Abstract
We applied a conceptual lens of gastrodiplomacy, or how countries conduct cultural diplomacy through the strategic use of cuisine in influencing perceptions of a nation, to examine middle power Singapore’s national and international campaigns to inscribe its hawker culture through UNESCO’s List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. With a rather robust nation brand and established programs in gastrodiplomacy, Singapore is the first among Southeast Asian nations to take the first step to seek international and formal food-based recognition. Above everything else, Singapore’s UNESCO bid is motivated by a desire, in collaboration with non-state actors, to further increase the value and standing of its nation brand through food. As self-making, Singapore’s bid builds not only upon national identity creation within its national borders but also othering, a process of shaping the country’s unique dissimilarities to differentiate from other nation states especially its neighbors to reap the expected perceptible benefits of a tangible and emotional transnational connection with its foreign publics through food.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad, Y. 2006. The scope and definitions of heritage: From tangible to intangible. International Journal of Heritage Studies 12 (3): 292–300.
Anholt, S. 2007. Editor’s forward to the first issue. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 1 (1): 4–11.
Anholt, S. 2010. Places: Identity, image, and reputation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Aykan, B. 2016. The politics of intangible heritage and food fights in Western Asia. International Journal of Heritage Studies 22 (10): 799–810.
Berg, P.O., and G. Sevón. 2014. Food-branding places: A sensory perspective. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 10 (4): 289–304.
Brand Finance. 2019. Nation Brands 2019. https://brandfinance.com/images/upload/nation_brands_100_2019_free_1.pdf
Brien, D.L. 2014. A taste of Singapore: Singapore food writing and culinary tourism. M/C Journal 17 (1).
Cang, V. 2015. Unmaking Japanese food: Washoku and intangible heritage designation. Food Studies 5: 49–58.
Chang, T.C. 2000. Renaissance revisited: Singapore as a ‘global city for the arts’. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (4): 818–831.
Characteristics of hawker culture. 2019. National Environment Agency. https://www.nea.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/annex-a---characteristics-of-hawker-culture-in-singapore.pdf
Chong, T. 2010. The state and the new society: The role of the arts in Singapore nation-building. Asian Studies Review 34 (2): 131–149.
Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, UNESCO. n.d. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001325/132540e.pdf.
Cooper, A.F., R.A. Higgott, and K.R. Nossal. 1993. Relocating middle powers. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Cull, N. 2008. Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences 616 (1): 31–54.
Demossier, M. 2016. The politics of heritage in the land of food and wine. In A companion to heritage studies, ed. W. Logan, M.N. Craith, and U. Kockel, 87–100. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
Foley, M., D. McGillivray, and G. McPherson. 2012. Event policy: From theory to strategy. London: Routledge.
Four reasons why our hawker culture deserves to be on the UNESCO list. n.d.. https://www.gov.sg/article/four-reasons-why-our-hawker-culture-deserves-to-be-on-the-unesco-list
FutureBrand. 2019. FutureBrand Country Index 2019. https://www.futurebrand.com/uploads/FCI/FutureBrand-Country-Index-2019.pdf
Gilboa, E. 2009. The public diplomacy of middle powers. Public Diplomacy Magazine 1 (2): 22–28.
Goh, C.L. 2006. Wanted: A single brand for Singapore, The Straits Times, 2.
Harrison, H., M. Birks, R. Franklin, and J. Mills. 2017. Case study research: Foundations and methodological orientations. Qualitative Social Research 18 (1): 19.
Hawker culture in Singapore submitted for inscription on UNESCO’s Representative List of the Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. 2019. https://www.nea.gov.sg/media/news/news/index/hawker-culture-in-singapore-submitted-for-inscription-on-unesco-s-representative-list-of-the-intangible-cultural-heritage-of-humanity
Hebbani, A., and D. Angus. 2016. Charity begins at home: Public perceptions of the homestay initiative for asylum seekers in Australia. Australian Journalism Review 38 (1): 83.
Henderson, J.C. 2004. Food as a tourism resource: A view from Singapore. Tourism Recreation Research 29 (3): 69–74.
Henderson, J.C. 2007. Uniquely Singapore? A case study in destination branding. Journal of Vacation Marketing 13 (3): 261–274.
Henderson, J.C. 2010. Cooked food hawking and its management: The case of Singapore. Tourism Review International 14 (4): 201–213.
Henderson, C.J. 2014. Food and culture: In search of a Singapore cuisine. British Food Journal 116 (6): 904–917.
Henderson, J.C. 2016. Local and traditional or global and modern? Food and tourism in Singapore. Journal of Gastronomy and Tourism 2 (1): 55–68.
Hoke, Z. 2015. North Korea receives UNESCO recognition for its kimchi variation. VOA. https://www.voanews.com/east-asia-pacific/north-korea-receives-unesco-recognition-its-kimchi-variation
Kamil, A. 2018. Getting Singapore’s hawker culture on Unesco’s list: Committee set up to prepare nomination bid. Today. https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/getting-singapores-hawker-culture-unescos-list-committee-set-prepare-nomination-bid
Kim, S. 2019. Tourism impacts continuity of World Heritage List inscription and sustainable management of Hahoe village, Korea: A case study of changes in tourist perceptions. Sustainability 11 (9): 2573.
Leximancer. 2011. Leximancer manual version 4, www.leximancer.com/site-media/lm/science/Leximancer_Manual_Version_4_0.pdf
Ma, E., M. Cheng, and A. Hsiao. 2018. Sentiment analysis: A review and agenda for future research in hospitality contexts. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 30 (11): 3287–3308.
Matta, R. 2016. Food incursions into global heritage: Peruvian cuisine’s slippery road to UNESCO. Social Anthropology 24: 338–352.
Medina, F.X. 2009. Mediterranean diet, culture and heritage: Challenges for a new conception. Public Health Nutrition 12: 1618–1620.
Mok, O. 2019. In bid for sole Unesco recognition, Penang govt says Singapore hawker culture not ‘so authentic.’ Malay Mail. https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/05/09/in-bid-for-sole-unesco-recognition-penang-govt-says-singapore-hawker-cultur/1751289
Mullen, T. 2017. Introduction to sentiment analysis. https://lct-master.org/files/MullenSentimentCourseSlides.pdf
Ooi, C.S. 2004. Brand Singapore: the hub of New Asia. In Destination branding: Creating the unique destination proposition, ed. N. Morgan, A. Pritchard, and R. Pride, 242–262. London: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann.
Ooi, C.S. 2008. Reimagining Singapore as a creative nation: The politics of place branding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 4 (4): 287–302.
Penang official suggests Malaysia make Unesco bid without Singapore whose hawker culture is not “so authentic.” 2019. Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/penang-official-suggests-malaysia-make-unesco-bid-without-singapore-whose-hawker
Penang proposes joint Singapore-Malaysia Unesco hawker culture bid. 2019. Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/penang-proposes-joint-spore-malaysia-unesco-hawker-culture-bid
Poria, Y., A. Reichel, and R. Cohen. 2010. World Heritage Site—Is it an effective brand name? A case study of a religious heritage site. Journal of Travel Research 50 (5): 482–495.
Public contributions and community support (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.oursgheritage.sg/hawker-culture-public-support/
Rockower, P.S. 2012. Recipes for gastrodiplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 8 (3): 235–246.
Rockower, P. 2014. The state of gastrodiplomacy. Public Diplomacy Magazine,11. Winter. https://www.bidd.org.rs/the-state-of-gastrodiplomacy/
Ruggles, D.F., and H. Silverman. 2009. From tangible to intangible heritage. In DF Ruggles, ed. H. Silverman, 1–14. New York: Intangible heritage embodied. Springer.
Ryan, J. 2015. Intangible cultural heritage: the new frontier of destination branding. In Ideas in marketing: Finding the new and polishing the old, ed. K. Kubacki, 388–390. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Seow, B.Y. 2018. Singapore’s hawker culture move starts food fight with Malaysia. Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/hawker-culture-move-starts-food-fight
Sims, R. 2009. Food, place and authenticity: Local food and the sustainable tourism experience. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 17 (3): 321–336.
Singapore National Environment Agency. 2019a. Hawker Culture In Singapore Submitted For Inscription On UNESCO’s Representative List Of The Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity. https://www.nea.gov.sg/media/news/news/index/hawker-culture-in-singapore-submitted-for-inscription-on-unesco-s-representative-list-of-the-intangible-cultural-heritage-of-humanity
Singapore National Environment Agency. 2019b. About the UNESCO Representative List. https://www.nea.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/annex-e---about-the-unesco-representative-list-of-the-intangible-cultural-heritage-of-humanity.pdf
Singapore’s year-long integrated culinary campaign. 2012. https://www.stb.gov.sg/content/stb/en/media-centre/media-releases/sg-year-long-integrated-culinary-campaign.html
Submission of nomination to UNESCO. n.d. https://www.oursgheritage.sg/hawker-culture-unesco-submission/
Suntikul, W. 2019. Gastrodiplomacy in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism 22 (9): 1076–1094.
The Good Country Index. 2018. https://www.goodcountry.org/index/results
Tornatore, J.-L. 2012. Anthropology’s payback: The gastronomic meal of the French. In The ethnographic elements of a heritage distinction: Heritage regimes and the state, ed. R. Bendix, A. Eggert, and A. Peselmann, 341–365. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
Ward, V., R. West, S. Smith, S. McDermott, J. Keen, R. Pawson, and A. House. 2014. The role of informal networks in creating knowledge among health-care managers: a prospective case study. Health Services and Delivery Research 2 (12): 1–132.
Welz, G. 2013. Contested origins: Food heritage and the european union's quality label program. Food, Culture & Society 16 (2): 265–279.
Wilson, R. 2011. Cocina Peruana Para El Mundo: Gastrodiplomacy, the culinary nation brand, and the context of national cuisine in Peru. Exchange: The Journal of Public Diplomacy 2 (2): 13–20.
Wilson, R. 2013. Cocina Peruana para el mundo: Gastrodiplomacy, the culinary nation brand, and the context of national cuisine in Peru. Exchange: Journal of Public Diplomacy 2: 13–20.
Wisdom, P. 2015. Breaking bread: A case study of South Korea’s gastrodiplomatic effort. Render. https://www.renderfoodmag.com/blog/2015/2/8/breaking-break-a-case-study-of-south-koreas-gastrodiplomatic-effort
Wiseman, G. 1999. Polylateralism and new modes of global dialogue. In Diplomacy, ed. C. Jonsson and R. Langhorne, 36–57. London: Sage.
Wolff, S. 2013. Paradiplomacy. Bologna Center Journal of International Affairs, 16.
Yin, R.K. 1984. Case study research: Design and methods, 1st ed. Newbury Park: Sage.
Yin, R.K. 2002. Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Yin, R.K. 2014. Case study research: Design and methods, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zaccheus, M. 2019. Singapore submits Unesco bid to recognize hawker culture. Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/singapore-submits-unesco-bid-to-recognise-hawker-culture
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, S.T., Kim, H.S. Food fight: gastrodiplomacy and nation branding in Singapore’s UNESCO bid to recognize Hawker culture. Place Brand Public Dipl 17, 205–217 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00166-3
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-020-00166-3