Abstract—
QWIP using group IV elements have created more interest among researchers for its potential application in optical communication as well as in optical interconnects. This paper presents modeling and theoretical analysis of Sn-based tensile strained type I direct band gap QWIP in which the active region has a multiple quantum well structure formed with Ge0.92Sn0.08 quantum wells separated by Si0.11Ge0.7Sn0.19 barriers. The structure reported by V. Ryzhii et al. has been reproduced and the parameters like responsivity, power density and the dark current density have been analytically calculated. A comprehensive comparison of responsivity and power density of this proposed structure with the existing QWIP structure made of GaAs/InGaAs is reported here. An improvement in the field of responsivity is observed with the proposed model. The reduction of threshold power density corresponds to an effective operation of the QWIPs in incident infrared radiation. The intersubband electron transition and tunneling electron injection effects are considered here to predict a better performance of the proposed structure operated in infrared region.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
B. F. Levine, “Quantum well infrared photodetectors,” J. Appl. Phys. 74, R1 (1993).
T. Chakraborty and V. M. Apalkov, “Quantum cascade transitions in nanostructures,” Adv. Phys. 52, 455 (2003).
V. Chakraborty, B. Mukhopadhyay, and P. K. Basu, “Effect of different loss mechanisms in SiGeSn based mid_infrared laser,” Semiconductors 49, 836 (2015).
H. C. Liu, “Photoconductive gain mechanism of quantum well intersubband infrared detectors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 1507 (1992).
P. Pareek, M. K. Das, and S. Kumar, “Theoretical analysis of tin incorporated group IV alloy based QWIP,” Superlattice and Microstructures 107, 56 (2017).
P. Pareek and M. K. Das, “Theoretical analysis of direct transition in SiGeSn/GeSn strain balanced QWIP,” Opt. Quant. Electron. 48, 228 (2016).
K. K. Choi, “Generalized relationship between gain, noise, and capture probability of quantum well infrared photodetectors,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 1266 (1994).
S. D. Gunapala and S.V. Bandara, “GaAs/AIGaAs based quantum well infrared photodetector focal plane arrays,” in Hand Book of Infrared Detection Technologies (Elsvier, 2002), p. 83.
S. D. Gunapala, S. V. Bandara, S. B. Rafol, and D. Z. Ting, “Quantum well infrared photodetectors,” Semicoductors&Semimetals 84, 59 (2011).
M. J. Deen and P. K. Basu, Silicon Photonics: Fundamentals and Devices (Wiley, Chichester, 2012).
M. Bauer, J. Taraci, J. Tolle, A. V. G. Chizmeshya, S. Zollner, D. J. Smith, J. Menendez, C. Hu, and J. Kouvetakis, “Ge–Sn Semiconductors for bandgap and lattice engineering,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2992 (2002).
V. R. D’Costa, C. S. Cook, A. G. Birdwell, C. L. Littler, M. Canonico, S. Zollner, J. Kouvetakis, and J. Menendez, “Optical critical points of thin-film Ge1 – ySny alloys: a comparative Ge1 – ySny /Ge1 – xSix study,” Phys. Rev. B. 73, 125207 (2006).
R. Roucka, J. Xie, J. Kouvetakis, J. Mathews, V. D’Costa, J. Menendez, J. Tolle, and S. Q. Yu, “Ge1 – ySny photoconductor structures at 1.55 μm: from advanced materials to prototype devices,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 26, 1952 (2008).
S. W. Chang and S. L. Chuang, “Theory of optical gain of Ge–SixGeySn1 – x – y quantum-well lasers,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 43, 249 (2007).
G. E. Chang, S. W. Chang, and S. L. Chuang, “Strain-balanced GezSn1 – z–SixGeySn1 – x – y multiple quantum well lasers,” IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 46, 1813 (2010).
V. Chakraborty, B. Mukhopadhyay, and P. K. Basu, “Performance prediction of an electro absorption modulator at 1550 nm using GeSn/SiGeSn quantum well structure,” Phys. E 50, 67 (2013).
P. Moontragoon, N. Vukmirovíc, Z. Ikoníc, and P. Harrison, “SnGe asymmetric quantum well electro absorption modulators for long wave silicon photonics,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant. Electron. 16, 100 (2010).
V. Ryzhii, “Characteristics of Quantum well infrared photodetector,” J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6442 (1997).
C. G. Van De Walle, “Band lineups and deformation potentials in the model-solid theory,” Phys. Rev. B 39, 1871 (1989).
C. G. Van De Walle and R. M. Martin, “Theoretical calculations of heterojunction discontinuities in the Si/Ge system,” Phys. Rev. B 57, 6493 (1998).
J. Menendez and J. Kouvetakis, “Type-I Ge/GeSiSn strained layer heterostructures with a direct Ge band gap,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1175 (2004).
G. E. Chang, S. W. Chang, and S. L. Chuang, “Strain-balanced GezSn1 – z–SixGeySn1 – x – y multiple quantum-well lasers,” IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 46, 1813 (2010).
S. Dey, V. Chakraborty, B. Mukhopadhyay, and G. Sen, “Modeling of tunneling current density of GeC based double barrier multiple quantum well resonant tunneling diode,” J. Semicond. 39, 104003 (2018).
Handbook of Mathematical Functions, with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Ed. by M. Abramovitz and I. A. Stegun (Dover, New York, 1965; Nauka, Moscow, 1979).
V. Ryzhii, M. Ryzhii, and H. C. Liu, “Self-consistent model for quantum well infrared photodetectors with thermionic injection under dark conditions,” J. Appl. Phys. 92, 206 (2002).
V. Ryzhii, I. Khmyrova, M. Ryzhii, and V. Mitin, “Comparison of dark current, responsivity and detectivity in different intersubband infrared photodetectors,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 19, 8 (2004).
Non-perturbative Quantum Field Theory: Mathematical Aspects and Applications, ed. by Frohlich Jurg, in Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics, (World Scientific Publishing, 1992), Vol. 15.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The first author (SD) acknowledges support by TEQIP-Phase III under University College of Technology-Calcutta University (UCT-CU) through award of fellowship. The second author (VC) acknowledges supports from Poddar Institute of Management and Technology (ECE Dept), Kolkata.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dey, S., Sen, G., Chakraborty, V. et al. Performance Prediction of a Quantum Well Infrared Photodetector Using GeSn/SiGeSn Structure. J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 64, 1298–1306 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422691911007X
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422691911007X