Skip to main content
Log in

Blueprint of indoor gamma dose rate through statistical modelling for Kabirdham district

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Naturally occurring radiation is present all around us. This study aims to predict the indoor gamma dose rate for areas of Kabirdham district using a statistical analysis model because there is no systematic modelling available for the study region. This study includes the statistical impact of geology on the indoor gamma dose rate. Statistical tests have been carried out for estimation of the indoor gamma dose rate and it was found as a significant value of ANOVA 0.009. Statistical model tested by using the previously reported data of Balod district, Chhattisgarh and found accepted 79%; therefore, the model is suitable for prediction of indoor gamma dose rate for Kabirdham district through the outdoor gamma dose rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brooks AL, Hoel DG, Preston RJ (2016) The role of dose rate in radiation cancer risk: evaluating the effect of dose rate at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels using key events in critical pathways following exposure to low LET radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 92:405–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2016.1186301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Yeşilkanat Cafer M, Yaşar K, Halim T, Uğur Ç (2017) Spatial interpolation and radiological mapping of ambient gamma dose rate by using artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic methods. J Environ Radioact 175–176:78–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2017.04.015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taskin H, Karavus M, Ay P, Topuzoglu Hidiroglu S, Karahan G (2009) Radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Kirklareli, Turkey. J Environ Radioact 100:49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2008.10.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yasar K, Halim T, Cafer MY, Ugur C (2015) Evaluation of outdoor gamma dose rate and cancer risk in Artvin Province, Turkey. Human Ecol Risk Assess Int J 1(8):2077–2085. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2015.1017876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Avwiri GO, Nwaka BU, Ononugbo CP (2017) Radiological health risk due to gamma dose rates around okposi okwu and uburu salt lakes, Ebonyi State. Int J Environ Pollut Res 5(4):18–30

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jwanbot DI, Izam MM, Nyam GG, Yusuf M (2014) Indoor and outdoor gamma dose rate exposure levels in major commercial building materials distribution outlets in Jos, Plateau State-Nigeria. Asian Online J Publ Group 1(1):5–7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karunakara N, Yashodhara I, Kumara KS, Tripathi RM, Menon SN, Kadam S, Chougaonkar MP (2014) Assessment of ambient gamma dose rate around a prospective uranium mining area of South India—a comparative study of dose by direct methods and soil radioactivity measurements. Results Phys 4:20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2014.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. UNSCEAR (United Nation Scientific Committee on the effect of Atomic Radiations) (2000) Ionizing radiation. Sources and biological effects report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. New York, United Nations

  9. Cinelli G, Gruber V, Felice LD, Bossew P, Hernandez-Ceballos MA, Tollefsen T, Mundigl S, Cort MD (2017) European annual cosmic-ray dose: estimation of population exposure. J Maps 13(2):812–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2017.1384934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. UNSCEAR (United Nation Scientific Committee on the effect of Atomic Radiations) (1993) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Isinkaye MO, Emelue HU (2015) Natural radioactivity measurements and evaluation of radiological hazards in sediment of Oguta Lake, South-East Nigeria. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 8:459–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2015.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Monica S, Prasad VAK, Soniya SR, Jojo PJ (2017) Ambient gamma levels in the in Seaside regions of Alapuzha District, Kerala. Int J Pure Appl Phys 13:179–187

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kendall GM, Wakeford R, Athanson M, Vincent TJ, Carter EJ, McColl NP, Little MP (2016) Levels of naturally occurring gamma radiation measured in British homes and their prediction in particular residences. Radiat Environ Biophys 55(1):103–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-016-0635-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Evrard A-S, Hemon D, Billon S, Laurier D, Jougla E, Tirmarche M, Clavel J (2006) Childhood leukemia incidence and exposure to indoor radon, terrestrial and cosmic gamma radiation. Health Phys 90(6):569–579. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.hp.0000198787.93305.35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kendall GM, Chernyavskiy P, Appleton JD, Miles JCH, Wakeford R, Athanson M, Vincent TJ, McColl NP, Little MP (2018) Modelling the bimodal distribution of indoor gamma-ray dose-rates in Great Britain. Radiat Environ Biophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-018-0752-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alghamdi AS, Aleissa KA, Al-Hamarneh IF (2019) Gamma radiation and indoor radon concentrations in the western and southwestern regions of Saudi Arabia. Heliyon 5(1):e01133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01133

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang Y-J, Shang-Guan Z-H, Zhao F, Lin M-G, Sha X-D, Luo D-Y, Chen Q, Peng K (2018) A correlation study of continuously monitored gamma dose rate and meteorological conditions. J Environ Radioact 192:467–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.07.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Orabi M (2018) Development of a simulation model for estimating the indoor gamma radiation dose. Radiat Phys Chem 147:114–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.02.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jindal MK, Sar SK, Singh S, Arora A (2018) Risk assessment from gamma dose rate in balod district of Chhattisgarh, India. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 317(1):387–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-018-5846-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jindal MK, Sar SK, Arora A, Singh S, Sahu M, Diwan V (2018) Annual effective dose equivalent of population staying in industrial area Bhilai, Chhattisgarh India estimated using Gamma dose rate measurements. Res J Chem Environ 22(12):22–27

    Google Scholar 

  21. A treasure trove of minerals. Mineral Resource Department. http://chhattisgarhmines.gov.in. Accessed 29 June 2019

  22. District Survey Report Bemetara (Chhattisgarh) (2016) Directorate of Geology and Mining Mineral Resources Department Govt. of Chhattisgarh

  23. Pandariya B, Lohara KS (2012) Government of India, Ministry of Water Resources Central Ground Water Board

  24. Census Data (2011) Meta Data, Ministry of Home Affair, Government of India. http://www.censusindia.gov.in. Accessed 29 June 2019

  25. Mukherjee A, Ray RK, Tewari D, Ingle VK, Sahoo BK, Khan MWY (2014) Revisiting the stratigraphy of the Mesoproterozoic Chhattisgarh Supergroup, Bastar craton, India based on subsurface lithoinformation. J Earth Syst Sci 123:617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-014-0418-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. NRC (National Research Council) (2006) Health risk from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Research Council of the National Academies. Washington, D. C. BEIR VII PHASE 2. The National Academies Press

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely acknowledged the critical comments of the anonymous reviewers and the editorial team that has helped to improve the manuscript significantly. We also acknowledge the support from CSVTU, Bhilai Institute of Technology, Durg for providing laboratory facilities and Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS), Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India for funding The Project 36(4)/14/90/2014-BRNS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manoj Kumar Jindal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The author declared that they had taken the oral permissions from the house owner for carried out indoor gamma dose rate.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jindal, M.K., Sar, S.K. Blueprint of indoor gamma dose rate through statistical modelling for Kabirdham district. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 325, 121–131 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07205-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07205-6

Keywords

Navigation