Abstract
Geopolymer concrete (GPC) is a sustainable substitute for ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete in the construction field. It makes use of materials abundant in alumina and silica that combine with an alkaline solution to form aluminosilicate gel which combines the aggregate and binder, forming three-dimensional polymeric bond structures, ultimately creating geopolymer concrete. GPC effectively tackles the challenges posed by exhausting natural resources and the high carbon dioxide emissions associated with cement production. Sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate are commonly used as alkaline activators in the production of GPC. To achieve the desired outcomes in GPC, a variety of binders, including waste materials such as fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, metakaolin, and rice husk ash, can be utilized either individually or in combination with additives. GPC generally outperforms OPC in terms of properties. It exhibits higher compressive strength, especially with an increased fluid–binder ratio. GPC's numerous Al–O and Si–O structures make it resistant to acid attacks, ideal for acid-resistant products. It also has lower water absorption due to a denser microstructure. Adding fibers, such as steel fibers, can enhance certain properties. Also, extended curing time and high temperatures improve GPC properties. However, GPC is susceptible to carbonation, leading to a decrease in pH and corrosion of rebars. Overall, GPC offers better performance than OPC and addresses environmental concerns associated with cement production. It is a widely accepted sustainable alternative in academia and research, but it faces challenges in industrial applications due to its varied raw materials and the need for significant investment in their development and certification. The construction and manufacturing sectors typically exhibit a cautious approach when it comes to embracing novel products, and geopolymer concrete might not completely align with regulatory standards, especially regarding its rheological properties and chemical composition. Extensive laboratory and field investigations are going on to collect comprehensive information regarding the engineering characteristics and durability of these composites in different service conditions, laying the foundation for their practical use in the construction industry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah MMAB, Faris MA, Tahir MFM, Kadir AA, Sandu AV, Mat Isa NAA, Corbu O (2017) Performance and characterization of geopolymer concrete reinforced with short steel fiber. IOP Conf Series: Mater Sci Eng 209(1):012038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/209/1/012038
Abhilash P, Sashidhar C, Reddy R (2008) Evaluation of performance of Geopolymer Concrete in acid environment. Int. Res J Eng Technol, 1433. www.irjet.net
Adak D, Mandal S (2019) Strength and durability performance of fly ash-based process-modified geopolymer concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 31(9):04019174. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002793
Adak D, Sarkar M, Mandal S (2014) Effect of nano-silica on strength and durability of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 70:453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2014.07.093
Adam AA, Deviana L, Siregar APN, Mustofa. (2023) Water absorption of ambient-cured geopolymer concrete. IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1157/1/012025
Ahmed HU, Mohammed AA, Rafiq S, Mohammed AS, Mosavi A, Sor NH, Qaidi SMA (2021) Compressive strength of sustainable geopolymer concrete composites: a state-of-the-art review. Sustainability 13(24):13502. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU132413502
Alanazi H, Yang M, Zhang D, Gao Z (2016) Early strength and durability of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete. Magazine of Concrete Res 69(1):46–54. https://doi.org/10.1680/JMACR.16.00118
Al-Azzawi M, Yu T, Hadi MNS (2018) Factors Affecting the bond strength between the fly ash-based geopolymer concrete and steel reinforcement. Structures 14:262–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2018.03.010
Albidah A, Alghannam M, Abbas H, Almusallam T, Al-Salloum Y (2021) Characteristics of metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete for different mix design parameters. J Market Res 10:84–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2020.11.104
Albidah A, Alqarni AS, Abbas H, Almusallam T, Al-Salloum Y (2022) Behavior of Metakaolin-based geopolymer concrete at ambient and elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 317:125910. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.125910
Albitar M, Mohamed Ali MS, Visintin P, Drechsler M (2017) Durability evaluation of geopolymer and conventional concretes. Constr Build Mater 136:374–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.01.056
Albitar M, Visintin P, Mohamed Ali MS, Drechsler M (2015) Assessing behaviour of fresh and hardened geopolymer concrete mixed with class-F fly ash. KSCE J Civ Eng 19(5):1445–1455. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12205-014-1254-Z/METRICS
Aliabdo AA, Abd Elmoaty AEM, Salem HA (2016) Effect of water addition, plasticizer and alkaline solution constitution on fly ash based geopolymer concrete performance. Constr Build Mater 121:694–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.06.062
Al-mashhadani MM, Canpolat O (2020) Effect of various NaOH molarities and various filling materials on the behavior of fly ash based geopolymer composites. Constr Build Mater 262:120560. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.120560
Al-mashhadani MM, Canpolat O, Aygörmez Y, Uysal M, Erdem S (2018) Mechanical and microstructural characterization of fiber reinforced fly ash based geopolymer composites. Constr Build Mater 167:505–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.02.061
Althoey F, Zaid O, Alsulamy S, Martínez-García R, De Prado Gil J, Arbili MM (2023) Determining engineering properties of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete modified with different waste materials. PLoS ONE 18(5):e0285692. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0285692
Alzeebaree R, Çevik A, Nematollahi B, Sanjayan J, Mohammedameen A, Gülşan ME (2019) Mechanical properties and durability of unconfined and confined geopolymer concrete with fiber reinforced polymers exposed to sulfuric acid. Constr Build Mater 215:1015–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.04.165
Amorim Júnior NS, Andrade Neto JS, Santana HA, Cilla MS, Ribeiro DV (2021) Durability and service life analysis of metakaolin-based geopolymer concretes with respect to chloride penetration using chloride migration test and corrosion potential. Constr Build Mater 287:122970. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.122970
Amran M, Debbarma S, Ozbakkaloglu T (2021) Fly ash-based eco-friendly geopolymer concrete: a critical review of the long-term durability properties. Constr Build Mater 270:121857. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.121857
Annapurna D, Kishore R, Anil K (2020) Effect of Different aggregates on alkali silica reaction of geopolymer. Concrete. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24314-2_2
Arham A, Sc AM (2009) Strength and durability properties of alkali activated slag and fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. https://researchrepository.rmit.edu.au/esploro/outputs/9921861379101341
Azarsa P, Gupta R (2020) Comparative study involving effect of curing regime on elastic modulus of geopolymer concrete. Buildings 10(6):101. https://doi.org/10.3390/BUILDINGS10060101
Aziz IH, Abdullah MMAB, Mohd Salleh MAA, Azimi EA, Chaiprapa J, Sandu AV (2020) Strength development of solely ground granulated blast furnace slag geopolymers. Constr Build Mater 250:118720. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.118720
Bahmani H, Mostofinejad D (2023) A review of engineering properties of ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete. Develop Built Environ 14:100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DIBE.2023.100126
Bakharev T (2005) Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack. Cem Concr Res 35(4):658–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2004.06.005
Barbosa VFF, MacKenzie KJD, Thaumaturgo C (2000) Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: sodium polysialate polymers. Int J Inorg Mater 2(4):309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1466-6049(00)00041-6
Bellum RR, Muniraj K, Madduru SRC (2020) Characteristic evaluation of geopolymer concrete for the development of road network: sustainable infrastructure. Innovative Infrastruct Solutions 5(3):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41062-020-00344-5/METRICS
Bellum RR, Venkatesh C, Madduru SRC (2021) Influence of red mud on performance enhancement of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Innovative Infrastruct Solutions 6(4):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/S41062-021-00578-X/METRICS
Bernal SA, Mejía De Gutiérrez R, Provis JL (2012) Engineering and durability properties of concretes based on alkali-activated granulated blast furnace slag/metakaolin blends. Constr Build Mater 33:99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2012.01.017
Billong N, Kinuthia J, Oti J, Melo UC (2018) Performance of sodium silicate free geopolymers from metakaolin (MK) and Rice Husk Ash (RHA): effect on tensile strength and microstructure. Constr Build Mater 189:307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.09.001
Çelik Aİ, Özbayrak A, Şener A, Acar MC (2022) Effect of activators in different ratios on compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Can J Civil Eng 50(2):69–79. https://doi.org/10.1139/CJCE-2021-0529
Chindaprasirt P, Chalee W (2014) Effect of sodium hydroxide concentration on chloride penetration and steel corrosion of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete under marine site. Constr Build Mater 63:303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2014.04.010
Chindaprasirt P, De Silva P, Sagoe-Crentsil K, Hanjitsuwan S (2012) Effect of SiO 2 and Al 2O 3on the setting and hardening of high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer systems. J Mater Sci 47(12):4876–4883. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-012-6353-Y/TABLES/4
Chindaprasirt P, Lao-un J, Zaetang Y, Wongkvanklom A, Phoo-ngernkham T, Wongsa A, Sata V (2022) Thermal insulating and fire resistance performances of geopolymer mortar containing auto glass waste as fine aggregate. J Build Eng 60:105178. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2022.105178
Chindaprasirt P, Rukzon S (2008) Strength, porosity and corrosion resistance of ternary blend Portland cement, rice husk ash and fly ash mortar. Constr Build Mater 22(8):1601–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2007.06.010
Chithambaram SJ, Kumar S, Prasad MM, Adak D (2018) Effect of parameters on the compressive strength of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Struct Concr 19(4):1202–1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/SUCO.201700235
Chouksey A, Verma M, Dev N, Rahman I, Upreti K (2022) An investigation on the effect of curing conditions on the mechanical and microstructural properties of the geopolymer concrete. Mater Res Exp 9(5):055003. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/AC6BE0
Cizer O, Campforts J, van Balen K, Elsen J, van Gemert D (2006) Hardening of calcium hydroxide and calcium silicate binders due to carbonation and hydration. Brittle Matrix Compos 8:589–599. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857093080.589
Das SK, Mishra J, Singh SK, Mustakim SM, Patel A, Das SK, Behera U (2020) Characterization and utilization of rice husk ash (RHA) in fly ash – Blast furnace slag based geopolymer concrete for sustainable future. Mater Today: Proceed 33:5162–5167. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.02.870
Davidovits J (1991) Geopolymers. J Thermal Anal 37(8):1633–1656. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01912193
Deb PS, Nath P, Sarker PK (2014) The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Mater Des 1980–2015(62):32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2014.05.001
Diab MA (2022) Enhancing class F fly ash geopolymer concrete performance using lime and steam curing. J Eng Appl Sci 69(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1186/S44147-022-00111-6/FIGURES/11
Dong M, Elchalakani M, Karrech A, Yang B (2021) Strength and durability of geopolymer concrete with high volume rubber replacement. Constr Build Mater 274:121783. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.121783
Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Mallicoat SW, Kriven WM, Van Deventer JSJ (2005) Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties. Colloids Surf, A 269(1–3):47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2005.06.060
Ekolu S (2017) INVESTIGATION OF MIXTURE FACTORS INFLUENCING ALKALI-SILICA REACTION IN FLY ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER MORTARS. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320877287
Fang G, Ho WK, Tu W, Zhang M (2018) Workability and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash-slag concrete cured at ambient temperature. Constr Build Mater 172:476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.04.008
Feng Y, Zhang Q, Chen Q, Wang D, Guo H, Liu L, Yang Q (2019) Hydration and strength development in blended cement with ultrafine granulated copper slag. PLoS ONE 14(4):e0215677. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0215677
Ferdous M, Kayali O, Khennane A (2013) A detailed procedure of mix design for fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Undefined.
Fernández Bertos M, Simons SJR, Hills CD, Carey PJ (2004) A review of accelerated carbonation technology in the treatment of cement-based materials and sequestration of CO2. J Hazard Mater 112(3):193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2004.04.019
Ganesan N, Abraham R, Deepa Raj S (2015) Durability characteristics of steel fibre reinforced geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 93:471–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2015.06.014
Ganesh AC, Muthukannan M (2021) Development of high performance sustainable optimized fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete and prediction of compressive strength. J Clean Prod 282:124543. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.124543
Ghafoor MT, Khan QS, Qazi AU, Sheikh MN, Hadi MNS (2021) Influence of alkaline activators on the mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Constr Build Mater 273:121752. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.121752
Ghugal YM, Patankar SV, Jamkar SS, Ghugal YM (2013) Effect of water-to-geopolymer binder ratio on the production of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Int J Adv Technol Civil Eng 2:2231–5721. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4792.1284
Gopalakrishna B, Dinakar P (2023) Mix design development of fly ash-GGBS based recycled aggregate geopolymer concrete. J Build Eng 63:105551. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2022.105551
Gruyaert E, Van Den Heede P, De Belie N (2013) Carbonation of slag concrete: effect of the cement replacement level and curing on the carbonation coefficient – Effect of carbonation on the pore structure. Cement Concr Compos 35(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2012.08.024
Gunasekara C, Law D, Bhuiyan S, Setunge S, Ward L (2019) Chloride induced corrosion in different fly ash based geopolymer concretes. Constr Build Mater 200:502–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.12.168
Guo H, Shi C, Guan X, Zhu J, Ding Y, Ling TC, Zhang H, Wang Y (2018) Durability of recycled aggregate concrete – A review. Cement Concr Compos 89:251–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2018.03.008
Gupta N, Gupta A, Saxena KK, Shukla A, Goyal SK (2021) Mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer concrete composite at varying superplasticizer dosage. Mater Today: Proceed 44:12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.05.646
Habeeb GA, Fayyadh MM (2009) Rice husk ash concrete: the effect of rha average particle size on mechanical properties and drying Shrinkage. Undefined.
Hamidi RM, Man Z, Azizli KA (2016) Concentration of NaOH and the effect on the properties of fly ash based geopolymer. Procedia Eng 148:189–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2016.06.568
Handayani L, Aprilia S, RahmawatiAbdullah C, Aulia TB, Ludvig P, Ahmad J (2022) Sodium silicate from rice husk ash and their effects as geopolymer cement. Polymers 14(14):2920. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM14142920
Hardjito D (2005) Studies of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/20.500.11937/634/2/18580_Hardjito2005.pdf
Hardjito D, Rangan BV (2005) Development and properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/20.500.11937/5594/2/19327_downloaded_stream_419.pdf
Hassan A, Arif M, Shariq M (2019) Effect of curing condition on the mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. SN Appl Sci 1(12):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42452-019-1774-8/FIGURES/9
Hassan A, Arif M, Shariq M (2020) Mechanical behaviour and microstructural investigation of geopolymer concrete after exposure to elevated temperatures. Arab J Sci Eng 45(5):3843–3861. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13369-019-04269-9
He J, Jie Y, Zhang J, Yu Y, Zhang G (2013) Synthesis and characterization of red mud and rice husk ash-based geopolymer composites. Cement Concr Compos 37(1):108–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2012.11.010
Hossain SS, Roy PK, Bae CJ (2021) Utilization of waste rice husk ash for sustainable geopolymer: a review. Constr Build Mater 310:125218. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.125218
Hounsi AD, Lecomte-Nana G, Djétéli G, Blanchart P, Alowanou D, Kpelou P, Napo K, Tchangbédji G, Praisler M (2014) How does Na, K alkali metal concentration change the early age structural characteristic of kaolin-based geopolymers. Ceram Int 40(7):8953–8962. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2014.02.052
Hu W, Nie Q, Huang B, Su A, Du Y, Shu X, He Q (2018) Mechanical property and microstructure characteristics of geopolymer stabilized aggregate base. Constr Build Mater 191:1120–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.10.081
Jena S, Panigrahi R, Sahu P (2019) Mechanical and durability properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete with silica fume. J Institution Eng India Series A 100(4):697–705
Jiang C, Gu X, Zhang W, Zou W (2015) Modeling of carbonation in tensile zone of plain concrete beams damaged by cyclic loading. Constr Build Mater 77:479–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2014.12.088
Jindal BB, Parveen Singhal D, Goyal, A. (2018). Predicting relationship between mechanical properties of low calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete. 76(4): 258–265
Jithendra C, Elavenil S (2019) Role of Superplasticizer on GGBS based geopolymer concrete under ambient curing. Mater Today: Proceed 18:148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2019.06.288
Joseph B, Mathew G (2012) Influence of aggregate content on the behavior of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Scientia Iranica 19(5):1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCIENT.2012.07.006
Kamseu E, Beleuk à Moungam LM, Cannio M, Billong N, Chaysuwan D, Melo UC, Leonelli C (2017) Substitution of sodium silicate with rice husk ash-NaOH solution in metakaolin based geopolymer cement concerning reduction in global warming. J Clean Prod, 142: 3050–3060. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.10.164
Kamseu E, Kaze CR, Fekoua JNN, Melo UC, Rossignol S, Leonelli C (2020) Ferrisilicates formation during the geopolymerization of natural Fe-rich aluminosilicate precursors. Mater Chem Phys 240:122062. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2019.122062
Kani EN, Allahverdi A (2009) Effects of curing time and temperature on strength development of inorganic polymeric binder based on natural pozzolan. J Mater Sci 44(12):3088–3097. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-009-3411-1/METRICS
Karim MR, Zain MFM, Jamil M, Lai FC (2015) Development of a zero-cement binder using slag, fly ash, and rice husk ash with chemical activator. Adv Mater Sci Eng, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/247065
Kaur K, Singh J, Kaur M (2018) Compressive strength of rice husk ash based geopolymer: the effect of alkaline activator. Constr Build Mater 169:188–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.02.200
Kaze RC, Beleuk à Moungam LM, Cannio M, Rosa R, Kamseu E, Melo UC, Leonelli C (2018) Microstructure and engineering properties of Fe2O3(FeO)-Al2O3-SiO2 based geopolymer composites. J Clean Prod, 199, 849–859 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.171
Komljenović M, Baščarević Z, Bradić V (2010) Mechanical and microstructural properties of alkali-activated fly ash geopolymers. J Hazard Mater 181(1–3):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2010.04.064
Krishnaraja AR, Sathishkumar NP, Kumar TS, Dinesh Kumar P (2014) Mechanical behaviour of geopolymer concrete under ambient curing.
Kuang F, Long Z, Kuang D, Guo R, Sun J (2022) Experimental study on preparation and properties of low content rubberized geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 352:128980. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.128980
Kumar Das S, Adediran A, Rodrigue Kaze C, Mohammed Mustakim S, Leklou N (2022) Production, characteristics, and utilization of rice husk ash in alkali activated materials: an overview of fresh and hardened state properties. Constr Build Mater 345:128341. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.128341
Kumar R, Verma M, Dev N (2022) Investigation on the effect of seawater condition, sulphate attack, acid attack, freeze-thaw condition, and wetting-drying on the geopolymer concrete. Iran J Sci Technol- Trans Civil Eng 46(4):2823–2853. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40996-021-00767-9/METRICS
Kumar Yierlapalli N, Kumar Boda D, Patiswara BL (2023) Effect of ambient curing periods on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete prepared with three mineral admixtures and glass fibers. Mater Today Proceed. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2023.07.213
Kumaravel S (2014) Development of various curing effect of nominal strength geopolymer concrete. J Eng Sci Technol Rev 7(1):116–119. https://doi.org/10.25103/JESTR.071.19
Kupwade-Patil K, Allouche EN (2012) Impact of alkali silica reaction on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 25(1):131–139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000579
Lavanya G, Jegan J (2015) Durability study on high calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Adv Mater Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/731056
Law DW, Adam AA, Molyneaux TK, Patnaikuni I, Wardhono A (2014) Long term durability properties of class F fly ash geopolymer concrete. Mater Struct/materiaux Et Construct 48(3):721–731. https://doi.org/10.1617/S11527-014-0268-9/METRICS
Lee WH, Wang JH, Ding YC, Cheng TW (2019) A study on the characteristics and microstructures of GGBS/FA based geopolymer paste and concrete. Constr Build Mater 211:807–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.03.291
Li C, Sun H, Li L (2010) A review: the comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si + Ca) and metakaolin (Si + Al) cements. Cem Concr Res 40(9):1341–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2010.03.020
Li Z, Li S (2018) Carbonation resistance of fly ash and blast furnace slag based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 163:668–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.12.127
Liang G, Zhu H, Zhang Z, Wu Q (2019) Effect of rice husk ash addition on the compressive strength and thermal stability of metakaolin based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 222:872–881. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.06.200
Lingyu T, Dongpo H, Jianing Z, Hongguang W (2021) Durability of geopolymers and geopolymer concretes: a review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 60(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/RAMS-2021-0002/ASSET/GRAPHIC/J_RAMS-2021-0002_FIG_015.JPG
Liu J, Qiu Q, Chen X, Wang X, Xing F, Han N, He Y (2016) Degradation of fly ash concrete under the coupled effect of carbonation and chloride aerosol ingress. Corros Sci 112:364–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CORSCI.2016.08.004
Liu J, Qiu Q, Chen X, Xing F, Han N, He Y, Ma Y (2017) Understanding the interacted mechanism between carbonation and chloride aerosol attack in ordinary Portland cement concrete. Cem Concr Res 95:217–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2017.02.032
Liu L (2001) Development of a CO2 solidification method for recycling autoclaved lightweight concrete waste investigation of carbon nanotube strength view project preparation of carbon nanotube-toughened alumina composites view project. J Mater Sci Lett. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012591318077
Lloyd RR, Provis JL, Van Deventer JSJ (2009) Microscopy and microanalysis of inorganic polymer cements. 1 Remnant fly ash particles. J Mater Sci 44(2):608–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-008-3077-0/METRICS
Longhi MA, Rodríguez ED, Walkley B, Zhang Z, Kirchheim AP (2020) Metakaolin-based geopolymers: Relation between formulation, physicochemical properties and efflorescence formation. Compos B Eng 182:107671. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2019.107671
Luan C, Shi X, Zhang K, Utashev N, Yang F, Dai J, Wang Q (2021) A mix design method of fly ash geopolymer concrete based on factors analysis. Constr Build Mater 272:121612. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.121612
Luhar S, Khandelwal U (2019) A study on water absorption and sorptivity of geopolymer concrete. Int J Civil Eng 2(8):1–9. https://doi.org/10.14445/23488352/IJCE-V2I8P101
Luukkonen T, Abdollahnejad Z, Yliniemi J, Kinnunen P, Illikainen M (2018) One-part alkali-activated materials: a review. Cem Concr Res 103:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2017.10.001
Ma H, Li Z (2013) Realistic pore structure of Portland cement paste: experimental study and numerical simulation. Comput Concrete 11(4):317–336. https://doi.org/10.12989/CAC.2013.11.4.317
Malhotra VM, Technology CC, M and E, & Institute AC (2003) Some properties of concrete with highly active rice-husk ash. xi, 1161 p.
Malkawi AB, Nuruddin MF, Fauzi A, Almattarneh H, Mohammed BS (2016) Effects of alkaline solution on properties of the HCFA geopolymer mortars. Procedia Eng 148:710–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2016.06.581
Mehta A, Siddique R (2017) Properties of low-calcium fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating OPC as partial replacement of fly ash. Constr Build Mater 150:792–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.06.067
Mehta A, Siddique R (2018) Sustainable geopolymer concrete using ground granulated blast furnace slag and rice husk ash: strength and permeability properties. J Clean Prod 205:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2018.08.313
Memon FA, Nuruddin MF, Demie S, Shafiq N (2011) Effect of curing conditions on strength of fly ash-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1070949
Memon MJ, Jhatial AA, Murtaza A, Raza MS, Phulpoto KB (2021) Production of eco-friendly concrete incorporating rice husk ash and polypropylene fibres. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(29):39168–39184. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-021-13418-3/FIGURES/19
Mohseni E, Kazemi MJ, Koushkbaghi M, Zehtab B, Behforouz B (2019) Evaluation of mechanical and durability properties of fiber-reinforced lightweight geopolymer composites based on rice husk ash and nano-alumina. Constr Build Mater 209:532–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.03.067
Mousavinejad SHG, Gashti MF (2021) Effects of alkaline solution/binder and Na2SiO3/NaOH ratios on fracture properties and ductility of ambient-cured GGBFS based heavyweight geopolymer concrete. Structures 32:2118–2129. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2021.04.008
Mousavinejad SHG, Sammak M (2021) Strength and chloride ion penetration resistance of ultra-high-performance fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete. Structures 32:1420–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2021.03.112
Muhammad N, Baharom S, Amirah N, Ghazali M, Alias NA (2019) Effect of heat curing temperatures on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete article in. International Journal of Engineering and Technology 8(1):15–19
Naghizadeh A, Ekolu SO (2022) Activator-related effects of sodium hydroxide storage solution in standard testing of fly ash geopolymer mortars for alkali–silica reaction. Mater Structures/materiaux Et Construct 55(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1617/S11527-021-01875-8/METRICS
Nana A, Epey N, Rodrique KC, Deutou JGN, Djobo JNY, Tomé S, Alomayri TS, Ngouné J, Kamseu E, Leonelli C (2021) Mechanical strength and microstructure of metakaolin/volcanic ash-based geopolymer composites reinforced with reactive silica from rice husk ash (RHA). Materialia 16:101083. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTLA.2021.101083
Nath P, Sarker PK (2014) Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Constr Build Mater 66:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2014.05.080
Nath P, Sarker PK (2017) Flexural strength and elastic modulus of ambient-cured blended low-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 130:22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.11.034
Nduka DO, Olawuyi BJ, Fagbenle OI, Fonteboa BG (2022) Assessment of the durability dynamics of high-performance concrete blended with a fibrous rice husk ash. Crystals 12(1):75. https://doi.org/10.3390/CRYST12010075
Nguyen KT, Le TA, Lee K (2018) Evaluation of the mechanical properties of sea sand-based geopolymer concrete and the corrosion of embedded steel bar. Constr Build Mater 169:462–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.02.169
Nisar N, Bhat JA (2020) Effect of rice husk ash on the carbonation depth of concrete under different curing ages and humidity levels. J Mater Civ Eng 33(1):04020427. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003520
Nisar N, Bhat JA (2021) Experimental investigation of Rice Husk Ash on compressive strength, carbonation and corrosion resistance of reinforced concrete. Aust J Civ Eng 19(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14488353.2020.1838419
Niveditha M, Koniki S (2020) Effect of durability properties on geopolymer concrete. A review. ES Web of Conferences 184:01092
Niyazuddin, & B, U. (2023) Mechanical and durability properties of standard and high strength geopolymer concrete using particle packing theory. Constr Build Mater 400:132722. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.132722
Nouping Fekoua JN, Kaze CR, Duna LL, Ghazouni A, Ndassa IM, Kamseu E, Rossignol S, Leonelli C (2021) Effects of curing cycles on developing strength and microstructure of goethite-rich aluminosilicate (corroded laterite) based geopolymer composites. Mater Chem Phys 270:124864. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATCHEMPHYS.2021.124864
Noushini A, Castel A, Aldred J, Rawal A (2020) Chloride diffusion resistance and chloride binding capacity of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Cement Concr Compos 105:103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2019.04.006
Nuaklong P, Jongvivatsakul P, Pothisiri T, Sata V, Chindaprasirt P (2020) Influence of rice husk ash on mechanical properties and fire resistance of recycled aggregate high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. J Clean Prod 252:119797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119797
Nuruddin MFN, Kusbiantoro AK, Qazi SQ, Darmawan MSD, Husin NAH (2011) Development of geopolymer concrete with different curing conditions. IPTEK J Technol Sci. https://doi.org/10.12962/J20882033.V22I1.54
Okoye FN (2017) Geopolymer binder: a veritable alternative to Portland cement. Mater Today: Proceed 4(4):5599–5604. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2017.06.017
Okoye FN, Durgaprasad J, Singh NB (2015) Mechanical properties of alkali activated flyash/Kaolin based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 98:685–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2015.08.009
Okoye FN, Prakash S, Singh NB (2017) Durability of fly ash based geopolymer concrete in the presence of silica fume. J Clean Prod 149:1062–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2017.02.176
Olivia M, Nikraz H (2012) Properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete designed by Taguchi method. Mater Des 1980–2015(36):191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2011.10.036
Parthiban D, Vijayan DS (2020) Study on Stress-Strain effect of reinforced Metakaolin based GPC under compression. Mater Today: Proceed 22:822–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2019.10.162
Parthiban K, Mohan SR, K. (2017) Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on the engineering and durability properties of alkali activated slag concrete. Constr Build Mater 133:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.12.050
Parveen SD, Jindal BB (2017) Experimental study on geopolymer concrete prepared using high-silica RHA incorporating alccofine. Adv Concrete Construct 5(4):345–358. https://doi.org/10.12989/ACC.2017.5.4.345
Parveen SD, JunaidJindalMehta MTBBA (2018) Mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash based geopolymer concrete incorporating alccofine at ambient curing. Constr Build Mater 180:298–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.05.286
Pasupathy K, Berndt M, Castel A, Sanjayan J, Pathmanathan R (2016) Carbonation of a blended slag-fly ash geopolymer concrete in field conditions after 8 years. Constr Build Mater 125:661–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.08.078
Pasupathy K, Sanjayan J, Rajeev P (2021) Evaluation of alkalinity changes and carbonation of geopolymer concrete exposed to wetting and drying. J Build Eng 35:102029. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2020.102029
Patankar SV, Ghugal YM, Jamkar SS (2014) Effect of concentration of sodium hydroxide and degree of heat curing on fly ash-based geopolymer mortar. Indian J Mater Sci 2014:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/938789
Patel YJ, Shah N (2018) Enhancement of the properties of ground granulated blast furnace slag based self compacting geopolymer concrete by incorporating rice husk ash. Constr Build Mater 171:654–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.03.166
Pather B, Ekolu SO, Quainoo H (2021) Effects of aggregate types on acid corrosion attack upon fly – Ash geopolymer and Portland cement concretes – Comparative study. Constr Build Mater 313:125468. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.125468
Pavithra P, Srinivasula Reddy M, Dinakar P, Hanumantha Rao B, Satpathy BK, Mohanty AN (2016) A mix design procedure for geopolymer concrete with fly ash. J Clean Prod 133:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.05.041
Perera DS, Uchida O, Vance ER, Finnie KS (2007) Influence of curing schedule on the integrity of geopolymers. J Mater Sci 42(9):3099–3106. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-006-0533-6
Pradhan P, Dwibedy S, Pradhan M, Panda S, Panigrahi SK (2022) Durability characteristics of geopolymer concrete - progress and perspectives. J Build Eng 59:105100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2022.105100
Premkumar R, Hariharan P, Rajesh S (2022) Effect of silica fume and recycled concrete aggregate on the mechanical properties of GGBS based geopolymer concrete. Mater Today: Proceed 60:211–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.12.442
Provis JL, Palomo A, Shi C (2015) Advances in understanding alkali-activated materials. Cem Concr Res 78:110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2015.04.013
Qaidi SMA, Sulaiman Atrushi D, Mohammed AS, Unis Ahmed H, Faraj RH, Emad W, Tayeh BA, Mohammed Najm H (2022) Ultra-high-performance geopolymer concrete: a review. Constr Build Mater 346:128495. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.128495
Rafeet A, Vinai R, Soutsos M, Sha W (2017) Guidelines for mix proportioning of fly ash/GGBS based alkali activated concretes. Constr Build Mater 147:130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.04.036
Raghunathan Lecturer T, Civil /, Ramasamy PAC (2021) Acid and its effect on various types of geopolymer concrete-a review. 8. www.jetir.orge620
Raijiwala DB, Patil HS, Kundan IU (n.d.). Effect of alkaline activator on the strength and durability of geopolymer concrete.
Ramani PV, Chinnaraj PK (2015) Geopolymer concrete with ground granulated blast furnace slag and black rice husk ash. Gradjevinar 67(8):741–747. https://doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1208.2015
Rangan V (n.d.) Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete. Retrieved November 7, 2022, from https://www.academia.edu/4456993/Fly_Ash_Based_Geopolymer_Concrete
Rangan BV, Rangan BV, Fieaust P, Faci C (2008) Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/20.500.11937/20680/2/20465_downloaded_stream_453.pdf
Rautray SS, Mohanty BN, Das MR (2020) Performance of self-compacting geopolymer concrete using Bacillus Licheniformis. Mater Today: Proceed 26:2817–2824. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.02.587
Reddy MS, Dinakar P, Rao BH (2016) A review of the influence of source material’s oxide composition on the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 234:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICROMESO.2016.07.005
Rodrigue Kaze C, Adesina A, Laure Lecomte-Nana G, Sontia Metekong JV, SamenKamseuMelo VEKLEUC (2021) Synergetic effect of rice husk ash and quartz sand on microstructural and physical properties of laterite clay based geopolymer. J Build Eng 43:103229. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JOBE.2021.103229
Rovnaník P (2010) Effect of curing temperature on the development of hard structure of metakaolin-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 24(7):1176–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2009.12.023
Roy SK, Poh KB, Northwood DO (1999) Durability of concrete—accelerated carbonation and weathering studies. Build Environ 34(5):597–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00042-0
Sagoe-Crentsil K, Weng L (2007) Dissolution processes, hydrolysis and condensation reactions during geopolymer synthesis: Part II. High Si/Al ratio systems. J Mater Sci 42(9):3007–3014. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-006-0818-9/METRICS
Saloni P, Pham TM (2020) Enhanced properties of high-silica rice husk ash-based geopolymer paste by incorporating basalt fibers. Constr Build Mater 245:118422. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.118422
Saraswathy V, Song H-W (2006) Corrosion performance of rice husk ash blended concrete. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.037
Sathia R, Babu KG, Santhanam M (2008) Durability study of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. In: The 3rd ACF international conference-ACF/VCA, vol 2008. Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai
Sathonsaowaphak A, Chindaprasirt P, Pimraksa K (2009) Workability and strength of lignite bottom ash geopolymer mortar. J Hazard Mater 168(1):44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2009.01.120
Shah V, Bishnoi S (2018) Carbonation resistance of cements containing supplementary cementitious materials and its relation to various parameters of concrete. Constr Build Mater 178:219–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.05.162
Shaikh FUA (2016) Mechanical and durability properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete containing recycled coarse aggregates. Int J Sustain Built Environ 5(2):277–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJSBE.2016.05.009
Sherwani AFH, Younis KH, Arndt RW (2022) Fresh, mechanical, and durability behavior of fly ash-based self compacted geopolymer concrete: effect of slag content and various curing conditions. Polymers 14(15):3209. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM14153209
Shilar FA, Ganachari SV, Patil VB, Khan TMY, Khadar DAS (2022) Molarity activity effect on mechanical and microstructure properties of geopolymer concrete: a review. Case Stud in Construc Mater 16:e01014. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CSCM.2022.E01014
Siddika A, Mamun MAAl, Alyousef R, Mohammadhosseini H, (2021) State-of-the-art-review on rice husk ash: a supplementary cementitious material in concrete. J King Saud Univ: Eng Sci 33(5):294–307
Silva RV, Neves R, De Brito J, Dhir RK (2015) Carbonation behaviour of recycled aggregate concrete. Cement Concr Compos 62:22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2015.04.017
Singh B (2018) Rice husk ash. Waste and Suppl Cementitious Mater Concrete Characterisation, Propert Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102156-9.00013-4
Singh B, Rahman MR, Paswan R, Bhattacharyya SK (2016) Effect of activator concentration on the strength, ITZ and drying shrinkage of fly ash/slag geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 118:171–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.05.008
Singh Rajput B, Pratap Singh Rajawat S, Jain G (2023) Effect of curing conditions on the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Mater Today: Proceed. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2023.07.359
Singh SP, Singh Saini B, Saini KS (n.d.). ACID RESISTANCE OF FLY ASH BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE.
Siyal AA, Azizli KA, Man Z, Ullah H (2016) Effects of parameters on the setting time of fly ash based geopolymers using taguchi method. Procedia Eng 148:302–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2016.06.624
Song Q, Guo MZ, Ling TC (2022) A review of elevated-temperature properties of alternative binders: Supplementary cementitious materials and alkali-activated materials. Constr Build Mater 341:127894. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2022.127894
Sufian Badar M, Kupwade-Patil K, Bernal SA, Provis JL, Allouche EN (2014) Corrosion of steel bars induced by accelerated carbonation in low and high calcium fly ash geopolymer concretes. Constr Build Mater 61:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2014.03.015
Sumajouw M, Rangan BV (2006) Low-Calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: Reinforced beams and columns. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/20.500.11937/23928/2/19466_downloaded_stream_558.pdf
Sumit Kumar and Gautam PD (2019) Effect of alkali activator ratio in compressive strength of geopolymer concrete with ggbs.
Swathi B, Vidjeapriya R (2023) Influence of precursor materials and molar ratios on normal, high, and ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete – A state of art review. Constr Build Mater 392:132006. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.132006
Tabsh SW, Abdelfatah AS (2009) Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on strength properties of concrete. Constr Build Mater 23(2):1163–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2008.06.007
Tammam Y, Uysal M, Canpolat O, Kuranlı ÖF (2022) Effect of waste filler materials and recycled waste aggregates on the production of geopolymer composites. Arab J Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13369-022-07230-5/FIGURES/17
Tanyildizi H, Yonar Y (2016) Mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete containing polyvinyl alcohol fiber exposed to high temperature. Constr Build Mater 126:381–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2016.09.001
Tashima MM, Akasaki JL (2008) Influence of Rice Husk Ash in Mechanical Characteristics of Concrete. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240623375
Temuujin J, Williams RP, van Riessen A (2009) Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. J Mater Process Technol 209(12–13):5276–5280. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2009.03.016
Tippayasam C, Balyore P, Thavorniti P, Kamseu E, Leonelli C, Chindaprasirt P, Chaysuwan D (2016) Potassium alkali concentration and heat treatment affected metakaolin-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 104:293–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2015.11.027
Topark-Ngarm P, Chindaprasirt P, Sata V (2014) Setting time, strength, and bond of high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. J Mater Civ Eng 27(7):04014198. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001157
Van Jaarsveld JGS, Van Deventer JSJ, Lukey GC (2002) The effect of composition and temperature on the properties of fly ash- and kaolinite-based geopolymers. Chem Eng J 89(1–3):63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00025-6
Venkatesan RP, Pazhani KC (2016) Strength and durability properties of geopolymer concrete made with Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag and Black Rice Husk Ash. KSCE J Civ Eng 20(6):2384–2391. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12205-015-0564-0/METRICS
Verma M, Dev N (2022) Effect of liquid to binder ratio and curing temperature on the engineering properties of the geopolymer concrete. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-021-00985-w/Published
Verma M, Nigam M (2023) Investigation on the effect of curing time on the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete. AIP Conf Proc 2721(1):020031. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0154116
Verma NK, Rao MC, Kumar S (2022) Effect of curing regime on compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. IOP Conf Series: Earth and Environ Sci 982(1):012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/982/1/012031
Vijai K, Kumutha R, Vishnuram BG (2010) Effect of types of curing on strength of geopolymer concrete. Int J Phys Sci 5(9):1419–1423. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJPS.9000200
Villa C, Pecina ET, Torres R, Gómez L (2010) Geopolymer synthesis using alkaline activation of natural zeolite. Constr Build Mater 24(11):2084–2090. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2010.04.052
Vora PR, Dave UV (2013) Parametric studies on compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Procedia Eng 51:210–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROENG.2013.01.030
Wallah SE, Rangan BV (2006) LOW-CALCIUM FLY ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE: LONG-TERM PROPERTIES.
Wang W, Lu C, Li Y, Yuan G, Li Q (2017) Effects of stress and high temperature on the carbonation resistance of fly ash concrete. Constr Build Mater 138:486–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.02.039
Wang XH, Val DV, Zheng L, Jones MR (2018) Influence of loading and cracks on carbonation of RC elements made of different concrete types. Constr Build Mater 164:12–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.12.142
Waqas RM, Butt F, Zhu X, Jiang T, Tufail RF (2021) A Comprehensive study on the factors affecting the workability and mechanical properties of ambient cured fly ash and slag based geopolymer concrete. Appl Sci 11(18):8722. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP11188722
Wasim M, Duc Ngo T, Abid M (2020) Investigation of long-term corrosion resistance of reinforced concrete structures constructed with various types of concretes in marine and various climate environments. Constr Build Mater 237:117701. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.117701
Wasim M, Ngo TD, Law D (2021) A state-of-the-art review on the durability of geopolymer concrete for sustainable structures and infrastructure. Constr Build Mater 291:123381. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2021.123381
Weng L, Sagoe-Crentsil K (2007) Dissolution processes, hydrolysis and condensation reactions during geopolymer synthesis: part I-low Si/Al ratio systems. J Mater Sci 42(9):2997–3006. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-006-0820-2/METRICS
Xie J, Wang J, Rao R, Wang C, Fang C (2019) Effects of combined usage of GGBS and fly ash on workability and mechanical properties of alkali activated geopolymer concrete with recycled aggregate. Compos B Eng 164:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2018.11.067
Xie T, Ozbakkaloglu T (2015) Behavior of low-calcium fly and bottom ash-based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Ceram Int 41(4):5945–5958. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2015.01.031
Xu H, Van Deventer JSJ (2003) The effect of alkali metals on the formation of geopolymeric gels from alkali-feldspars. Colloids Surf, A 216(1–3):27–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00499-5
Yang W, Zhu P, Liu H, Wang X, Ge W, Hua M (2021) Resistance to sulfuric acid corrosion of geopolymer concrete based on different binding materials and alkali concentrations. Materials 14(23):7109. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA14237109
Yasaswini K, Venkateshwara Rao A (2020) Behaviour of geopolymer concrete at elevated temperature. Mater Today: Proceed 33:239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATPR.2020.03.833
Yaseri S, Hajiaghaei G, Mohammadi F, Mahdikhani M, Farokhzad R (2017) The role of synthesis parameters on the workability, setting and strength properties of binary binder based geopolymer paste. Constr Build Mater 157:534–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2017.09.102
Yewale VV, Nikam PG (2018) Evaluation of efficient type of curing for geopolymer concrete. JournalNX - A Multidisciplin Peer Rev J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/938789
Yunsheng Z, Wei S, Qianli C, Lin C (2007) Synthesis and heavy metal immobilization behaviors of slag based geopolymer. J Hazard Mater 143(1–2):206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2006.09.033
Yurt Ü (2020) High performance cementless composites from alkali activated GGBFS. Constr Build Mater 264:120222. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2020.120222
Zannerni GM, Fattah KP, Al-Tamimi AK (2020) Ambient-cured geopolymer concrete with single alkali activator. Sustain Mater Technol 23:e00131. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SUSMAT.2019.E00131
Zhang J, Zhao Y (2016) The mechanical properties and microstructure of ultra-high-performance concrete containing various supplementary cementitious materials. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater 6(4):254–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2016.1262798
Zhang P, Gao Z, Wang J, Guo J, Hu S, Ling Y (2020) Properties of fresh and hardened fly ash/slag based geopolymer concrete: a review. J Clean Prod 270:122389. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2020.122389
Zhang P, Wei S, Zheng Y, Wang F, Hu S (2022) Effect of single and synergistic reinforcement of PVA fiber and nano-SiO2 on workability and compressive strength of geopolymer composites. Polymers 14(18):3765. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM14183765
Zhang SP, Zong L (2014) Evaluation of relationship between water absorption and durability of concrete materials. Adv Materials Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/650373
Zhang W, Yin C, Ma F, Huang Z (2018) Mechanical properties and carbonation durability of engineered cementitious composites reinforced by polypropylene and hydrophilic polyvinyl alcohol fibers. Materials 11(7):1147. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA11071147
Zhao R, Yuan Y, Cheng Z, Wen T, Li J, Li F, Ma ZJ (2019) Freeze-thaw resistance of Class F fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 222:474–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.06.166
Zheng K (2016) Pozzolanic reaction of glass powder and its role in controlling alkali–silica reaction. Cement Concr Compos 67:30–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEMCONCOMP.2015.12.008
Zhu H, Liang G, Zhang Z, Wu Q, Du J (2019) Partial replacement of metakaolin with thermally treated rice husk ash in metakaolin-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 221:527–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2019.06.112
Zhuang XY, Chen L, Komarneni S, Zhou CH, Tong DS, Yang HM, Yu WH, Wang H (2016) Fly ash-based geopolymer: clean production, properties and applications. J Clean Prod 125:253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2016.03.019
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Manzoor, T., Bhat, J.A. & Shah, A.H. Advancements in Geopolymer Concrete: A State-of-the-Art Analysis of Its Mechanical and Durability Features. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01261-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01261-0