Abstract
With the progress in tissue engineering, the need for deep understanding of the interaction between individual cells and cellular systems with biocompatible polymer scaffolds has become obvious. This requires data on the adhesion and proliferation of cells on the scaffolds. Environmental scanning electron microscopy makes it possible to increase the pressure and humidity in a microscope chamber, thereby bringing the experimental conditions close to environmental. Scanning electron microscopy study of dermal fibroblasts is illustrated by the example of several scaffolds of different morphologies, including sponges, films, and nonwoven materials based on poly(L-)lactide, polycaprolactone, and a poly(L-)lactide-co-polycaprolactone. The data obtained show that the proposed method is promising for studying cell structures on polymer scaffolds.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
K. I. Lukanina, T. E. Grigoriev, S. V. Krasheninnikov, et al., Carbohydr. Polym. 191, 119 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.02.061
O. A. Romanova, T. H. Tenchurin, T. S. Demina, et al., Cell Prolif. 52 (3), 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12598
T. K. Tenchurin, L. P. Istranov, E. V. Istranova, et al., Nanotechnol. Russ. 13 (9–10), 476 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995078018050154
A. A. Mikhutkin, R. A. Kamyshinsky, T. K. Tenchurin, et al., BioNanoScience 8 (2), 511 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-017-0493-0
G. A. Horridge and S. L. Tamm, Science 163 (3869), 817 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.163.3869.817
H. Moor, Cryotechniques in Biological Electron Microscopy, Ed. by R. A. Steinbrecht and K. Zierold (Springer, Berlin, 1987), p. 175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72815-0_8
G. D. Danilatos, J. Microsc. 160 (1), 9 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.1990.tb03043.x
G. D. Danilatos, Microsc. Res. Tech. 25 (5–6), 354 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.1070250503
L. Muscariello, F. Rosso, G. Marino, et al., J. Cell. Physiol. 205 (3), 328 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.20444
B. Ruozi, G. Tosi, E. Leo, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. C 27 (4), 802 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2006.08.018
D. J. Stokes, S. M. Rea, A. E. Porter, et al., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 711, 113 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1557/proc-711-ff6.5.1
J. Chen, M. A. Birch, and S. J. Bull, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 21 (1), 277 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-009-3843-9
C. Maia-Brigagão and W. de Souza, Micron 43 (2–3), 494 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2011.08.008
A. Bridier, T. Meylheuc, and R. Briandet, Micron 48, 65 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2013.02.013
A. M. Gatti, J. Kirkpatrick, A. Gambarelli, et al., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 19 (4), 1515 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-008-3385-6
D. J. Stokes, Adv. Eng. Mater. 3 (3), 126 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/1527-2648(200103)3:3<126::AID-ADEM126>3.0.CO;2-B
A. Ivanova, N. Mitiurev, A. Cheremisin, et al., Sci. Rep. 9 (1), 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47139-y
J. E. McGregor and A. M. Donald, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 241, 012021 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/241/1/012021
Funding
This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 17-13-01376 “Visualization of Adhesion and Proliferation of Stromal and Epithelial Cells on Different Biocompatible Polymer-Based Scaffolds.” The porous materials were fabricated under the financial support of NRC “Kurchatov Institute” (order no. 1362 from June 25, 2019).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamyshinsky, R.A., Patsaev, T.D., Tenchurin, T.K. et al. Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy of Dermal Fibroblasts on Various Types of Polymer Scaffolds. Crystallogr. Rep. 65, 762–765 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774520050107
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063774520050107