, A., Hidiroglu, S., and Karahan, G., J. Environ. Radioact., 2009, vol. 100, p. 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.10.012
Age-Dependent Doses to Members of the Public from Intake of Radionuclides, part 5: Compilation of lngestion and Inhalation Dose Coefficients: ICRP Publication 72, Oxford: Pergamon, 1996.
Cuttler, J.M., Dose-Response, 2013, vol. 11, p. 432. https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.13-008.Cuttler
Feinendegen, L.E., Radiat. Prot. Dosim., 2003, vol. 104, p. 337. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006197
Feinendegen, L.E., Pollycove, M., and Neumenn, R.D., Dose-Response, 2012, vol. 557. https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.09-035.Feinendegen
Pandey, B.N., Sarma, H.D., Shukla, D., and Mishra, K.P., Int. J. Low Radiat., 2006, vol. 2, p. 111. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLR.2006.007901
Mishra, K.P., Ahmed, M., and Hill, R.P., Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 2008, vol. 84, p. 441. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553000802061293
Murphy, B.Y.J.B. and Morton, J.J., J. Exper. Med., 1915. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.29.1.25
Calabrese, E.J., Wound Repair Regen., 2013, vol. 21, p. 180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00842.x
Calabrese, E.J. and Calabrese, V., Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 2013, vol. 89, p. 287. https://doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2013.752595
Rodel, F., Frey, B., and Gaipl, U., Keilholz, L., Fournier, C., Manda, K., Schollnberger, H., Hildebrandt, G., and Rodel, C., Curr. Med. Chem., 2012, vol. 19, p. 1741. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986712800099866
Calabrese, E.J. and Dhawan, G., Dose-Response, 2012, vol. 10, p. 626. https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.12-016.Calabrese
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are thankful to Aggarwal College Ballabgarh for providing all the facilities required to carry this project. Authors also aknowledge the contributions of Dr. J.S. Laura, Dr. Babita Khosla, and Dr. Meena Deswal, Department of Environmental Sciences, MDU, Rohtak for providing ArcGIS facility.
Funding
This study was funded by the Board Research in Nuclear Sciences, Department of Atomic Energy under National Uranium Project. Authors would like to acknowledge members of TSC-4, NRFCC, BRNS; HPD, HS&E Group, BARC, and NUP team members for their continuous support in the execution of the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tanwer, N., Anand, P., Batra, N. et al. Measurement of Seasonal Variation of Outdoor Gamma Radiation Dose Rate Level and Assessment of Consequent Health Hazards in Panchkula, Haryana, India. Radiochemistry 64, 424–431 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1066362222030213
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1066362222030213