Skip to main content
Log in

Digital technologies as a response to healthcare system crises: agenda-setting of digital health policies in France

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
French Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

Since the COVID-19 crisis, digital health or (‘eHealth’) technologies have been a prominent element of domestic political agendas. However, in France, their emergence on the political agenda had already been linked to another type of crisis: the continuous and enduring crisis concerning the financing of the French healthcare system between 1995 and 2004. The aim of this article is to shed light on the conditions under which digital health technologies may be adopted as ‘solutions’ amidst financial constraint and austerity, based on an in-depth study of the French case. Using the Multiple Streams Framework, combined with a comparative and qualitative methodology, this article explains why digital health technologies were adopted as a central instrument of the 2004 French healthcare reform (the Douste-Blazy reform), but not during the 1995 social welfare reforms (the Juppé plan). It shows that if the perceived political risk associated with a reform increases, political decision-makers are more likely to select economically ambivalent devices, such as the Electronic Health Record (EHR), in order to restore the balance between pursuing policies and retaining votes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Chermann Elodie (2020). ‘La crise liée au coronavirus consacre la télémédecine [The COVID-19 crisis consecrates the use of telemedicine technologies]’, published on Le Monde website, available on: https://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/2020/05/03/la-crise-liee-au-coronavirus-consacre-la-telemedecine_6038519_3234.html.

  2. Even though the effects of partisan politics on retrenchment policies is not as clear-cut as one would expect, especially in times of economic constraint (Brady et al. 2005).

  3. These interviews were conducted between 2017 and 2022 as part of two broader studies on digital public health policies.

  4. See the appendix at the end of the text for more details on this selection process. The coding of institutional speeches distinguished sentences that mentioned the deficit in relation to the social security, finance or economic measures (increase in contribution, decrease in benefits, social debt reimbursement, expected cost saving…). More general organisational measures (even if they were intended to contribute to the general objective of rebalancing the budget) were excluded from this coding. As regards TV interviews and speeches, the coding was mainly thematic, in order to show which measures were primarily highlighted by decision makers.

  5. Source: Eurostat, ‘Government deficits/surplus, debt and associated data’, code: gov_10dd_edpt1.

  6. Mission interministérielle de revue de projet sur le Dossier Médical Personnel (DMP) [Inter-ministerial review mission on the DMP]. Rapport sur le Dossier Médical Personnalisé (DMP) [Report on the French Electronic Health Record DMP]. Paris, Novembre 2007, p.49, see also p.64, translation by the authors.

  7. The Carte Vitale is an administrative health insurance card which is automatically given to French insured persons.

  8. Policy officer from the unit for electronic and new technologies in health, French Ministry for Health (1995–1999), 24.05.2018, 30.05.2018, see also: Loth, André (1996). ‘Systèmes d'information et cartes de santé’, Droit Social, special issue september–october, p.829.

  9. Source: Eurostat isoc_ci_in_h.

  10. Director of the Mission for the digitalisation of the health system, French Ministry for Health (1998-2005), 04.06.2018.

  11. Cohabitations refer to specific political periods within the French semi-presidential system during which the President belongs to a different political party than the majority in the French Parliament.

  12. Philippe Douste-Blazy’s speech on 16th june 2004: ‘The health insurance reform’, Available on: https://www.vie-publique.fr/discours/143188-declaration-de-m-philippe-douste-blazy-ministre-de-la-sante-et-de-la-p.

  13. Hearing of Mr. Philippe Douste-Blazy, Minister for Health and Social Protection, and Mr. Xavier Bertrand, Secretary for the Health insurance, by the special commission of the National Assembly charged with an examination of the bill on health insurance, 17th June 2004 (hearing opened to the media), Available on: http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/12/cr-spec-assurance-maladie/03-04/c0304002.asp

  14. Interview with the Minister for Solidarity, Health and Family, Philippe Douste-Blazy on TF1, on 3rd may 2004.

  15. Advisor to the Minister for Solidarity, Health and Family, Philippe Douste-Blazy (2004–2005), 06.04.2017. Translations by the authors.

  16. Advisor to the Minister for Solidarity, Health and Family, Philippe Douste-Blazy (2004–2005), 08.06.2018. Translations by the authors.

  17. Advisor to the Minister for Solidarity, Health and Family, Philippe Douste-Blazy (2004-2005), 06.04.2017; Advisor to the Minister for Solidarity, Health and Family, Philippe Douste-Blazy (2004-2005), 20.07.2022 Translation by the authors.

  18. Interview with the Minister for Solidarity, Health and Family, Philippe Douste-Blazy on TF1, on 3rd may 2004.Translation by the authors.

  19. Hearing of Mr. Philippe Douste-Blazy, Minister for Health and Social Protection, and Mr. Xavier Bertrand, Secretary for Health insurance, by the special commission of the National Assembly charged with the examination of the bill on health insurance, 17th June 2004 (hearing opened to the media), Available on: http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/12/cr-spec-assurance-maladie/03-04/c0304002.asp. Translation by the authors.

  20. The time span selected was from around six months before the reform to one month after the reform. The 20’clock TV news from the national channels TF1 and France 2 were selected and analysed when appropriate.

References

  • Ackrill, Robert, Adrian Kay, and Nikolaos Zahariadis. 2013. Ambiguity, Multiple Streams, and EU Policy. Journal of European Public Policy 20 (6): 871–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asensio, Maria, and Tamara Popic. 2019. Portuguese Healthcare Reforms in the Context of Crisis: External Pressure or Domestic Choice? Social Policy & Administration 53 (7): 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Michael W., Andrew Jordan, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, and Adrienne Héritier. 2012. Dismantling Public Policy: Preferences, Strategies, and Effects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, Henri, and Patrick Castel. 2018. Sociologie politique de la santé. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bermeo, Nancy, and Jonas Pontusson, eds. 2012. Coping with Crisis: Government Reactions to the Great Recession. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bérut, Chloé. 2022. The Chemical Framework: Exploring Europeanisation in French, Austrian, and Irish EHealth Policy Processes. Governance. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, Ashly D., Josip Car, Claudia Pagliari, Chantelle Anandan, Kathrin Cresswell, Tomislav Bokun, Brian McKinstry, Rob Procter, Azeem Majeed, and Aziz Sheikh. 2011. The Impact of EHealth on the Quality and Safety of Health Care: A Systematic Overview. PLoS Medicine 8 (1): e1000387. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatter, Joachim, and Markus Haverland. 2012. Designing Case Studies: Explanatory Approaches in Small-N Research ECPR Research Methods. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137016669.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bonoli, Giuliano. 2013. The Origins of Active Social Policy: Labour Market and Childcare Policies in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press.

  • Brady, David, Jason Beckfield, and Martin Seeleib-Kaiser. 2005. Economic Globalization and the Welfare State in Affluent Democracies, 1975–2001. American Sociological Review 70 (6): 921–948. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressers, Hans Th A., and Laurence J. O’toole. 1998. The Selection of Policy Instruments: A Network-Based Perspective. Journal of Public Policy 18 (3): 213–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Eleanor, and Robert Geyer. 2020. The Development of EU Health Policy and the Covid-19 Pandemic: Trends and Implications. Journal of European Integration 42 (8): 1057–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1853718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buton, François, and Frédéric. Pierru. 2012. Les dépolitisations de la santé. Les Tribunes De La Santé 34 (1): 51–70. https://doi.org/10.3917/seve.034.0051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairney, Paul, and Michael D. Jones. 2016. Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach: What Is the Empirical Impact of This Universal Theory? Policy Studies Journal 44 (1): 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capano, Giliberto, and Andrea Lippi. 2017. How Policy Instruments Are Chosen: Patterns of Decision Makers ‘Choices.’ Policy Sciences 50 (2): 269–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornilleau, Gérard., and Thierry Debrand. 2011. Crise et déficit de l’assurance maladie. Revue De l’OFCE 116 (1): 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop, Claire A., and Claudio M. Radaelli. 2017. Learning in the Bath-Tub: The Micro and Macro Dimensions of the Causal Relationship between Learning and Policy Change. Policy and Society 36 (2): 304–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1321232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, Rebekah, Andrew Burton-Jones, Ian Scott, Andrew Staib, and Clair Sullivan. 2018. Effects of EHealth on Hospital Practice: Synthesis of the Current Literature. Australian Health Review: A Publication of the Australian Hospital Association 42 (5): 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH17255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich, Jane R. 2011. Making Markets in the Welfare State: The Politics of Varying Market Reforms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guinaudeau, Isabelle, and Sabine Saurugger. 2018. Entrepreneurs politiques et engagement électoral. Revue Francaise De Science Politique 68 (2): 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, Joseph. 1984. The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and the Symbolic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, Jacob S., Paul Pierson, and Kathleen Thelen. 2015. Drift and Conversion: Hidden Faces of Institutional Change. In Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis, ed. James Mahoney and Kathleen Thelen, 180–208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A. 1993. Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A. 2018. Varieties of Capitalism in Light of the Euro Crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 25 (1): 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenteufel, Patrick. 1997. Les médecins face à l’Etat. Une comparaison européenne. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenteufel, Patrick. 2008. Welfare Policies and Politics. In Developments in French Politics 4, ed. Alistair Cole, Patrick Le Galès, and Jonah Levy, 227–242. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassenteufel, Patrick. 2016. Muddling Through the Crisis: The French Welfare State Under Financial Stress. In Challenges to European Welfare Systems, ed. Klaus Schubert, Paloma De Villota, and Johanna Kuhlman, 247–269. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenteufel, Patrick, and Bruno Palier. 2005. Les trompe-l’œil de la « gouvernance » de l’assurance maladie. Revue Francaise D’administration Publique 113 (1): 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenteufel, Patrick, and Bruno Palier. 2007. Towards Neo-Bismarckian Health Care States? Comparing Health Insurance Reforms in Bismarckian Welfare Systems. Social Policy & Administration 41 (6): 574–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00573.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenteufel, Patrick, and Bruno Palier. 2015. Still the Sound of Silence? Towards a New Phase in the Europeanisation of Welfare State Policies in France. Comparative European Politics 13 (1): 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herweg, Nicole, Nikolaos Zahariadis, and Reimut Zohlnhöfer. 2017. The Multiple Streams Framework : Foundations, Refinements, and Empirical Applications. In Theories of the Policy Process, ed. Christopher M. Weible and Paul A. Sabatier, 17–53. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, Michael. 2004. Beyond Good and Evil in Policy Implementation: Instrument Mixes, Implementation Styles, and Second Generation Theories of Policy Instrument Choice. Policy and Society 23 (2): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, Michael. 2009. Governance Modes, Policy Regimes and Operational Plans: A Multi-Level Nested Model of Policy Instrument Choice and Policy Design. Policy Sciences 42 (1): 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Carsten, Christoph Arndt, Seonghui Lee, and Georg Wenzelburger. 2017. Policy Instruments and Welfare State Reform. Journal of European Social Policy 28 (2): 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717711974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Desmond, and Patrick Le Galès, eds. 2017. Reconfiguring European States in Crisis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John W. 2002. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nde ed. New York: Pearson Education Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lartigot-Hervier, Louise. 2012. La Peau de Chagrin ? Affaiblissement Syndical Dans Les Assurances Sociales En France et En Allemagne. Paris: Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lartigot-Hervier, Louise. 2021. Reconfigurations d’acteurs et Politiques de Protection Sociale Dans La Crise. In Politiques Publiques 4. Les Politiques Publiques Dans La Crise, ed. Patrick Hassenteufel and Sabine Saurugger, 235–262. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Stephen H., and Guy B. Peters. 1989. Instruments of Government: Perceptions and Contexts. Journal of Public Policy 9 (1): 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James, and Kathleen Thelen, eds. 2015. Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Wolfgang C., and Kaare Strøm, eds. 1999. Policy, Office, or Votes?: How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge England; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palier, Bruno. 1999. Réformer La Sécurité Sociale. Les Interventions Gouvernementales En Matière de Protection Sociale Depuis 1945 La France En Perspective Comparative. Paris: Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palier, Bruno. 2010. A Long Goodbye to Bismarck?: The Politics of Welfare Reform in Continental Europe, 01 ed. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palier, Bruno. 2005a. Gouverner la sécurité sociale. Les réformes du système français de protection sociale depuis 1945. Quadrige. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. https://www.cairn.info/gouverner-la-securite-sociale--9782130550051.htm.

  • Palier, Bruno. 2005b. ‘Redresser Les Comptes de La Sécurité Sociale’. In Gouverner La Sécurité Sociale, 167–210. Quadrige. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

  • Persico, Simon, Caterina Froio, and Isabelle Guinaudeau. 2012. Action publique et partis politiques. Gouvernement Et Action Publique 1 (1): 11–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Guy B. 2005. The problem of policy problems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 7 (4): 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980500319204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierru, Frédéric. 2007. Hippocrate malade de ses réformes. Bellecombe-en-Bauges: Editions du Croquant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 2002. Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies. Revue Française De Sociologie 43 (2): 369–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/3322510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, Aaron, Martin McKee, Sanjay Basu, and David Stuckler. 2014. The Political Economy of Austerity and Healthcare: Cross-National Analysis of Expenditure Changes in 27 European Nations 1995–2011. Health Policy 115 (1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.11.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruellan, Rolande. 2015. La gouvernance de la Sécurité sociale à partir du plan Juppé de 1995. Vie Sociale 10 (2): 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saurugger, Sabine. 2013. Constructivism and Public Policy Approaches in the EU: From Ideas to Power Games. Journal of European Public Policy 20 (6): 888–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saurugger, Sabine, and Patrick Hassenteufel, eds. 2021. Les politiques publiques dans la crise: 2008 et ses suites. Paris: Les Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Vivien A., and Mark Thatcher, eds. 2013. Resilient Liberalism in Europe’s Political Economy, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somer-Topcu, Zeynep. 2009. Timely Decisions: The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy Change. The Journal of Politics 71 (1): 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608090154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, and Armin Schäfer, eds. 2013. Politics in the Age of Austerity, 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuckler, David, and Sanjay Basu. 2013. The Body Economic: Why Austerity Kills by David Stuckler Sanjay Basu. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, Kathleen. 2014. Varieties of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 1996. Selling British Rail: An Idea Whose Time Has Come? Comparative Political Studies 29 (4): 400–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414096029004002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahariadis, Nikolaos. 2003. Ambiguity and Choice in Public Policy: Political Decision Making in Modern Democracies. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chloé Bérut.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 46 KB)

Appendix: Data

Appendix: Data

Semi-structured interviews

Questions were asked about eHealth in the two reforms, the issues that were raised, their supporters and opponents, and the policy formation process in general. Since there is a 15–25 years’ time span between the reforms themselves and the interviews, the risk of memories bias was very high. Nevertheless, interviews were mainly used as a way to deepen observations primarily made on institutional and media speeches, which can be considered as archives and do not suffer the same bias.

Policy officers from the Ministry of Health in charge of eHealth

For the period under study (1995–2004) we identified the main policy officers in charge of eHealth within the French Ministry for Health. For a long time, there was only few people in charge of these issues, who worked most of the time within small units with limited resources. These interviews were central in gathering data about eHealth activities in the central administration during these periods of time.

References

  • Policy officer of the unit for electronic and new technologies in health, French Ministry for Health (1995–1999), 24.05.2018, 30.05.2018.

  • Director of the Mission for the digitalization of the health system, French Ministry for Health (1998–2005), 04.06.2018.

Members of the Minister for Health’s office in charge of eHealth (2004)

Generally, only one person within Ministers for Health cabinets is in charge of dealing with eHealth. Hence, data are often obtained using a unique interview. In our case, a second interview was performed with a more senior-level member of the cabinet, in order to triangulate the information gathered during the first interview. Two other interviews were conducted with external advisors of the Minister.

References

  • Advisor to the Minister for Solidarity, Health and Family Philippe Douste-Blazy (2004–2005), 06.04.2017.

  • Advisor to the Minister for Solidarity, Health and Family Philippe Douste-Blazy (2004–2005), 21.02.2019.

  • Advisor to the Minister for Solidarity, Health and Family Philippe Douste-Blazy (2004–2005), 08.06.2018.

  • Advisor to the Minister for Solidarity, Health and Family Philippe Douste-Blazy (2004–2005), 20.07.2022.

Institutional and TV speeches

To understand decision-makers’ initial intentions when communicating about their reforms, we selected the main institutional speeches gave by the relevant ministers in 1995 and in 2004. We chose to complete this first selection with interviews performed to present the respective reforms on TV news. Indeed, if the institutional setting of the 1995 reform made the institutional speech of Alain Juppé before the National Assembly very visible in the media (as it was a General Policy Statement), the same cannot be said for the 2004 reform. In this case, it is likely that the TV intervention constituted the main channel of communication from the Minister to the public. The choice to focus specifically on TV speeches relies on two elements: first, oral interviews are not partially transcribed or rewritten as it can be the case in the newspapers, and can therefore be analysed as a whole. Then, the choice of TV as opposed to radio is due to its prominent status within the French audience.

Institutional speeches

The selection of the relevant institutional speech with regard to the Juppé plan was based on its status as a General Policy Statement (Déclaration de Politique Générale). Due to its particular role in French politics, this type of speech is generally heavily reported in the media, and can therefore be considered as the main channel of communication of the Prime Minister on the reform. In the case of the Douste-Blazy reform, various and less visible channels of institutional communication have been used. The speech following the Council of Ministers on the 16 June 2004 has been reported in the media, as it took place at the beginning of the parliamentary decision-making process of this law. The other main channel of institutional communication was the speeches given by the Minister for Health Philippe Douste-Blazy’s and its Secretary for the Health insurance Xavier Bertrand’s before the National Assembly on the 17 June 2004. If these two institutional speeches may have been less influential in the media than the 1995 General Policy Statement, they can nevertheless be considered as a functional equivalent. All these speeches were found already transcribed on official websites from the public service and the French National Assembly.

References

TV interviews and speeches

To complete institutional speeches, all televised speeches and interviews about the two reforms were gathered. The selection process of which speeches and interviews we included in our selection was dependent on the materials found on the National Audio-visual Institute (INA) database, which is the main source of data on this matter in France. A keyword research (name of Ministers and sorting by date and media type)Footnote 20 was performed. Finding the main TV intervention by Philippe Douste-Blazy was easily possible, mainly because its intervention on France 2 in May 2004 was regularly mentioned by French eHealth actors we interviewed. In the case of the Juppe plan, the Minister did not specifically present its reform on the TV, as the General Policy Statement was heavily taken up by the media. However, several aspects of the social security reform were announced about a week before the General Policy Statement, during a televised speech about the Ministerial reshuffle.

References

  • Televised speech of Prime Minister Alain Juppé on the Ministerial reshuffle, on France 2, on the 7.th November 1995.

  • Interview with Minister for Solidarity, Health and Family Philippe Douste-Blazy on TF1, on 3.rd may 2004.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bérut, C., Saurugger, S. Digital technologies as a response to healthcare system crises: agenda-setting of digital health policies in France. Fr Polit 21, 227–248 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-023-00223-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41253-023-00223-2

Keywords

Navigation