Abstract
The Punica granatum (Pomegranate) tree attracted a lot of interest for its nutritious fruits and therapeutic benefits. Although research on genetic diversity is important to develop breeding programs and implement efficient cultivar improvement, the genetic diversity of pomegranates in Saudi Arabia has not been investigated completely. The two important pomegranate cultivars in Al-Baha region of Saudi Arabia (Bidah-red and Bidah-green), which have recently gained considerable attention due to their unique sweet taste, were studied using DNA barcodes because information about their phylogeny is limited. To reveal the phylogeny of these two cultivars, three DNA barcodes [the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2), ribulose 1,5-biphosphate carboxylase (rbcL), and intergenic spacer region (trnH-psbA)] were used. The ITS2 and psbA-trnH had sufficient polymorphism to allow distinction at the cultivar level, whereas the rbcL region had a uniform sequence; hence, it failed to discriminate among the cultivars. The two cultivars were found to be clustered in the same clade on the phylogenetic tree constructed using the ITS2 and psbA-trnH sequences, suggesting that they are either closely related or have adapted to their locations. As the ITS2 region exhibited higher polymorphism than psbA-trnH, the phylogenetic tree based on ITS2 indicated that Bidah-red and Bidah-green are distinct cultivars. We conclude that ITS2 and psbA-trnH DNA barcodes are capable of authenticating and identifying pomegranate cultivars and can assist in improving pomegranate quality in the future through molecular breeding.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) is among the oldest and most significant cultivated crops that are widely known. The plant is grown extensively in tropical and subtropical climates as well as in other countries, such as Saudi Arabia, and is a member of the Lythraceae family [1, 2]. Consumption of pomegranate fruits often takes the form of juice or raw seeds. Phytoconstituents and antioxidants from the polyphenolic class, comprising tannins, polyphenols, and flavonoids, have been shown to be present in the fruit extract, along with essential minerals, acids, sugars, vitamins, polysaccharides, and polyphenols [3]. In addition, different parts of the plant have been evaluated for their possible medicinal benefits against conditions including cancer, cardiovascular issues, diabetes, and gum infections [4, 5]. Moreover, studies have shown antioxidant activity and changes to the physical and chemical composition of fruits as pomegranates develop [6]. The cultivar determines plant quality, and cultivars differ greatly in terms of their morphological, agronomical, and post-harvest properties [7, 8]. Some of these characteristics may be influenced by the environment, hindering the classification of cultivars based on morphological and/or chemical properties. Therefore, in order to measure the genetic diversity among pomegranate cultivars and to assist breeders in choosing and developing genotypes with better levels of quality and fidelity, it is crucial to discover molecular markers that are unaffected by the environment.
Molecular markers are important tools for genotype characterization and the identification of phylogenetic relationships between cultivars that are difficult to distinguish morphologically, thus aiding the management of accessions and breeding programs. Standard DNA barcodes, such as ITS2, rbcL, and trnH-psbA, have been suggested to differentiate between plant varieties and cultivars. Several studies have demonstrated the application of different molecular markers in pomegranates, including random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) [9,10,11] simple-sequence repeats (SSRs) [12,13,14] Inter Simple Sequence Repeats (ISSR), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) [15, 16], sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) [17], 18–28S rDNA [18] and chloroplast microsatellites [19]. Several investigations have been carried out to identify pomegranate cultivars using chloroplast DNA barcodes, such as the trnH-psbA spacer, trnL‑F, Maturase K (matK), and cpDNA petA–psaJ/trnC–trnD [20,21,22].
Pomegranate is a valuable agricultural crop in the Al-Baha region of Saudi Arabia because of its high quality, which is mainly based on the fruit’s unique taste. These features made it a highly valued commodity in the region. Moreover, because of the economic and nutritional importance of pomegranate, a local festival is celebrated annually that is named after pomegranate. There are two different cultivars of pomegranate that are locally known as Bidah-red and Bidah-green. Pomegranate cultivated in the Al-Baha region has never been characterized using any molecular markers. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the molecular phylogeny of two important pomegranate cultivars in Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia (Bidah-red and Bidah-green), using three DNA barcodes—ITS2, rbcL, and trnH-psbA. Phylogenetic analyses were performed between the two cultivars and the cultivars identified in GenBank. We believe that the study's findings will be useful for breeding plans and genetic conservation measures.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Plant materials
Three randomly chosen trees of each of the two pomegranates cultivars growing on farms in the Al-Baha area of southern Saudi Arabia were sampled for their leaves.
2.2 DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing
DNA was extracted from the samples using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method [23]. The amount of extracted DNA was measured using a UV spectrophotometer (NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer: Thermo Scientific, UK). DNA was amplified using a Techne PCR thermal cycler (GMI, USA) with the primers ITS-S2F (5′ ATGCGATACTTGGTGTGAAT 3′) and ITS4rev (5′ TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC 3′) for the ITS region, rbcLaF (5′ ATGTCACCACAAACAGAGACTAAAGC 3′) and rbcLarev (5′ GTAAAATCAAGTCCACCRCG 3′) for the rbcL region, and psbAF (5′ CGCGCATGGTGGATTCACAATCC 3′) and t-rnH2 (5′ GTTATGCATGAACGTAATGCTC 3′) for the trnH-psbA region. The reaction mixture had a 50 μL volume, and the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was performed at the following temperatures: 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing for 40 s, and extension at 72 °C for 50 s. The annealing temperatures for ITS2, rbcL, and psbA-trnH were 55 °C, 58 ℃, and 60 °C, respectively.
Electrophoresis with 1.0% agarose gel was used to separate the PCR products, and Expin PCR Purification Kit (Gene ALL, Korea) was used for DNA purification. The amplicons were sequenced by Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea).
2.3 Sequence and phylogenetic analysis
All pomegranate cultivars' sequences were submitted to NCBI, and the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTn) was used to compare them to previously published sequences in GenBank (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Accession numbers were given to all sequences that were submitted to GenBank. Highly similar sequences of pomegranate cultivars with clear cultivar names and references were retrieved. The sequencing data were aligned, trimmed, and analyzed using the MEGA11 program [24]. Using maximum likelihood and the Tamura 3-parameter model, a phylogenetic tree was generated [24]. To evaluate the reliability of the phylogenetic trees, 1000 bootstrap replicates were used.
3 Results
The amplification of the three loci was successful in all samples obtained from the two cultivars. For Bidah-red and Bidah-green, the accession numbers of ITS2 loci sequences are ON678157 and ON678153, respectively; those of rcbL loci sequences are ON873728 and ON873729, respectively; and those of trnH-psbA are ON873730 and ON873731, respectively as shown in Table 1.
After searching GenBank (NCBI) for ITS2, rbcL, and psbA-trnH sequences of Bidah-red and Bidah-green cultivars, a number of accessions were obtained; the sequences that were accompanied by a clear cultivar name and reference were included in the study. The retrieved sequences, accession numbers, names, and sites of collection of the cultivars are listed in Table 1.
The nucleotide sequences of all retrieved cultivars were analyzed along with those of the two cultivars under study using MEGA11. Sequence alignment revealed that the ITS2 region contained 84 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and 22 insertions and deletions (INDELs), whereas the psbA-trnH region contained six SNPs and four INDELs. In contrast, the rbcL region was uniform.
The Tamura 3-parameter model had the lowest Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) scores; therefore, the evolutionary relationship between the two cultivars and other related cultivars was inferred using the maximum likelihood method and the Tamura 3-parameter model. Because the rbcL sequence was uniform for all cultivars, only the ITS2 and psbA-trnH sequences were used for analysis. The dendrogram based on ITS2 sequences consisted of two clades (Fig. 1). Clade 2 consisted of Bidah-red and Bidah-green cultivars, and clade 1 consisted of the remaining 36 cultivars retrieved from NCBI with an 87% bootstrap value as displayed in Fig. 1.
The dendrogram based on psbA-trnH sequences consisted of three clades with 84% bootstrap value (Fig. 2). Clade 3 consisted of the Jangalhaye Asalem and Darya kenar babolsar cultivars; clade 2 consisted of only the Gol sefid cultivar; and clade 1 consisted of the remaining 15 cultivars, including Bidah-red and Bidah-green.
4 Discussion
The determination of plant varieties and cultivars has significant importance within the agricultural sector, mostly owing to the extensive range of plant varieties and cultivars that have been generated across various crop species. Nevertheless, the identification of plant varieties and cultivars based on basic morphological features presents challenges and difficulties, particularly when distinguishing closely related species. These challenges arise not only from the limited differences between these species but also from the technical constraints of the method of identification. Specifically, this process is tedious, requires significant labour, and experiences high costs.
The present study on pomegranate cultivars has demonstrated that ITS2, rbcL, and psbA-trnH barcodes can be used for distinguishing and clustering different cultivars of this species. ITS2, rbcL, and psbA-trnH have been previously suggested as core plant barcodes. The ITS2 region has been empirically shown to serve as a very effective barcode for plant authentication, owing to its multitude of potential advantages relative to its constraints. According to previous investigations on barcoding, the ITS2 region demonstrates superior capacity for species differentiation and sequence retrieval across various plant species [25, 26], Therefore, the ITS2 region has emerged as a favored choice for the selection of barcoding genes in the context of plant identification. Soliman et al. [27] have effectively distinguished and differentiated four Lantana ornamental plant types at the variety level with enhanced precision by using the ITS2 region for barcoding.
In the current study, ITS2 and psbA-trnH DNA barcodes fulfilled two basic requirements: the amplification rate was 100%, and polymorphism and variable sites were present between cultivars. Other molecular markers, such as RAPD, SSRs, ISSR, AFLP, SRAP, and 18–28S rDNA, have been extensively used to evaluate the genetic diversity of pomegranates. These markers were highly polymorphic among the pomegranate cultivars, and DNA barcoding is such a way for identifying and classifying many organisms at the species and genus levels utilizing markers. For example, Zhang et al. [28] developed a unique method for identifying pomegranate germplasms. Specifically, they focused on recording and using the polymorphic bands created by RAPD markers to construct a cultivar identification diagram. The primary limitations of RAPD lie in its reduced repeatability [29]. The study conducted by Amar and El-Zayat [30] demonstrated that the discriminating capacity (DC) analysis indicated that the SRAP test yielded higher-quality outcomes in terms of the number of alleles, number of polymorphic amplicons, and polymorphism information content for the classification of Egyptian pomegranates.
In addition, the pomegranate breeding plan used AFLP as another marker type. However, there is only one available report on this particular application, which involved screening 16 Tunisian cultivars [16]. The results of this study indicated a greater degree of polymorphism. Moreover, several SSR markers were used in pomegranate breeding and characterization studies [31]. However, the primary constraint associated with SSR markers is the complicated and time-consuming nature of the process.
Genetically, it is evident that pomegranates are highly diverse, owing to the existence of a large number of cultivars distributed across different habitats.
The role of the ITS2 barcode and its applications in the assessment of genetic diversity and analysis of genetic relationships between pomegranate cultivars have been reported previously [11]. Singh et al. [11] evaluated the nuclear rRNA and ITS regions and suggested using ITS2 as a DNA barcode for molecular genetic discrimination of pomegranate germplasm for crop improvement. In addition, rbcL, psbA-trnH, ITS, and matK were evaluated for their potential genetic diversity among the pomegranate genotypes [21]. Among these, psbA-trnH has been found to be the most effective in discriminating among cultivars owing to having the greatest number of variable regions among all the plant DNA barcodes [21]. In contrast, rbcL had the lowest ability to identify pomegranate genotypes [21]. These findings are in line with those of the present investigation, since rbcL failed to distinguish between those two pomegranate cultivars. This was because of the lack of variable sites in the rbcL loci of the sequences of the tested cultivars. The common use of rbcL as a DNA barcode has been attributed to its historical popularity rather than its usefulness in barcoding species [32]. Several studies have investigated the discriminating capacity of rbcL, and it has not been deemed the optimal barcode for seed plants [33,34,35].
The association between the morphological and geographical characterization of pomegranates and molecular classification was not evident in most studies. For example [36], used RAPD markers to evaluate diversity among 24 Iranian pomegranate cultivars, and the results indicated no correlation between the pomegranate genotype clusters obtained using the UPGMA method and morphological traits. Additionally, AFLP analysis, which was used to characterize 34 pomegranate cultivars, showed that the clustering of cultivars was independent of their geographical origin [16].
Moreover, the phenotypic divergence between pomegranate cultivars, such as soft- and hard-seeded pomegranates, was attributed to genomic variations and the expression of certain genes involved in sucrose transport and environmental adaptation [37].
However, in the current research, the cultivars Bidah-red and Bidah-green, belonging to the same geographical region, were present in the same cluster in both the phylogenetic trees. In fact, the influence of the environment on the genetic variation present within a given species is widely documented [38]. It may be inferred that population variations resulting from biotic or abiotic environmental changes have the potential to impact the majority, if not all, of living species [38,39,40]. The variations in ecological systems may be attributed to several factors, including climate change, pest outbreaks, and the more recent influence of human activities [41]. In addition, the influence of contemporary agricultural practices and other human-related activities on plant genetic resources has been confirmed [42].
Using ITS2 sequences, the maximum likelihood approach and the Tamura three-parameter model, a dendrogram was generated that unambiguously separated all P. granatum variants into two major clusters. The second cluster contained Bidah-red and Bidah-green cultivars with an 87% bootstrap value, while the first cluster contained the remaining varieties retrieved from GenBank, including wild and cultivated varieties from different geographical regions. Therefore, Bidah-red and Bidah-green can be considered as distinct cultivars.
The phylogenetic relationship between pomegranate varieties inferred using the maximum likelihood method and the Tamura 3-parameter based on the psbA-trnH loci clearly delineated all varieties of P. granatum into two main clusters (Fig. 2.). The first cluster comprised Bidah-red and Bidah-green cultivars, along with all sequences of pomegranate varieties retrieved from NCBI, except for Angalhaye Asalem and Darya kenar babolsar.
In addition, the multiple sequence alignment of all pomegranate sequences for the three loci revealed variation in the occurrence of SNPs and INDELs. However, the rbcl region was relatively uniform in all the varieties evaluated, which corroborates the suggestion that it is a weak DNA barcode to study intraspecies phylogeny [21]. ITS2 sequences in plants are associated with environmental adaptation [43]. In the present study, the ITS2 region exhibited higher polymorphism than psbA-trnH region, showing a greater genetic diversity among the selected pomegranate varieties. The clustering of Bidah-red and Bidah-green sequences implies that they may be closely related or have a history of adaptability to their respective locations, which might aid pomegranate breeding efforts.
5 Conclusions
This study's results will aid in the development of breeding programs and genetic conservation measures, which are primarily based on the quantity and distribution of genetic diversity in the genetic pool. Moreover, the characterization of superior cultivars is a prerequisite to improving crop production in Saudi Arabia. The present study focused on the examination of two significant pomegranate cultivars, namely Bidah-red and Bidah-green, which are prominently cultivated in the Al-Baha area of Saudi Arabia. These cultivars have garnered substantial interest in recent times owing to their distinctive sweet flavour. Given the limited knowledge on their phylogenetic characteristics, DNA barcoding techniques were used to investigate their genetic profiles. The ITS2 and psbA-trnH regions exhibited significant levels of polymorphism, enabling differentiation at the cultivar level. Conversely, the rbcL region had a consistent sequence, rendering it ineffective in distinguishing across cultivars. The two cultivars were shown to be grouped together in the same clade on the phylogenetic tree generated using the ITS2 and psbA-trnH sequences. This finding implies that they share a close evolutionary relationship or have undergone adaptation specific to their respective environments. The ITS2 region had a greater degree of variability compared to psbA-trnH. Consequently, the phylogenetic analysis using the ITS2 region revealed clear differentiation between Bidah-red and Bidah-green, confirming their separate cultivar status. Based on our findings, it can be inferred that the use of ITS2 and psbA-trnH DNA barcodes has the potential to authenticate and distinguish various pomegranate cultivars. Furthermore, these DNA barcodes hold promise in facilitating advancements in pomegranate quality via the application of molecular breeding. Because the cultivars Bidah-red and Bidah-green possess many desirable traits, such as high fruit sweetness, they may help improve other pomegranate cultivars.
Data availability
All the data created or analyzed during the time of this investigation are presented in this publication.
Change history
17 November 2023
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-023-00102-0
References
Patil PG, Jamma SM, Singh NV, Bohra A, Parashuram S, Injal AS, Gargade VA, Chakranarayan MG, Salutgi UD, Dhinesh Babu K (2020) Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) using hypervariable SSR markers. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 26:1249–1261
Vaughan J, Geissler C (2009) The new Oxford book of food plants. OUP, Oxford
Rajan S, Mahalakshmi S, Deepa VM, Sathya K, Shajitha S, Thirunalasundari T (2011) Antioxidant potentials of Punica granatum fruit rind extracts. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 3:82–88
Jurenka J (2008) Therapeutic applications of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.): a review. Altern Med Rev 13:128–144
Yılmaz B, Usta C (2010) Nar’ın (Punica granatum) terapötik etkileri. Türkiye Aile Hekimliği Dergisi 14:146–153
Ozgen M, Durgaç C, Serçe S, Kaya C (2008) Chemical and antioxidant properties of pomegranate cultivars grown in the Mediterranean region of Turkey. Food Chem 111:703–706
Holland D, Hatib K, Bar-Ya’akov I (2009) Pomegranate: botany, horticulture, breeding. Hortic Rev 35:127–191
Heber D, Schulman RN, Seeram NP (2006) Pomegranates: ancient roots to modern medicine. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Ercisli S, Agar G, Orhan E, Yildirim N, Hizarci Y (2007) Interspecific variability of RAPD and fatty acid composition of some pomegranate cultivars (Punica granatum L.) growing in Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey. Biochem Syst Ecol 35:764–769
Talebi BM, Bahar M, Sharifnabi B, Yamchi A (2011) Evaluation of genetic diversity among Iranian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars, using ISSR and RAPD markers. Taxonomy and Biosystematics 8:35–44
Singh SK, Meghwal PR, Pathak R, Gautam R, Kumar S (2013) Genetic diversity in Punica granatum revealed by nuclear rRNA, internal transcribed spacer and RAPD polymorphism. Natl Acad Sci Lett 36:115–124
Pirseyedi SM, Valizadehghan S, Mardi M, Ghaffari MR, Mahmoodi P, Zahravi M, Zeinalabedini M, Nekoui SMK (2010) Isolation and characterization of novel microsatellite markers in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Int J Mol Sci 11:2010–2016
Parvaresh M, Talebi M, Sayed-Tabatabaei B (2012) Molecular diversity and genetic relationship of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes using microsatellite markers. Sci Hortic 138:244–252
Soriano JM, Zuriaga E, Rubio P, Llácer G, Infante R, Badenes ML (2011) Development and characterization of microsatellite markers in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Mol Breed 27:119–128
Ercisli S, Kafkas E, Orhan E, Kafkas S, Dogan Y, Esitken A (2011) Genetic characterization of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes by AFLP markers. Biol Res 44:345–350
Jbir R, Hasnaoui N, Mars M, Marrakchi M, Trifi M (2008) Characterization of Tunisian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars using amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. Sci Hortic 115:231–237
Soleimani MH, Talebi M, Sayed-Tabatabaei BE (2012) Use of SRAP markers to assess genetic diversity and population structure of wild, cultivated, and ornamental pomegranates (Punica granatum L.) in different regions of Iran. Plant Syst Evol 298:1141–1149
Melgarejo P, Martínez JJ, Hernández F, Martínez R, Legua P, Oncina R, Martinez-Murcia A (2009) Cultivar identification using 18S–28S rDNA intergenic spacer-RFLP in pomegranate (Punica granatum L.). Sci Hortic 120:500–503
Norouzi M, Talebi M, Sayed-Tabatabaei B (2012) Chloroplast microsatellite diversity and population genetic structure of Iranian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes. Sci Hortic 137:114–120
Shahsavari S, Noormohammadi Z, Sheidai M, Farahani F, Vazifeshenas MR (2022) A bioinformatic insight into the genetic diversity within pomegranate cultivars: from nuclear to chloroplast genes. Genet Resour Crop Evol 69:1207–1217
Hajiahmadi Z, Talebi M, Sayed-Tabatabaei BE (2013) Studying genetic variability of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) based on chloroplast DNA and barcode genes. Mol Biotechnol 55:249–259
Sevindik E, Efe F (2021) Molecular genetic diversity and phylogenetic analyses of Punica granatum L. populations revealed by ISSR markers and chloroplast (cpDNA) trnL-F region. Erwerbs-obstbau 63:339–345
Doyle JJ (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15
Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol 38:3022–3027
Chen S, Yao H, Han J, Liu C, Song J, Shi L, Zhu Y, Ma X, Gao T, Pang X (2010) Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE 5:e8613
Yao H, Song J, Liu C, Luo K, Han J, Li Y, Pang X, Xu H, Zhu Y, Xiao P (2010) Use of ITS2 region as the universal DNA barcode for plants and animals. PLoS ONE 5:e13102
Soliman M, Shedeed ZA, Soliman MM (2018) Morphological, biochemical and DNA barcoding characteristics for some Lantana L cultivars growing in Egypt. TropPlant Res 5:207–216
Zhang YP, Tan HH, Cao SY, Wang XC, Yang G, Fang JG (2012) A novel strategy for identification of 47 pomegranate (Punica granatum) cultivars using RAPD markers. Genet Mol Res 11:3032–3041
Khan AS, Ali S, Khan IA (2015) Morphological and molecular characterization and evaluation of mango germplasm: an overview. Sci Hortic 194:353–366
Amar MH, El-Zayat MA (2017) Utilization of ISTR, ISSR and SRAP molecular markers to reveal and classify Egyptian pomegranates ('Punica granatum’ L. Plant Omics 10:237–245
Sau S, Sarkar S, Mitra M, Gantait S (2021) Recent trends in agro-technology, post-harvest management and molecular characterisation of pomegranate. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 96:409–427
Ford CS, Ayres KL, Toomey N, Haider N, Van Alphen Stahl J, Kelly LJ, Wikström N, Hollingsworth PM, Duff RJ, Hoot SB (2009) Selection of candidate coding DNA barcoding regions for use on land plants. Bot J Linn Soc 159:1–11
Clement WL, Donoghue MJ (2012) Barcoding success as a function of phylogenetic relatedness in Viburnum, a clade of woody angiosperms. BMC Evol Biol 12:1–13
Hernandez-Leon S, Gernandt DS, de la Rosa P, Jorge A, Jardon-Barbolla L (2013) Phylogenetic relationships and species delimitation in Pinus section Trifoliae inferrred from plastid DNA. PLoS ONE 8:e70501
Zhang C, Wang F, Yan H, Hao G, Hu C, Ge X (2012) Testing DNA barcoding in closely related groups of Lysimachia L (Myrsinaceae). Mol Ecol Resour 12:98–108
Sarkhosh A, Zamani Z, Fatahi R, Ebadi A (2006) RAPD markers reveal polymorphism among some Iranian pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes. Sci Hortic 111:24–29
Luo X, Li H, Wu Z, Yao W, Zhao P, Cao D, Yu H, Li K, Poudel K, Zhao D (2020) The pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) draft genome dissects genetic divergence between soft-and hard-seeded cultivars. Plant Biotechnol J 18:955–968
Ellegren H, Galtier N (2016) Determinants of genetic diversity. Nat Rev Genet 17:422–433
Sun J, Cornelius SP, Janssen J, Gray KA, Motter AE (2015) Regularity underlies erratic population abundances in marine ecosystems. J R Soc Interface 12:20150235
Bjørnstad ON, Grenfell BT (2001) Noisy clockwork: time series analysis of population fluctuations in animals. Science 293:638–643
Banks SC, Cary GJ, Smith AL, Davies ID, Driscoll DA, Gill AM, Lindenmayer DB, Peakall R (2013) How does ecological disturbance influence genetic diversity? Trends Ecol Evol 28:670–679
Pathirana R, Carimi F (2022) Management and utilization of plant genetic resources for a sustainable agriculture. Plants 11:2038
Whittle C (2006) The influence of environmental factors, the pollen: ovule ratio and seed bank persistence on molecular evolutionary rates in plants. J Evol Biol 19:302–308
Ranade SA, Rana TS, Narzary D (2009) SPAR profiles and genetic diversity amongst pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) genotypes. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 15:61–70
Yan M, Zhao X, Zhou J, Huo Y, Ding Y, Yuan Z (2019) The complete chloroplast genomes of Punica granatum and a comparison with other species in Lythraceae. Int J Mol Sci 20:2886
Guo L, Ge D, Yuan R, Dong J, Zhao X, Liu X, Yuan Z (2022) The comparative analysis and identification of secondary metabolites between Tibet wild and cultivated pomegranates (Punica granatum L.) in China. J Integr Agric 21:736–750
Feng L, Yang X, Jiao Q, Wang C, Yin Y, Tao J (2020) Characterization of the complete chloroplast genome of Punica granatum ‘Luqing1.’ Mitochondrial DNA Part B 5:2578–2579
Zhang T, Liu C, Huang X, Zhang H, Yuan Z (2019) Land-plant phylogenomic and pomegranate transcriptomic analyses reveal an evolutionary scenario of CYP75 genes subsequent to whole genome duplications. J Plant Biol 62:48–60
Yan M, Zhao X, Zhao Y, Ren Y, Yuan Z (2019) The complete chloroplast genome sequence of pomegranate ‘Bhagwa.’ Mitochondrial DNA Part B 4:1967–1968
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was funded by the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia, under Grant number MOE-BU-3-2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, FOA and HMD; methodology, FOA; writing—original draft preparation, FOA; writing—review and editing, FOA and HMD. Manuscript final revision: MA, DA, and SZ.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No relevant financial or non-financial interests are disclosed by the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this article was revised: the name of one author was not correct.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Omari Alzahrani, F., Dguimi, H.M., Alshaharni, M.O. et al. Employing plant DNA barcodes for pomegranate species identification in Al-Baha Region, Saudi Arabia. J.Umm Al-Qura Univ. Appll. Sci. 10, 136–144 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-023-00087-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-023-00087-w