Abstract
Creative cognition and figural fluency are two closely related concepts. Previous studies suggest different brain regions involved in figural fluency, creativity, and divergent thinking including frontal and parietal cortices. Furthermore, neural underpinning of the figural fluency is yet to be studied. This study aimes to investigate effects of modulation of cortical excitability in the right posterior parietal cortex (r-PPC) and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC) on figural fluency using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Twenty neurologically unimpaired participants (mean age 27.55, SD = 5.11) received anodal r-PPC (P4), anodal l-DLPFC (F3), and sham tDCS (15 min, 1.5 mA) with 72-h interval between each stimulation condition. After 5 min of stimulation, participants underwent the Five-Point Test (FPT) which is a measure of figural fluency. Results showed that although participants produced more unique figures under both stimulation montages, they significantly produced more unique designs under anodal r-PPC tDCS compared to anodal l-DLPFC and sham tDCS. Findings imply that figural fluency is more dependent on the activation of the right posterior regions of parietal cortex, which is associated with spatial cognition, visual attention, cognitive flexibility, and creative cognition, but may partially benefit from activation of prefrontal regions too. tDCS has beneficial effects in enhancing figural fluency and potentially creative cognition as well as potential therapeutic effects in disorders suffering from impaired figural fluency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, A., Beudt, S., Ott, D. V. M., & Yves von Cramon, D. (2012). Creative cognition and the brain: Dissociations between frontal, parietal–temporal and basal ganglia groups. Brain Research, 1482, 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2012.09.007.
Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2017). Latency predicts category switch in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000091.
Behrmann, M., Geng, J. J., & Shomstein, S. (2004). Parietal cortex and attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.012.
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.05.007.
Brunoni, A. R., & Vanderhasselt, M.-A. (2014). Working memory improvement with non-invasive brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain and Cognition, 86, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2014.01.008.
Cattaneo, Z., Pisoni, A., & Papagno, C. (2011). Transcranial direct current stimulation over Broca’s region improves phonemic and semantic fluency in healthy individuals. Neuroscience, 183, 64–70.
Cerruti, C., & Schlaug, G. (2009). Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex enhances complex verbal associative thought. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1980–1987. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21143.
Chi, R. P., & Snyder, A. W. (2011). Facilitate insight by non-invasive brain stimulation. PLoS One, 6, e16655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016655.
Chrysikou, E. G., Hamilton, R. H., Coslett, H. B., Datta, A., Bikson, M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2013). Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use. Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 81–89.
Coffman, B. A., Clark, V. P., & Parasuraman, R. (2014). Battery powered thought: Enhancement of attention, learning, and memory in healthy adults using transcranial direct current stimulation. NeuroImage, 85(Part 3), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.083.
Curtis, C. E. (2006). Prefrontal and parietal contributions to spatial working memory. Neuroscience, 139, 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.04.070.
Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Gebauer, D., Reishofer, G., Koschutnig, K., & Ebner, F. (2010). Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: Evidence from an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 52, 1687–1695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.05.072.
Flöel, A., Rösser, N., Michka, O., Knecht, S., & Breitenstein, C. (2008). Noninvasive brain stimulation improves language learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1415–1422. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20098.
Forthmann B, Wilken A, Doebler P, Holling H (2016) Strategy induction enhances creativity in figural divergent thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior.
Foster, P. S., Williamson, J. B., & Harrison, D. W. (2005). The Ruff Figural Fluency Test: Heightened right frontal lobe delta activity as a function of performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2004.09.010.
Gandiga, P. C., Hummel, F. C., & Cohen, L. G. (2006). Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 845–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003.
Gill, J., Shah-Basak, P. P., & Hamilton, R. (2015). It’s the thought that counts: Examining the task-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on executive function. Brain Stimulation, 8, 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.018.
Gladwin, T. E., den Uyl, T. E., Fregni, F. F., & Wiers, R. W. (2012). Enhancement of selective attention by tDCS: Interaction with interference in a Sternberg task. Neuroscience Letters, 512, 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.01.056.
Goebel, S., Fischer, R., Ferstl, R., & Mehdorn, H. M. (2009). Normative data and psychometric properties for qualitative and quantitative scoring criteria of the Five-point Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 675–690.
Hsu, T.-Y., et al. (2011). Modulating inhibitory control with direct current stimulation of the superior medial frontal cortex. NeuroImage, 56, 2249–2257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.059.
Husain, M., & Nachev, P. (2007). Space and the parietal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.011.
Javadi, A. H., & Walsh, V. (2012). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates declarative memory. Brain Stimulation, 5, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.06.007.
Lee, G. P., Strauss, E., Loring, D. W., McCloskey, L., Haworth, J. M., & Lehman, R. A. (1997). Sensitivity of figural fluency on the five-point test to focal neurological dysfunction. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 59–68.
Luft, C. D. B., Zioga, I., Banissy, M. J., & Bhattacharya, J. (2017). Relaxing learned constraints through cathodal tDCS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Scientific Reports, 7, 2916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03022-2.
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.
Monti, A., Ferrucci, R., Fumagalli, M., Mameli, F., Cogiamanian, F., Ardolino, G., & Priori, A. (2013). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and language. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 84, 832–842.
Nejati, V., Salehinejad, M. A., & Nitsche, M. A. (2017a). Interaction of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (l-DLPFC) and right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in hot and cold executive functions: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.10.042.
Nejati, V., Salehinejad, M. A., Nitsche, M. A., Najian, A., & Javadi, A.-H. (2017b). Transcranial direct current stimulation improves executive dysfunctions in ADHD: Implications for inhibitory control, interference control, working memory, and cognitive flexibility. Journal of Attention Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054717730611.
Nejati, V., Salehinejad, M. A., Shahidi, N., & Abedin, A. (2017c). Psychological intervention combined with direct electrical brain stimulation (PIN-CODES) for treating major depression: A pre-test, post-test, follow-up pilot study. Neurology, Psychiatry and Brain Research, 25, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npbr.2017.05.003.
Nitsche, M. A., Boggio, P. S., Fregni, F., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2009). Treatment of depression with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): A review. Experimental Neurology, 219, 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.038.
Nitsche, M. A., et al. (2007). Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 3109–3117. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01312.2006.
Nitsche, M. A., Kuo, M.-F., Paulus, W., & Antal, A. (2015). Transcranial direct current stimulation: protocols and physiological mechanisms of action. In H. Knotkova & D. Rasche (Eds.), Textbook of neuromodulation: Principles, methods and clinical applications (pp. 101–111). New York: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1408-1_9.
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Intelligence, 39, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.11.002.
Palm, U., et al. (2013). Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Brain Stimulation, 6, 690–695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.005.
Regard, M., Strauss, E., & Knapp, P. (1982). Children’s production on verbal and non-verbal fluency tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 839–844. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1982.55.3.839.
Ross, T. P., Lindsay Foard, E., Berry Hiott, F., & Vincent, A. (2003). The reliability of production strategy scores for the Ruff Figural Fluency Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 879–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0887-6177(02)00163-4.
Ruff, R. (2011). Design fluency test. In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, & B. Caplan (Eds.), Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology (pp. 821–822). New York: Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_1426.
Ruff, R. M., Allen, C. C., Farrow, C. E., Niemann, H., & Wylie, T. (1994). Figural fluency: Differential impairment in patients with left versus right frontal lobe lesions. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-6177(94)90013-2.
Ruff, R. M., Light, R. H., & Evans, R. W. (1987). The ruff figural fluency test: A normative study with adults. Developmental Neuropsychology, 3, 37–51.
Ruff, R. M., Marshall, L. F., & Evans, R. (1986). Impaired verbal and figural fluency after head injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-6177(86)90009-0.
Runco MA (1991) Divergent thinking. Ablex Norwood, NJ.
Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 93–96.
Salehinejad, M. A., Ghanavai, E., Rostami, R., & Nejati, V. (2017a). Cognitive control dysfunction in emotion dysregulation and psychopathology of major depression (MD): Evidence from transcranial brain stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Journal of Affective Disorders, 210, 241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.036.
Salehinejad, M. A., Nejati, V., & Derakhshan, M. (2017b). Neural correlates of trait resiliency: Evidence from electrical stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dLPFC) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.005.
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Adler, N., Aharon-Peretz, J., Perry, D., & Mayseless, N. (2011). The origins of originality: The neural bases of creative thinking and originality. Neuropsychologia, 49, 178–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.020.
Silvia, P. J., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: Exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 68.
Tucha, L., Aschenbrenner, S., Koerts, J., & Lange, K. W. (2012). The Five-Point Test: Reliability, validity and normative data for children and adults. PLoS One, 7, e46080.
Utz, K. S., Dimova, V., Oppenländer, K., & Kerkhoff, G. (2010). Electrified minds: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) as methods of non-invasive brain stimulation in neuropsychology—A review of current data and future implications. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2789–2810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.06.002.
van Eersel, M. E. A., Joosten, H., Koerts, J., Gansevoort, R. T., Slaets, J. P. J., & Izaks, G. J. (2015). Longitudinal study of performance on the ruff figural fluency test in persons aged 35 years or older. PLoS One, 10, e0121411. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121411.
Veijola, J., Jokelainen, J., Läksy, K., Kantojärvi, L., Kokkonen, P., Järvelin, M. R., Joukamaa, M. (2003). The Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 in screening DSM-III-R axis-I disorders. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 57(2), 119–123.
Ward J (2015) The student’s guide to cognitive neuroscience. Psychology Press.
Wassermann, E. M., & Grafman, J. (2005). Recharging cognition with DC brain polarization. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 503–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.001.
Wysokiński, A., Zboralski, K., Orzechowska, A., Gałecki, P., Florkowski, A., & Talarowska, M. (2010). Normalization of the Verbal Fluency Test on the basis of results for healthy subjects, patients with schizophrenia, patients with organic lesions of the chronic nervous system and patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes. Archives of Medical Science : AMS, 6, 438–446. https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2010.14268.
Zalonis, I., et al. (2017). Verbal and figural fluency in temporal lobe epilepsy: Does hippocampal sclerosis affect performance? Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 30, 48–56.
Zmigrod, S., Colzato, L. S., & Hommel, B. (2015). Stimulating creativity: Modulation of convergent and divergent thinking by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Creativity Research Journal, 27, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1087280.
Acknowledgements
We appreciate participants for taking part in this study. The authors are grateful of the reviewers for their insightful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ghanavati, E., Nejati, V. & Salehinejad, M.A. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Posterior Parietal Cortex (PPC) Enhances Figural Fluency: Implications for Creative Cognition. J Cogn Enhanc 2, 88–96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0059-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-017-0059-7