Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of mutual interference of piers on their local scour phenomenon

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Local scour is a phenomenon considering a three-dimensional flow system which sets up around bridge piers and abutments constructed in alluvial bed rivers. The process of local scour can bring about partial inability or complete breakdown of bridge supports and decks. The current investigation involves a series of analyses to determine the effect of mutual interference of bridge piers of various materials with varying distances between them and express the observations with the distinctive parameters of the analysis. With an isolated single pier as standard, tests with piers of five different materials were conducted under clear water conditions. The outcome revealed that the interference between two piers was most prominent at a spacing of two times the pier diameter which was then reduced at increased pier spacing. However, at a spacing of about eight times the pier diameter, the two piers behave as individual piers without affecting the scour depths around the other pier. Further, the surface roughness of the pier bears an inverse relation with scour depth and the interference effects get reduced with increasing surface roughness of the pier. In addition, the increase in the Froude number results in an increase in the scour depth around both upstream and downstream piers and the critical spacing ratio at which the interference is maximum increases with increasing Froude number. Following the experimental outcomes of the present analysis, a model for equilibrium scour depth at complex piers is formulated and validated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(D\) :

Pier diameter

\(D_{10}\) :

Effective size

\(D_{30}\) :

Size at which 30% is finer by weight

\(D_{50}\) :

Median grain size

\(D_{60}\) :

Size at which 60% is finer by weight

\(F_{r}\) :

Froude number

\(q\) :

Discharge intensity

\(C_{d}\) :

Coefficient of discharge

\(y\) :

Flow depth

\(X\) :

Clear spacing between two in-line piers

\(X\)/\(D\) :

Pier spacing ratio (ratio of spacing between piers and pier diameter)

\(D_{s}\) :

Maximum scour depth around individual pier

\(D_{s1}\) :

Maximum scour depth around upstream pier for two in-line piers

\(D_{s2}\) :

Maximum scour depth around downstream pier for two in-line piers

\(C_{u}\) :

Uniformity coefficient

\(C_{c}\) :

Coefficient of curvature

\(f\) :

Silt factor

\(k\) :

Absolute surface roughness of the pier materials

References

  1. Shahriar AR, Gabr MA (2021) Bridge Pier Scour: an overview of factors affecting the phenomenon and comparative evaluation of selected models. Transp Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pizarro A, Manfreda S, Tubaldi E (2020) The Science behind scour at Bridge foundations: a review. Water. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Malik R, Setia B (2013) Experimental study on behaviour of closely placed bridge pier models. National Conference on Current Advances in Hydraulics, Hydropower Engineering and Water Conservation (CAHHEWC-2013), National Institute of Technology Kurukshetra

  4. Keaton Jeffrey R, Mishra Subhendu K, Clopper Paul E (2010) Scour at bridge foundations on rock: overview of NCHRP Project No. 24–29. In: Proceedings 5th international conference on scour and erosion (ICSE-5), San Francisco, USA Reston, Va: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp 749–756

  5. Duan H, Cao J, Zhang Y, Huang Y, Wei S, Jiang Y (2021) Summary of research on evaluation of local scour around bridge pier. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/692/4/042023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rady RAE (2020) Prediction of local scour around bridge piers: Artificial-intelligence-based modelling versus conventional regression methods. Appl Water Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-020-1140-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deng L, Cai CS (2010) Bridge scour: prediction, modelling, monitoring, and countermeasures-review. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 15(2):125–134. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferraro D, Tafarojnoruz A, Gaudio R, Cardoso AH (2013) Effects of pile cap thickness on the maximum scour depth at a complex pier. J Hydraul Eng 139(5):482–491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barkdoll BD (2012) Effects of climate change on bridge scour. World Environ Water Resour Congress 2012:2532–2537. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784412312.253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alexandros NK, Imam B (2016) Probabilistic assessment of local scour in bridge piers under changing environmental conditions. Struct Infrastruct Eng 12(9):1228–1241. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1102295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laursen EM, Toch A (1956) Scour around bridge piers and abutments. Bulletin No 4. Iowa Highway Research Board, Bureau of Public Roads, Iowa

  12. Breusers HNC, Raudkivi AJ (1991) Scouring. Hydraulic structures design manual, Vol 2, AA Balkmea, Rotterdam

  13. Kothyari UC, Garde RCJ, Raju KGR (1992) Temporal variation of scour around circular bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 118:1091–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Melville BW (1997) Pier and abutment scour: integrated approach. J Hydraul Eng 123(2):125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heza YBM, Soliman AM, Saleh SA (2007) Prediction of the scour hole geometry around exposed bridge circular-pile foundation. J Eng Appl Sci 54(4):375–392

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hafez YI (2016) Mathematical modelling of local scour at slender and wide bridge piers. J Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4835253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mir BH, Lone MA, Bhat JA (2017) Effect of obstacle material type on local scour. Int J Adv Struct Geotech Eng 6(3):114–119

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mir BH, Lone MA, Bhat JA, Rather NA (2018) Effect of gradation of bed material on local scour depth. Geotechnol Geol Eng 36:2505–2516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mir BH, Lone MA, Rather NA (2019) Significance of shape factor of obstacle on local scour. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civil Eng 43(1):S323–S330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Qi M, Li J, Chen Q (2016) Comparison of existing equations for local scour at bridge piers: parameter influence and validation. Nat Hazards 82:2089–2105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2287-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vonkeman JK, Basson GR (2019) Evaluation of empirical equations to predict bridge pier scour in a non-cohesive bed under clear-water conditions. J South Afr Inst Civil Eng https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8775/2019/v61n2a1

  22. Annad M, Lefkir A, Mammar-Kouadri M, Bettahar I (2021) Development of a local scour prediction model clustered by soil class. Water Practice Technol 16(4):1159–1172. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2021.065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ghaderi A, Abbaszadeh Shahri A, Larsson S (2019) An artificial neural network based model to predict spatial soil type distribution using piezocone penetration test data (CPTu). Bull Eng Geol Env 78:4579–4588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1400-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sumer BM, Bundgaard K, Fredsoe J (2005) Global and local scour at pile groups. In: Fifteenth international offshore and polar engineering conference, Seoul, Korea

  25. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Baratian GZ, Beheshtia A (2010) Experimental investigation of clear water local scour of compound piers. J Hydraul Eng 136(6):343–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Amini A, Melville BW, Ali TM, Ghazali AH (2012) Clear-water local scour around pile groups in shallow-water flow. J Hydraul Eng 138:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943.7900.0000488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Malik R, Setia B (2019) Interference Effects around Bridge Piers- A Review of Parameters. J Indian Water Resour Soc 38(4)

  28. Malik R, Setia B (2020) Interference between pier models and its effects on scour depth. SN Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1868-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Malik R, Setia B (2020) Prediction of scour depth around bridge piers in tandem arrangement using M5 and ANN regression models. Arch Mater Sci Eng 102(2):49–58. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hassan ZF, Karim I, Shukur AHK (2020) Effect of interaction between bridge piers on local scouring in cohesive soils. Civil Eng J 6(4), 659–669. https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2020-03091498

  31. Khaple S, Hanmaiahgari PR, Gaudio R, Dey S (2017) Interference of an upstream pier on local scour at downstream piers. Acta Geophys 65:29–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-017-0004-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hannah CR (1978) Scour at pile groups. Univ Canterbury, NZ, Civil Eng Res REP, No 78–3:92

    Google Scholar 

  33. Movahedi N, Dehghani AA, Aarabi MJ, Zahiri AR (2013) Temporal evolution of local scour depth around side-by-side piers. J Civil Eng Urban 3(3):82–86

    Google Scholar 

  34. Beg M (2004) Mutual Interference of bridge piers on local scour. In: Proceeding’s 2nd international conference on scour and erosion (ICSE-2), Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

  35. Keshavarzi A, Shrestha CK, Melville B, Khabbaz H, Zahedani MR, Ball J (2018) Estimation of maximum scour depths at upstream of front and rear piers for two in-line circular columns. Environ Fluid Mech 18(2):537–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-017-9572-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Khan KA, Muzzammil M, Alam J (2016) Bridge pier scour: a review of mechanism, causes and geotechnical aspects. In: Proceedings of advances in geotechnical engineering, national conference on ‘advances in geotechnical engineering’ (AGE-2016), Aligarh Muslim University, India

  37. Barry JJ, Buffington JM, King JG (2004) A general power equation for predicting bed load transport rates in gravel bed rivers. Water Resourc Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Asheghi R, Hosseini SA, Sanei M (2021) Intelligent hybridized modeling approach to predict the bedload sediments in gravel-bed rivers. Model Earth Syst Environ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01165-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chiew YM, Melville BW (1987) Local scour around bridge piers. J Hydraul Res 25(1):15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ettema R (1980) Scour at bridge piers. Reg No 216, School of Engineering, Auckland University, Auckland

  41. Yang Y, Qi M, Wang X, Li J (2020) Experimental study of scour around pile groups in steady flows. Ocean Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Igarashi T (1981) Characteristics of the flow around two circular cylinders arranged in tandem: 1st report. Bull JSME 24(188):323–331. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsme1958.24.323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Abbaszadeh Shahri S, Larrson S, Renkel C (2020) Artificial intelligence models to generate visualized bedrock level: a case study in Sweden. Model Earth Syst Environ 6:1509–1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00767-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Melville BW, Coleman SE (2000) Bridge scour. Water Resources Publications, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sheppard DM, Melville B, Demir H (2014) Evaluation of existing equations for local scour at bridge piers. J Hydraul Eng 140:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hamby DM (1994) A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models. Environ Monit Assess 32:135–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gaudio R, Tafazojnoruz A, Bartolo SD (2013) Sensitivity analysis of bridge pier scour depth predictive formulae. J Hydroinf 15(3):939–951. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2013.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Asheghi R, Hosseini SA, Saneie M, Shahri AA (2020) Updating the neural network sediment load models using different sensitivity analysis methods: a regional application. J Hydroinf 22(3):562–577. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2020.098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. DaDalt PJ, Wolf JG (2020) Sensitivity and Simulation Analysis in Excel Without Programming. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3623496

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this paper are highly grateful to the staff of Fluid Mechanics Laboratory of the National Institute of Technology, Srinagar, for providing every facility for carrying out the experimental work for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Srinagar, India

    Rehab Jan & M. A. Lone

Authors
  1. Rehab Jan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. Lone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rehab Jan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jan, R., Lone, M.A. Effect of mutual interference of piers on their local scour phenomenon. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 7, 186 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00790-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00790-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation