Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental study on effects of air injection on cavitation pressure pulsation and vibration in a centrifugal pump with inducer

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cavitation commonly induces performance deterioration and system vibration in many engineering applications. This paper aims to investigate the effects of air injection on cavitation evolution, pressure pulsation and vibration in a centrifugal pump with inducer. In this paper, the high-speed camera is used to capture the gas flow pattern and cavitation evolution process in the inducer. The impacts of air injection on the inlet pressure pulsation and vibration are also investigated. The results show that the cavitation development in the inducer undergoes four patterns: incipient cavitation, sheet cavitation, cloud cavitation and super cavitation. During the development of cavitation, the main frequency of the pressure pulsation shifts to lower frequencies, and the amplitude of the vibration increases. In addition, air injection promotes the incipient cavitation but delays the cavitation development. A small amount of air can effectively decrease amplitudes of pressure pulsation and vibration. But as the air content increases, the fluctuations and amplitudes of pressure pulsation and vibration increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brennen C. E. Cavitation and bubble dynamics [M]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Xiang L., Li C. L., Xu K. F. et al. Inducer super-synchronous rotating cavitation propagation mechanism [J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2022, 48(2): 76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huang X. L., Chen W., Wang W. T. et al. Performance of high-speed centrifugal pump with different pre-positioned inducer [J]. Journal of Rocket Propulsion, 2020, 46(2): 64–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng H. Y., Bai X. R., Long X. P. et al. Large eddy simulation of the tip-leakage cavitating flow with an insight on how cavitation influences vorticity and turbulence [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2020, 77: 788–809.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Z., Cheng H., Ji B. et al. Numerical investigation of inner structure and its formation mechanism of cloud cavitating flow [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2023, 165: 104484.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng H. Y., Ji B., Long X. P. et al. A review of cavitation in tip-leakage flow and its control [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2021, 33(2): 226–242.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stutz B. Influence of roughness on the two-phase flow structure of sheet cavitation [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2003, 125: 652–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu Q., Huang B., Wang G. et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of hydroelastic response of a flexible hydrofoil in cavitating flow [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015, 74: 19–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kadivar E., Lin Y. X., Moctar O. Experimental investigation of the effects of cavitation control on the dynamics of cavitating flows around a circular cylinder [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 286: 115634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jia J., Zhang J., Huang Z. Cavitation flow and broadband noise source characteristics of NACA66 hydrofoil with a V groove on the suction surface [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 266: 112889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chatterjee D., Arakeri V. H. Towards the concept of hydrodynamic cavitation control [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1997, 332: 377–394.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chatterjee D., Arakeri V. H. Some investigations on the use of ultrasonics in traveling bubble cavitation control [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 504: 365–389.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Timoshevskiy M. V., Zapryagaev I. I., Pervunina K. S. et al. Manipulating cavitation by a wall jet: Experiments on a 2D hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018, 99: 312–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang W., Zhang Q., Tang T. et al. Numerical study of the impact of water injection holes arrangement on cavitation flow control [J]. Science Progress, 2020, 103(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chahine G. L., Frederick G. F., Bateman R. D. Propeller tip vortex cavitation suppression using selective polymer injection [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1993, 115(3): 497–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang N., Ganesh H., Yakushiji R. Tip vortex cavitation suppression by active mass injection [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2011, 133(11): 111301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ji B., Luo X. W., Peng X. X. Numerical investigation of the ventilated cavitating flow around an under-water vehicle based on a three-component cavitation model [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010, 23(6): 753–759.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang G., Kong D., Wu Q. et al. Physical and numerical study on unsteady shedding behaviors of ventilated partial cavitating flow around an axisymmetric body [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 197: 106884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Arndt R. E. A., Ellis C. R., Paul S. Preliminary investigation of the use of air injection to mitigate cavitation erosion [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1995, 117(3): 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen X. P., Xi R. Z., Shao D. C. New concept of air entrainment effect on mitigating cavitation damage [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, (8): 70–74(in Chinese).

  21. Mäkiharju S. A., Ganesh H., Ceccio S. L. Effect of non-condensable gas injection on cavitation dynamics of partial cavities [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2015, 656: 012161.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wu J. H., Su K. P., Wang Y. et al. Effect of air bubble size on cavitation erosion reduction [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2017, 60(4): 523–528.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Russell S. O., Sheehan G. J. Effect of entrained air on cavitation damage [J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1974, 1(1): 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Luo J., Xu W. L., Niu Z. P. et al. Experimental study of the interaction between the spark-induced cavitation bubble and the air bubble [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2013, 25(6): 895–902.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Luo J., Xu W. L., Li R. Collapse of cavitation bubbles near air bubbles [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2020, 32(5): 929–941.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Xu W. L., Li J. B., Luo J. et al. Effect of a single air bubble on the collapse direction and collapse noise of a cavitation bubble [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2021, 120: 110218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J. B., Xu W. L., Zhai Y. W. et al. Influence of multiple air bubbles on the collapse strength of a cavitation bubble [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2021, 123: 110328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ukon Y. Cavitation characteristics of a finite swept wing and cavitation noise reduction due to air injection [C]. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Propeller and Cavitation, Wuxi, China, 1986, 383–390.

  29. Wang C., Huang B., Zhang M. et al. Effects of air injection on the characteristics of unsteady sheet/cloud cavitation shedding in the convergent-divergent channel [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018, 106: 1–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ye J. M., Xiong Y., Li F. et al. Experimental study of effects of air content on cavitation and pressure fluctuations [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2010, 22(5): 634–638.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lu X. X., Wang D. M., Shen W. et al. Experimental investigation on the performance of improving jet pump cavitation with air suction [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2015, 88: 379–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lannetti A., Stickland M. T., Dempster W. M. A CFD and experimental study on cavitation in positive displacement pumps: Benefits and drawbacks of the ‘full’ cavitation model [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2016, 10(1): 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

(This research received other funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hou-lin Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Hou-lin Liu is editorial board member for the Journal of Hydrodynamics and was not involved in the editorial review, or the decision to publish this article. All authors declare that there are no other competing interests.

Ethical approval: This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51979126).

Biography: Yan-hong Mao (1997-), Female, Ph. D. Candidate

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mao, Yh., Liu, Hl., Wang, Y. et al. Experimental study on effects of air injection on cavitation pressure pulsation and vibration in a centrifugal pump with inducer. J Hydrodyn 35, 1168–1178 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-024-0086-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-024-0086-7

Key words

Navigation