Skip to main content
Log in

An integrated plithogenic MCDM approach for financial performance evaluation of manufacturing industries

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Risk Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Financial performance evaluation is very significant for manufacturing industries in a competitive environment to achieve investment goals, especially increasing revenue. Financial performance measures must be identified accurately, because the evaluation process reflects the effectiveness of a company. The purpose of this article is to present a plithogenic multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method, and Technique in Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method. The financial performance in this study is measured by a set of financial ratios. To examine the proposed model, the top 10 steel companies in Egypt are evaluated based on specified financial ratios. According to steel manufacturing experts, the weight of the criteria is determined using AHP method. The company ranking is determined using VIKOR and TOPSIS comparatively. The results show that the obtained ranks of the companies by these methods are almost the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abastante, F., S. Corrente, S. Greco, A. Ishizaka, and I.M. Lami. 2019. A new parsimonious AHP methodology: Assigning priorities to many objects by comparing pairwise few reference objects. Expert Systems with Applications 127: 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdel-Basset, M., A. Atef, and F. Smarandache. 2019a. A hybrid Neutrosophic multiple criteria group decision making approach for project selection. Cognitive Systems Research 57: 216–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdel-Basset, M., R. Mohamed, A.E.N.H. Zaied, and F. Smarandache. 2019b. A hybrid plithogenic decision-making approach with quality function deployment for selecting supply chain sustainability metrics. Symmetry 11 (7): 903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdel-Baset, M., I.M. Hezam, and F. Smarandache. 2016. Neutrosophic goal programming. Neutrosophic Sets & Systems 11 (1): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, Y., M. Razi, F. De Felice, M. Sabir, and A. Petrillo. 2019. A VIKOR based approach for assessing the social, environmental and economic effects of “smog” on human health. Science of the Total Environment 650: 2897–2905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa, J.K., V. Goyal, S.K. Mitra, and S. Basu. 2019. An analysis of NPAs of Indian banks: Using a comprehensive framework of 31 financial ratios. IIMB Management Review 31 (1): 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulgurcu, B.K. 2012. Application of TOPSIS technique for financial performance evaluation of technology firms in Istanbul stock exchange market. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 62: 1033–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butdeea, S., and P. Phuangsaleeb. 2019. Uncertain risk assessment modelling for bus body manufacturing supply chain using AHP and fuzzy AHP. Procedia Manufacturing 30: 663–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakir, O., and M.S. Canbolat. 2008. A web-based decision support system for multi-criteria inventory classification using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert Systems with Applications 35 (3): 1367–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, P. 2019. Effects of normalization on the entropy-based TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications.‏.

  • de Farias Aires, R.F., and L. Ferreira. 2019. A new approach to avoid rank reversal cases in the TOPSIS method. Computers & Industrial Engineering 132: 84–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos, B.M., L.P. Godoy, and L.M. Campos. 2019. Performance evaluation of green suppliers using entropy-TOPSIS-F. Journal of Cleaner Production 207: 498–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, Y.K. 2019. An integrated approach to catering supplier selection using AHP-ARAS-MCGP methodology. Journal of Air Transport Management 75: 164–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul, M., M.F. Ak, and A.F. Guneri. 2019. Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR-based approach for safety risk assessment in mine industry. Journal of Safety Research 69: 135–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, C. L., and K. Yoon. 1981. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making, 58–191. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Kim, J.H., and B.S. Ahn. 2019. Extended VIKOR method using incomplete criteria weights. Expert Systems with Applications 126: 124–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokangül, A., U. Polat, and C. Dağsuyu. 2017. A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies. Safety Science 91: 24–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linares-Mustaros, S., G. Coenders, and M. Vives-Mestres. 2018. Financial performance and distress profiles. From classification according to financial ratios to compositional classification. Advances in Accounting 40: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud, K., and A. Mahmoud. 2019. The sustainable management of byproducts of the steel industry: Egypt case study.‏ Digital Archive and Research Repository.

  • Opricovic, S. 1998. Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade 2(1): 5–21.

  • Pineda, P.J.G., J.J. Liou, C.C. Hsu, and Y.C. Chuang. 2018. An integrated MCDM model for improving airline operational and financial performance. Journal of Air Transport Management 68: 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh, R. 2018. Measuring the barriers to resilience in manufacturing supply chains using Grey Clustering and VIKOR approaches. Measurement 126: 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaie, K., S.S. Ramiyani, S. Nazari-Shirkouhi, and A. Badizadeh. 2014. Evaluating performance of Iranian cement firms using an integrated fuzzy AHP–VIKOR method. Applied Mathematical Modelling 38 (21–22): 5033–5046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivieccio, U. 2008. Neutrosophic logics: Prospects and problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 159 (14): 1860–1868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty, T. L. 1980. The Annfytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

  • Sennaroglu, B., and G.V. Celebi. 2018. A military airport location selection by AHP integrated PROMETHEE and VIKOR methods. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 59: 160–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaverdi, M., M.R. Heshmati, and I. Ramezani. 2014. Application of fuzzy AHP approach for financial performance evaluation of Iranian petrochemical sector. Procedia Computer Science 31: 995–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache, F. 2019. Neutrosophy. Neutrosophic probability, set, and logic, proQuest information & learning. Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA 105: 118–123.

  • Smarandache, F. 2017. Plithogeny, plithogenic set, logic, probability, and statistics. Mountain View: Infinite Study. Publ. Hse, GoogleLLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache, F. 2018a. Extension of soft set to hypersoft set, and then to plithogenic hypersoft set. Infinite study. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems 22: 168–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache, F. 2018. Plithogenic set, an extension of crisp, fuzzy, intuitionistic fuzzy, and neutrosophic sets-revisited. Infinite study.‏.

  • ‏Smarandache, Florentin. 2018b. Physical Plithogenic Set, 71st Annual Gaseous Electronics Conference, Session LW1, Oregon Convention Center Room, Portland, Oregon, USA, November 5–9.

  • Vatankhah, S., M. Zarra-Nezhad, and G. Amirnejad. 2019. Tackling the fuzziness of business model concept: A study in the airline industry. Tourism Management 74: 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin, N., A. Bayrakdaroglu, and C. Kahraman. 2012. Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries. Expert Systems with Applications 39 (1): 350–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdi, M. 2018. Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach. Safety Science 110: 438–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zyoud, S.H., and D. Fuchs-Hanusch. 2017. A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques. Expert Systems with Applications 78: 158–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research has no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Abdel-Basset.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest about the research.

Research involving human participants and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdel-Basset, M., Ding, W., Mohamed, R. et al. An integrated plithogenic MCDM approach for financial performance evaluation of manufacturing industries. Risk Manag 22, 192–218 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-020-00061-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-020-00061-4

Keywords

Navigation