Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing watershed sustainability with automatic expert-based methods and managers’ preferences

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainable Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Watershed sustainability involves hydrologic, socioeconomic, environmental, and governance aspects, assessed by the Watershed Sustainability Index—WSI. However, in data-scarce basins, the application of the WSI can be biased, because of data incompleteness and uncertainty. This bias can be mitigated by the utilization of expert-based systems and user preferences. The objective of the present study was to assess basin sustainability of a data-scarce basin (Beheshtabad basin, in Iran) using the WSI, with weights calculated by automatic expert-based methods, and to compare the basin sustainability score with those of different basins of the world. Analytical Hierarchical and Network Processes (AHP and ANP) were used to obtain unbiased WSI weights, based on the results of questionnaires applied to 30 basin managers and specialists. Although the WSI weights calculated with the AHP and ANP methods varied from 0.19 to 0.33, and were significantly different from the WSI original weights (0.25), the overall WSI scores for the Beheshtabad basin using the modified and original WSI were similar (0.69 and0.70, respectively). The similar WSI scores resulted from the additive and balanced structure of the WSI index, compensating for the variation in the indicator weights. Compared to the WSI of 10 basins from developing countries around the world, the Beheshtabad watershed ranked third. The WSI bottlenecks affecting basin sustainability were related to water availability, which could be tackled by the establishment of appropriate water management policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because the permission to publish them is in the hands of responsible organizations, and researchers are not allowed to publish them, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by Shahrekord University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafat Zare Bidaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zare Bidaki, R., Esmaeilzadeh, M. & Chaves, H.M.L. Assessing watershed sustainability with automatic expert-based methods and managers’ preferences. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 9, 70 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-023-00847-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-023-00847-w

Keywords

Navigation